Translational activation and cytoplasmic polyadenylation of FGF receptor-1 are independently regulated during Xenopus oocyte maturation

Global profiling of stimulus-induced polyadenylation in cells using a poly(A) trap

Polyadenylation of mRNA leads to increased protein expression in response to diverse stimuli, but it is difficult to identify mRNAs that become polyadenylated in living cells. Here we describe a click chemistry-compatible nucleoside analog that is selectively incorporated into poly(A) tails of transcripts in cells. Next-generation sequencing of labeled mRNAs enables a transcriptome-wide profile of polyadenylation and provides insights into the mRNA sequence elements that are correlated with polyadenylation.

Maternal determinants of embryonic cell fate

How important is the contribution of mRNAs and proteins stored in the oocyte for determining the body plan of the Xenopus embryo? Here we review the current understanding of the roles of maternally supplied transcription factors, signaling molecules, and signaling regulators in establishing the ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm germ layers and the embryonic axes. Key essential asymmetries of VegT, Wnt11, and Ectodermin are described, as well as the complexity of maternal transcription factors that are involved in the initial expression of early zygotic genes.

Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE)- and CPE-binding protein (CPEB)-independent mechanisms regulate early class maternal mRNA translational activation in Xenopus oocytes

Meiotic cell cycle progression during vertebrate oocyte maturation requires the correct temporal translation of maternal mRNAs encoding key regulatory proteins. The mechanism by which specific mRNAs are temporally activated is unknown, although both cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements (CPE) within the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) of mRNAs and the CPE-binding protein (CPEB) have been implicated. We report that in progesterone-stimulated Xenopus oocytes, the early cytoplasmic polyadenylation and translational activation of multiple maternal mRNAs occur in a CPE- and CPEB-independent manner. We demonstrate that polyadenylation response elements, originally identified in the 3'-UTR of the mRNA encoding the Mos proto-oncogene, direct CPE- and CPEB-independent polyadenylation of an early class of Xenopus maternal mRNAs. Our findings refute the hypothesis that CPE sequences alone account for the range of temporal inductions of maternal mRNAs observed during Xenopus oocyte maturation. Rather, our data indicate that the sequential action of distinct 3'-UTR-directed translational control mechanisms coordinates the complex temporal patterns and extent of protein synthesis during vertebrate meiotic cell cycle progression.

A novel regulatory element determines the timing of Mos mRNA translation during Xenopus oocyte maturation

Progression through vertebrate oocyte maturation requires that pre-existing, maternally derived mRNAs be translated in a strict temporal order. The mechanism that controls the timing of oocyte mRNA translation is unknown. In this study we show that the early translational induction of the mRNA encoding the Mos proto-oncogene is mediated through a novel regulatory element within the 3' untranslated region of the Mos mRNA. This novel element is responsive to the MAP kinase signaling pathway and is distinct from the late acting, cdc2-responsive, cytoplasmic polyadenylation element. Our findings suggest that the timing of maternal mRNA translation is controlled through signal transduction pathways targeting distinct 3' UTR mRNA elements.

Translational control in vertebrate development

Translational control plays a large role in vertebrate oocyte maturation and contributes to the induction of the germ layers. Translational regulation is also observed in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation. The features of an mRNA that mediate translational control are found both in the 5' and in the 3' untranslated regions (UTRs). In the 5' UTR, secondary structure, the binding of proteins, and the presence of upstream open reading frames can interfere with the association of initiation factors with the cap, or with scanning of the initiation complex. The 3' UTR can mediate translational activation by directing cytoplasmic polyadenylation and can confer translational repression by interference with the assembly of initiation complexes. Besides mRNA-specific translational control elements, the nonspecific RNA-binding proteins contribute to the modulation of translation in development. This review discusses examples of translational control and their relevance for developmental regulation.

The temporal control of Wee1 mRNA translation during Xenopus oocyte maturation is regulated by cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements within the 3'-untranslated region

The Wee1 protein tyrosine kinase is a key regulator of cell cycle progression. Wee1 activity is necessary for the control of the first embryonic cell cycle following the fertilization of meiotically mature Xenopus oocytes. Wee1 mRNA is present in immature oocytes, but Wee1 protein does not accumulate in immature oocytes or during the early stages of progesterone-stimulated maturation. This delay in Wee1 translation is critical since premature Wee1 protein accumulation has been shown to inhibit oocyte maturation. In this study we provide evidence that Wee1 protein accumulation is regulated at the level of mRNA translation. This translational control is directed by sequences within the Wee1 mRNA 3'-untranslated region (3' UTR). Specifically, cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE) sequences within the Wee1 3' UTR are necessary for full translational repression in immature oocytes. Our data further indicate that while CPE-independent mechanisms may regulate the levels of Wee1 protein accumulation during progesterone-stimulated oocyte maturation, the timing of Wee1 mRNA translational induction is directed through a CPE-dependent mechanism.

Differential regulation of the translation and the stability of two maternal transcripts in preimplantation rabbit embryos

In most species, transcription is essentially silent during the first mitotic cell cycles that follow fertilization. This means that the regulation of gene expression in early embryos heavily relies on the translational activation or inactivation of maternal mRNAs. In mammals, the mechanisms that control the translation of maternal mRNAs have been mainly studied in the mouse when maternal to zygotic transition occurs after the first mitotic division. In other mammalian species, however, this transition occurs later after several cell cycles, and little is known concerning the regulation of maternal information during this period. To address this question, we have used rabbit pre-implantation embryos to analyze the translational activation and stability of two maternal mRNAs, mm 41 and mm61. During the cleavage period, these mRNAs exhibit distinct kinetics for both their translational activation and degradation. In addition, these mRNAs both undergo cytoplasmic polyadenylation but with different efficiencies. This polyadenylation was functionally correlated with the translational activation of these mRNAs; inhibiting polyadenylation prevented translational activation. The differential efficiency of cytoplasmic polyadenylation, driven by cis-elements in the 3' untranslated region of these mRNAs, was also observed in Xenopus laevis embryos, which emphasizes the high conservation of this mechanism between species.

c-mos and cdc2 cooperate in the translational activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 during Xenopus oocyte maturation

During oocyte maturation in Xenopus, previously quiescent maternal mRNAs are translationally activated at specific times. We hypothesized that the translational recruitment of individual messages is triggered by particular cellular events and investigated the potential for known effectors of the meiotic cell cycle to activate the translation of the FGF receptor-1 (XFGFR) maternal mRNA. We found that both c-mos and cdc2 activate the translation of XFGFR. However, although oocytes matured by injection of recombinant cdc2/cyclin B translate normal levels of XFGFR protein, c-mos depletion reduces the level of XFGFR protein induced by cdc2/cyclin B injection. In oocytes blocked for cdc2 activity, injection of mos RNA induced low levels of XFGFR protein, independent of MAPK activity. Through the use of injected reporter RNAs, we show that the XFGFR 3' untranslated region inhibitory element is completely derepressed by cdc2 alone. In addition, we identified a new inhibitory element through which both mos and cdc2 activate translation. We found that cdc2 derepresses translation in the absence of polyadenylation, whereas mos requires poly(A) extension to activate XFGFR translation. Our results demonstrate that mos and cdc2, in addition to functioning as key regulators of the meiotic cell cycle, cooperate in the translational activation of a specific maternal mRNA during oocyte maturation.

From factors to mechanisms: translation and translational control in eukaryotes

Biochemical and genetic studies are revealing a network of interactions between eukaryotic translation initiation factors, further refining or redefining perceptions of their function. The notion of translated mRNA as a 'closed-loop' has gained support from the identification of physical and functional interactions between the two mRNA ends and their associated factors. Translational control mechanisms are beginning to unravel in sufficient detail to pinpoint the affected step in the initiation pathway.

Dissociation of mRNA cytoplasmic polyadenylation from translational activation by structural modification of the 5'-UTR

During early metazoan development, certain maternal mRNAs are translationally activated by elongation of their poly(A) tails. Bicoid ( bcd ) mRNA is a Drosophila maternal mRNA that is translationally activated by cytoplasmic polyadenylation during the first hour after egg deposition. The sequences necessary and sufficient to promote its poly(A) elongation, and hence translation, are contained within its 3'-untranslated region (UTR). The mechanism by which poly(A) elongation at the 3'-end affects translational initiation at the 5'-end remains unknown. To investigate this question, we have analyzed a bicoid mRNA whose 5'-UTR contains a short antisense sequence directed against a portion of the coding region. This mutated RNA is efficiently translated in vitro. After injection into Drosophila embryos, this RNA is stable and polyadenylated, but inefficiently translated. These experiments show that structural modification of the 5'-end of an mRNA can perturb the translational activation normally conferred by polyadenylation in vivo.

Translational control of nuclear lamin B1 mRNA during oogenesis and early development of Xenopus

Cytoplasmic polyadenylation of specific mRNAs is commonly correlated with their translational activation during development. A canonical nuclear polyadenylation element AAUAAA (NPE) and cytoplasmic polyadenylation element(s) (CPE) are necessary and sufficient for polyadenylation during egg maturation. We have characterized cis-acting sequences of Xenopus nuclear lamin B1 mRNA that mediate translational regulation. By injection of synthetic RNAs into oocytes we show that the two CPE-like elements found in the 3'-untranslated region of B1 mRNA act as translational repressors in oocytes. The same CPEs in conjunction with the NPE confer transient polyadenylation and translational activation during egg maturation. Poly(A) length determination of the endogenous lamin B1 mRNA reveals a gradual increase of poly(A) tail length in early development up to mid-blastula, and a shortening of poly(A) tails during gastrulation and neurulation. The same kinetic and extent of polyadenylation and poly(A) tail shortening is observed with synthetic RNAs injected into fertilized eggs. Polyadenylation and translational activation of these RNAs is independent of the two CPEs and a NPE during early development. While translational regulation of lamin B1 mRNA functions in parts via established mechanisms, the pattern of polyadenylation and deadenylation during early development points to a novel mode of translational regulation.

Control of translation initiation in animals

Regulation of translation initiation is a central control point in animal cells. We review our current understanding of the mechanisms of regulation, drawing particularly on examples in which the biological consequences of the regulation are clear. Specific mRNAs can be controlled via sequences in their 5' and 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) and by alterations in the translation machinery. The 5'UTR sequence can determine which initiation pathway is used to bring the ribosome to the initiation codon, how efficiently initiation occurs, and which initiation site is selected. 5'UTR-mediated control can also be accomplished via sequence-specific mRNA-binding proteins. Sequences in the 3' untranslated region and the poly(A) tail can have dramatic effects on initiation frequency, with particularly profound effects in oogenesis and early development. The mechanism by which 3'UTRs and poly(A) regulate initiation may involve contacts between proteins bound to these regions and the basal translation apparatus. mRNA localization signals in the 3'UTR can also dramatically influence translational activation and repression. Modulations of the initiation machinery, including phosphorylation of initiation factors and their regulated association with other proteins, can regulate both specific mRNAs and overall translation rates and thereby affect cell growth and phenotype.

Masking, unmasking, and regulated polyadenylation cooperate in the translational control of a dormant mRNA in mouse oocytes

The mechanisms responsible for translational silencing of certain mRNAs in growing oocytes, and for their awakening during meiotic maturation, are not completely elucidated. We show that binding of a approximately 80-kD protein to a UA-rich element in the 3' UTR of tissue-type plasminogen activator mRNA, a mouse oocyte mRNA that is translated during meiotic maturation, silences the mRNA in primary oocytes. Translation can be triggered by injecting a competitor transcript that displaces this silencing factor, without elongation of a pre-existing short poly(A) tail, the presence of which is mandatory. During meiotic maturation, cytoplasmic polyadenylation is necessary to maintain a poly(A) tail, but the determining event for translational activation appears to be the modification or displacement of the silencing factor.