1
|
Evolutionarily conserved transcription factor Apontic controls the G1/S progression by inducing cyclin E during eye development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:9497-502. [PMID: 24979795 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407145111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
During Drosophila eye development, differentiation initiates in the posterior region of the eye disk and progresses anteriorly as a wave marked by the morphogenetic furrow (MF), which demarcates the boundary between anterior undifferentiated cells and posterior differentiated photoreceptors. However, the mechanism underlying the regulation of gene expression immediately before the onset of differentiation remains unclear. Here, we show that Apontic (Apt), which is an evolutionarily conserved transcription factor, is expressed in the differentiating cells posterior to the MF. Moreover, it directly induces the expression of cyclin E and is also required for the G1-to-S phase transition, which is known to be essential for the initiation of cell differentiation at the MF. These observations identify a pathway crucial for eye development, governed by a mechanism in which Cyclin E promotes the G1-to-S phase transition when regulated by Apt.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sasamura T, Matsuno K, Fortini ME. Disruption of Drosophila melanogaster lipid metabolism genes causes tissue overgrowth associated with altered developmental signaling. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003917. [PMID: 24244188 PMCID: PMC3820792 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2013] [Accepted: 09/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Developmental patterning requires the precise interplay of numerous intercellular signaling pathways to ensure that cells are properly specified during tissue formation and organogenesis. The spatiotemporal function of many developmental pathways is strongly influenced by the biosynthesis and intracellular trafficking of signaling components. Receptors and ligands must be trafficked to the cell surface where they interact, and their subsequent endocytic internalization and endosomal trafficking is critical for both signal propagation and its down-modulation. In a forward genetic screen for mutations that alter intracellular Notch receptor trafficking in Drosophila melanogaster, we recovered mutants that disrupt genes encoding serine palmitoyltransferase and acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Both mutants cause Notch, Wingless, the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EFGR), and Patched to accumulate abnormally in endosomal compartments. In mosaic animals, mutant tissues exhibit an unusual non-cell-autonomous effect whereby mutant cells are functionally rescued by secreted activities emanating from adjacent wildtype tissue. Strikingly, both mutants display prominent tissue overgrowth phenotypes that are partially attributable to altered Notch and Wnt signaling. Our analysis of the mutants demonstrates genetic links between abnormal lipid metabolism, perturbations in developmental signaling, and aberrant cell proliferation. The development of complex, multicellular animal tissues requires the coordinated function of many different cell-cell communication pathways, in which secreted or cell-surface-anchored ligands from one cell typically activate a receptor on the surface of other cells, which in turn regulates downstream gene transcription and other cellular processes. We used a genetic approach in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to search directly for mutations that perturb intracellular trafficking of a major signaling receptor, namely the Notch receptor, which controls cell differentiation in various tissue contexts. The Notch signaling pathway, like other key developmental signaling pathways, is evolutionarily conserved and functions in a similar manner in D. melanogaster and mammals, including humans. We recovered and characterized mutations in two genes that encode different enzymes involved in cellular lipid metabolism. Both mutants alter not only Notch signaling but also downstream activity of another highly conserved signaling pathway mediated by the Wingless protein, illustrating that alterations in cellular enzymes of lipid metabolism can exert complex effects on multiple critical signaling pathways. We also found that the new mutants exhibit dramatic cell overproliferation effects, reinforcing findings from mammalian studies suggesting that lipid metabolism might play an important role in oncogenesis and tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Sasamura
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America ; Department of Biological Science, Osaka University, Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Farrell PH. Quiescence: early evolutionary origins and universality do not imply uniformity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2012; 366:3498-507. [PMID: 22084377 PMCID: PMC3203459 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Cell cycle investigations have focused on relentless exponential proliferation of cells, an unsustainable situation in nature. Proliferation of cells, whether microbial or metazoan, is interrupted by periods of quiescence. The vast majority of cells in an adult metazoan lie quiescent. As disruptions in this quiescence are at the foundation of cancer, it will be important for the field to turn its attention to the mechanisms regulating quiescence. While often presented as a single topic, there are multiple forms of quiescence each with complex inputs, some of which are tied to conceptually challenging aspects of metazoan regulation such as size control. In an effort to expose the enormity of the challenge, I describe the differing biological purposes of quiescence, and the coupling of quiescence in metazoans to growth and to the structuring of tissues during development. I emphasize studies in the organism rather than in tissue culture, because these expose the diversity of regulation. While quiescence is likely to be a primitive biological process, it appears that in adapting quiescence to its many distinct biological settings, evolution has diversified it. Consideration of quiescence in different models gives us an overview of this diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick H O'Farrell
- Department of Biochemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158-2200, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin JI, Mitchell NC, Kalcina M, Tchoubrieva E, Stewart MJ, Marygold SJ, Walker CD, Thomas G, Leevers SJ, Pearson RB, Quinn LM, Hannan RD. Drosophila ribosomal protein mutants control tissue growth non-autonomously via effects on the prothoracic gland and ecdysone. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1002408. [PMID: 22194697 PMCID: PMC3240600 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2011] [Accepted: 10/20/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The ribosome is critical for all aspects of cell growth due to its essential role in protein synthesis. Paradoxically, many Ribosomal proteins (Rps) act as tumour suppressors in Drosophila and vertebrates. To examine how reductions in Rps could lead to tissue overgrowth, we took advantage of the observation that an RpS6 mutant dominantly suppresses the small rough eye phenotype in a cyclin E hypomorphic mutant (cycEJP). We demonstrated that the suppression of cycEJP by the RpS6 mutant is not a consequence of restoring CycE protein levels or activity in the eye imaginal tissue. Rather, the use of UAS-RpS6 RNAi transgenics revealed that the suppression of cycEJP is exerted via a mechanism extrinsic to the eye, whereby reduced Rp levels in the prothoracic gland decreases the activity of ecdysone, the steroid hormone, delaying developmental timing and hence allowing time for tissue and organ overgrowth. These data provide for the first time a rationale to explain the counter-intuitive organ overgrowth phenotypes observed for certain members of the Minute class of Drosophila Rp mutants. They also demonstrate how Rp mutants can affect growth and development cell non-autonomously. Ribosomes are required for protein synthesis, which is essential for cell growth and division, thus mutations that reduce Rp expression would be expected to limit cell growth. Paradoxically, heterozygous deletion or mutation of certain Rps can actually promote growth and proliferation and in some cases bestow predisposition to cancer. The underlying mechanism(s) behind these unexpected overgrowth phenotypes despite impairment of ribosome biogenesis has remained obscure. We have addressed this question using the power of Drosophila genetics, taking advantage of our observation that four different Rp mutants, or Minutes, are able to suppress a small rough eye phenotype associated with a mutation of the essential controller of cell proliferation cyclin E (cycEJP). Our findings demonstrate that suppression of cycEJP by the RpS6 mutant is exerted via a tissue non-autonomous mechanism whereby reduced Rp in the prothoracic gland decreases activity of the steroid hormone ecdysone, delaying development and hence allowing time for compensatory growth. These data provide for the first time a rationale to explain the counter-intuitive organ overgrowth phenotypes observed for certain Drosophila Minutes. Our findings also have implications for the effect of Rp mutants on endocrine related control of tissue growth in higher organisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane I. Lin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Naomi C. Mitchell
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Marina Kalcina
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Mary J. Stewart
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States of America
| | - Steven J. Marygold
- Growth Regulation Laboratory, Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cherryl D. Walker
- Growth Regulation Laboratory, Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - George Thomas
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Sally J. Leevers
- Growth Regulation Laboratory, Cancer Research UK London Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard B. Pearson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Leonie M. Quinn
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- * E-mail: (LMQ); (RDH)
| | - Ross D. Hannan
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- * E-mail: (LMQ); (RDH)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Firth LC, Bhattacharya A, Baker NE. Cell cycle arrest by a gradient of Dpp signaling during Drosophila eye development. BMC DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY 2010; 10:28. [PMID: 20214806 PMCID: PMC2846880 DOI: 10.1186/1471-213x-10-28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2009] [Accepted: 03/09/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The secreted morphogen Dpp plays important roles in spatial regulation of gene expression and cell cycle progression in the developing Drosophila eye. Dpp signaling is required for timely cell cycle arrest ahead of the morphogenetic furrow as a prelude to differentiation, and is also important for eye disc growth. The dpp gene is expressed at multiple locations in the eye imaginal disc, including the morphogenetic furrow that sweeps across the eye disc as differentiation initiates. RESULTS Studies of Brinker and Dad expression, and of Mad phosphorylation, establish that there is a gradient of Dpp signaling in the eye imaginal disc anterior to the morphogenetic furrow, predominantly in the anterior-posterior axis, and also Dpp signaling at the margins of the disc epithelium and in the dorsal peripodial membrane. Almost all signaling activity seems to spread through the plane of the epithelia, although peripodial epithelium cells can also respond to underlying disc cells. There is a graded requirement for Dpp signaling components for G1 arrest in the eye disc, with more stringent requirements further anteriorly where signaling is lower. The signaling level defines the cell cycle response, because elevated signaling through expression of an activated Thickveins receptor molecule arrested cells at more anterior locations. Very anterior regions of the eye disc were not arrested in response to activated receptor, however, and evidence is presented that expression of the Homothorax protein may contribute to this protection. By contrast to activated Thickveins, ectopic expression of processed Dpp leads to very high levels of Mad phosphorylation which appear to have non-physiological consequences. CONCLUSIONS G1 arrest occurs at a threshold level of Dpp signaling within a morphogen gradient in the anterior eye. G1 arrest is specific for one competent domain in the eye disc, allowing Dpp signaling to promote growth at earlier developmental stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy C Firth
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cyclin E-dependent protein kinase activity regulates niche retention of Drosophila ovarian follicle stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:21701-6. [PMID: 19966222 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909272106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Whether stem cells have unique cell cycle machineries and how they integrate with niche interactions remains largely unknown. We identified a hypomorphic cyclin E allele WX that strongly impairs the maintenance of follicle stem cells (FSCs) in the Drosophila ovary but does not reduce follicle cell proliferation or germline stem cell maintenance. CycE(WX) protein can still bind to the cyclin-dependent kinase catalytic subunit Cdk2, but forms complexes with reduced protein kinase activity measured in vitro. By creating additional CycE variants with different degrees of kinase dysfunction and expressing these and CycE(WX) at different levels, we found that higher CycE-Cdk2 kinase activity is required for FSC maintenance than to support follicle cell proliferation. Surprisingly, cycE(WX) FSCs were lost from their niches rather than arresting proliferation. Furthermore, FSC function was substantially restored by expressing either excess DE-cadherin or excess E2F1/DP, the transcription factor normally activated by CycE-Cdk2 phosphorylation of retinoblastoma proteins. These results suggest that FSC maintenance through niche adhesion is regulated by inputs that normally control S phase entry, possibly as a quality control mechanism to ensure adequate stem cell proliferation. We speculate that a positive connection between central regulators of the cell cycle and niche retention may be a common feature of highly proliferative stem cells.
Collapse
|
7
|
Grzeschik NA, Amin N, Secombe J, Brumby AM, Richardson HE. Abnormalities in cell proliferation and apico-basal cell polarity are separable in Drosophila lgl mutant clones in the developing eye. Dev Biol 2007; 311:106-23. [PMID: 17870065 PMCID: PMC2974846 DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2007] [Revised: 08/06/2007] [Accepted: 08/07/2007] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
In homozygous mutants of Drosophila lethal-2-giant larvae (lgl), tissues lose apico-basal cell polarity and exhibit ectopic proliferation. Here, we use clonal analysis in the developing eye to investigate the effect of lgl null mutations in the context of surrounding wild-type tissue. lgl- clones in the larval eye disc exhibit ectopic expression of the G1-S regulator, Cyclin E, and ectopic proliferation, but do not lose apico-basal cell polarity. Decreasing the perdurance of Lgl protein in larval eye disc clones, by forcing extra proliferation of lgl- tissue (using a Minute background), leads to a loss in cell polarity and to more extreme ectopic cell proliferation. Later in development at the pupal stage, lgl mutant photoreceptor cells show aberrant apico-basal cell polarity, but this is not associated with ectopic proliferation, presumably because cells are differentiated. Thus in a clonal context, the ectopic proliferation and cell polarity defects of lgl- mutants are separable. Furthermore, lgl- mosaic eye discs have alterations in the normal patterns of apoptosis: in larval discs some lgl- and wild-type cells at the clonal boundary undergo apoptosis and are excluded from the epithelia, but apoptosis is decreased elsewhere in the disc, and in pupal retinas lgl- tissue shows less apoptosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola A. Grzeschik
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Anatomy and Cell Biology Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nancy Amin
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Anatomy and Cell Biology Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Secombe
- Genetics Department, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anthony M. Brumby
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Anatomy and Cell Biology Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Genetics Department, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Helena E. Richardson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Anatomy and Cell Biology Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Genetics Department, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baker NE. Patterning signals and proliferation in Drosophila imaginal discs. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2007; 17:287-93. [PMID: 17624759 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2007.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2007] [Revised: 05/15/2007] [Accepted: 05/15/2007] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Recent studies indicate that signaling pathways with well-known roles in patterning also directly regulate cell proliferation. During the differentiation of the retina, Hedgehog, Decapentaplegic, Notch and the EGF receptor regulate proliferation spatially through transcriptional regulation of string, dacapo, and as yet unidentified regulators of Retinoblastoma and Cyclin E/Cdk2 activities. In the developing wing, a novel response to discontinuities in Decapentaplegic signaling combines with concentration-dependent effects to achieve a uniform proliferation pattern in response to a Decapentaplegic gradient. Damage to growing tissues is repaired by transient Decapentaplegic and Wingless secretion from dying cells to induce compensatory proliferation. Diverse spatial patterns of fate specification and of proliferation can arise through distinct combinations of signaling pathways. Reminiscent of pattern formation, cell cycle effects of each signaling pathway differ in distinct developmental fields, making use of a variety of target genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas E Baker
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zraly CB, Marenda DR, Dingwall AK. SNR1 (INI1/SNF5) mediates important cell growth functions of the Drosophila Brahma (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex. Genetics 2005; 168:199-214. [PMID: 15454538 PMCID: PMC1448117 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.029439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
SNR1 is an essential subunit of the Drosophila Brahma (Brm) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex, with counterparts in yeast (SNF5) and mammals (INI1). Increased cell growth and wing patterning defects are associated with a conditional snr1 mutant, while loss of INI1 function is directly linked with aggressive cancers, suggesting important roles in development and growth control. The Brm complex is known to function during G1 phase, where it appears to assist in restricting entry into S phase. In Drosophila, the activity of DmcycE/CDK2 is rate limiting for entry into S phase and we previously found that the Brm complex can suppress a reduced growth phenotype associated with a hypomorphic DmcycE mutant. Our results reveal that SNR1 helps mediate associations between the Brm complex and DmcycE/CDK2 both in vitro and in vivo. Further, disrupting snr1 function suppressed DmcycEJP phenotypes, and increased cell growth defects associated with the conditional snr1E1 mutant were suppressed by reducing DmcycE levels. While the snr1E1-dependent increased cell growth did not appear to be directly associated with altered expression of G1 or G2 cyclins, transcription of the G2-M regulator string/cdc25 was reduced. Thus, in addition to important functions of the Brm complex in G1-S control, the complex also appears to be important for transcription of genes required for cell cycle progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia B Zraly
- Oncology Institute, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University of Chicago, Maywood, Illinois 60153, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brumby A, Secombe J, Horsfield J, Coombe M, Amin N, Coates D, Saint R, Richardson H. A genetic screen for dominant modifiers of a cyclin E hypomorphic mutation identifies novel regulators of S-phase entry in Drosophila. Genetics 2005; 168:227-51. [PMID: 15454540 PMCID: PMC1448096 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.026617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Cyclin E together with its kinase partner Cdk2 is a critical regulator of entry into S phase. To identify novel genes that regulate the G1- to S-phase transition within a whole animal we made use of a hypomorphic cyclin E mutation, DmcycEJP, which results in a rough eye phenotype. We screened the X and third chromosome deficiencies, tested candidate genes, and carried out a genetic screen of 55,000 EMS or X-ray-mutagenized flies for second or third chromosome mutations that dominantly modified the DmcycEJP rough eye phenotype. We have focused on the DmcycEJP suppressors, S(DmcycEJP), to identify novel negative regulators of S-phase entry. There are 18 suppressor gene groups with more than one allele and several genes that are represented by only a single allele. All S(DmcycEJP) tested suppress the DmcycEJP rough eye phenotype by increasing the number of S phases in the postmorphogenetic furrow S-phase band. By testing candidates we have identified several modifier genes from the mutagenic screen as well as from the deficiency screen. DmcycEJP suppressor genes fall into the classes of: (1) chromatin remodeling or transcription factors; (2) signaling pathways; and (3) cytoskeletal, (4) cell adhesion, and (5) cytoarchitectural tumor suppressors. The cytoarchitectural tumor suppressors include scribble, lethal-2-giant-larvae (lgl), and discs-large (dlg), loss of function of which leads to neoplastic tumors and disruption of apical-basal cell polarity. We further explored the genetic interactions of scribble with S(DmcycEJP) genes and show that hypomorphic scribble mutants exhibit genetic interactions with lgl, scab (alphaPS3-integrin--cell adhesion), phyllopod (signaling), dEB1 (microtubule-binding protein--cytoskeletal), and moira (chromatin remodeling). These interactions of the cytoarchitectural suppressor gene, scribble, with cell adhesion, signaling, cytoskeletal, and chromatin remodeling genes, suggest that these genes may act in a common pathway to negatively regulate cyclin E or S-phase entry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Brumby
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Keller SA, Ullah Z, Buckley MS, Henry RW, Arnosti DN. Distinct developmental expression of Drosophila retinoblastoma factors. Gene Expr Patterns 2005; 5:411-21. [PMID: 15661648 DOI: 10.1016/j.modgep.2004.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2003] [Revised: 09/07/2004] [Accepted: 09/08/2004] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor proteins are important regulators of the cell cycle and are implicated in a wide variety of human tumors. Genetic analysis of RB mutations in humans and in model systems indicates that individual RB proteins also have distinct functions in development. Specific target genes or mechanisms of action of individual RB proteins in developmental contexts are not well understood, however. To better understand the developmental activities of the two RB family members in Drosophila, we have characterized endogenous expression patterns of Rbf1 and Rbf2 proteins and transcripts in embryos and imaginal discs. These gene products are coexpressed at several stages of development, however, spatial and temporal differences are evident, including partly complementary patterns of expression in the embryonic central nervous system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott A Keller
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1319, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Michaut L, Flister S, Neeb M, White KP, Certa U, Gehring WJ. Analysis of the eye developmental pathway in Drosophila using DNA microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:4024-9. [PMID: 12655063 PMCID: PMC153041 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0630561100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2003] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Pax-6 genes encode evolutionarily conserved transcription factors capable of activating the gene-expression program required to build an eye. When ectopically expressed in Drosophila imaginal discs, Pax-6 genes induce the eye formation on the corresponding appendages of the adult fly. We used two different Drosophila full-genome DNA microarrays to compare gene expression in wild-type leg discs versus leg discs where eyeless, one of the two Drosophila Pax-6 genes, was ectopically expressed. We validated these data by analyzing the endogenous expression of selected genes in eye discs and identified 371 genes that are expressed in the eye imaginal discs and up-regulated when an eye morphogenetic field is ectopically induced in the leg discs. These genes mainly encode transcription factors involved in photoreceptor specification, signal transducers, cell adhesion molecules, and proteins involved in cell division. As expected, genes already known to act downstream of eyeless during eye development were identified, together with a group of genes that were not yet associated with eye formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Michaut
- Biozentrum, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kango-Singh M, Nolo R, Tao C, Verstreken P, Hiesinger PR, Bellen HJ, Halder G. Shar-pei mediates cell proliferation arrest during imaginal disc growth in Drosophila. Development 2002; 129:5719-30. [PMID: 12421711 DOI: 10.1242/dev.00168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 276] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
During animal development, organ size is determined primarily by the amount of cell proliferation, which must be tightly regulated to ensure the generation of properly proportioned organs. However, little is known about the molecular pathways that direct cells to stop proliferating when an organ has attained its proper size. We have identified mutations in a novel gene, shar-pei, that is required for proper termination of cell proliferation during Drosophila imaginal disc development. Clones of shar-pei mutant cells in imaginal discs produce enlarged tissues containing more cells of normal size. We show that this phenotype is the result of both increased cell proliferation and reduced apoptosis. Hence, shar-pei restricts cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis. By contrast, shar-pei is not required for cell differentiation and pattern formation of adult tissue. Shar-pei is also not required for cell cycle exit during terminal differentiation, indicating that the mechanisms directing cell proliferation arrest during organ growth are distinct from those directing cell cycle exit during terminal differentiation. shar-pei encodes a WW-domain-containing protein that has homologs in worms, mice and humans, suggesting that mechanisms of organ growth control are evolutionarily conserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhuri Kango-Singh
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Hedgehog proteins play an essential role during pattern formation in animal development and, increasingly, much of our appreciation of their modes of action is emanating from studies of their signalling mechanisms at the cellular level. Recent work has provided insights into how Hedgehog controls the cell cycle in a variety of circumstances. The data suggest that this influence may be direct and operates through interaction of the signalling pathway with cell cycle regulators at multiple points within the cell cycle. These new findings have profound implications in the context of clinical conditions - especially cancers - that arise from de-regulated cell proliferation in response to aberrant Hedgehog signalling activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudipto Roy
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 30 Medical Drive, Singapore 117609, Singapore.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brumby AM, Zraly CB, Horsfield JA, Secombe J, Saint R, Dingwall AK, Richardson H. Drosophila cyclin E interacts with components of the Brahma complex. EMBO J 2002; 21:3377-89. [PMID: 12093739 PMCID: PMC126084 DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdf334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cyclin E-Cdk2 is essential for S phase entry. To identify genes interacting with cyclin E, we carried out a genetic screen using a hypomorphic mutation of Drosophila cyclin E (DmcycE(JP)), which gives rise to adults with a rough eye phenotype. Amongst the dominant suppressors of DmcycE(JP), we identified brahma (brm) and moira (mor), which encode conserved core components of the Drosophila Brm complex that is highly related to the SWI-SNF ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex. Mutations in genes encoding other Brm complex components, including snr1 (BAP45), osa and deficiencies that remove BAP60 and BAP111 can also suppress the DmcycE(JP) eye phenotype. We show that Brm complex mutants suppress the DmcycE(JP) phenotype by increasing S phases without affecting DmcycE protein levels and that DmcycE physically interacts with Brm and Snr1 in vivo. These data suggest that the Brm complex inhibits S phase entry by acting downstream of DmcycE protein accumulation. The Brm complex also physically interacts weakly with Drosophila retinoblastoma (Rbf1), but no genetic interactions were detected, suggesting that the Brm complex and Rbf1 act largely independently to mediate G(1) arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony M. Brumby
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, Victoria 8006, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia and Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1270, USA Present address: Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA Corresponding authors e-mail: or
| | - Claudia B. Zraly
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, Victoria 8006, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia and Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1270, USA Present address: Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA Corresponding authors e-mail: or
| | - Julie A. Horsfield
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, Victoria 8006, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia and Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1270, USA Present address: Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA Corresponding authors e-mail: or
| | - Julie Secombe
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, Victoria 8006, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia and Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1270, USA Present address: Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA Corresponding authors e-mail: or
| | - Robert Saint
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, Victoria 8006, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia and Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1270, USA Present address: Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA Corresponding authors e-mail: or
| | - Andrew K. Dingwall
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, Victoria 8006, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia and Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1270, USA Present address: Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA Corresponding authors e-mail: or
| | - Helena Richardson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked bag 1, A’Beckett Street, Melbourne, Victoria 8006, Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia and Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1270, USA Present address: Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Present address: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA Corresponding authors e-mail: or
| |
Collapse
|