Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Patients in Residential Treatment Facilities

Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Epilepsy: Experiences of Participants with Cognitive Deficits

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to examine patients' experiences of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) with a special interest in patients with cognitive deficit (CD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An open, retrospective study was conducted on 82 patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy, who were treated with VNS for at least 10 months. Based on the inability to live independently, they were divided into two groups: patients with cognitive deficit (CD group) and patients without cognitive deficit (non-CD group). A specially designed questionnaire was used for semi-structured interviews about patients' experiences of VNS treatment.

RESULTS

Approximately one-third described a continuous reduction of seizure frequency of 50% or more and were regarded as responders. Fewer subjects in the CD group were responders than in the non-CD group. Approximately one-third of all subjects had no positive effect of VNS treatment. More CD patients described additional improvements and the most common were milder seizures and improved alertness. The most commonly reported adverse effect was hoarseness.

DISCUSSION

VNS treatment in patients without CD had better effect on seizure frequency reduction than in patients with CD, but many patients with CD reported other benefits from the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Non-CD patients had higher seizure frequency reduction than CD patients during VNS treatment, but many CD patients described other benefits.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy update

Epilepsy affects millions of people worldwide. Approximately one-third have pharmacoresistant epilepsy, and of these, the majority are not candidates for epilepsy surgery. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy has been an option to treat pharmacoresistant seizures for 30 years. In this update, we will review the clinical data that support the device's efficacy in children, adolescents, and adults. We will also review its side-effect profile, quality of life and cost benefits, and the impact the device has on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). We will then discuss candidate selection and provide guidance on dosing and future models. Vagus nerve stimulation therapy is an effective treatment for many seizure types and epilepsy syndromes with a predictable and benign side-effect profile that supports its role as the most commonly prescribed device to treat pharmacoresistant epilepsy. "This article is part of the Supplement issue Neurostimulation for Epilepsy."

Meta-analysis of vagus nerve stimulation treatment for epilepsy: correlation between device setting parameters and acute response

BACKGROUND

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive neurophysiological treatment for those patients who have pharmacoresistant or surgically resistant partial onset epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the effects of high and low stimulation paradigms on a responder rate of ≥50 and ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency and associated adverse effects in adults and children.

METHOD

A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies using vagus nerve stimulation published from January 1980 until July 2014 for medically or surgically resistant partial onset seizures, in children and adults. No restrictions on languages were imposed.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors reviewed and selected studies for inclusion and exclusion. The search identified five randomized control trials that fit with our inclusion criteria. The following outcomes were evaluated: 50% or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, 75% or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Results indicate high stimulation is more effective in adult patients who experienced ≥50 and ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency with a significant difference within both high and low stimulation groups. In children, there was no significant difference between the two groups and patients with ≥50 % reduction in seizures. Adverse effects such as hoarseness and dyspnea were more common in the high stimulation group where the remaining side effects were not statistically different among both groups.

CONCLUSION

High stimulation is more effective than low stimulation in producing a greater reduction in seizure frequency in patients with medically and surgically resistant epilepsy.

Brain stimulation in the treatment of epilepsy

Stimulation of the brain for the treatment of epilepsy, indirectly via the vagus nerve and directly through intracranial targets, is feasible and has increased in use and complexity over the past 10 years. Vagus nerve stimulation is widely applied and the present indications and outcomes together with possible ways in which the treatment could be refined are reviewed. The application of stimulation to deep-brain targets is also reviewed along with present practice and results. Possible developments in the use of direct intracranial stimulation are also considered.

Vagus nerve stimulation and the postictal state

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established neurostimulation therapy used to treat refractory epilepsy. The effect of acute or chronic VNS on the postictal state as a separate entity is seldom reported in clinical or experimental studies. Apart from its antiseizure effects, VNS has several other beneficial effects. These effects may be of particular benefit for patients with postictal neuropsychiatric symptoms. The hypothesized mechanisms underlying the initiation and sustainment of the postictal phase, to some extent, overlap with mechanisms involved in the seizure-suppressing effects of VNS as well as other neurological and psychotropic effects of VNS. Both the clinical symptoms and the basic research hypotheses of the postictal state show similarities with clinical effects induced by VNS and its underlying mechanisms of action.

Vagal nerve stimulation--a 15-year survey of an established treatment modality in epilepsy surgery

Neurostimulation is an emerging treatment for neurological diseases. Electrical stimulation of the tenth cranial nerve or vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has become a valuable option in the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with refractory epilepsy. It is indicated in patients with refractory epilepsy who are unsuitable candidates for epilepsy surgery or who have had insufficient benefit from such a treatment. Vagus nerve stimulation reduces seizure frequency with > 50% in 1/3 of patients and has a mild side effects profile. Research to elucidate the mechanism of action of vagus nerve stimulation has shown that effective stimulation in humans is primarily mediated by afferent vagal A- and B-fibers. Crucial brainstem and intracranial structures include the locus coeruleus, the nucleus of the solitary tract, the thalamus and limbic structures. Neurotransmitters playing a role may involve the major inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA but also serotoninergic and adrenergic systems. This manuscript reviews the clinical studies investigating efficacy and side effects in patients and the experimental studies aiming to elucidate the mechanims of action.

Vagus nerve stimulation therapy: 2-year prospective open-label study of 40 subjects with refractory epilepsy and low IQ who are living in long-term care facilities

Treating seizures among patients with mental retardation/developmental disabilities (MR/DD) is difficult owing in large part to the presence of additional comorbidities and the resulting need for polytherapy. Therefore, a nonpharmacological treatment option is needed for this population. This prospective, open-label study documented the long-term outcome of 40 low-IQ (<70) patients living in long-term care facilities who received vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy for pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Subjects were seen every 1 to 3 months by their neurologist (R.H.). Seizure frequency, antiepileptic medication, and quality-of-life information were documented preimplantation and quarterly thereafter through 2 years. The surgery and therapy were well tolerated. Seizures were reduced by at least 50% for 11 subjects. Antiepileptic medications were reduced from 3.3 per subject at baseline to an average of 2.3 per subject after 2 years. According to caregiver reports, overall quality of life improved for the majority of subjects; also, using the Client Development Evaluation Report (CDER), statistically significant improvements were reported at both 1 and 2 years in attention span, word usage, clarity of speech, standing balance, washing dishes, and household chores. VNS is a viable treatment option for low-IQ patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy who are living in long-term care facilities.

Spasticity in adults living in a developmental center

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain the prevalence of spasticity among adults living in a developmental center and to document the development of spasticity treatment plans for this population.

DESIGN

Descriptions of the clinical features of medical disorders and a prevalence survey.

SETTING

Residential developmental center.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred three adults.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Characteristics described included the prevalence of spasticity in this population, the specific spasticity diagnosis, functional goals for spasticity treatment identified by the participants' multidisciplinary teams, and the specific treatment indicated by the neurologist.

RESULTS

Of the 103 people diagnosed by the neurologist, 24 had diplegic spasticity, 4 had hemiplegic spasticity, 44 had quadriplegic spasticity, and 31 had no spasticity. Functional goals identified by multidisciplinary teams were undergarment change (46.3% of the persons for whom goals were identified), splinting hands (11%), dressing (57.4%), hygiene (20.4%), wheelchair positioning (25.9%), ambulation improvement (14.8%), and transfers (9.3%). After physical and occupational therapy, the first invasive treatments indicated for people with spasticity included botulinum toxin injections (60%), intrathecal baclofen (26.4%), orthopedic surgery (5.6%), and medication (1.4%). No treatment was recommended for 25% of the spasticity patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of spasticity was 35% in this developmental center population of 205 individuals. A multidisciplinary team approach to the evaluation of adults with spasticity who live in a developmental center makes it possible to identify functional goals that are amenable to spasticity treatment and minimizes treatment that does not target specific functional goals.