High-dose methotrexate for gestational trophoblastic disease

Ten-Year Review of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar

Objective: To determine the frequency and management outcome of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) in Lady Reading Hospital.

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from January 2011 to December 2021. Hospital records of all patients with GTD were reviewed and all were included in this study except those with an incomplete record or unconfirmed histology. Treatment was analysed in terms of surgical, chemotherapy or no treatment, and outcomes were noted in terms of complete remission, disease persistence or death.

Results: In 10 years 353 patients were admitted with GTD, and the frequency of the disease was 3.72 cases per 1000 pregnancies. The most frequent lesions were complete mole 65.2% (n=230) followed by invasive mole 20.4% (n=72). Mortality rate was 0.56% (n=2).

Maternal blood group analysis revealed that B positive 28.3% (n=100) was more frequent. O positive blood group was found more in the malignant form of the disease at 3.96% (n=14). GTD was most prevalent in 21 to 30 years of age (41.4%, n=146). Regarding treatment, in 69.97% (n=247) of cases, suction and evacuation were performed, in 4.2% (n=15) of cases hysterectomy was performed as primary therapy, and 4.8% (17) needed hysterectomy for chemoresistance.

In this study 42.49% (n=150) were given single-agent chemotherapy and 4.8% (n=17) were given multi-agent therapy. We had 21.33% (32) patients with a risk score of 7-9. In the group with a risk score of 7-9, 15.62% (n=5) patients were directly started on multi-agent therapy because of evidence of metastasis or choriocarcinoma; the remaining 84.37% (n=27) of patients who had no evidence of metastasis, no prior chemotherapy, no choriocarcinoma and International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage 1 were given single-agent methotrexate with folinic acid (eight days) after informed consent. In 18.75% of patients (n=6) hysterectomy was performed as the primary treatment either for haemorrhage or with age > 40, family completed, or reluctance to undergo chemotherapy. They all had a complete cure. In 3.1% (n=1) of cases, resistance to single-agent therapy was found and multi-agent treatment was started. Overall, in 96.29% of patients, complete remission was achieved with single-agent therapy in patients with risk scores of 7-9.

Conclusion: The frequency of GTD was 3.4/1000 pregnancies. Complete mole was the most frequent lesion, and single-agent chemotherapy had a good outcome in low- and high-risk patients with a risk score of 7-9 (with no evidence of metastasis, prior chemotherapy, or choriocarcinoma and FIGO stage 1).

Predictive factors associated with resistance to initial methotrexate treatment in women with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

AIM

To compare clinical characteristics and identify factors predictive of resistance to initial treatment with methotrexate-folinic acid (MTX-FA) in women with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).

METHODS

Retrospective chart reviews were conducted in patients diagnosed with low-risk GTN who were treated with MTX-FA at Siriraj Hospital between 2002 and 2018. Demographic data, disease characteristics, treatment response, toxicity, and data of the subsequent pregnancy were collected and analyzed. Groups of patients who were responsive or resistant to treatment were compared. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors predictive of resistance to methotrexate chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Totally, 113 patients were eligible for analysis. The primary remission rate was 55.8% with first-line MTX-FA. All other patients achieved remission by subsequent treatment with actinomycin D or multiple-agent chemotherapy. Relapse of disease occurred in 4.4% and the overall survival rate was 99.1%. Univariate analysis showed that pretreatment serum hCG, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at baseline, and serum hCG ratio of the first three consecutive cycles (C) were significantly associated with resistance to MTX-FA. Independent factors that predict failure to respond to first-line MTX-FA were pretreatment serum hCG ≥15,000 IU/L, a less than 4.8-fold reduction of serum hCG between cycle 1 and cycle 2 (C1/C2), and a less than seven-fold reduction of serum hCG from cycle 2 to cycle 3 (C2/C3).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line MTX-FA treatment is effective in 55.8% of patients. Pretreatment serum hCG, and serum hCG ratio between consecutive treatment cycles can predict initial treatment failure.

First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

BACKGROUND

This is the second update of a Cochrane review that was first published in 2009, Issue 1, . Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare but curable disease arising in the fetal chorion during pregnancy. Most women with low-risk GTN will be cured by evacuation of the uterus with or without single-agent chemotherapy. However, chemotherapy regimens vary between treatment centres worldwide and the comparable benefits and risks of these different regimens are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of low-risk GTN.

SEARCH METHODS

We electronically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase in September 2008, February 2012, and January 2016. In addition, we searched online trial registers for protocols and ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

For the original review, we included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and non-RCTs that compared first-line chemotherapy for the treatment of low-risk GTN. For this updated versions of the review, we included only RCTs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data to a pre-designed data extraction form. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs (667 women) in this updated review. Most studies were at a low or moderate risk of bias and all compared methotrexate with actinomycin D. Three studies compared weekly intramuscular (IM) methotrexate with bi-weekly pulsed intravenous (IV) actinomycin D (393 women), one study compared five-day IM methotrexate with bi-weekly pulsed IV actinomycin D (75 women), one study compared eight-day IM methotrexate-folinic acid (MTX-FA) with five-day IV actinomycin D (49 women), and one study compared eight-day IM MTX-FA with bi-weekly pulsed IV actinomycin D. One study contributed no data. Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that actinomycin D is probably more likely to lead to primary cure than methotrexate (risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.75; six trials, 577 participants; I(2) = 26%), and first-line methotrexate treatment is probably more likely to fail than actinomycin D treatment (RR 3.55, 95% CI 1.81 to 6.95; six trials, 577 participants; I(2) = 61%; moderate-certainty evidence) Low-certainty evidence suggests that there may be little or no difference between methotrexate and actinomycin D treatment with respect to nausea (four studies, 466 women; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.26) or any of the other individual side-effects reported, although data for all of these outcomes were insufficient and too inconsistent to be conclusive. Low-certainty evidence suggests that there may be little or no difference in the risk of severe adverse events (SAEs) between the groups overall (five studies, 515 women; RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.66; I² = 60%); however, the direction of effect favours methotrexate and more evidence is needed. Furthermore, evidence from subgroup analyses suggests that actinomycin D may be associated with a greater risk of SAEs than methotrexate (low-certainty evidence). We found no evidence on the effect of these treatments on future fertility.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Actinomycin D is probably more likely to achieve a primary cure in women with low-risk GTN, and less likely to result in treatment failure, than a methotrexate regimen. There may be little or no difference between the pulsed actinomycin D regimen and the methotrexate regimen with regard to side-effects. However, actinomycin D may be associated with a greater risk of severe adverse events (SAEs) than a methotrexate regimen. Higher-certainty evidence is still needed on treating low-risk GTN and the four ongoing trials are likely to make a significant contribution to this field. Given the variety of treatment regimens, findings from these trials could facilitate a network meta-analysis in the next version of this review to help women and clinicians determine the best treatment options for low-risk GTN.

First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane review that was first published in Issue 1, 2009. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare but curable disease arising in the fetal chorion during pregnancy. Most women with low-risk GTN will be cured by evacuation of the uterus with or without single-agent chemotherapy. However, chemotherapy regimens vary between treatment centres worldwide and the comparable benefits and risks of these different regimens are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of low-risk GTN.

SEARCH METHODS

In September 2008, we electronically searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE and EMBASE. In addition, we searched online trial registers, conference proceedings and reference lists of identified studies. We re-ran these searches in February 2012 for this updated review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

For the original review, we included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and non-RCTs that compared first-line chemotherapy for the treatment of low-risk GTN. For this updated version of the review, we included only RCTs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data to a pre-designed data extraction form. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling the risk ratio (RR) of individual trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five moderate to high quality RCTs (517 women) in the updated review. These studies all compared methotrexate with dactinomycin. Three studies compared weekly intramuscular (IM) methotrexate with bi-weekly pulsed intravenous (IV) dactinomycin (393 women), one study compared five-day IM methotrexate with bi-weekly pulsed IV dactinomycin (75 women) and one study compared eight-day IM methotrexate-folinic acid (MTX-FA) with five-day IV dactinomycin (49 women).Overall, dactinomycin was associated with significantly higher rates of primary cure than methotrexate (five studies, 513 women; RR 0.64, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.54 to 0.76). Methotrexate was associated with significantly more treatment failure than dactinomycin (five studies, 513 women; RR 3.81, 95% CI 1.64 to 8.86). We consider this evidence to be of a moderate quality.There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to nausea (four studies, 466 women; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.26) or any of the other individual side-effects reported, although data for all of these outcomes were insufficient and too heterogeneous to be conclusive. No severe adverse effects (SAEs) occurred in either group in three out of the five included studies and there was no significant difference in SAEs between the groups overall (five studies, 515 women; RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.66; I² = 60%), however, there was a trend towards fewer SAEs in the methotrexate group. We considered this evidence to be of a low quality due to substantial heterogeneity and low consistency in the occurrence/reporting of SAEs between trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Dactinomycin is more likely to achieve a primary cure in women with low-risk GTN, and less likely to result in treatment failure, compared with methotrexate. There is limited evidence relating to side-effects, however, the pulsed dactinomycin regimen does not appear to be associated with significantly more side-effects than the low-dose methotrexate regimen and therefore should compare favourably to the five- and eight-day methotrexate regimens in this regard.We consider pulsed dactinomycin to have a better cure rate than, and a side-effect profile at least equivalent to, methotrexate when used for first-line treatment of low-risk GTN. Data from a large ongoing trial of pulsed dactinomycin compared with five- and eight-day methotrexate regimens is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in these findings.

Treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with weekly high-dose methotrexate-etoposide

OBJECTIVE

To assess toxicity and efficacy of weekly high-dose methotrexate-etoposide (HD MTX-ETO) in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of high-risk GTN patients treated with HD MTX-ETO (methotrexate 1000 mg/m² day 1, etoposide 100 mg/m² days 1 and 2, q 1 wk).

RESULTS

134 cycles of HD MTX-ETO were administered to twelve patients; median number of cycles was 8 (range 2-39 cycles). Median follow up was 25.5 months (range 11-69). 7 of these patients switched due to ototoxicity from EP-EMA (etoposide 150 mg/m², cisplatin 75 mg/m² i.v. day 1; etoposide 100 mg/m², methotrexate 300 mg/m², dactinomycin 0.5 mg i.v. day 8, q 14 d) to HD MTX-ETO, after an average of 7 cycles of EP-EMA. Six achieved complete remission without disease recurrence. One patient with a placental site trophoblastic tumour died due to progressive disease. Five patients received HD MTX-ETO primarily; 1 patient with choriocarcinoma presenting with metastases to the brain and liver (WHO score 19) was switched to EP-EMA and died due to complications under EP-EMA. The other 4 achieved complete remission without disease recurrence. HD MTX-ETO was well tolerated; non-haematological toxicity was low except for alopecia and fatigue. Nine patients had grade 2-4 anaemia and received packed cells. Eight patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia and received G-CSF. Two patients developed febrile neutropenia without sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results show a better toxicity profile with HD MTX-ETO than EP-EMA and encouraging efficacy. HD MTX-ETO might be a treatment option for some patients with high-risk GTN and needs further investigation.

Phase III trial of weekly methotrexate or pulsed dactinomycin for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on the best regimen for the primary treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two commonly used single-drug regimens were compared with respect to the proportion of patients meeting the criteria for a complete response (CR) in a randomized phase III trial conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Eligibility was purposefully broad to maximize the generalizability of the results and included patients with a WHO risk score of 0 to 6 and patients with metastatic disease (limited to lung lesions < 2 cm, adnexa, or vagina) or choriocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty women were enrolled, and 216 were deemed eligible. Biweekly intravenous dactinomycin 1.25 mg/m² was statistically superior to weekly intramuscular (IM) methotrexate 30 mg/m² (CR: 70% v 53%; P = .01). Similarly, in patients with low-risk GTN as defined before the 2002 WHO risk score revisions (risk score of 0 to 4 and excluding choriocarcinoma), response was 58% and 73% in the methotrexate and dactinomycin arms, respectively (P = .03). Both regimens were less effective if the WHO risk score was 5 or 6 or if the diagnosis was choriocarcinoma (CR: 9% and 42%, respectively). There were two potential recurrences; one at 4 months (dactinomycin) and one at 22 months (methotrexate). Not all patients completed follow-up. Both regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The biweekly dactinomycin regimen has a higher CR rate than the weekly IM methotrexate regimen in low-risk GTN, a generally curable disease.

Gestational trophoblastic disease II: classification and management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) includes invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, placental site trophoblastic tumor, and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor. The overall cure rate in treating these tumors is currently >90%. Thorough evaluation and staging allow selection of appropriate therapy that maximizes chances for cure while minimizing toxicity. Nonmetastatic (stage I) and low-risk metastatic (stages II and III, score <7) GTN can be treated with single-agent chemotherapy resulting in a survival rate approaching 100%. High-risk GTN (stages II-IV, score ≥7) requires initial multiagent chemotherapy with or without adjuvant radiation and surgery to achieve a survival rate of 80-90%.

Combination chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumour

BACKGROUND

Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) includes gestational trophoblastic tumour and hydatidiform mole. Many women of reproductive age are affected by this disease although its incidence differs by geographical location. A number of chemotherapy regimens are used for treating the disease, such as methotrexate, actinomycin D and cyclophosphamide (MAC), methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, melphalan, hydroxyurea and vincristine (CHAMOC), etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin (EMA) plus cyclophosphamide and vincristine (CO) (EMA-CO), etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin (EMA) plus etoposide and cisplatin(EP) (EMA-EP). The efficacy of these drugs has not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy in treating high-risk GTT.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 2, 2008), MEDLINE, EMB and CBM, May 2008. Four journals were handsearched and other searching methods were used for identifying more studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The review included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of combination chemotherapy for treating high-risk GTT. Patients with placental-site trophoblastic tumour (PSTT), who had received chemotherapy in the previous two weeks, or patients with chemotherapy intolerance were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two investigators independently collected data using a data extraction form. Meta-analysis was not performed and the review was conducted as a narrative review.

MAIN RESULTS

One study with 42 participants was included in this review. It indicated that a MAC regimen was better than a CHAMOCA regimen for high-risk GTT because of lower toxicity. The quality of the study was unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The methodological limitations of the included study prevent any firm conclusions about the best combination chemotherapy regimen for high-risk GTT. High quality studies are required.

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: an update

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) includes invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, and placental site trophoblastic tumors. The overall cure rate in treating these tumors currently exceeds 90%. Thorough evaluation and staging allow selection of appropriate therapy that maximizes chances for cure while minimizing toxicity. Nonmetastatic (stage I) and low-risk metastatic (stages II and III, World Health Organization score < 7) GTN can be treated with single-agent chemotherapy, resulting in a survival rate approaching 100%. High-risk metastatic GTN (stage IV, WHO score > or = 7) requires initial multiagent chemotherapy with or without adjuvant radiation and surgery to achieve a survival rate of 80% to 90%.

First line chemotherapy in low risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a rare but curable disease. The incidence in Europe and North America is nearly 1.5 per 1000 live births but much higher rates are reported from Africa and Asia. The majority of the patients respond to evacuation of the uterus plus or minus chemotherapy, however, occasional patients will die. Patients are categorised into low or high risk groups using a variety of scoring systems. A large number of regimens are used worldwide in the management of low risk GTN; there are reports of 14 different regimens in the English literature. The choice of the regimen is usually dependent on geographic location, prior training and current experience with the specific regimen. Regimens have significant differences in the route of administration, hospitalisation and side effects and so have a bearing on healthcare cost. Patients are therefore exposed to different regimens with the potential for different response rates and different side effect profiles.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of first line chemotherapy in the treatment of low risk GTN.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We electronically searched Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Specialized Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3 2008), MEDLINE and EMBASE in September 2008. We performed additional searching of online trial registers and conference proceedings. We cross examined article references to identify relevant papers not detected by the electronic search.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The review included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) , quasi-RCTs and non-RCTs (cohort and case control studies (CCS)) for the treatment of low risk GTN.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion in the review using a data extraction form. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling the relative risk (RR) of individual trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight studies met the review entry criteria (n = 769). There were four RCTs and four CCS. Six different treatment regimens were identified; weekly methotrexate, 5-day methotrexate, 8-day methotrexate-folinic acid, "pulsed" dactinomycin, 5-day dactinomycin and the combination of methotrexate and dactinomycin. "Pulsed" dactinomycin was superior to weekly methotrexate in achieving primary cure without significantly increasing toxicity (three studies, RR 3.00, 95% CI 1.10 to 8.17, n = 392) . Eight-day methotrexate-folinic acid did not show significant advantage over 5-day methotrexate both in reducing toxicity or primary cure rate (two studies, RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.25, n = 169). The combination of methotrexate-dactinomycin resulted in significantly increased toxicity without significantly improving primary cure rate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence from the included RCTs, the authors conclude that "pulsed" dactinomycin is superior to weekly parenteral methotrexate at the reported dosages. However, the authors believe that rigorously designed, multicentred, randomised double-blind trials are required to evaluate other combinations of chemotherapy regimens, most importantly "pulsed" dactinomycin with the widely used 8-day methotrexate-folinic acid.

Combination chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumour

BACKGROUND

Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) includes gestational trophoblastic tumour and hydatidiform mole. Many women of reproductive age are affected by this disease although its incidence differs by geographical location. A number of chemotherapy regimens are used for treating the disease, such as methotrexate, actinomycin D and cyclophosphamide (MAC), methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, melphalan, hydroxyurea and vincristine (CHAMOC), etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin (EMA) plus cyclophosphamide and vincristine (CO) (EMA-CO), etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin (EMA) plus etoposide and cisplatin(EP) (EMA-EP). The efficacy of these drugs has not been systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy in treating high-risk GTT.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMB, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CBM were carried out. Four journals were handsearched and other searching methods were used for identifying more studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of combination chemotherapy for treating high-risk GTT. Patients with placental-site trophoblastic tumour (PSTT), who had received chemotherapy in the previous two weeks, or patients with chemotherapy intolerance were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two investigators independently collected data using a data extraction form. Meta-analysis was not performed and the review was conducted as a narrative review.

MAIN RESULTS

One study with 42 participants was included in this review. It indicated that a MAC regimen was better than a CHAMOCA regimen for high-risk GTT because of lower toxicity. The quality of the study was unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The methodological limitations of the included study prevent any firm conclusions about the best combination chemotherapy regimen for high-risk GTT. High quality studies are required.

What is the best protocol of single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy in nonmetastatic or low-risk metastatic gestational trophoblastic tumors? A review of the evidence

OBJECTIVE

Gestational trophoblastic diseases (GTD), a group of rare placenta disorders, have a varying potential for invasion, either local, or remote under the form of metastases, and are definitely cured by chemotherapy in 85 to 99% of cases. Single-agent methotrexate is the usual primary treatment for women with low-risk trophoblastic tumors (TT), yet various regimens are currently used worldwide. We reviewed these regimens and the available evidence for evaluating their respective efficacy and tolerance.

METHODS

We performed an exhaustive literature search and applied the French agency for evaluation in healthcare (HAS) methodology for critical appraisal and level of evidence. We summarised the protocols used in the selected studies and their respective results regarding efficacy and toxicity.

RESULTS

We selected 18 original studies on the efficacy and tolerance of methotrexate used alone or in association with folinic acid for the treatment of nonmetastatic or low-risk metastatic trophoblastic tumors. Among these 18 studies, 15 were retrospective series, 3 were prospective series without any control group, and none were controlled clinical trial. We identified four main chemotherapy regimens and two very different strategies for repeating the treatment courses. It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis due to the lack of controlled clinical trials. Because all studies were observational with no control group and methods were heterogeneous for scoring women, setting criteria for starting therapy, defining remission, and collecting information on adverse events, we found no objective element allowing recommending one protocol rather than another.

CONCLUSION

Objective comparison should be addressed in the scope of comparative trials organised at the national or even international level. However their feasibility is highly problematic for rare diseases such as GTD. International collaborative works should be encouraged to reduce practice variations and allow a better comparability between strategies.

Treatment of gestational trophoblastic tumors

Gestational trophoblastic tumors (invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, and placental site trophoblastic tumor) should be classified according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), World Health Organization (WHO), and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria into nonmetastatic, low-risk metastatic, and high-risk metastatic categories. Nonmetastatic tumors (FIGO Stage I) can be treated with a variety of single-agent methotrexate or actinomycin D protocols, resulting in cure of essentially all patients. Metastatic low-risk tumors (FIGO Stages II and III, WHO score < 8) should be treated with 5-day dosage schedules of methotrexate or actinomycin D, with cure rates approaching 100%. Metastatic high-risk tumors (FIGO Stage IV, WHO score > 7) require combination chemotherapy with etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine (EMA-CO) with or without adjuvant radiation therapy and surgery to achieve cure rates of 80% to 90%.

Weekly intravenous methotrexate with folinic acid for nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the complete response rate to weekly intravenous methotrexate at 100 mg/m(2) with folinic acid for patients with nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

METHODS

From 1988 to 1999, 22 women with nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia were treated with weekly intravenous methotrexate with folinic acid at the Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre. Complete response was defined as the attainment of a serum beta-hCG level <5 IU/L for 3 consecutive weeks. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group criteria for chemotherapy toxicity.

RESULTS

There were 10 women who achieved complete response with weekly intravenous methotrexate alone (45.5%). Of the 12 who did not achieve complete response with methotrexate, 10 received actinomycin D and 2 received EMA as second-line chemotherapy. Patients successfully treated with methotrexate required a median of 6.5 cycles (including 2 cycles for consolidation) to achieve complete response. The only significant prognostic factor for failure with methotrexate was pretreatment beta-hCG (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Only a select group of patients with low pretreatment beta-hCG titers would be expected to achieve complete response with this regimen. Large randomized studies are required to determine the optimal treatment for nonmetastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Methotrexate infusion in low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease

OBJECTIVES

The current study attempts to evaluate the effectiveness of methotrexate infusion therapy in the management of low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease and to find out whether an increase in the dose intensity can effect a faster remission and a shorter treatment duration.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective study. Between June 1990 and August 1998, 59 patients with low-risk trophoblastic disease were treated with methotrexate at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus over 30 minutes followed by a 12-hour infusion of methotrexate at a dose of 200 mg/m(2). Folinic acid was not given unless the serum methotrexate reached a toxic level 24 hours after infusion (toxic level, 10 micromol/L). Actinomycin D was added in patients with a partial response. The follow-up period of these patients ranged from 12 to 113 months, with a median of 58.5 months and a mean of 55.7 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients attained a complete biochemical remission. Twenty-eight patients went into biochemical remission after one methotrexate infusion. Five patients showed a partial biochemical response. A relapse developed in 2 of the 54 complete responders at 3 months and 18 months after the initial therapy. Both patients received combination therapy consisting of methotrexate, etoposide, and bleomycin. They went into biochemical remission and have remained disease-free at the time of analysis. All of the 59 patients were in biochemical remission at the time of analysis. No significant side effects were observed except that Stevens-Johnson syndrome developed in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate infusion therapy described in this study is effective in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease. The omission of consolidation therapy and folinic acid rescue decreases the cost and duration of treatment.