LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold-knife conization

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure combined with cold coagulation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma in-situ: a feasible treatment with a low risk of residual/recurrent disease

Objective

This study was performed to evaluate the significance of positive resection margins (RMs) with the loop electrosurgical excision procedure combined with cold coagulation (LEEP with CC) as a definitive treatment for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and adenocarcinoma in-situ.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 467 patients who underwent LEEP with CC. A right-angled triangular loop in a single pass followed by a CC (120 °C) to the cone bed for 10 to 20 s was used. Pathology reports and clinical data were obtained and evaluated.

Results

Histopathology evaluation of LEEP tissue samples revealed the presence of CIN 1 in 69, CIN 2/3 in 366, AIS in 5 and invasive carcinoma in 16 (microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and invasive SCC, 13 and 3) patients. Margins were positive in 66 (14.5%) cases: 0 in CIN 1, 54 in CIN 2/3 (12.4%), 1 in AIS (20.0%) and 11 in microinvasive/invasive SCC (68.8%). Although 54 CIN2/3 patients with positive RMs did not undergo additional treatment, 1 of these (1.9%) was confirmed to have residual CIN3 at the first follow-up. Two of 8 (25.0%) microinvasive SCC patients with positive RMs were confirmed to have residual diseases (1 microinvasive SCC and 1 invasive SCC) after hysterectomy. Four out of 360 (1 positive RM, 3 negative RM) CIN cases recurred during the study period.

Conclusions

These results suggest that CIN patients with positive RMs after LEEP with CC may be followed up without additional treatment.

Cold Knife Conization and Loop Excision for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Aims and Background

Our aim was to investigate whether loop excision is an acceptable alternative to traditional cold knife conization of the cervix.

Patients and Methods

240 with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were randomly assigned to loop excision (n = 120) or cold knife conization (n = 120). Success and complication rates of both methods were analysed.

Results

100% of cold knife conization and 98% of loop excision surgical specimens were positive for dysplasia. The rate of complete resection was 91% in the cold knife and 82% in the loop excision group, but histologic confirmation of residual CIN was obtained in only 2 (1.7%) women after cold knife conization and in 5 (4.2%) after loop excision. Loop excision cones were significantly shallower than those obtained by a cold knife. Secondary surgical procedures due to early hemorrhage were performed in 9 (7.5%) patients treated with cold knife conization and in 8 (6.7%) treated with loop excision. Elevated temperature postoperatively was observed in 16.4% of patients after cold knife conization and in 13.9% after loop excision. There were no other postoperative complications.

Conclusions

The results suggest that cold knife conization and loop excision are comparable and equally effective diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for CIN.

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) increases the risk for preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation and clarify whether the increased risk for preterm birth is attributable to the procedure itself or to risk factors associated with cervical dysplasia.

DATA SOURCES

Two authors performed a search of the relevant data through February 2013 using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included observational studies that compared rates of preterm birth in women with prior LEEP with women with no history of cervical excision. Nineteen of 559 identified studies met selection criteria.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

We compared women with a history of LEEP with two unexposed groups without a history of cervical excision: 1) women with an unknown or no history of cervical dysplasia; and 2) women with a history of cervical dysplasia but no cervical excision. The primary outcome was preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes were preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation, spontaneous preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and perinatal mortality. DerSimonian-Laird random effects models were used. We assessed heterogeneity between studies using the Q and I tests. Stratified analyses and metaregression were performed to assess confounding. Nineteen studies were included with a total of 6,589 patients with a history of LEEP and 1,415,015 without. Overall, LEEP was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (pooled relative risk 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.92). However, no increased risk was found when women with a history of LEEP were compared with women with a history cervical dysplasia but no cervical excision (pooled relative risk 1.08, 95% CI 0.88-1.33).

CONCLUSION

Women with a history of LEEP have similar risk of preterm birth when compared with women with prior dysplasia but no cervical excision. Common risk factors for both preterm birth and dysplasia likely explain findings of association between LEEP and preterm birth, but LEEP itself may not be an independent risk factor for preterm birth.

LLETZ Specimen Fragmentation: Impact on Diagnosis, Outcome, and Implications for Training

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess fragmentation of Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) specimens, its influence on short-term cytological outcome, and the risk factors for specimen fragmentation, as we well as trainee performance on clinical outcome.

METHOD

This retrospective study was performed at a cancer center. Women who underwent LLETZ for suspected high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) over a 5-year period were included. Patients were identified through a regional database. Data were obtained from hospital and regional databases. Fisher's exact test was used.

RESULTS

75 % of all specimens were obtained intact. When the LLETZ specimen was intact, 89 % of smear tests were reported as negative, against 86 % when the specimen was fragmented. Fragmentation was significantly associated with high-grade smear results at 6 months. Trainee status was significantly related to specimen fragmentation.

CONCLUSION

Fragmentation of LLETZ specimens is associated with an increased likelihood of obtaining a high-grade smear at 6 months post treatment. Enhancing the colposcopy training may help improve clinical outcome.

Risk of cesarean delivery after loop electrosurgical excision procedure

OBJECTIVE

To estimate whether previous loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) affects the risk of cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed. Women who underwent a prior LEEP were compared with two unexposed cohorts: 1) women with prior screening cervical cytology only; and 2) women with prior cervical punch biopsy. The pregnancy evaluated in this analysis was the first pregnancy of a duration more than 20 weeks of gestation after the identifying cervical procedure. Stratified and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to control for confounding.

RESULTS

Five hundred ninety-eight women with prior LEEP, 588 women with screening cytology only, and 552 women with cervical biopsy were included in this study. After adjusting for relevant confounders, similar rates of cesarean delivery were seen in women with prior LEEP (31.6%) and women with prior cervical cytology only (29.3%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.41). Likewise, no differences were found in rates of cesarean delivery when women with prior LEEP were compared with those with a prior punch biopsy (29.0%, adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.74-1.33). Among women who had a cesarean delivery, arrest of labor was the indication for cesarean delivery in a similar proportion of women in the groups (LEEP compared with cytology only, P=.12; LEEP compared with biopsy, P=.50). Loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimen size did not vary by delivery mode. Length of time between LEEP and subsequent pregnancy also did not influence delivery mode.

CONCLUSION

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure does not affect mode of delivery in the subsequent pregnancy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy finding following a biopsy diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: frequency and clinical significance

CONTEXT

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is a therapeutic option following biopsy diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Most LEEPs will confirm the HSIL biopsy diagnosis but a number of them will not. Such negative findings suggest the possibility of an incorrect biopsy diagnosis, removal of the lesion by biopsy, or insufficient LEEP sampling.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of negative LEEP findings following HSIL biopsies and better understand the clinical significance of negative LEEP findings.

DESIGN

The Department of Pathology's records were searched for all patients undergoing LEEP excision who had prior cervical biopsies and subsequent clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-eight women were found who had index biopsies, subsequent LEEPs, and clinical follow-up averaging 25.8 months. Three hundred six women had HSIL on biopsy with 223 (73%) showing HSIL on LEEP. Seventy-three (24%) LEEPs in women with HSIL index biopsy results yielded negative findings or disclosed low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). Twenty-nine of 223 patients (13%) with an HSIL result both on biopsies and LEEPs had HSIL on biopsy and/or excisional clinical follow-up. Seven of 73 patients (10%) with positive (HSIL) biopsy results but negative LEEP findings or LSIL had HSIL on biopsy and/or excisional follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-four percent of patients with HSIL on biopsy had negative findings or LSIL on LEEP. There is no statistical difference in development of HSIL after LEEP for those with positive biopsy and positive LEEP results (13%) versus positive biopsy and negative LEEP results (10%). The occurrence of a negative LEEP finding following a positive biopsy finding was frequent (24%) and does not portend a different clinical follow-up from a positive biopsy and positive LEEP result.

C-LETZ versus large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) with contour-loop excision of the transformation zone (C-LETZ) in management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with respect to number of specimens obtained, weight of specimen, surgical margin, treatment time, and morbidity associated with those procedures.

METHOD

Women were randomly allocated to receive LLETZ or C-LETZ. Inclusion criteria were the following circumstances: (1) presence of biopsy-proved CIN 2/3, (2) persistent biopsy-proved CIN 1, (3) discrepancy between cytology and histology, or 4) an endocervical curettage was positive.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight women were eligible for the study. Mean weight of specimens in C-LETZ group was significantly more than LLETZ group (4.35 ± 1.39 vs. 3.55 ± 1.48 g, p = 0.007). Duration of treatment were similar in both groups (p = 0.39). After multiple logistic regressions were analyzed, C-LETZ was more likely to result in a single pathologic specimen (76 vs. 29.16 %, p < 0.001; adjusted RR 8.33, CI 3.23-21.47). There was no statistical significant difference in the frequency of positive margins between the groups (40 vs. 39.5 %, p = 0.64; adjusted RR 1.27, CI 0.46-3.50). The morbidity associated with those procedures was not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

C-LETZ has a clear clinical benefit in term of a higher rate of a single pathologic specimen. It removes more cervical tissue than LLETZ. The incidence of incomplete excision and complication seem to be similar in both groups.

Thermal artifact after three techniques of loop excision of the transformation zone: a comparative study

AIMS

To compare a surgical-margin thermal artifact in 3 techniques of loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ).

METHODS

The histopathologic specimens from 140 patients who underwent 3 techniques of LETZ with different electrosurgical units (large loop used with a Valleylab, large loop used with an Ellman Surgitron, and contoured loop with a Utah Finesse) performed in Rajavithi Hospital between January 2003 and June 2007 were reevaluated by one pathologist with regard to degree and width of diathermy artifact.

RESULTS

All of the specimens exhibited thermal tissue artifacts but there were varying degrees of extent and severity. Overall, the mean thermal artifact zone was 0.85 ± 0.94, 0.57 ± 0.47, and 0.49 ± 0.51 mm for the endocervical margin, ectocervical margin, and stromal margin, respectively. However, the thermal artifact did not interfere with the histological diagnosis or the assessment of the margins in all cases. There were no statistical differences in the thermal artifact measurements in the 3 groups. The 3 LETZ techniques provided comparable thermal artifacts in terms of qualitative and quantitative measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

The thermal artifacts, both in severity and extent, are not significantly different in the 3 LETZ techniques. For routine LETZ in clinical practice, those techniques can be used with a comparable outcome.

Number of fragments, margin status and thermal artifacts of conized specimens from LLETZ surgery to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) is a nontraumatic cut and coagulation method with several advantages, but it induces thermal artifacts in the cut region. The aim here was to assess the correlations of age, number of fragments, lesion grade and degree of thermal artifacts with margin quality in conized specimens from LLETZ for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cross-sectional study at Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp).

METHODS

The records and histopathology findings of 118 women who underwent LLETZ between 1999 and 2007 were reviewed. Age, number of fragments, lesion grade, degree of thermal artifacts and margin quality were assessed.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 27.14 years; 63.6% had been diagnosed with CIN II and 36.4% with CIN III. The lesion was removed as a single fragment in 79.6% of the cases. The margins were free from intraepithelial neoplasia in 85.6% and compromised in the endocervical margin in 6.8%. Fragment damage due to artifacts occurred in 2.5%. Severe artifacts occurred in 22.8%. Women aged 30 years or over presented more cases of CIN III (P < 0.0004). Neoplastic compromising of surgical margins and severe artifacts occurred more often in cases in which two or more fragments were removed, and in patients aged 30 years or over.

CONCLUSION

CIN III in women aged 30 or over, when removed in two or more fragments during LLETZ, presented a greater number of compromised margins and greater severity of thermal artifacts.

Fertility-sparing treatment in younger women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix

OBJECTIVE

For women who have completed childbearing, the treatment of choice for adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) of the cervix is hysterectomy. In women who desire future fertility, however, conservative therapy is an acceptable alternative. In this study we compare the outcomes for young women who underwent loop conization or were treated with cold knife conization.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis in 112 patients with ACIS, age 30 or younger, treated with cold knife conization or loop conization between 1998 and 2010. Decision to perform office loop conization was based on the size of the cervix and the colposcopic lesion. Main outcomes were negative margins after the procedure and recurrence of ACIS.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (52%) were treated with cold knife conization and 54 (48%) underwent loop conization. The odds ratio for cold knife conization to achieve negative cone margins compared with loop conization was 1.4 (95% CI 0.6-3.5). We observed no difference in residual or recurrent ACIS between patients treated with loop conization versus cold knife conization.

CONCLUSIONS

In select young patients who desire future fertility, loop conization and cold knife conization have equivalent rates of negative margins and negative follow-up. For optimal results, patients must have a lesion which can be removed in one pass of a loop, confirmed by expert colposcopy. Loop excision should be considered the treatment of choice in this specific group of patients.

Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery

The current body of literature concerning cervical conization and its effect on subsequent pregnancy outcome is conflicting. Depending on the type of conization procedure that is examined and the quality of the control group, the results and conclusions vary widely. Because treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is commonplace among women of reproductive age, it is imperative that practitioners have an understanding of the issues surrounding the treatment. Therefore, this review will summarize the published literature that addresses excisional procedures of the uterine cervix and the risk of preterm delivery in subsequent pregnancies and provide reasonable treatment recommendations for women with cervical abnormalities and a desire for future fertility.

Treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in an area of Thailand with a high incidence of cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To audit the treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) at Chiang Mai University Hospital based on 12 standard requirements of the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme.

METHODS

Records were reviewed of all women with histologically proven HSIL undergoing treatment at Chiang Mai University Hospital between January 2005 and May 2009.

RESULTS

Four of the standard requirements were not met: not all women underwent colposcopy before definitive treatment; the rate of specimen fragmentation was high; among women with ectocervical lesions, the rate of tissue removal to a depth of greater than 7 mm was low; and among women aged over 50 years with endocervical-margin involvement, the rate of repeat excision was low.

CONCLUSION

This audit highlights four treatment practices that do not meet standard requirements and require detailed exploration. The development of guidelines for the treatment of cervical precancerous lesions in Thailand is challenging and merits further attention.

2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ

OBJECTIVE

To provide updated consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS).

PARTICIPANTS

A group of 146 experts including representatives from 29 professional organizations, federal agencies, and national and international health organizations met on September 18-19, 2006, in Bethesda, MD, to develop the guidelines. MAJOR CHANGES IN THE GUIDELINES: The management of women with CIN grade 1 (CIN 1) has been modified significantly. In the earlier guidelines, management depended on whether the colposcopic examination was satisfactory and treatment using ablative or excisional methods was acceptable for women with CIN 1. In the new guidelines, cytological follow-up is the only recommended management option, regardless of whether the colposcopic examination is satisfactory, for women with CIN 1 who have a low-grade referral cervical cytology. Treatment of CIN 1 is particularly discouraged in adolescents. The basic management of women in the general population with CIN 2,3 underwent only minor modifications, but options for the conservative management of adolescents with CIN 2,3 have been expanded. Moreover, management recommendations for women with biopsy-confirmed AIS are now included.

CONCLUSION

Updated evidenced-based guidelines have been developed for the management of women with CIN or AIS. These guidelines reflect recent changes in our understanding of human papillomavirus-associated diseases of the cervix and the potential impact of treatment on future pregnancies.

Compliance After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure or Cold Knife Cone Biopsy

OBJECTIVE

To examine rates and predictors of compliance with follow-up recommendations in low-income women from a county hospital clinic undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and cone knife cone biopsy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 135 patients who underwent LEEP or cold knife cone biopsy was performed. Demographic data, results of cytology, colposcopy biopsy, excision specimen pathology, and indication for the LEEP or cold knife cone biopsy were collected. Compliance was determined by whether the patient adhered to the recommended follow-up within 1 year from the date of the procedure. Multivariable analysis was performed by using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were included for analysis (81 LEEP and 54 cold knife cone cases). Type of procedure was significant in predicting compliance: 74.1% of cold knife cone patients were compliant compared with 43.2% of LEEP patients (adjusted relative risk 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.30-1.87). There was a trend for older patients to be more compliant than younger patients in the univariable analyses but not in multivariable analysis. After adjusting for age, LEEP patients were still significantly less compliant than cold knife cone patients. Pathologic indication (severity of disease), race, payor source, and gravidity were not significant predictors of compliance and not included in the multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Compared with LEEP, cold knife cone patients were significantly more compliant with follow-up. Because LEEP is a less invasive in-office procedure, it may convey to patients the idea that their condition is less severe.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Follow-up of screening patients conservatively treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2–3

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the frequency and correlates of non-adherence to follow-up among patients conservatively treated for CIN2-3.

STUDY DESIGN

Study population comprised 1560 patients aged 25-64 years from a screening programme in northern Italy. The regional standard protocol was used as a reference. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio probability of a patient being lost to follow-up (no check-ups within 27 months of treatment) or incompletely followed-up (1-3 negative check-ups) versus having 4 negative check-ups.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-six patients (21%) were lost to follow-up, 678 (43%) were incompletely followed-up, 352 (23%) presented for 4 negative check-ups and 204 (13%) were diagnosed with persistent disease. The probability of no or incomplete follow-up was greater for patients who lived in the urban district, who were treated in private settings (versus screening centres), who exhibited a visibile squamocolumnar junction on pre-treatment colposcopy, who were treated with cold knife excision and local destructive therapy (versus loop diathermy excision), and whose surgical specimens had positive excision margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to the reference protocol was poor. Factors involved in follow-up failures require greater clinical attention.

Outcomes of loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women

The objective of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes and complications in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for cervical neoplasia. The medical record of 60 evaluable HIV-infected women who had abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear and underwent LEEP following colposcopy at Chiang Mai University Hospital between May 1998 and June 2004 was reviewed. Thirty-one (51.7%) had associated genital infection at screening. Twenty-five (41.7%) had opportunistic infection, but only 18 (30.0%) were treated with antiretroviral therapy. The most common abnormal Pap smear was high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (46.7%), followed by low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (40.0%). Forty (66.7%) women had clear surgical margins after LEEP. Only one (1.7%) woman had severe intraoperative hemorrhage. Early and late postoperative hemorrhage were noted in three (5%) women of each period. Localized infection of the cervix was detected in seven (11.7%) women. Two (3.3%) women developed cervical stenosis at 6 months after LEEP. There was no significant difference in overall complications between HIV-infected women and the control group (P= 0.24). Among 60 HIV-infected women, no statistical difference in the rate of margins involvement (P= 1.00) and complications (P= 0.85) could be demonstrated between HIV-infected women who received antiretroviral therapy and those who did not. Disease-free rate at 6 and 12 months were 97.1% and 88%, respectively. These data demonstrated that LEEP appears to be safe and effective in HIV-infected women.

Does microcolposcopy protect patients with CIN and unsatisfactory colposcopy from the risk of incomplete excision of disease at the time of conization?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of microcolposcopy in preventing incomplete electrosurgical excision at the endocervical cone margin in patients with CIN and unsatisfactory colposcopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four-hundred and twenty-one patients were studied. Complete excision of disease at the endocervical margin was evaluated using multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

One-hundred and eighty-three patients underwent microcolposcopy. In 160 patients, the cone depth exceeded the endocervical extension of the squamocolumnar junction as predicted by microcolposcopy. In 23 patients, the opposite was observed. Microcolposcopy was not performed in 238 patients. For the three groups, the frequency of endocervical cone margin involvement was 22%, 22%, and 13%, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that patients with a cone depth exceeding the endocervical margin of the squamocolumnar junction as predicted by microcolposcopy had no reduction in the risk of incomplete conization.

CONCLUSION

The use of microcolposcopy awaits validation for assessment of the transformation zone to predict negative conization margins.

Loop conization for the treatment of microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of loop conization in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. A retrospective study was conducted from 1997 to 2003 at the Colposcopic Clinic, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Sixty-three consecutive patients with microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix receiving cold-knife conization (35 patients) or loop conization (28 patients) were included in the study. All patients underwent definitive hysterectomy. We reviewed the conization specimen together with the hysterectomied uterus to compare the two conization techniques with respect to the histopathologic interpretation and diagnostic accuracy. The mean depth of cone specimens was significantly less in the loop conization compared with cold-knife conization (1.65 versus 2.35 cm, P = 0.035). Regarding the application of conization, the loop conization was completed in a single slice in 27 patients (77.1%) and in multiple slices in 8 patients (22.9 %), in spite of encouragement to perform conization in a one-pass application when possible. However, the cold-knife specimens were invariably a single cone-shaped piece. As reviewed by microscopic examination, the rate of tissue transection was significantly higher in the loop group than in the cold-knife group (14.3% versus 0%, P = 0.04). Because of tissue transection and disorientation, pathologic evaluation of stromal status was inadequate in 11.4% (4/35) of the loop cones as opposed to none of the 28 cold-knife cones. After assessing the hysterectomy specimens, the clinical diagnoses in the loop group were downgraded in three patients compared with only one in the cold-knife group. Data from this investigation suggest that cervical cold-knife conization is superior to loop conization as a method to assess microinvasive cervical cancer.

Chronic pelvic pain: a rare complication following a large-loop excision of the transformation zone

This is the unique report of a patient with deep-seated, left-sided pelvic pain following a large-loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III. She transpired to have a definite diagnosis of pelvic varicosities which were only on the left side. Our surmise was that the varicosities had risen on the back of an arteriovenous malformation following her LLETZ performed by a colleague. The first attempted treatment was radiologic embolization. When this failed, she had a formal surgical procedure, and the left unilateral varicosities were ligated. Her pain ceased entirely thereafter, and she remained pain free at her 1-year review.

The influence of time intervals between loop electrosurgical excision and subsequent hysterectomy on the morbidity of patients with cervical neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To improve clinical prospects by reducing intraoperative or postoperative complications, subsequent hysterectomy is generally conducted within 48 h or 6 weeks after cervical cold-knife conization. The loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is widely used for cervical conization. However, no study has ever been undertaken on the relation between postoperative sequelae and the time between LEEP and hysterectomy. Therefore, this study was undertaken to evaluate the correlations between postoperative sequelae and the interval between LEEP and hysterectomy.

METHODS

The medical records of 338 patients, who underwent type 1 extended hysterectomy after LEEP at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, were retrospectively reviewed. The subjects were divided into three groups according to time from LEEP to hysterectomy: group 1 (within 48 h, n = 210), group 2 (between 48 h and 6 weeks, n = 88), and group 3 (>6 weeks, n = 40).

RESULTS

The three groups showed no significant differences with respect to patient characteristics (age, delivery history, body mass index, and a history of surgery). Postoperative complications such as fever, dysuria, and surgical region complications (effraction, infection, and rubefaction) were not significantly different among the three groups. Other complications, namely, ureter injury and abdominal wall hematoma, were found in one case in each group 1.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative clinical courses were not significantly different regardless of time interval between LEEP and subsequent hysterectomy. Therefore, hysterectomies can be conducted at any time when the patient is in an appropriate condition, i.e., not precisely within 48 h or >6 weeks after LEEP.

Large loop excision and cold coagulation for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) combined with a single application of the cone probe of a Semm Cold Coagulator as a new treatment for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).

METHODS

Retrospective case-record review of 666 women treated with large loop excision and cold coagulation (LLECC) from 1992 to 2000.

RESULTS

Of the women who had high-grade CIN at their initial consultation, 4.2% had abnormal cytologic results 6 months after treatment and 0.6% had abnormal cytologic results at 12 months. Of the women who had low-grade CIN at initial presentation, 3.8% had abnormal cytologic results 6 months after treatment and none (0%) at 12 months. Furthermore, there were no reported cases of cervical cancer in this cohort of women during the follow-up period. Short-term bleeding complications (within 24 h of the procedure) occurred in 1% of the women assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Large loop excision combined with cold coagulation is a new and effective treatment for CIN. Randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings and determine the long-term safety of the technique.

A Randomized Trial of the Fischer Cone Biopsy Excisor and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure

OBJECTIVE

To compare specimens obtained with the Fischer cone biopsy excisor or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) with respect to number of specimens obtained, margin interpretability, adequacy of excision, and ease of use.

METHODS

One hundred eligible patients aged 13 years and older were randomly assigned to treatment with the Fischer cone biopsy excisor or LEEP. Eligibility criteria included: (1) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3, (2) persistent CIN 1, or (3) cytologic/histologic discrepancy. Following excision, providers ranked ease of use on a scale of 1 to 10. A pathologist blinded to procedure type analyzed specimens for margin interpretability and adequacy of excision. Before study initiation we calculated that a total of 100 patients would be required to demonstrate a significant difference in the interpretable margin rate of 80% for LEEP and 99% for cone biopsy excisor (power 80%, alpha =.05).

RESULTS

After adjustment for ease of use, lesion size, and degree of neoplasia, the cone biopsy excisor was no more likely to result in a single specimen than LEEP (74% versus 63%, relative risk [RR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 -1.11), to result in a specimen with interpretable margins (65% versus 73%, RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78-1.22), or to result in a fully excised cervical lesion (72% versus 62% for LEEPs, RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.77-1.52). Providers found their experiences with both Fischer cone biopsy excisor and LEEP cone biopsies to be similar, even after adjustment for year of training and previous experience (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72-1.24).

CONCLUSION

The Fischer cone biopsy excisor and LEEP performed similarly with respect to the number of final specimens, margin interpretability, and ease of use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I

The clinical significance of a negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy for high-grade dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

We sought to estimate the incidence and clinical significance of a negative therapeutic loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and to evaluate patient specimens for limiting histologic features associated with a negative LEEP.

METHODS

We identified 674 patients with biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical dysplasia who were treated with LEEP from 1991 through 2001. The results of these LEEP procedures were reviewed for the absence of dysplasia or the presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia stages 1-3. Computerized pathology files of patients were then reviewed through July 2002 to determine whether dysplasia recurred. Slides of negative LEEP specimens were reviewed to confirm the absence of dysplasia and to search for histologic features that may have limited our interpretation of the specimen.

RESULTS

Ninety-three (14%) of LEEP specimens reviewed were completely negative for dysplasia. Clinical follow-up was available on 75 of the 93 patients, with a median follow-up time of 2 years. Eighteen (24%) patients had subsequent positive follow-up, including carcinoma (n = 2), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (n = 8), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (n = 6), and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (n = 2). Patients with negative LEEPs had a recurrence rate similar to patients with positive LEEPs (24% versus 27%). Limiting histologic features were more commonly identified in negative LEEPs as compared with LEEPs containing dysplasia (16% versus 5%, P <.001).

CONCLUSION

A negative LEEP is not an uncommon finding, occurring in 14% (95% confidence interval 11-17%) of specimens at our institution. Negative LEEPs are more likely to contain histologic features that limit pathology interpretation. A negative LEEP is not a reassuring finding and was associated with a recurrence rate similar to those of a positive LEEP. Both negative and positive populations should be carefully followed.

Frozen section examination of the endocervical margin of cervical conization specimens

OBJECTIVE

We conducted this retrospective study to determine accuracy of frozen section examination of endocervical margin during cold knife conization.

METHODS

Between June 1993 and June 2001, 310 consecutive patients underwent cervical conization for squamous intraepithelial lesion or stage IA1 cervical cancer. Before 1997, the surgical specimens of 149 patients were processed following a standard pathological procedure (historical group). After 1997, a frozen section of the upper endocervical margin was processed during surgery for 161 patients. If the upper endocervical margin was involved with intraepithelial neoplasia, the surgeon performed a second resection if possible. Results of the frozen section examination were compared with the final diagnoses to determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The usefulness of this procedure was evaluated by comparison of positive margin status rate with the one of the historical control group.

RESULTS

For the diagnosis of intraepithelial neoplasia involving the endocervical margin, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of frozen section were 91%, 100%, 100%, and 98%, respectively. Eleven patients had definitive positive endocervical margin in the frozen section group (three false negatives, six patients without additional resection, and two patients with intraepithelial neoplasia involving the upper margin of the additional resection) and 17 patients in the historical group (P =.16).

CONCLUSION

Frozen section examination of the endocervical margin of cervical specimen obtained during cold knife conization is highly accurate. Its clinical relevance has to be demonstrated in a multicenter study.

2001 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

The study was undertaken to provide consensus guidelines for the management of women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) that can act as a precursor to invasive cervical cancer and represents one of the most common significant gynecologic diseases of women of reproductive age.

PARTICIPANTS

An independent panel of 121 experts in various aspects of the diagnosis and management of cervical cancer precursors, including representatives from 29 participating professional organizations, federal agencies, national and international health organizations, and others were invited by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP).

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Guidelines for the management of women with CIN were developed through a multistep process. Draft management guidelines were developed by working groups who performed formal literature reviews and obtained input from the professional community at large by way of an interactive internet-based bulletin board. At the ASCCP Consensus Conference, September 6 through 8, 2001, in Bethesda, Md, all guidelines were discussed, revised, and adopted by formal vote.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based guidelines have been developed for the management of women with biopsy-confirmed CIN.

2001 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To provide consensus guidelines for the management of women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), which can act as a precursor to invasive cervical cancer and represents one of the most common significant gynecologic diseases of women of reproductive age.

PARTICIPANTS

An independent panel of 121 experts in various aspects of the diagnosis and management of cervical cancer precursors, including representatives from 29 participating professional organizations, federal agencies, national and international health organizations, and others invited by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP).

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Guidelines for the management of women with CIN were developed through a multistep process. Working groups, who performed formal literature reviews and obtained input from the professional community at large by way of an interactive Internet-based bulletin board, developed draft management guidelines. At the ASCCP Consensus Conference, September 6-8, 2001, in Bethesda, Maryland, all guidelines were discussed, revised, and adopted by formal vote.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based guidelines have been developed for the management of women with biopsy-confirmed CIN.

Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term recurrence rates and complication of different techniques of cervical ablation.

METHODS

A randomized trial of three techniques of conization (cold knife, laser, and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP)) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in which 110 patients had been recruited.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were followed-up for more than 3 years. Of these 28 had been treated with the cold knife, 29 with LEEP and 29 by laser. Five recurrences were observed, one in the cold knife group, two in the LEEP group and two in the laser group (P=NS). The only observed complication was cervical stenosis: zero cases in the laser group, one case in the LEEP group and four cases in the cold knife group (laser versus cold knife: P=0.03; LEEP versus cold knife: P=0.06). Fifty pregnancies were observed in 39 patients. First and second trimester outcomes of pregnancy were without complications. One patient treated with the LEEP presented with a premature rupture of membranes and premature labor at 36 weeks. A total of nine cesarean sections were performed with two cases for cervical dystocia.

CONCLUSION

There is no major difference in obstetrical outcome between the three techniques.

Management of women with cervical cancer precursor lesions

An understanding of the natural history of HPV-induced precancer and cancer, and of the immune response to HPV and to these lesions, has significantly changed the management of lower genital tract neoplasia. New management guidelines incorporate this understanding, providing a more rational approach to diagnosis and treatment. Understanding that low-grade HPV-induced lesions are not true cervical cancer precursor has fostered expectant management of women with these lesions; however, management approaches are still hampered by the inability to better predict who is at risk for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer and who is not; this is particularly problematic in the expectant management of CIN 1. In addition, the decision whether or not to treat these low-grade lesions may depend on a number of complex factors that take into account the woman's preferences and reliability for follow-up, as well as a host of issues related to costs and the reliability of the original diagnosis and the tests used for follow-up. Management options for high-grade cervical cancer precursor lesions are much more definitive, because the option of expectant management is given except in pregnancy and for adolescents with CIN 2. New markers that better predict which women with high-risk HPV are at highest risk for subsequent development of a true cervical cancer precursor lesion appear to be on the horizon and may make the management of low-grade lesions as clear as present guide lines for their high-grade cousins. Until that time, understanding all the issues involved in expectant and in active management of cervical HPV-induced lesions will help provide women with the best care possible.

Disease persistence in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing electrosurgical conization

OBJECTIVE

Cone margin status has been reported to be the most important predictor of residual disease in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) undergoing electrosurgical excisional treatment. The primary aim of this study of patients treated with electrosurgical conization was to evaluate the association of cone margin status and other clinical and pathologic factors with the probability of residual disease.

METHODS

The study population comprised 699 patients with at least one follow-up visit within 12 months of conization. Residual disease was defined as a histology diagnosis of CIN within 3 years of conization. Multivariate associations were evaluated with multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Attendance to follow-up was 97% for the second visit and 34% for the third visit. Residual disease was detected in a total of 38 patients (5.4%). The detection rate was 3.3% at the first visit, 2.1% at the second visit, and 0.4% at the third visit. An increased probability of residual disease was associated with a referral Pap smear reported as high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma (odds ratio, 2.9; reference category, low-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia). A decreased probability was associated with a squamocolumnar junction entirely visible at the first follow-up visit (odds ratio, 0.2; reference category, squamocolumnar junction not visible). Patient age, time period, lesion size, lesion site, grade of CIN, cone width, cone depth, and margin status had no influence.

CONCLUSIONS

The determinants of residual disease in this study differed from those generally reported so far. Factors associated with effectiveness of electrosurgical treatment of CIN need further research.

Is high-risk human papillomavirus infection associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia eliminated after conization by large-loop excision of the transformation zone?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether high-risk HPV infection associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was successfully eliminated after electrosurgical conization by large-loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ).

STUDY DESIGN

142 women, who were admitted for conization of CIN 1-3 were recruited into a prospective follow-up study of HPV infection, including cervical sampling for HPV DNA before, and then 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. We examined whether there were any differences in the rate of HPV DNA positivity after LLETZ between specific risk groups, such as patients with primary (i.e. before surgical treatment) high-risk HPV infection, CIN of different grades, and positive margins.

RESULTS

We did not detect statistically significant differences between specific risk groups. According to the assay used (hybrid capture II) at the last follow-up visit 94% of primarily infected patients were completely free from infection with high-risk HPV types, while 6% had persisting HPV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

With a detection limit of 5000 genomes/ml HPV DNA the hybrid capture II results revealed, that after electrosurgical removal of CIN in 94% of patients testing positive for high-risk HPV DNA prior to surgery were negative 12 months post-surgery.

Laser use and research in gastroenterology, gynecology, and general surgery: a status report

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND DATA

Despite the burgeoning growth of laser applications in dermatology and plastic surgery, applications in other specialties have declined. Laser use in gastroenterology, general surgery, and gynecology was examined over the past 3 years. Future trends and opportunities are discussed.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was scanned for scholarly publications between January 1, 1997, and January 1, 2000, and the number of publications in these specialties was determined. A questionnaire was distributed to 362 general surgeons from the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery (ASLMS) to assess current use and future needs. These results were compared to the actual cases performed at a laser center over the same period.

RESULTS

Of 3,331 publications, 21 (0.6%) covered gastroenterology (GE), general surgery (GS), gynecology (GYN), or laparoscopy (LAP). Keyword citations were 2 GS, 3 GYN, 7 GE, and 12 LAP. Questionnaire results and actual utilization were well correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

Lasers are being used in these specialties despite slow development of novel uses. Opportunities exist for future applications.

Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the rates of recurrent dysplasia with longer follow-up durations and to determine whether margin status and other variables were associated with recurrence.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was performed for all women who underwent a loop electrosurgical excision procedure at Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, between January 1993 and December 1994. Extracted information included age, parity, indication for the loop electrosurgical excision procedure, histologic classification of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimen, margin status, and whether a "deep" (endocervical) pass had been performed. Follow-up data included findings of repeated cytologic examination, colposcopy, and biopsy if performed.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up for all women was 24 months. Margins were positive in 28%, with 73% of these being endocervical. The overall recurrent dysplasia rate was 31%, with a mean time to recurrence of 11.9 months. Participants with any positive margins had a higher recurrence rate than did those with negative margins (47% vs 26%; P = .009). High-grade lesions at the margin were more commonly associated with recurrence than were low-grade lesions relative to those with clear margins (high-grade lesion vs negative margins, 55% vs 26%; P = .003; low-grade lesion vs negative margins, 36% vs 26%; P = .34). Recurrence was not associated either with the performance of an endocervical pass or with the histologic diagnosis of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimen.

CONCLUSION

With comprehensive long-term follow-up, positive margins on loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimens were shown to be a risk factor for recurrence of cervical dysplasia, particularly when high-grade lesions were seen at the margin. Recurrence was also considerable among women with negative margins. Women should be counseled regarding this risk, and the importance of follow-up should be emphasized.

Margin status and excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review

Excisional biopsy of the cervix for diagnosis and treatment of cervical neoplasia is common. Management of patients with involved margins of resection is unresolved. Data concerning use of thermal techniques show that this technique yields equivalent results in most cases. Important exceptions are microinvasive squamous disease and adenocarcinoma. Conservative management of involved squamous margins is possible. Techniques for follow-up include cytology, colposcopy, and endocervical curettage. Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) should be treated with cold-knife conization. The standard of care for AIS is hysterectomy except in certain specific indications. Data concerning technique, follow-up, use of endocervical curettage, and the need for reexcision will be presented.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader will be able to compare the efficacy of the various excisional procedures in the treatment of cervical dysplasia, list the indications for additional surgery after positive margins on cervical excisions, and describe the proper management of a patient with adenocarcinoma in situ.

[Conization with positive margins: what strategy should be adopted?]

OBJECTIVE

To define recommended treatment in cases of positive margins on cone biopsy specimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study concerned 220 conizations performed between January 1996 and June 1998. The results of 70 conizations (31.8%) with positive margins were analysed. There were 32 cold knife conizations (mean age: 43 years) and 38 conizations by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (mean age: 33 years).

RESULTS

Mean depth of conization was 15.94 mm for cold knife conization and 10.08 mm for loop electrosurgical conization. Fifteen patients were excluded (5 with invasive cancer and 10 were lost to follow-up). This study included 55 patients with a mean 12-month follow-up. Six underwent hysterectomy for mini-invasion on the specimen or advanced age. Eleven underwent a second conization (followed by hysterectomy in 2 cases). The other 38 patients were submitted to simple surveillance with cervico-vaginal cytology and colposcopic examination. The rate of residual lesions (cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia: CIN 3) after conization with positive margin was 14.5% (n = 8).

CONCLUSION

Residual persistent dysplasia is not present in all patients after conization with positive margins. Cytology and colposcopy allow detection of dysplasia, indicating the need for a second conization. In women with no desire for further pregnancy, systematic repeat surgery must be recommended.

Thermal artefact after diathermy loop excision and laser excision cone biopsy

Whether or not thermal artefact precludes accurate histopathologic assessment of excision biopsies of the uterine cervix is currently controversial. Some authors state that margins cannot be assessed at all while others feel that the pathologist can 'see through' the artefact in the majority of cases. Over a 7-month period, 164 patients had loop excision and 84 patients had laser cone biopsy. The zone of coagulation at the specimen periphery was measured and the adequacy of excision assessed. The average width for this zone of coagulation in diathermy loop was 0.32 mm and for laser cone biopsies was 0.31 mm. In 12% of the loop specimens the line of excision was compromised by dysplasia or its assessment was rendered uncertain by thermal artefact. This was far more common in fragmented specimens (20%) compared to those removed as a single specimen (6%). In this study, 40% of patients had fragmented loop specimens. Thus, in attempting to replace cone biopsy with loop excision, we are asking pathologists to reassemble a pathologic jigsaw, then look through the thermal artefact for a decision on margins. We believe that this fragmentation should preclude the use of loop excision for lesions which would previously have been managed by cone biopsy.

A study of diagnostic failure of loop conization in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the specimen adequacy and the histological interpretation of loop conization for microinvasive cervical carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the histopathological findings of the original cone specimens together with the final hysterectomy specimens in patients with microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix. From 1990 to 1995, 63 consecutive patients with microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix were included in the study, of which 35 patients underwent loop conization and 28 underwent cold-knife conization. All patients had a hysterectomy.

RESULTS

The mean width, depth, and cone volume of the conization specimens were 2.44 cm, 2.15 cm, and 3.96 cm3, respectively, in the loop group versus 2.3 cm, 2.35 cm, and 4.38 cm3 in the cold-knife group. No significant differences were seen between the two groups. The application of loop conization was completed in a single slice in 27 patients (77.1%) and multiple slices by the loop in 8 (22.9%), in spite of the attempt to perform conization in a one-pass application when possible. In assessing these cone specimens microscopically, the rate of transection of tissue was significantly higher in the loop cone than in the cold-knife cone (17.1% versus 0%, P = 0.02). Because of transection of tissue and misorientation, pathologic determination of the depth and width of stromal invasion was undetermined in two loop cone specimens compared with none in the cold-knife cones.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that cold-knife conization is a preferred method in assessing microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix if multiple applications of loop conization are inevitable.

Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized, prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare the diagnostic ability and treatment efficacy of conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure with cold-knife conization.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred eighty women who required conization for diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia or microinvasive cervical carcinoma were prospectively enrolled in a randomized clinical trial to receive either cold-knife conization or conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Conization complications, rate of lesion clearance, and therapeutic outcome were assessed for the 2 study groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the complication rate (P = 1.00), the rate of lesion clearance (P =.18), or the rate of disease recurrence (P =.13) between the 2 study groups. The mean follow-up was 11.2 months in the cold-knife conization group and 10.4 months in the loop-excision conization group.

CONCLUSION

Cold-knife conization and loop-excision conization yield similar diagnostic and therapeutic results.

Bipolar electrosurgical loop excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of a bipolar electrosurgical loop excision instrument in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients underwent treatment for CIN using a 20 x 10-mm bipolar electrosurgical loop device (Valley Forge Scientific, Oaks, PA). A Malis (Valley Forge Scientific) electrosurgical generator unit (60 watts cutting) was used to remove the cervical lesion and transformation zone under colposcopic guidance. Specimens were evaluated for histopathological diagnosis, tissue depth, fragmentation of specimens, mean maximal thermal artifact, and mean maximal endocervical and ectocervical thermal artifact.

RESULTS

Final pathology from bipolar electrosurgical loop excision revealed CIN3 (8), CIN2 (4), CIN1 (11), human papillomavirus changes (3), and normal findings (2). Mean operating time was less than 15 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was less than 10 ml. Average number of tissue pieces was 1.6 (range, 1-4). No complications occurred. Mean maximal thermal artifact was 0.318 mm. Mean endocervical mucosal and ectocervical mucosal thermal artifacts were 0.177 mm and 0.176 mm, respectively. Mean tissue depth of the excised specimen was 0.40 cm. Histopathological diagnosis was possible on all specimens. In five specimens (17.9%), evaluation of the cauterized endocervical margin for CIN was not possible, owing to thermal artifact. No correlation was observed between tissue depth and thermal artifact.

CONCLUSION

Bipolar electrosurgical loop excision for the treatment of CIN is a safe and effective alternative to the traditional unipolar electrosurgical loop excision. Thermal artifact did not interfere with histopathological diagnosis, and the presence of artifact at cauterized margins was similar to that reported for historically unipolar specimens. A randomized control trial comparing therapeutic effectiveness of bipolar electrosurgical loop excision and unipolar electrosurgical loop excision is planned.

One-step management of cervical lesions

OBJECTIVE

To test the value of diagnosing and treating cervical lesions at the first colposcopic visit using large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) based on abnormal colposcopic findings as compared with punch biopsies followed by subsequent therapy accordingly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 1255 patients with a clinically suspicious cervix, 119 patients with abnormal and satisfactory colposcopy were divided into two groups. In group A (53 patients) multiple cervical punch biopsies were taken. In group B (66 patients), LLETZ under local paracervical anesthesia was done.

RESULTS

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was diagnosed in 25 and 29 cases, condyloma acuminatum in seven and six cases, granulomatous cervicitis including tuberculous and bilharzial cervicitis was diagnosed in two and four cases in groups A and B, respectively. Endocervical adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in two cases in group B whereas microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed in one case in each group. Histopathologic assessment of the specimens obtained in group B revealed minimal coagulation artifact, adequate biopsies and free margins in all but three cases (4.5%) who needed further treatment by hysterectomy. In group B, only one case was complicated by a second hemorrhage and the overtreatment rate was 30.3%. On follow-up visits 20 patients (38%) and 59 patients (89%) were satisfied with the procedure in both groups, respectively. Further treatment was required in 29 cases in group A (55%) after initial assessment of punch biopsies and in three cases in group B (4.5%). Persistent abnormal colposcopic findings at follow-up visits 3 months after diathermy coagulation were seen in five patients (9.4%) in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

LLETZ at the first colposcopic visit is a practical and fast method of treating most cervical lesions with limited complications and has the advantage of eliminating a second session of treatment. These advantages, particularly in developing countries, may outweigh the high overtreatment rate of this procedure. Many cervical lesions can be properly treated using large loop excision of the transformation zone at the first colposcopic visit. This may help save time and resources, especially in developing countries.

Postprocedural Pap Smears: a LEEP of faith?

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is gaining in popularity in the United States as an outpatient alternative to the diagnosis, and potentially the treatment, of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). LEEP is fast, simple, performed under local anesthesia, readily learned, and without significant morbidity. As cytopathologists and cytotechnologists, immediate cytologic evaluation of cervico-vaginal smears following LEEP is not the routine; however, there are very specific artifacts, most of which are related to the transfer of thermal energy, which result from the procedure. It is important to recognize these cytomorphologic features for accurate interpretation. The indications and contraindications for LEEP are similar to those for other ablative or excisional procedures. There appears to sacrifice in the efficacy of diagnosing and treating CIN by this method. Factors predictive of disease clearance are as confounding as they are for any other cone procedure. At the University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics (UIHC), immediate post-LEEP endocervical brush (PLEB) is often performed as a method of assessing the endocervical canal for residual disease or skip lesions. The most common cytomorphologic features observed are: "taffy-pulled" nuclei in elongated endocervical cells; cell aggregates with coalesced cytoplasm; hockey stick nuclei; notched and enlarged nuclei; and, smudgy chromatin. The difficulties or most frequent diagnostic dilemmas in interpreting these smears initially include abundant blood and smudgy chromatin, often tempting an interpretation of "unsatisfactory". However, careful study reveals that these changes are related to the nature of the procedure and reproducible. Recognition and familiarization of these features enables more accurate interpretation of PLEB cytology. The significance of abnormal PLEB, with regard to disease clearance, is still uncertain.