Paclitaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

HMGB1 enhances the migratory and invasive abilities of A2780/DDP cells by facilitating epithelial to mesenchymal transition via GSK‑3β

The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact and mechanism of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) on the regulation of cell migration and invasion in A2780/DDP cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells. After transfecting small interfering (si)RNA-HMGB1 into A2780/DDP cells, Transwell migration and invasion assays were conducted to assess alterations in the cell migratory and invasive abilities. Additionally, western blotting analyses were performed to examine changes in HMGB1, phosphorylated (p)-GSK-3β, GSK-3β, E-cadherin and vimentin expression levels. The results of the present study demonstrated that the migratory and invasive abilities of A2780/DDP cells were significantly higher compared with those of A2780 cells. Additionally, the expression levels of HMGB1, p-GSK-3β and the mesenchymal phenotype marker, vimentin, in A2780/DDP cells were significantly elevated relative to the levels in A2780 cells. Conversely, the expression level of the epithelial phenotype marker, E-cadherin, was markedly decreased compared with that in A2780 cells. Following transfection of A2780/DDP cells with siRNA-HMGB1, there was a significant reduction in the rate of cell migration and invasion. Simultaneously, the expression levels of HMGB1, p-GSK-3β and vimentin were downregulated while the level of E-cadherin was upregulated. It was therefore concluded that the high expression of HMGB1 in A2780/DDP cells enhanced the cell migration and invasion abilities by facilitating epithelial to mesenchymal transition via GSK-3β.

Chemoresistance in Ovarian Cancer: Prospects for New Drugs

This review focuses on the conventional treatment, signaling pathways and various reasons for drug resistance with an understanding of novel methods that can lead to effective therapies. Ovarian cancer is amongst the most common gynecological and lethal cancers in women affecting different age groups (20-60). The survival rate is limited to 5 years due to diagnosis in subsequent stages with a reoccurrence of tumor and resistance to chemotherapeutic therapy. The recent clinical trials use the combinatorial treatment of carboplatin and paclitaxel on ovarian cancer after the cytoreduction of the tumor. Predominantly, patients are responsive initially to therapy and later develop metastases due to drug resistance. Chemotherapy also leads to drug resistance causing enormous variations at the cellular level. Multifaceted mechanisms like drug resistance are associated with a number of genes and signaling pathways that process the proliferation of cells. Reasons for resistance include epithelial-mesenchyme, DNA repair activation, autophagy, drug efflux, pathway activation, and so on. Determining the routes on the molecular mechanism that target chemoresistance pathways are necessary for controlling the treatment and understanding efficient drug targets can open light on improving therapeutic outcomes. The most common drug used for ovarian cancer is Cisplatin that activates various chemoresistance pathways, ultimately causing drug resistance. There have been substantial improvements in understanding the mechanisms of cisplatin resistance or chemo sensitizing cisplatin for effective treatment. Therefore, using therapies that involve a combination of phytochemical or novel drug delivery system would be a novel treatment for cancer. Phytochemicals are plant-derived compounds that exhibit anti-cancer, anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory properties and reduce side effects exerted by chemotherapeutics.

ST3Gal3 confers paclitaxel‑mediated chemoresistance in ovarian cancer cells by attenuating caspase‑8/3 signaling

The aberrant expression of sialyltransferase has a role in cell differentiation, neoplastic transformation and the progression of various types of cancer. Our previous studies have shown that high expression of β-galactoside-α2,3-sialyltransferase III (ST3Gal3) in the metastatic ovarian cancer cell line HO8910PM attenuated cisplatin-induced apoptosis. The present study demonstrated that paclitaxel-induced chemoresistance in ovarian cancer cells upregulated the expression of ST3Gal3 and reduced the activity of caspase-8/3. The results of the present study revealed that the endogenous levels of ST3Gal3 mRNA and protein were significantly higher in HO8910PM cells compared with SKOV3 cells. A higher expression of ST3Gal3 was correlated with an increased resistance to paclitaxel, while the downregulation of ST3Gal3 resulted in paclitaxel-induced apoptosis. Paclitaxel upregulated ST3Gal3 expression at the mRNA and protein levels in HO8910PM cells, but not in SKOV3 cells. Silencing of ST3Gal3 by small interfering RNA reversed these effects and increased the protein levels of caspase-8/3, which may contribute to paclitaxel-induced apoptosis. The results of the present study suggested that ST3Gal3 was a target for paclitaxel-related resistance during ovarian cancer chemotherapy.

The plant extract of Pao pereira potentiates carboplatin effects against ovarian cancer

CONTEXT

Herbal preparation of Pao pereira [Geissospermum vellosii Allem (Apocynaceae)] has long been used by oncologic patients and Integrative Medicine practitioners in South America. However, its anticancer activities have not been systematically studied.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the anticancer effects of β-carboline alkaloids-enriched extract from Pao pereira (Pao), either alone or in combination with carboplatin, in preclinical ovarian cancer models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cytotoxicity of Pao (0-800 µg/ml) against different ovarian cancer cell lines and an immortalized epithelial cell line was detected by flow cytometry, MTT assay and colony formation in soft agar. Combination of Pao and carboplatin, a primary chemotherapeutic drug for ovarian cancer, was evaluated using Chou-Talalay's methods. Mice bearing intraperitoneally spread ovarian cancer were treated with 20 or 50 mg/kg/day Pao by i.p. injection. Carboplatin at 15 mg/kg/week i.p. was compared and combined to Pao treatments.

RESULTS

Pao selectively inhibited ovarian cancer cell growth with IC₅₀ values of 180-235 µg/ml, compared to 537 µg/ml in normal cells. Pao induced apoptosis dose- and time-dependently and completely inhibited colony formation of tumor cells in soft agar at 400 µg/ml. Pao greatly enhanced carboplatin cytotoxicity, with dose reduction (DRIs) for carboplatin at 1.2-10 fold. In vivo, Pao alone suppressed tumor growth by 79% and decreased volume of ascites by 55%. When Pao was combined with carboplatin, tumor inhibition reached 97% and ascites was completely eradicated.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Pao possess potent antitumor activity and could enhance carboplatin effect, and therefore holds therapeutic potential in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Docetaxel and oxaliplatin in the second-line treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

A prospective phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination docetaxel (Taxotere) (DTX) and oxaliplatin (OXA) in ovarian cancer patients recurring after a platinum-free interval (PFI) >12 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

DTX, 75 mg/m(2), was administered by 60 min i.v. infusion, followed by OXA, 100 mg/m(2), given by a 2 h i.v., on day 1 every 21 days.

RESULTS

From October 2003 to June 2006, 43 ovarian cancer patients were enrolled. Median PFI was 26 months. All patients were available for response evaluation: 17 complete responses and 12 partial responses were registered, for an overall response rate of 67.4%. The median response duration was 10 months. Stable disease was documented in 11 patients (median duration = 5.5 months). The median time to progression and overall survival were 14 and 28 months. A total of 259 courses were administered. Grade 3-4 leukopenia was documented in 32.5% of the patients, while no case of severe anemia and thrombocytopenia was observed. Grade 3-4 neurotoxicity and grade 2 alopecia were observed in 9.3% and 34.9% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DTX/OXA combination is an active regimen with a favorable toxicity profile, for treatment of recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients.

A phase I study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in relapsed ovarian cancer

This phase I study sought to determine the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of giving carboplatin every 3 weeks and paclitaxel weekly in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Eligible patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer and prior treatment with platinum- and paclitaxel-based therapy were treated with an escalating regimen of carboplatin (day 1) at an area under the curve (AUC) of 4–6 and 1-h infusions of paclitaxel (days 1, 8, and 15) at 50–80 mg/m2 cycled at 3-week intervals. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first day of cycles 1 and 2. All patients had a platinum-free interval of greater than 6 months from the most recent platinum treatment. A total of 77 cycles were administered to 16 patients, with a similar median number of cycles per patient at each dose level varying from 4.6 to 5.3. Febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities at dose levels 3 and 4 after the third cycle, with no mucositis, nausea, vomiting, or peripheral neuropathy observed greater than grade 2. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin was an AUC of 5 and 80 mg/m2 for paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a marginal statistical difference with regard to reduced systemic paclitaxel concentration after cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P= 0.06). Of nine patients evaluable for a radiographic response, the response rate was 66.6% with a complete response of 33.3%. All five patients with nonmeasurable disease achieved a biochemical response. The combination of carboplatin given every 3 weeks at an AUC of 5 and 1-h weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2 is a feasible and reasonably well-tolerated regimen and may have significant antitumor activity in relapsed ovarian cancer patients.

Paclitaxel and Carboplatin as Second-Line Therapy in Women With Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Carcinoma Treated With Platinum and Paclitaxel as First-Line Therapy

The study was performed to assess response rate, progression-free interval (PFI), and side effects of the combination paclitaxel and carboplatin as second-line therapy among women with platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Thirty women who achieved partial surgical response at second-look surgery (n = 8) or who had recurrence (n = 22) more than 6 months after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 for 3 hours) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve 5) every 3 weeks. Response rate, PFI, and side effects of treatment were recorded. One hundred sixty-seven cycles of treatment (median = 6, range = 2-11) were administered. Among 22 patients with measurable or assessable disease, 14 had complete response and 3 had partial response. Five patients had progressive disease. The overall response rate was 77%. The median PFI was 10 months (range = 1-29). Among 22 patients in whom recurrence or progression developed after second-line therapy, the median interval was 9 months (range = 1-26). The incidence of grade III or IV neutropenia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia was 48%, 27%, and 3%, respectively. One patient discontinued treatment secondary to persistent thrombocytopenia. Eight patients died secondary to their disease. It was concluded that the combination paclitaxel and carboplatin has a high success rate, long duration of response, and is well tolerated as a second-line therapy among patients with platinum-sensitive EOC.

Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis of women treated with single-agent carboplatin originally treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel

OBJECTIVE

There is no standard treatment for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). As there are no curative options, many oncologists choose to treat women who recur with carboplatin, particularly if they are deemed to have platinum-sensitive disease. However, particularly in the era of platinum-taxane treatment as primary therapy, the utility of this treatment has not been established, nor is it clear whether the results of single-agent treatment are equivalent to that of combination therapy. We sought to determine the outcomes for patients with platinum-sensitive EOC who were treated with carboplatin-taxane therapy and received single-agent carboplatin (C) as second chemotherapy. In addition, we sought to compare these results to the outcomes in women who received carboplatin and paclitaxel (C + T) at first relapse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 24 patients using our electronic institutional database with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of ovarian cancer that had a complete response to platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy, relapsed greater than 6 months after treatment, and received single-agent carboplatin as second-line chemotherapy. We performed a subsequent comparison between a subgroup of this cohort and one that met the same inclusion criteria but received C + T at relapse between January 1998 and December 2000.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were evaluable for response, and all were available for analysis of survival end points. For evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 39% (complete, 11%; partial, 28%). Twenty-two percent had stable disease. Six (25%) patients experienced a hypersensitivity reaction, including 1 who required hospitalization. The median overall survival was 22 months. The 2-year overall survival rate was 49%. Stratification by treatment-free interval (TFI) showed a 25% for a TFI between 6 and 12 months and 43% for a TFI > 12 months. When a subgroup of these women (18/24) was compared to a cohort that received C + T (29), the combination was associated with a higher complete and overall response rate, 7 and 36% for C versus 45 and 71% for C + T (P = 0.02). The overall survival in women who received C was 26 months versus 42 months in the women who received C + T (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin as a single agent is effective therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer in women who recur following treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel, and the treatment-free interval predicts response to single-agent carboplatin. However, our secondary analysis suggests that carboplatin and paclitaxel may produce a higher response rate and a survival benefit compared to C alone. This supports the conclusions of ICON4, which recently reported both overall and progression-free survival benefits with C + T over C in women with platinum-sensitive recurrent disease.

A phase I study of weekly topotecan and Paclitaxel in previously treated epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients

OBJECTIVE

We have previously reported on the feasibility of weekly topotecan as single-agent therapy in previously treated patients with ovarian cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly bolus intravenous (IV) topotecan combined with weekly paclitaxel in a comparable patient population.

METHODS

Previously treated ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease and/or elevated cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) received (as second-line or third-line therapy) weekly 30-min bolus IV topotecan starting at 2 mg/m(2) combined with weekly paclitaxel starting at a dose of 60 mg/m(2). In this intrapatient dose-escalation study, topotecan and paclitaxel were escalated in parallel until the MTD was reached, defined as the first dose level at which >or= 2 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of 26 patients were evaluable for toxicity and received a total of 306 weeks of therapy (median, 13 weeks; range, 5 to 33 weeks). No significant dose-limiting toxicity was observed up to a weekly bolus IV topotecan dose of 3 mg/m(2) and a concurrent paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/m(2). The MTD was topotecan 3.5 mg/m(2) plus 90 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. The dose-limiting toxicities included anemia and fatigue, with 10 of 21 patients receiving epoetin alfa for grade 3 or 4 anemia; only 1 patient required a blood transfusion. Two patients had a treatment delay of at least 1 week and only 1 patient required a dose reduction to maintain the weekly schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this study, the recommended initial dose for this novel regimen is topotecan 3 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2). Further investigation of the efficacy of weekly topotecan plus paclitaxel in less heavily pretreated patients is warranted.

Retrospective analysis of carboplatin and paclitaxel as initial second-line therapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: application toward a dynamic disease state model of ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

The majority of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who achieve a complete remission with front-line chemotherapy develop recurrent disease. Carboplatin and paclitaxel are used for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent disease, although there is little information regarding the response and survival in unselected patients treated with this strategy. We sought to determine the outcomes for patients with EOC treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel at the time of first recurrence. In addition, we sought to define a new paradigm for disease transition in patients with EOC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-nine patients were identified who had a complete response to front-line platinum-based chemotherapy for EOC, relapsed 6 months after completion of front-line chemotherapy, and were treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel as second-line therapy.

RESULTS

Eighty-four cases were available for analysis of survival end points, and 66 were assessable for response. The median follow-up was 27 months. The overall response rate was 70%. The median progression-free interval for the cohort was 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.7 to 13.8 months). The 3-year survival rate was 72% (95% CI, 59.4 to 86.1%). Toxicity was limited, and no deaths from treatment were observed. Using this data, it is possible to construct a disease states model of EOC, which provides risk estimates for transitions between clinically distinct categories.

CONCLUSION

Re-treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel is effective as initial therapy in recurrent EOC. This should form the basis of a randomized trial to determine the best agents for initial treatment of relapse from EOC in potentially platinum-sensitive patients.

Results of reinduction therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the treatment results and toxicity of a retreatment regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with ovarian cancer relapse.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 241 consecutive patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer receiving paclitaxel and a platinum analogue as first-line treatment was performed. Relapse treatment of platinum-sensitive patients consisted of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) over 3 h followed by carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 5, repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with relapse were treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin after a median progression-free interval from the end of first-line chemotherapy of 15.8 months (range 6.0-41.7 months). In patients with evaluable disease the overall response rate was 84% (95% CI: 68.0-93.8%). The progression-free survival and overall survival from start of relapse treatment were a median of 9.7 months (range 1.4-26.9 months) and 13.1 months (range 4.5-35.5 months), respectively. In a multivariate Cox analysis independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival after first relapse were response to relapse treatment (P = 0.002, hazard ratio = 13.9) and time to first recurrence (P = 0.016, hazard ratio = 0.167). The planned treatment was accomplished by 67% of patients. Grade 4 neutrocytopenia over 1 week was observed in 9.3% of patients. Grade 1-2 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 30% of patients. Only 1 patient had her paclitaxel dose attenuated because of grade 4 neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

Retreatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer relapse yielded a high response rate and encouraging progression-free survival and overall survival. Paclitaxel-carboplatin reinduction therapy is generally well tolerated and the toxicity is manageable.

Second-line carboplatin and gemcitabine in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer--a dose-finding study by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Ovarian Cancer Study Group

BACKGROUND

Despite the progress that has been achieved in the last years, recurrence rates in ovarian cancer patients are still considerably high and the majority of patients ultimately become candidates for second-line treatment. Carboplatin reinduction is a broadly adopted regimen in patients with recurrences occurring six months or later after first-line treatment. Gemcitabine is among the candidates as combination partner in second-line regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a study with escalating doses of gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in 26 platinum-pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and a treatment-free interval of 6+ months. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and a maximum tolerable dose (MTD) recommendable for further trials was evaluated.

RESULTS

The DLT was myelosuppression, mainly thrombocytopenia. No dose limiting non-hematological toxicities were observed. The MTD of gemcitabine was 1,000 mg/m2 given on days 1 + 8 of a three-week schedule combined with carboplatin AUC 4 given on day 1. The majority of evaluable patients showed an objective response (62.5%), and median progression-free and overall survival were 10 and 18+ months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine-carboplatin given according to the MTD is well tolerated and active against recurrent platinum-sensitive disease. A randomized trial comparing carboplatin with or without gemcitabine in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer has already been initiated.

Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women

A substantial proportion of all women dying from gynaecological malignancies are aged >75 years. Many reports have indicated that the survival of these patients is decreased compared with younger patients. Differences in biological behaviour, stage of the disease at presentation, and reluctance to undergo aggressive treatment with its associated morbidity are among the factors thought to be responsible for this difference in outcomes. However, investigations also indicate that elderly patients may receive less surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment without obvious clinical rationale. This overview is aimed at providing a guideline of chemotherapy appropriate for patients with epithelial ovarian, uterine (corpus and cervix), and vulvar cancer, aged 70 to 75 years and over. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of drug treatment in patients with ovarian cancer. Patients aged between 70 and 75 years with a good performance status can be treated with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Carboplatin, either in combination or as a single-agent, may offer advantages in patients aged >75 years and in those with a poor performance status. For patients with early recurrence there is no standard treatment, but several cytostatic and hormonal agents can be used with palliative intent. Patients with a late recurrence are probably best retreated with a platinum-based regimen. In metastatic endometrial cancer, hormonal therapy is the first choice in tumours expressing a progesterone receptor. Poorly differentiated tumours infrequently respond to endocrine therapy. In this situation, and for patients with tumours that have become resistant to hormonal manipulation, platinum-based chemotherapy may be used. The use of carboplatin-based regimens seems preferable in elderly patients, particularly in those with a decreased performance status. The usefulness of chemotherapy in elderly patients with cervical cancer is limited. In case of recurrent or metastatic disease, the use of single agent (low-dose) cisplatin should be balanced against best supportive care. Although overall chemoradiation seems superior than radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, the feasibility of this approach in elderly patients needs further investigation. Chemoradiation might also be considered in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer. However, treatment-related morbidity can be considerable and randomised studies are lacking to prove a survival benefit. Our understanding of the tolerance and effectiveness of chemotherapy in elderly patients is still incomplete due to a paucity of trials that specifically focus on this subset of patients. However, there appears no argument to withhold chemotherapy based purely on age.

Recurrent ovarian carcinoma: is there a place for surgery?

The role of cytoreductive surgery is well established in patients with primary ovarian carcinoma. Minimal residual disease translates to improved response to adjuvant treatment and prolonged survival. For close clinical follow-up, different approaches may be helpful in detecting recurrent disease, including regular physical/pelvic examination, serial CA-125 levels, and imaging studies using computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or positron emission testing. At recurrence, those patients with a good performance status, a good response to primary therapy, and a macronodular tumor distribution pattern may be candidates for a secondary cytoreductive procedure. Data suggests that secondary cytoreduction is superior to chemotherapy alone in patients who have a significant disease-free interval (6 to 12 months). Survival after secondary cytoreduction is optimized with cytoreduction to microscopic disease, yet there is a recognized risk of surgical morbidity. Therefore, a strong relationship between the gynecologic oncology surgeon and the patient is key to obtaining appropriate informed consent and relaying appropriate outcome expectations.

Chemotherapy in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): an analysis of prognostic factors

OBJECTIVE

Prognosis of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is generally poor. Cisplatin is the most effective drug. We used three cisplatin based chemotherapeutic (CT) regimens and retrospectively analyzed the data to determine the response rate, toxicity, survival and the impact of various prognostic factors on the outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August, 1989 and September, 1997, 102 patients were diagnosed to have recurrent EOC. Sixty-five of 102 patients received CT every 3 weeks using cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 plus cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 (CP, Group A, n = 29), cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, plus adriamycin 40 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and cyclophosphamide (CAP, Group B, n = 22) and paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 (TP, Group C, n = 14). Twelve patients received single agent CT and were not analyzed. Remaining 25 patients refused CT treatment and were followed for survival.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (complete and partial) was 59.2% for patients receiving CP (Group A), 45% for CAP (Group B) and 76.9% for those receiving TP (Group C), p = ns. Response rate was significantly higher for patients with platinum sensitive disease compared to those with platinum resistant disease; 55.76 vs 39%, p < 0.007. CT was generally tolerated well; 2 patients died of CT toxicity, one each in Group A (CP) and C (TP), respectively. The median survival from the date of relapse for patients receiving chemotherapy was 15 months compared to 4 months for those who did not receive chemotherapy, p < 0.001. Chemotherapy responders had a significantly higher median survival than chemotherapy non-responders, 24 months vs 10 months, p < 0.01. The median overall survival was not significantly different in the 3 groups; Group A--15 months, Group B--12 months and 15 months in Group C, p = 0.738. On univariate analysis--time since last CT (< 6 months vs > 6 months, p < 0.037, response to previous CT, p < 0.0183, cisplatinum sensitivity vs resistance, p < 0.032, number of sites (< 2 vs > 2) of recurrence, p < 0.004 and response to salvage CT, p < 0.01 were associated with survival benefit. On multivariate analysis, 2 factors--platinum sensitivity and response to salvage CT attained significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the benefit of platinum based chemotherapy in recurrent EOC. Patients with platinum sensitive disease, and those responding to salvage chemotherapy benefit most.

Paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy in recurrent or advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study

PURPOSE

On the basis of the activity of paclitaxel as a single agent in chemotherapy-naive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix in a prior Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trial, a phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy was conducted by the GOG.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility included squamous cell cancer of the cervix not curable by surgery or radiation, measurable disease, WBC count > or = 3,000/microL, platelet count > or = 100, 000/microL, serum creatinine > or = 2 mg/100 mL, and adequate hepatic function. The starting dose was paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) infused over 24 hours followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days. On the basis of toxicity, a dose escalation of paclitaxel to a maximum dose of 170 mg/m(2)/d was prescribed.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were enrolled onto this study; 44 patients were assessable for toxicity and 41 for response. Forty (90.9%) had received prior radiation therapy. A median of six courses of chemotherapy was given (range, one to 10 courses). Neutropenia grade 3 (15.9%) and 4 (61.4%) was the most frequent severe adverse effect and was associated with fever in 13 patients (27.7%). Two patients (4.5%) died from neutropenic sepsis. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 6.8% of patients. Of 41 assessable patients, five (12.2%) had complete responses and 14 (34.1%) had partial responses for an overall response rate of 46.3% (95% confidence interval, 30.7% to 62.6%). The median progression-free interval, was 5.4+ months (range, 0.3 to 22+ months) with a median survival of 10.0+ months (range, 0.9 to 22. 2 months). Response was more frequent in patients with disease in nonirradiated sites (70% v 23%, P =.008).

CONCLUSION

This regimen seems highly active in advanced and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and is currently being evaluated by the GOG in a phase III randomized study comparing the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with cisplatin alone.

Long-term results from a phase II study of single agent paclitaxel (Taxol) in previously platinum treated patients with advanced ovarian cancer: the Nordic experience

BACKGROUND

Owing to the wide spread perception of a possible benefit from paclitaxel in the second-line situation the Nordic Gynecologic Oncology Group (NGOG) conducted two prospective phase II studies of paclitaxel single agent treatment (175 mg/m2, three-hour i.v. infusion with standard pre-medication every third week) in patients with relapsing or progressing epithelial ovarian cancer following platinum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1992-1994 138 patients in total were enrolled of whom 136 received paclitaxel and were included in the toxicity and survival analysis, while 112 were evaluable for response.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 28% with 16 patients achieving a CR (14%). The estimated median (range) time to progression was 4.1 (0.7-60.7) months. The projected four-year overall survival was 7%, with a median (range) of 9.6 (0.3-60.7) months. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that platinum resistance, and WHO performance status at baseline, independently correlated with survival at all three time points (median survival time 9.6, 18, and 24 months). Patients with platinum sensitive tumors and WHO performance status 0 had a median survival of 25.6 months compared to 7.0 months for the rest of the patients (P < or = 0.0001). No serious toxicity was registered.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel could safely be administered in an outpatient setting using this schedule. Patients with platinum sensitive tumors and a good performance status were most likely to survive. However, these patients are also most likely to respond to re-treatment with a platinum compound. With reference to the reasonably good tumor control and limited toxicity observed in this study, we conclude that paclitaxel single agent therapy is a viable option in the salvage situation, which in some patients can give long-lasting responses. However, although responses can be induced in a significant number of patients, the survival figures remain poor.

Paclitaxel is preferentially cytotoxic to human cervical tumor cells with low Raf-1 kinase activity: implications for paclitaxel-based chemoradiation regimens

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Low Raf- kinase activity has been reported to be associated with radioresistance in epithelial tumor cell lines and with paclitaxel sensitivity in cervical tumor cells. Paclitaxel might thus be effective in eliminating radioresistant clones from cervical tumors, even in the absence of synergistic interaction between these therapeutic modalities. We thus established the relationship between Raf-1 kinase activity and radiosensitivity in human cervical tumor cells and determined if paclitaxel is preferentially cytotoxic to radio-resistant tumor clones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We established and contrasted the radiation and paclitaxel sensitivity of 12 human cervical tumor clones that exhibited a wide range of Raf-1 kinase activity.

RESULTS

Raf-1 kinase activity was inversely correlated (P = 0.001) with SF2 values in the 12 cervical tumor clones studied. Paclitaxel was preferentially cytotoxic to radioresistant tumor clones, with the level of paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity being significantly (P = 0.0016) influenced by Raf-1 kinase activity levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our in vitro data indicate that there are marked, but completely opposite, Raf-1 kinase dependencies of radiation and paclitaxel cytotoxicity in cervical tumor cells. The use of combined paclitaxel and radiotherapy treatment may thus lead to higher local control rates for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Circumstantially, our data suggest that the greatest therapeutic gains might accrue if paclitaxel was administered when there is the greatest proportion of tumor clones with low Raf-1 kinase activity. It may thus be desirable to use paclitaxel towards the end of radiotherapy treatment or post-radiotherapy as consolidation therapy.

Paclitaxel. An update of its use in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and ovarian and other gynaecological cancers

The antitumour agent paclitaxel has proved to be effective for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast or ovarian cancer, and limited data also indicate its clinical potential in patients with cervical or endometrial cancer. The regimen of paclitaxel administration has varied in clinical trials, the most common including a dosage of between 135 and 250 mg/m2 administered over an infusion period of 3 or 24 hours once every 3 weeks. Promising results have been achieved in phase I/II trials of a weekly regimen of paclitaxel (60 to 175 mg/m2). The objective response rate in patients with metastatic breast cancer (either pretreated or chemotherapy-naive) is generally between 20 and 35% with paclitaxel monotherapy, which compares well with that of other current treatment options including the anthracycline doxorubicin. Combination therapy with paclitaxel plus doxorubicin appears superior to treatment with either agent alone in terms of objective response rate and median duration of response. However, whether combination therapy also provides a survival advantage remains unclear; recent results of a phase III study indicate that it does not. Paclitaxel is also a useful second-line option in some patients with anthracycline-resistant disease. Combination therapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin has proved highly effective as first-line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, showing superior efficacy to cyclophosphamide/cisplatin in terms of progression-free survival time and median duration of survival. Combination therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin has also shown promising results. Paclitaxel monotherapy is a useful second-line option for patients with platinum-refractory metastatic ovarian cancer (objective response rates have ranged from 15 to 48%). The major dose-limiting adverse events associated with paclitaxel include myelotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy. Paclitaxel has acceptable tolerability in most patients, although adverse events are common.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel generally appears to be as effective as other antineoplastic agents used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, including doxorubicin. Importantly, it is a useful second-line option for some patients with anthracycline-resistant disease. Combination therapy with both paclitaxel and doxorubicin is a highly effective first-line option for metastatic breast cancer; however, recent results indicate no survival advantage versus monotherapy. Paclitaxel is a valuable agent for second-line treatment of patients with platinum-refractory metastatic ovarian cancer and, when combined with cisplatin or carboplatin, is recommended as first-line therapy for this disease.

Progress in ovarian cancer

The management of advanced ovarian cancer relies on appropriate surgical cytoreduction in conjunction with appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy. In the past year several studies have continued to support aggressive cytoreduction at the initial operation, including for stage IV disease, as well as in a second-look setting. Ongoing research has identified several agents active in ovarian cancer, yet the optimal first-line regimen has yet to be developed.