Phase II trial of pyrazoloacridine in patients with persistent or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

Indazole as a Privileged Scaffold: The Derivatives and their Therapeutic Applications

BACKGROUND

Heterocyclic compounds, also called heterocycles, are a major class of organic chemical compound that plays a vital role in the metabolism of all living cells. The heterocyclic compound, indazole, has attracted more attention in recent years and is widely present in numerous commercially available drugs. Indazole-containing derivatives, representing one of the most important heterocycles in drug molecules, are endowed with a broad range of biological properties.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science regarding articles related to indazole and its therapeutic application.

RESULTS

The mechanism and structure-activity relationship of indazole and its derivatives were described. Based on their versatile biological activities, the compounds were divided into six groups: anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anti-HIV, antiarrhythmic, antifungal and antitumour. At least 43 indazole-based therapeutic agents were found to be used in clinical application or clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

This review is a guide for pharmacologists who are in search of valid preclinical/clinical drug compounds where the progress of approved marketed drugs containing indazole scaffold is examined from 1966 to the present day. Future direction involves more diverse bioactive moieties with indazole scaffold and greater insights into its mechanism.

Recent advances in endometrial cancer: a review of key clinical trials from 2015 to 2019

In the past few years, we have seen several important advances in understanding of and therapy for endometrial cancer. This review highlights key recent abstracts and publications in endometrial cancer from 2015 to 2019. We focus on clinical trials in surgical staging and the utility of sentinel lymph node mapping, adjuvant treatment for high-risk disease and HER2/neu-positive serous tumors, combination therapy for recurrent disease, molecular biology, and immunotherapy.

A phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and correlation with biomarker analysis

OBJECTIVE

Chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer requires further development. Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) suppresses tumor growth in several endometrial cancer strains. The present study evaluated the anti-tumor activity and toxicity of CPT-11 in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Enrolled patients had advanced endometrial cancer with measurable lesions and received 2 pretreatment regimens. A 90-minute intravenous infusion of CPT-11 (100 mg/m²) was given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle, aiming for an effect with ≤2 cycles. Treatment was continued until the primary disease worsened or severe toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was response rate, and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. Antitumor effect and adverse events were evaluated according to RECIST version 1.1 and NCI-CTC AE version 3.0, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were registered (11 endometrioid carcinomas and 11 serous carcinomas). The median duration of the treatment-free interval (TFI) was 7.5 months, and the median number of administered cycles per patient was 4. Response rate was 36.4% (complete response: 1 patient, partial response: 7 patients). Clinical benefit rate, including stable disease, was 77.3%. Median progression-free and overall survival was 4.4 and 18.4 months, respectively. Observed adverse events included grade 4 hematotoxicity (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia), and grade 2 or 3 non-hematotoxicity (diarrhea). All adverse events were manageable. Biomarker predictors of therapeutic effectiveness were not observed.

CONCLUSION

As a single agent, CPT-11 has anti-tumor activity for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and has manageable adverse events.

Management Strategies for Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the developed world, and its incidence is increasing. Mortality from this cancer has not improved in recent decades and is primarily driven by high-grade carcinomas that are more likely to present at an advanced stage and ultimately are more likely to recur. The prognosis for recurrent endometrial cancer is poor, especially for the 50% of these women that present with extrapelvic disease recurrence. As a standard of care, recurrent disease has been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy; however, new therapies are emerging as we identify drivers of proliferation and metastasis at the cellular and molecular levels. Areas Covered: We review currently available data for the management of recurrent endometrial cancer, with a focus on systemic treatment of recurrent disease. We discuss the available evidence for first-line, second-line, and subsequent systemic therapy and discuss emerging therapeutic targets including their biologic plausibility and early clinical data. Expert Commentary: Endometrial cancer, though prevalent, remains underfunded and understudied. Recurrent and metastatic disease remains difficult to treat, and prospective randomized data are limited. Our ability to reduce mortality due to this cancer is dependent on identifying new and effective therapeutic strategies for recurrent disease.

Endometrial cancer: Molecular markers and management of advanced stage disease

Endometrial cancer is the most prevalent gynecologic cancer in the United States. Over the last 10 years, death rates from endometrial cancer have been rising about 1.4% per year. Traditionally endometrial cancer treatment has been driven by stage and histology. Recent studies have, however, shown that cancers of the same stage and histology have very distinct molecular and genomic profiles. Translational research is progressing rapidly and endometrial cancer-specific precision medicine is evolving. The first tissue agnostic therapy based on the molecular profile of the tumor was approved by the FDA this year. The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1), for all solid tumors with defective DNA mismatch repair, could benefit 20-30% of patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Other genomic changes and molecular markers in endometrial cancer, such as hormone receptor status, could lead to more tailored therapy in the future. Pre-clinical and clinical investigations of targeted therapies suggest efficacy for some agents. Single agent targeted therapies, however, have modest activity. Identifying biomarkers that effectively determine response to targeted therapy remains a challenge. The next generation of clinical trials will focus on novel combinations and how to best utilize the advances that have been made in sequencing technology and bioinformatics. Although there is currently an immense body of data and many options for obtaining genomic characteristics of endometrial cancer, how to interpret and utilize this data is still being explored. This review will summarize the important trials that have led to the treatment options we have for advanced and/or recurrent endometrial cancer and discuss the important studies that have led to a better understanding of the distinctive molecular and genomic profiles within endometrial cancer. We will review the current status of biomarker-driven targeted therapy in endometrial cancer and the rationale behind ongoing clinical trials that are utilizing novel targeted agents.

Efficacy of combination chemotherapy using irinotecan and nedaplatin for patients with recurrent and refractory endometrial carcinomas: preliminary analysis and literature review

PURPOSE

We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of an irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT) and nedaplatin (N) combination therapy for recurrent and refractory endometrial carcinoma, administered based on UGT1A1 genotype.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2017, 21 patients who received CPT-N therapy for recurrent endometrial carcinoma as second- or third-line chemotherapy at our hospital were identified. The CPT-N regimen included 40-70 mg/m² of CPT-11 on days 1, 8, and 15, and 50 mg/m² of nedaplatin on day 1, q4 weeks.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 63 years. The number of prior chemotherapeutic regimens ranged from 1 to 2. Two patients had prior pelvic irradiation. The response rate [ratio of complete remission (CR) to partial remission (PR)] of CPT-N therapy was 3 of 21 (14.3%), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) [the combined percentages of CR, PR, and stable disease (SD)] was 9 of 21 (42.8%). Toxicities included grade 3 neutropenia [4 (19.0%) cases], grade 3 febrile neutropenia [2 (9.5%) cases], and grade 3 diarrhea [3 (14.3%) cases]; all resolved with conservative treatment. Patients with a wild-type UGT1A1 status received higher doses of CPT-11 (p = 0.048) and had similar RR and CBR compared to those with a UGT1A1*6 and *28 status. There were no significant differences in frequencies of hematological or non-hematological toxicities, regardless of UGT1A1 status.

CONCLUSIONS

The CPT-N regimen for recurrent and refractory endometrial carcinoma had tolerable side effects and significant efficacy. This regimen is a viable treatment option for endometrial carcinoma.

A phase II trial of trebananib (AMG 386; IND#111071), a selective angiopoietin 1/2 neutralizing peptibody, in patients with persistent/recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium: An NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group trial

OBJECTIVES

Ang1 & 2 (angiopoietin-1; -2) interact with Tie2 receptors on endothelial cells to mediate vascular remodeling in an angiogenesis signaling pathway distinct from the VEGF axis. Trebananib is a peptide Fc fusion protein that binds Ang1 and 2 and prevents interaction with Tie2. The efficacy of trebananib in recurrent/persistent endometrial cancer (EC) was studied.

METHODS

The primary objective was to determine the frequency of patients with objective tumor responses (ORR) and event-free survival for ≥6months (6-month EFS) and determine toxicity of trebananib at a dose and schedule of 15mg/kg, IV QW. Recurrent/persistent EC, measurable disease, and ≤2 prior chemotherapy lines were required.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were eligible and treated. The most common histologies were G1/2 endometrioid (31%), G3 endometrioid (28%) and serous (31.3%). 78% of patients had 1 prior regimen. Patients received 1-9+ cycles of trebananib; 24 patients (75%) received ≤2cycles. One patient had a partial response (3.1%); 8 patients had stable disease (25%) and 5 patients (15.6%) had 6 month EFS. Median progression-free survival and overall-survival were 1.97 months (90% CI 1.77-2.1) and 6.6 months (90% CI 4.01-14.75), respectively. Most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, anemia, and GI issues. Grade 3 and 4 AEs were: GI 31 and 0%; vascular 22 and 0%; metabolism/nutrition 19 and 3%; and general (including edema) 16 and 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Trebananib has insufficient single agent activity in recurrent EC to warrant further investigation at this dose/schedule.

Phase II study of everolimus and letrozole in patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma

PURPOSE

The phosphoinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is frequently dysregulated in endometrial cancer (EC). Hormonal manipulation leads to response in some patients with EC, but resistance derived from PI3K pathway activation has been documented. Targeting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) may overcome endocrine resistance. We conducted a two-institution phase II trial of everolimus and letrozole in women with recurrent EC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were considered incurable, had measurable disease, and were treated with up to two prior cytotoxic regimens. Everolimus was administered orally at 10 mg daily and letrozole was administered orally at 2.5 mg daily. Each cycle consisted of 4 weeks of therapy. Patients were treated until progression, toxicity, or complete response (CR). The primary end point was the clinical benefit rate (CBR), which was defined as CR, partial response, or stable disease (≥ 16 weeks) by RECIST 1.0 criteria. Translational studies were performed to correlate biomarkers with response.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled (median age, 62 years; range, 24 to 82 years). Thirty-five patients were evaluable for response. The CBR was 40% (14 of 35 patients); the median number of cycles among responders was 15 (range, seven to 29 cycles). The confirmed objective response rate (RR) was 32% (11 of 35 patients; nine CRs and two partial responses; median, 15 cycles; range, eight to 29 cycles). Twenty percent of patients (seven of 35 patients) were taken off treatment after a prolonged CR and at the discretion of the treating clinician. None of the patients discontinued treatment as a result of toxicity. Serous histology was the best predictor of lack of response. Patients with endometrioid histology and CTNNB1 mutations responded well to everolimus and letrozole.

CONCLUSION

Everolimus plus letrozole results in a high CBR and RR in patients with recurrent EC. Further development of this combination in recurrent endometrioid EC is under way.

Phase II trial of bevacizumab in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), has clinical activity in multiple tumor types. We conducted a phase II trial to assess the activity and tolerability of single-agent bevacizumab in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer (EMC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had persistent or recurrent EMC after receiving one to two prior cytotoxic regimens, measurable disease, and Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 2. Treatment consisted of bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. VEGF-A was assessed by immunohistochemistry in archival tumor and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in pretreatment plasma. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and overall response rate.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were enrolled. Fifty-two patients were eligible and evaluable. Median age was 62 years, and prior treatment consisted of one or two regimens in 33 (63.5%) and 19 (36.5%) patients, respectively. Twenty-nine patients (55.8%) received prior radiation. Adverse events were consistent with those expected with bevacizumab treatment. No GI perforations or fistulae were seen. Seven patients (13.5%) experienced clinical responses (one complete response and six partial responses; median response duration, 6.0 months), and 21 patients (40.4%) survived progression free for at least 6 months. Median PFS and overall survival times were 4.2 and 10.5 months, respectively. Suggested associations were observed between high VEGF-A and adjusted hazard of death or tumor response when evaluated in tumor/plasma or plasma, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab is well tolerated and active based on PFS at 6 months in recurrent or persistent EMC and warrants further investigation.

A phase II evaluation of pemetrexed (Alimta, LY231514, IND #40061) in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the anti-tumor activity of pemetrexed in patients with advanced or recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium and to determine the nature and degree of toxicity.

METHODS

A multicenter phase II trial was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG). Patients must have had advanced or recurrent measurable carcinoma of the endometrium and failed one prior chemotherapy regimen. Pemetrexed at a dose of 900 mg/m(2) was administered as an IV infusion over 10 min every 21 days.

RESULTS

From May 1, 2006 to July 31, 2007, 27 patients were entered by 10 member institutions of the GOG with two patients being deemed ineligible. A total of 101 cycles were administered with 28% of patients receiving five or more cycles. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. More serious toxicities (grade 3 and 4) included anemia in 20%, leukopenia in 40%, neutropenia in 48%, and constitutional in 16%. No treatment-related deaths were reported. One patient (4%) had a partial response. Eleven patients (44%) had stable disease and eleven (44%) patients had increasing disease. Response could not be assessed in two patients (7%). Median progression-free survival was 2.7 months and overall survival was 9.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed has minimal activity in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma at the dose and schedule tested.

Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Endometrial adenocarcinoma is a common gynaecological cancer, but a comparatively small proportion of patients present with or develop recurrent or advanced disease. Progestogens are widely used, with little evidence of their efficacy. Co-morbidity including obesity and cardiac disease and concerns over toxicity have prevented more extensive studies of cytotoxic chemotherapy, although there are a number of active agents.

OBJECTIVES

To assess any benefits or adverse effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy in women with advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial adenocarcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The major medical literature databases were searched for all known randomised controlled trials (RCTs), as were trials registers and reference lists of relevant publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs comparing chemotherapy versus another intervention (including different chemotherapy) in advanced disease were considered. Trials of adjuvant treatment or for sarcomatous tumours were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted from the papers by reviewers and authors of included studies contacted for further information.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven eligible trials were identified which entered 2288 patients between 1974 and 2000. A meta-analysis of the 6 trials comparing more with less chemotherapy with combination was possible and included 1135 patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.80, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.71 to 0.90, p = 0.004), but there was only a trend toward improved survival (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03). Toxicity was in general higher with the combination chemotherapy regimens. Only one trial showed a significant survival benefit from the addition of paclitaxel to combination chemotherapy, but this was at the expense of increased toxicity. There was insufficient evidence to assess whether there was any benefit from cytotoxic chemotherapy in terms of symptom control or quality of life (QOL) compared with best supportive care. There were no comparative trials of chemotherapy with endocrine therapy

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The optimum cytotoxic drug regimen for advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma has still to be defined although our review suggests that it may contain paclitaxel or platinum. These mainly North American and European trial populations represent a highly selected subgroup of the 10, 000 women dying annually from this disease. Future trials should include measures of QOL and symptom control in addition to PFS and overall survival (OS). They should should also consider comparison of of endocrine therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with no prior drug therapy. Stratification of patients should take into account other prognostic factors including co-morbidity and prior radiation treatment.