Combination of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin for the treatment of metastatic and recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

Therapeutic Effects of Natural Products on Cervical Cancer: Based on Inflammatory Pathways

Inflammation is a protective response of the body to an irritant. When an inflammatory response occurs, immune cells are recruited to the injury, eliminating the irritation. The excessive inflammatory response can cause harm to the organism. Inflammation has been found to contribute to cervical cancer if there is a problem with the regulation of inflammatory response. Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors globally, and the incidence tends to be younger. The harm of cervical cancer cannot be ignored. The standard treatments for cervical cancer include surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. However, the prognosis for this treatment is poor, so it is urgent to find a safer and more effective treatment. Natural products are considered excellent candidates for the treatment of cervical cancer. In this review, we first describe the mechanisms by which inflammation induces cervical cancer. Subsequently, we highlight natural products that can treat cervical cancer through inflammatory pathways. We also introduce natural products for the treatment of cervical cancer in clinical trials. Finally, methods to improve the anticancer properties of natural products were added, and the development status of natural products was discussed.

Pharmacological Treatment of Patients with Metastatic, Recurrent or Persistent Cervical Cancer Not Amenable by Surgery or Radiotherapy: State of Art and Perspectives of Clinical Research

Cervical cancer patients with distant or loco-regional recurrences not amenable by surgery or radiotherapy have limited treatment options, and their 5-year overall survival (OS) rates range from 5% to 16%. The purpose of this paper is to assess the results obtained with chemotherapy and biological agents in this clinical setting. Several phase II trials of different cisplatin (CDDP)-based doublets and a phase III randomized trial showing a trend in response rate, progression-free survival, and OS in favor of CDDP + paclitaxel (PTX) compared with other CDDP-based doublets have been reviewed. The factors predictive of response to chemotherapy as well as the benefits and risks of the addition of bevacizumab to CDDP + PTX have been analyzed. The FDA has recently approved pembrolizumab for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer in progression on or after chemotherapy whose tumors were PD-L1 positive. Interesting perspectives of clinical research are represented by the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in addition to chemotherapy, whereas PARP inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors are still at the basic research phase, but promising.

Triplet chemotherapy vs doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in metastatic, recurrent, and persistent cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of paclitaxel-cisplatin-ifosfamide triplet regimen (TIP) was reported to be superior to that of paclitaxel-cisplatin doublet. However, the efficacy of paclitaxel-cisplatin-bevacizumab triplet (TPA) and TIP has not been compared. Here, we compared the efficacy and safety of TIP and TPA in patients with metastatic, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer who were at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea between January 2005 and September 2018. Of the 161 patients included in the study, 92 had received TIP and 71 had received TPA. For the study, we compared the response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety in the 2 treatment groups.

RESULTS

The response rates of patients who received TIP and TPA were comparable (64.1% vs 73.2%, P = 0.239). Histology (squamous vs nonsquamous) was the only prognostic factor that affected the response to therapy (odds ratio, 0.259; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.119-0.562; P = 0.001). The PFS after TIP and TPA treatment was similar: 12.0 months (95%CI, 10.26-13.74) vs 11.5 months (95%CI, 10.18-12.83), respectively. In a Cox proportional hazard model, objective response to therapies was the only independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. However, different types of therapy (TIP vs TPA) did not affect the oncological outcomes for either PFS or OS. Although hematologic toxicity was significantly higher in the TIP-treated group than in the TPA-treated group, both regimens were safe and well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness and safety of TIP was comparable to TPA in terms of response rates, survival, and adverse effects. TIP could be an effective alternative in the treatment of cervical cancer when TPA is contraindicated or unaffordable.

Efficacy of Modified Dose-dense Paclitaxel in Recurrent Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine survival outcomes of women with recurrent cervical cancer who received salvage chemotherapy with modified dose-dense paclitaxel (MDDP) monotherapy (paclitaxel 80 mg/m, administered on day 1, 8, and 15 without day 22).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate cause-specific survival after the first recurrence (SAR) of women with recurrent cervical cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2014. Pooled analyses were performed to examine SAR in women who received MDDP monotherapy (n=17) for any treatment line, compared with those who received salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel-doublet (n=18) and nonpaclitaxel regimens (n=52).

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, median SAR was 13.7 months including 63 (72.4%) events. MDDP monotherapy regimen was most commonly used in the second-line setting (35.3%) followed by the third/fourth lines (both, 23.5%). Among the women who received MDDP regimen, there were 6 (35.3%) women who received ≥6 cycles; there was 1 (5.9%) women who discontinued the regimen due to adverse effects (grade 3 transaminitis); regimen postponement was seen in 2 (1.4%) of 140 total cycles; and the response rate after the sixth cycle of this regimen was 29.4% (1 complete and 4 partial responses). On univariate analysis, MDDP usage had the highest 2-year SAR rate (MDDP 54.1%, paclitaxel-doublet 43.6%, and nonpaclitaxel regimens 28.1%; Ptrend=0.044). On multivariate analysis, MDDP monotherapy remained an independent prognostic factor for improved SAR compared with the nonpaclitaxel regimen (adjusted-hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.95; P=0.036).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that MDDP monotherapy is a tolerable and relatively effective regimen for recurrent cervical cancer.

A systematic review comparing cisplatin and carboplatin plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of advanced/recurrent cervical cancer patients is generally poor with 1-year survival ranging between 15 and 20%. Cisplatin (CDDP) based treatments are considered the most effective regimens; unfortunately toxicity is an issue in a population in which the treatment remains palliative in the finality. Carboplatin (CBDCA), with its more favorable non toxicity profile and the convenience of outpatient administration, may be a suitable alternative to CDDP in combination regimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature comparing CDDP and CBDCA based chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer (recurrent, persistent or metastatic disease). Only studies that met the following criteria were considered for the present review: 1) patients treated with CDDP/paclitaxel or CBDCA/paclitaxel combinations as first line chemotherapy for metastatic disease; 2) one or more of the following data available: overall response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS); 3) single-arm retrospective or prospective study; and 4) at least 20 patients enrolled.

RESULTS

17 eligible studies comprehensive of 1181 patients were included in the final analysis. The objective RR was 48.5% for CBDCA and 49.3% for CDDP-based chemotherapy. Median PFS for CDDP and CBDCA-based treatments was 6.9months and 5months respectively (p=0.03); the corresponding figures for median OS were 12.87 and 10months respectively (p=0.17).

DISCUSSION

Our study indicates that CBDCA may represent an attractive and valid alternative to the more toxic and equally effective CDDP in the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.

Role of paclitaxel and cisplatin as the neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

Objective

The therapeutic outcomes of patients with advanced vulvar cancer are poor. Multi-modality treatments including concurrent chemoradiation or different regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and surgery have been explored to reduce the extent of surgery and morbidity. The present single-institution trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and cisplatin in locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Methods

From 2002 to 2009, 10 patients with stage III-IV locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were prospectively treated with 3 courses of paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin or paclitaxel-cisplatin. Nine of them subsequently underwent radical local excision or radical partial vulvectomy and bilateral inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy.

Results

The clinical response rate of all enrolled patients was 80%, whereas the pathological responses included 1 case with complete remission, 2 with persistent carcinoma in situ, and 6 invasive cancer cases with tumor shrinkage of more than 50%. Four patients had positive nodes. Forty percent of patients experienced grade 3-4 bone marrow toxicity, which was successfully managed with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, even in cases of elderly patients. Median progression-free survival after surgery was 14 months (range, 5 to 44 months). Six of the 7 recurrent cases were local, and 3 of them were treated with salvage surgery while the other 3 received radiation with or without chemotherapy. After a median follow-up period of 40 months (range, 5 to 112 months), 55.5% of patients remained alive with no evidence of disease, including 2 long-term survivors after recurrence at 5 and 9 years.

Conclusion

Based on the high response rate and manageable toxicity, NACT with paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without ifosfamide followed by surgery could be considered as a therapeutic option for locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy for stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer in Japanese women

Chemoradiotherapy is currently the main treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer, but neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy (IA-NAC) has been reported to achieve favorable results. This study investigated the efficacy of several different IA-NAC regimens. The subjects were 55 patients with stage IIB-IIIB cervical cancer who received IA-NAC between January 1991 and April 2006. IA-NAC was administered for a total of 1-3 courses at 3-week intervals, with three different regimens being employed in chronological order. The response rate achieved with IA-NAC was 90.2% for squamous cell carcinoma, 60% for adenosquamous carcinoma and 42.9% for adenocarcinoma. Surgery was performed after IA-NAC in 36 patients, and radiotherapy alone was performed in 19 patients. The 5-year survival rate was 72.9% for patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 50% for those with adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma. PAMF therapy (cisplatin, epirubicin, mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil) achieved a response rate of ≥90% for squamous cell carcinoma, as did CDDP + THP therapy (cisplatin plus pirarubicin), while PACF therapy (cisplatin, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5-flurouracil) achieved a better response rate for adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity was significantly more common with PAMF therapy. In conclusion, IA-NAC improved the survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma. CDDP + THP therapy achieved a high response rate with little hematologic toxicity. PACF therapy achieved a significantly higher response rate in patients with adenosquamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. Therefore, IA-NAC may be a therapeutic option for locally advanced cervical cancer, particularly using the above-mentioned regimens.

Treatment options in recurrent cervical cancer (Review)

The management of recurrent cervical cancer depends mainly on previous treatment and on the site and extent of recurrence. Concurrent cisplatin-based chemo-radiation is the treatment of choice for patients with pelvic failure after radical hysterectomy alone. However, the safe delivery of high doses of radiotherapy is much more difficult in this clinical setting compared with primary radiotherapy. Pelvic exenteration usually represents the only therapeutic approach with curative intent for women with central pelvic relapse who have previously received irradiation. In a recent series, the 5-year overall survival and operative mortality after pelvic exenteration ranged from 21 to 61% and from 1 to 10%, respectively. Free surgical margins, negative lymph nodes, small tumour size and long disease-free interval were associated with a more favourable prognosis. Currently, pelvic reconstructive procedures (continent urinary conduit, low colorectal anastomosis, vaginal reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps) are strongly recommended after exenteration. Concurrent cisplatin-based chemo-radiation is the treatment of choice for isolated para-aortic lymph node failure, with satisfactory chances of a cure in asymptomatic patients. Chemotherapy is administered with palliative intent to women with distant or loco-regional recurrences not amenable by surgery or radiotherapy. Cisplatin is the most widely used drug, with a response rate of 17-38% and a median overall survival of 6.1-7.1 months. Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy achieves higher response rates (22-68%) when compared with single-agent cisplatin, but median overall survival is usually less than one year. In a recent Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trial the combination topotecan + cisplatin obtained a significantly longer overall survival than single-agent cisplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent or persistent cervical cancer. A subsequent GOG study showed a trend in terms of longer overall survival and better quality of life for the doublet cisplatin + paclitaxel vs. the doublets cisplatin + topotecan, cisplatin + vinorelbine, and cisplatin + gemcitabine. Molecularly targeted therapy may represent a novel therapeutic tool, but its use alone or in combination with chemotherapy is still investigational.

Evaluation of the paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer

Background:

Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer represents an aggressive malignancy with a high rate of locoregional and distant failure. Therefore, we evaluated the three-drug combination of paclitaxel–ifosfamide–cisplatin (TIP).

Methods:

Systemic chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced metastatic/relapsed cervical cancer and a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (PS) of 0–2 were eligible. TIP chemotherapy doses were paclitaxel 175 mg m⁻² on day 1, ifosfamide 2.5 g m⁻² on days 1+2, and cisplatin 40 mg m⁻² on days 1+2, with prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.

Results:

A total of 42 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 56 (25–74) years; PS: 1 (0–2); histologies – squamous: 35, adenosquamous: 5, and adenocarcinoma: 2. Responses were overall response rate (RR): 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.3–76.7%), with complete response (CR): 26% (95% CI: 12.7–39.3%), and partial response (PR): 36% (95% CI: 21.5–49.9%). Responses according to the relapse site were overall RR: 32% (95% CI: 13.7–50.3%) within previously irradiated pelvis vs 75% (95% CI: 57.7–92.3%) in extra-pelvic sites. Median time to progression (TTP) was 7 (range, 2–34+) months and median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (range, 3–36+) months. Toxicities included grade 3–4 neutropenia: 83% (21% febrile neutropenia), grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia: 9%, no grade 3 neuropathy (35% grade 2), grade 2 asthenia/fatigue 15%, and no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion:

TIP is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity in advanced/relapsed cervical cancer.

Chemotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer

PURPOSE

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer of women worldwide and one of the leading cause of death in relative young women. This review gives an outline of chemotherapy of advanced, persistent or recurrent cervical cancer.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in the PubMed of almost all relevant articles concerning chemotherapy of advanced, persistent or recurrent cervical cancer.

RESULTS

The available data from the literature is mainly composed of most recent reviews, phase II and randomized phase III clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent cisplatin remains the current standard therapy for advanced, persistent or recurrent cervical cancer. Several single-agents have been tested, but none has been found to be superior compared to cisplatin. Both topotecan and paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin, have yielded superior response rates and progression-free survival without diminishing patient quality of life. However, only the combination of cisplatin and topotecan has improved overall survival. It is important to identify clinical and tumor-related factors predictive of response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Future trials are necessary, not only to compare combinations of existing agents, but to incorporate biological agents (monoclonal antibodies or small molecules) to chemotherapy in order to improve the treatment results of advanced, persistent or recurrent cervix cancer.

Chemotherapy for recurrent cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To give an overview of chemotherapy schemes used in recurrent cervical cancer.

METHODS

A pubmed search was performed using chemotherapy and recurrent cervical cancer including articles until April 2007.

RESULTS

Most recent articles and articles of interest are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Single agent cisplatin (50 mg/m2) remains the current standard for recurrent cervical cancer. Numerous chemotherapeutic agents have been tested but did not show convincing evidence of improved survival rates, except for the GOG 179 study which showed an improved survival for the combination of cisplatin and topotecan compared with single agent cisplatin. However, nearly 60% of patients in both groups received prior cisplatinum therapy as a radiosensitizer, which could be responsible for the development of platinum resistance, causing lower response and survival rates in the single platinum group. Hence, the apparent benefit in the doublet group is maybe just a reflection from the change in primary therapy and patient population. It is hoped that current trials comparing standard therapy with other single or doublet chemotherapeutic regimens or that the use of molecular-targeted agents will give us promising therapeutic options in the future.

Salvage chemotherapy with a combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin for the patients with recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicities of a combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) for recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Fifty-three patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma were treated with ifosfamide 1500 mg/m(2) intravenously over 3 h on days 1-3, paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) as a 3-h intravenous infusion, and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 min on day 1. The chemotherapy was repeated every 3 weeks until there was disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Forty-five patients received at least three courses of treatment and were evaluable for their response. Twenty-one patients (46.7%) showed objective responses, including 4.4% complete responses and 42.2% partial responses. The median time to progression and the overall survival for all the patients were 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-8.9 months) and 19.0 months (95% CI, 11.9-26.1 months), respectively. The median duration of response was 9.0 months. Patients who had previously been treated with another chemotherapy after tumor recurrence showed a moderate response rate (29.4%) but a shorter time to progression (6 vs 8 months, P= 0.0421) and a shorter survival (11 vs 39 months, P= 0.0018). Patients with good performance status showed a higher response rate (63.6% vs 30.4%, P= 0.026) and a longer time to progression (9 vs 7 months, P= 0.0049). Patients with recurrent disease only outside the previous radiotherapy (RT) field exhibited a slightly higher response without statistical significance (60.0% vs 36.0%, P= 0.109). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 13% of patients and neurotoxicity in 5%. Three deaths during treatment were observed, but two of them were due to disease progression. We conclude that the combination chemotherapy with TIP yields a high response rate with acceptable toxicity for patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma, including those patients who have failed to respond to prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

The impact of age in the outcome of patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Cervical cancer is a disease of middle-aged and elderly but still there are young women diagnosed with advanced disease that is incurable with local treatment and is treated with platinum-based combination chemotherapy. It is unknown whether these young patients have a poorer outcome compared to older patients or whether elderly patients have inferior outcome than younger patients when treated with combination chemotherapy.

METHODS

We compared the outcome between young (<35), elderly (>70) and middle-aged (35-70) women who were treated with platinum-based combination chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent or persistent disease.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighteen patients were included in our database. The baseline clinical and disease characteristics were not different between age groups but anemia and thrombocytosis were more frequent in younger patients. Median survival for all patients was 13.4 (95%CI 11-15.8) months while survival of patients<35 years of age was 9 months (95% CI 5.8-12), of patients older than 70 was 10 months (95% CI 6.9-13) of patients 35 to 70 years of age was 14.5 months (95% CI 11-18) (p=0.004). Multiple factors were significant for survival in univariate analysis but only weight loss, pain score and relapse inside an irradiated filed were significant predictors of outcome in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Very young (<35) and elderly (>70) patients have a worse prognosis after treatment with combination chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Nevertheless, this difference is not significant when adjusted for other prognostic factors.

Outcomes in 24 selected patients with stage IVB cervical cancer and excellent performance status treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy

PURPOSE

We sought to review outcomes in patients with stage IVB carcinoma of the cervix treated with irradiation in combination with chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report outcomes of 24 consecutive patients with good performance status treated from 1998 to 2005. Most of these patients underwent concurrent irradiation with platinum-based chemotherapy. Some patients received subsequent systemic chemotherapy.

RESULTS

All patients underwent external beam radiotherapy; 7 patients (29%) had additional high-dose-rate and 12 (50%) low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Two patients (8%) received an IMRT boost instead of brachytherapy. The mean dose to point A was variable (73.9 +/- 19.2 Gy). Twenty patients (83%) received radio-sensitizing platinum-based chemotherapy, and the remaining had radiotherapy alone. Seven patients (29%) had further combination chemotherapy. Therapy was well tolerated. The overall survival was 44% at 36 months and 22% at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Patients with stage IVB cervical cancer have mostly been treated with palliative intent. With the advent of concurrent chemoradiation, we have treated many of these cases with aggressive combination therapy. In this series, the use of radiotherapy and multiagent chemotherapy in patients with stage IVB cervical carcinoma and good performance status was well tolerated and resulted in higher survival rates than previously reported.

Gynecologic oncology group trials of chemotherapy for metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer

Because only 16% of patients with metastatic cervical cancer are alive 5 years after diagnosis, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) has carefully designed and conducted many phase II studies to identify promising drugs. Cisplatin has emerged as the most active single agent with overall response rates of 19%. Recent phase III trials have documented response rates of 27% and 39% when cisplatin has been combined with either paclitaxel or topotecan, respectively. The comparison of cisplatin to cisplatin plus topotecan in GOG-179 has yielded the first study to show a statistically significant impact on the overall response rate, median progression-free survival, and median survival, with all outcome measures favoring the two-drug regimen. Despite these encouraging results, however, most of the responses are partial and of short duration. The need for novel combinations and the implementation of active biologic agents is implicit. The accumulated data in this disease setting, as evidenced by the experience of the GOG, are presented in this review.

The outcome of advanced or recurrent non-squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after platinum-based combination chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Data about the outcome and prognostic factors in the group of patients with non-squamous cell advanced or recurrent carcinomas of the uterine cervix are limited. We compared the outcome of patients with non-squamous with that of squamous cell carcinomas after platinum-based combination chemotherapy as first line therapy for stage IV or recurrent cervical carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 200 patients with stage IV or recurrent carcinomas of the cervix received platinum-based combination chemotherapy and were included in our analysis.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients with non-squamous and 142 patients with squamous cell carcinomas. Response to chemotherapy was 53.5% in non-squamous vs. 43.5% in squamous carcinomas. Histology was not an independent predictor of tumor response (P = 0.797). Response rates were lower in patients with relapse only in a previously irradiated area in both squamous (26.9% vs. 53.5%, P = 0.005) and non-squamous carcinomas (47.1% vs. 65%, P = 0.270). Weight loss was the only significant predictor of survival in non-squamous histology patients (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in median survival between squamous (11.57 months [95% CI 9.35-13.79]) and non-squamous carcinomas (19.05 months [95% CI 13.63-24.47]) (P = 0.064). After adjustment for independent prognostic factors (ECOG performance status and weight loss), differences in survival remained not significant.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a similar outcome for both squamous and non-squamous stage IV or recurrent cervical carcinomas treated with platinum-based combination chemotherapy.

The role of chemotherapy in locally advanced, metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is among the major health problems world-wide although advances in screening programs. Surgery and radiotherapy are the treatment modalities of choice for early and locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the role of chemotherapy in this setting has been better investigated in the latest years. To improve loco-regional control in locally advanced disease, authors have tested both neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From 1999 NCI clinical announcement, concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation is considered the treatment of choice for cervical cancer patients requiring radiation therapy. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is reaching encouraging results in IB bulky-IIA cervical cancer, but further investigation are ongoing in locally advanced cervical setting. The optimal treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer is still undefined and chemotherapy is used with palliation intent. Cisplatin remains the most active cytotoxic agents, although combinations of cisplatin with paclitaxel, topotecan, vinorelbine, have shown encouraging results in phase II and in early phase III studies. This paper reviews the role of chemotherapy in the management of patients with locally advanced, metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer. Studies discussed in this paper were selected trough a search in the med-line database performed in October 2003.

Role of Ifosfamide in Cervical Cancer: An Overview

Ifosfamide, a cyclophosphamide analogue, has demonstrated a wide spectrum of activity against numerous neoplasms in different oncologic areas, including paediatric, haematological, breast, lung and testicular cancers, soft tissue sarcomas and gynaecological cancer. In gynaecologic cancers in particular, evidence suggests activity in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer, cervical carcinoma, germ cell carcinoma of the ovary. Cervical cancer has long been considered a poorly chemosensitive tumour and for several years the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of this tumour was confined to persistent or recurrent disease after failure of surgery and/or radiotherapy. In the management of cervical cancer, chemotherapy has received increasing attention in the last two decades and is currently used in neoadjuvant regimens, as salvage treatment in patients with disseminated or recurrent disease, or as a radiosensitizer. Over the past 30 years, several agents have been tested but cisplatin and ifosfamide are the agents that have attracted the greater attention. Cisplatin represents the cornerstone of chemotherapy for cervical cancer. Ifosfamide has been studied as a single agent or in combination with other drugs in different studies. In this paper we reviewed the approach with systemic therapy and, in particular, the role of ifosfamide in advanced or recurrent, and less advanced cervical cancer.

Antiblastic Drug Combinations with Ifosfamide: An Update

Ifosfamide is an alkylating agent that is widely used in the treatment of various neoplasms, such as sarcomas, lymphomas, pediatric malignancies, germ cell tumors, lung, breast and ovarian cancer. The clinical toxicity of ifosfamide depends on the dose and administration schedules. The pharmacologic features of this drug enable its combination with other antiblastic agents, such as vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel and docetaxel. Moreover, the pharmacologic profile of ifosfamide allows the use of this antiblastic drug in patients who have previously failed many other treatments, and a large percentage of responses has already been obtained. There is some concern about the optimal scheduling of the drug with other novel chemotherapeutics. Clinical trials that include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies may be the most efficient way to optimize the therapeutic efficacy of ifosfamide and define the dosing and scheduling.