Do we know which patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome should receive long-term high dose anti-coagulation?

Controversies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: can we ever stop warfarin?

Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome are at increased risk for recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis and therefore benefit from long term warfarin therapy. The optimal duration of warfarin therapy after a first venous thromboembolic event is however a matter of some controversy and many questions remain unanswered. After reviewing and analysing the available evidence, we discuss some common scenarios in everyday clinical practice where treatment decisions are difficult.

Controversies and unresolved issues in antiphospholipid syndrome pathogenesis and management

While much is understood concerning the clinical features of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), many issues remain. The proper designation of patients with "definite" APS and the correct categorization of patients by both laboratory and clinical features are matters of ongoing debate. Recent proposals have identified new subsets of patients who have many typical features of APS but either do not fit the criteria for a "definite" diagnosis or have initially negative laboratory tests for antiphospholipid antibodies. Meanwhile, decisions about laboratory tests are based on expert opinion, rather than the results of controlled trials. As for treatment, many guidelines are offered, but few are backed by data from strong clinical trials. This article summarizes the clinical questions remaining to be answered and debates concerning pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.

[Occlusion of the innominate artery in association with a primary antiphospholipid syndrome: treatment by angioplasty stenting]

INTRODUCTION

Antiphospholipid syndrome may be associated with stroke.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of a symptomatic occlusion of the innominate artery in a 37-year-old patient, who developed primary anti-phospholipid syndrome. This association, to our knowledge, has not been reported in the literature. Occlusion of the innominate artery was treated by angioplasty-stenting. Effective oral anticoagulation was given to prevent a new thrombotic event.

CONCLUSION

Systematic search for antiphospholipid antibodies is needed as part of the etiology work-up in young stroke victims.

Current debates in antiphospholipid syndrome: the acquired antibody-mediated thrombophilia

Antiphospholipid (APL) syndrome is the most common form of acquired thrombophilia. It can cause significant morbidity and even mortality. The term "APL antibodies" represents a heterogeneous group of antibodies associated with this disorder. Currently no single assay can identify every APL antibody. Clinically relevant APL antibodies are mainly anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) detected by solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lupus anticoagulants (LA) demonstrated by in vitro coagulation assay. However, there are some other antibodies associated with the APL syndrome (i.e., subgroup APL antibodies). ACAs, LAs, and subgroup APL antibodies represent intersecting, but non-identical, subsets of autoantibodies. Thus, those autoantibodies may coexist or may occur independently. Any organ system and any size of vessel can be affected during the clinical course of the disease. Therefore, the APL syndrome can manifest itself in a wide variety of clinical thrombotic features. Fetal loss and pregnancy morbidity represent a specific challenge. Despite tremendous advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of APL syndrome during the past decade, the mainstay of management is still anticoagulation. However, there is no general agreement regarding the duration and intensity of anti-coagulant therapy. In this review, we focused on the current dilemmas and their present clarifications in the wide clinicopathologic spectrum of APL syndrome and APL antibody-related distinct pathologic conditions.

Current status and implications of autoimmune antiphospholipid antibodies in relation to thrombotic disease

This review briefly describes the development of the concepts of antiphospholipid antibody and of antiphospholipid syndrome. It focuses on the two main antigenic targets, beta2 glycoprotein I and prothrombin. An excessive production of natural antibodies rather than an immune response to exogenous antigen is proposed as pathogenetic for the development of these antibodies. The review attempts to explain how some of these antibodies are anticoagulant in vitro yet prothrombotic in vivo. The final section discusses when to test for such antibodies, how to test and how to consider treatment of patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid antibodies and the risk of thromboembolic events in valvular heart disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in subsequent thromboembolic events and mortality in a prospective follow-up of 89 patients with severe, nonspecific valvular heart disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 1, 1993, and March 31, 1994, 89 patients with valvular heart disease were assessed for the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant. The primary end point was thromboembolic events, and the secondary end points were cardiovascular mortality and overall mortality.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for a mean of 59 months; 1 patient (without aPLs) was lost to follow-up. Nineteen patients had increased titers of aPLs. Thromboembolic events were significantly more frequent in the aPL-positive group than in the aPL-negative group (7/19 [37%] vs 8/70 [11%]; P=.01). Cardiovascular mortality tended to be higher in the aPL-positive group than in the aPL-negative group (3 [16%] vs 6 [9%]; P = .40). However, in multivariate Cox analysis, presence of aPLs was not an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that patients with severe valvular heart disease and aPLs have an increased risk for developing thromboembolic events.

Intramuscular Bleeding as a Complication of Anticoagulation Treatment in a Patient With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Thrombotic events account for significant morbidity and mortality among patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. The cornerstone of management includes long-term anticoagulation. However, the benefit of long-term anticoagulation must be weighed against the risk of bleeding complications. This article presents the case of a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome who experienced severe intramuscular hemorrhage as a complication of warfarin anticoagulation. This case emphasizes the importance of careful monitoring of anticoagulation treatment, and of recognizing a new differential diagnosis when dealing with a painful, swollen calf in the setting of lupus and antiphospholipid syndrome.

Primary anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome (APS): current concepts

Primary anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thrombophilic state characterized by recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis, recurrent pregnancy loss, and the presence of circulating anti-phospholipid antibodies that may be responsible for thrombophilia and pregnancy morbidity. Ophthalmologic features are present in 15-88% of the patients with primary APS, thus ophthalmologists are one of the first physicians to whom the patient will present. An accurate diagnosis may save the patient from recurrent, potentially life-threatening thrombosis. In the U.S.A., an estimated 35,000 new cases of APS-related venous thrombosis occur each year in a population that is several decades younger than the patient population typically affected by thrombosis. Clinical features, such as chorea, transverse myelitis, cardiac valvular lesions, and accelerated atherosclerosis, are hypothesized to be due to a direct tissue-antibody interaction and cannot be explained purely by thrombosis. The use of recently proposed, well-defined diagnostic criteria, and better standardization of laboratory assays for the anti-phospholipid antibodies should help enable epidemiological surveys to establish the prevalence of these antibodies in patients with thrombosis and in the general population. Diagnosis of APS should be considered in all patients with recurrent systemic or ocular thrombosis in the absence of known risk factors. Several well-designed prospective studies show an increased risk of thrombosis in the presence of medium to high antibody level. With ocular involvement in as many as 88% of APS patients, an ophthalmic assessment should be an integral part of the clinical work-up of any patient with suspected or confirmed APS. The presence of isolated ocular thrombophilia with persistently elevated anti-phospholipid antibodies or lupus coagulant should confirm the diagnosis of APS. Management of these patients must be a multi-disciplinary effort with either a rheumatologist or a hematologist having the overall responsibility for coordinating treatment and monitoring the patient's immune status and anticoagulation. Treatment of isolated ocular thrombophilia in the presence of moderate to high titers of antiphospholipid antibodies should be on the same principles as patients with APS to prevent recurrent ocular or cerebral thrombosis.