Should we include anti-prothrombin antibodies in the screening for the antiphospholipid syndrome?

Profiles of criteria and non-criteria anti-phospholipid autoantibodies are associated with clinical phenotypes of the antiphospholipid syndrome

Background

Specific anti-phospholipids antibodies (aPLs) are used as classification criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These aPLs, although essential for diagnosis, do not predict disease phenotypes, which may require specific therapies. Non-criteria aPLs are rarely evaluated and their role is yet to be defined. In the current study, we aimed to examine the association between criteria and non-criteria aPLs and APS phenotypes.

Methods

Serum samples from 188 subjects, 130 APS patients and 58 controls were analyzed for the presence of 20 aPLs (IgG and IgM isotypes to cardiolipin (CL), beta2-glycoprotein1 (β2GP1), phosphatidic acid (P-acid), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserine (PS), annexin-5 (AN) and prothrombin (PT) using a line immunoassay (GA Generic Assays, Germany). Sero-positivity to the different aPLs/aPLs profiles was correlated to APS phenotypes (i.e. arterial thrombosis, CNS manifestations, venous thrombosis, relapsing disease, obstetric morbidity).

Results

In this cohort, arterial thrombosis was associated with accumulative number of ≥ 7/20 aPLs evaluated (OR 4.1; CI 95% 1.9–96, p = 0.001) as well as the sole presence of aPT (IgG) (OR 2.3;CI 95% 1.1–5.1, p = 0.03). CNS manifestations were linked with a profile of 4 aPLs (IgG): aPT, aPG, aPI and aAN (OR 2.6;CI 95% 1.1–6.3, p = 0.03). Symptom-free period of ≥ 3 years was linked with lower number of aPLs and the presence of aPI (IgG) (OR 3.0;CI 95% 1.08–8.1, p < 0.05) or aAN (IgG) (OR 3.4;CI 95% 1.08–10.9, p < 0.05). APS related pregnancy morbidity correlated with a profile of 2 aPLs (IgG): aCL and aPS (OR 2.9; CI 95% 1.3–6.5, p < 0.05) or the sole presence of aAN (IgG) (OR 2.8; CI 95% 1.02–8, p = 0.05).

Conclusion

In this study, we observed an association between specific criteria/non-criteria aPLs or aPLs profiles and clinical phenotypes of APS. Our data suggest that examination of a wider variety of aPLs may allow better characterization of APS.

Antiphospholipid syndrome and recurrent miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition that is associated with thrombosis and morbidity in pregnancy. The exact mechanisms by which these associations occur appear to be heterogeneous and are not yet well understood. The aim of this study was to identify and analyze publications in recent years to better understand the diagnosis and its contribution to monitoring APS among women with recurrent miscarriage (RM). This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Knowledge databases, with articles published between 2010 and 2014, according to the PRISMA statement. Of the 85 identified studies, nine were selected. Most of the studies reported an association between recurrent miscarriage and specific antiphospholipid antibodies, as anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) and antiphosphatidylserine (aPS), which showed a relationship with RM. The main result of the meta-analysis revealed association between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and/or APS compared to the patients with RM (OR: 0.279; 95% CI: 0.212-0.366) and APS cases compared to the patients with RM (OR: 0.083; 95% CI: 0.036-0.189). High heterogeneity among these studies (I²=100.0%, p <0.001) was observed. In addition, there was no significant publication bias across studies according to Begg's test (p=0.230), although Egger's test (p=0.037) suggests significant publication bias. The funnel plot was slightly asymmetrical. Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a positive association between antiphospholipid antibodies and/or antiphospholipid syndrome in patients with recurrent miscarriage.

Evaluation of phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibody testing for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome: results of an international multicentre study

Objective A task force of scientists at the International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies recognized that phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) might contribute to a better identification of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Accordingly, initial and replication retrospective, cross-sectional multicentre studies were conducted to ascertain the value of aPS/PT for APS diagnosis. Methods In the initial study (eight centres, seven countries), clinical/laboratory data were retrospectively collected. Serum/plasma samples were tested for IgG aPS/PT at Inova Diagnostics (Inova) using two ELISA kits. A replication study (five centres, five countries) was carried out afterwards. Results In the initial study ( n = 247), a moderate agreement between the IgG aPS/PT Inova and MBL ELISA kits was observed ( k = 0.598). IgG aPS/PT were more prevalent in APS patients (51%) than in those without (9%), OR 10.8, 95% CI (4.0-29.3), p < 0.0001. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratio of IgG aPS/PT for APS diagnosis were 51%, 91%, 5.9 and 0.5, respectively. In the replication study ( n = 214), a moderate/substantial agreement between the IgG aPS/PT results obtained with both ELISA kits was observed ( k = 0.630). IgG aPS/PT were more prevalent in APS patients (47%) than in those without (12%), OR 6.4, 95% CI (2.6-16), p < 0.0001. Sensitivity, specificity, LR + and LR- for APS diagnosis were 47%, 88%, 3.9 and 0.6, respectively. Conclusions IgG aPS/PT detection is an easily performed laboratory parameter that might contribute to a better and more complete identification of patients with APS.

Efficacy of the antiphospholipid score for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome and its predictive value for thrombotic events

OBJECTIVE

To define the antiphospholipid score (aPL-S) by testing multiple antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and to evaluate its efficacy for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and predictive value for thrombosis.

METHODS

This study comprised 2 independent sets of patients with autoimmune diseases. In the first set of patients (n = 233), the aPL profiles were analyzed. Five clotting assays for testing lupus anticoagulant and 6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (IgG/IgM anticardiolipin antibodies, IgG/IgM anti-β(2)-glycoprotein I, and IgG/IgM phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies) were included. The association of the aPL-S with a history of thrombosis/pregnancy morbidity was assessed. In the second set of patients (n = 411), the predictive value of the aPL-S for thrombosis was evaluated retrospectively. Two hundred ninety-six of these patients were followed up for >2 years. The relationship between the aPL-S and the risk of developing thrombosis was analyzed.

RESULTS

In the first set of patients, the aPL-S was higher in those with thrombosis/pregnancy morbidity than in those without manifestations of APS (P < 0.00001). For the aPL-S, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value was 0.752. In the second set of patients, new thromboses developed in 32 patients. The odds ratio (OR) for thrombosis in patients with an aPL-S of ≥30 was 5.27 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.32-11.95, P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, an aPL-S of ≥30 appeared to be an independent risk factor for thrombosis (hazard ratio 3.144 [95% CI 1.383-7.150], P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The aPL-S is a useful quantitative index for diagnosing APS and may be a predictive marker for thrombosis in autoimmune diseases.

Antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) as potential markers of antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid antibodies present in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are directed at a number of phospholipid-binding proteins: β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI), prothrombin, and so on. Antibodies directed at β2GPI are accepted as a classification criterion for APS, while the presence of antiprothrombin antibodies is not. In the present article, we investigated the possible role of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) as marker of APS on a cohort of 295 individuals with APS (95 primary APS and 45 secondary APS) and APS-related diseases. We found aPS/PT to be highly associated with venous thrombosis (immunoglobulin G [IgG] aPS/PT odds ratio [OR], 7.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.97-13.92 and IgM aPS/PT OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.35-4.77) and obstetric abnormalities (IgG aPS/PT OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.04-5.43), but not with arterial thrombosis. A very high degree of concordance between the concentration of aPS/PT and lupus anticoagulant activity was demonstrated. Therefore, we support the inclusion of aPS/PT determination as second-level assay to confirm APS classification.

Prevalence and clinical correlates of anti‐phospholipid antibodies in South Africans with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence and clinical correlates of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL), including anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL), lupus anti-coagulant (LA), anti-beta2-glycoprotein 1 (abeta2GP1), and anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies, in Black South African patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of 100 SLE patients in whom clinical characteristics, including features of the anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS), disease activity, and damage were documented, and sera tested for aCL, abeta2GP, and aPT of all isotypes, and LA.

RESULTS

Positive aCL, abeta2GPI, aPT, and LA were found in 53, 84, 20, and 2 patients, respectively. Immunoglobulin (Ig)A aCL and IgG abeta2GPI were the commonest aCL (49.1%) and abeta2GPI (47%) isotypes, respectively. IgA abeta2GPI were associated with both a history of thrombosis alone (p<0.05) and a history of any clinical feature, thrombosis, and/or spontaneous abortion of the APS (p<0.05); IgA aCL were associated with a history of any clinical APS event (p<0.05); and abeta2GPI of any isotype were associated with a history of arthritis (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide further evidence that screening for abeta2GPI and IgA aCL isotypes may improve the risk assessment for APS in SLE patients of African extraction. Further prospective studies are warranted to determine the clinical utility of these tests and to elucidate the genetic basis for the increased IgA aPL response in SLE patients of African extraction.

Autoantibodies to Tumor Necrosis Factor in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective.

To detect autoantibodies to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and to determine their clinical correlates.

Methods.

Ninety-two patients with RA and 62 with SLE were studied. Sera were examined for autoantibodies to TNF by enzyme linked immunoassay. Levels of these autoantibodies were analyzed in respect to markers of inflammation such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and joint erosions, as well as other clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic aspects of RA and SLE.

Results.

Anti-TNF levels were higher in those RA patients without erosions, but did not correlate with ESR or CRP.

Conclusion.

These observations suggest that autoantibody anti-TNF may be part of the innate immune system and may contribute to decreased inflammation in patients with RA.

Antiphospholipid antibodies: paradigm in transition

OBJECTIVES

This is a critical review of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL). Most prior reviews focus on the aPL syndrome (APS), a thrombotic condition often marked by neurological disturbance. We bring to attention recent evidence that aPL may be equally relevant to non-thrombotic autoimmune conditions, notably, multiple sclerosis and ITP.

ORGANIZATION

After a brief history, the recent proliferation of aPL target antigens is reviewed. The implication is that many more exist. Theories of aPL in thrombosis are then reviewed, concluding that all have merit but that aPL may have more diverse pathological consequences than now recognized. Next, conflicting results are explained by methodological differences. The lupus anticoagulant (LA) is then discussed. LA is the best predictor of thrombosis, but why this is true is not settled. Finally, aPL in non-thrombotic disorders is reviewed.

CONCLUSION

The current paradigm of aPL holds that they are important in thrombosis, but they may have much wider clinical significance, possibly of special interest in neurology.

Controversies and unresolved issues in antiphospholipid syndrome pathogenesis and management

While much is understood concerning the clinical features of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), many issues remain. The proper designation of patients with "definite" APS and the correct categorization of patients by both laboratory and clinical features are matters of ongoing debate. Recent proposals have identified new subsets of patients who have many typical features of APS but either do not fit the criteria for a "definite" diagnosis or have initially negative laboratory tests for antiphospholipid antibodies. Meanwhile, decisions about laboratory tests are based on expert opinion, rather than the results of controlled trials. As for treatment, many guidelines are offered, but few are backed by data from strong clinical trials. This article summarizes the clinical questions remaining to be answered and debates concerning pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management.

Antibodies to C reactive protein

BACKGROUND

C reactive protein (CRP) is a known indicator of inflammation. Serum CRP is often raised in patients with inflammatory conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether individuals make antibodies to CRP and whether this might affect serum CRP concentrations.

METHODS

An enzyme linked immunosorbent assay was developed for the detection of antibodies to CRP. Specificity of the reaction was determined by inhibition of the reaction.

RESULTS

Sera from 413 patients were tested and 25 were found to be positive, particularly in patients with rheumatic diseases. Levels of anti-CRP did not correlate with serum CRP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of low CRP levels may not reflect the presence of antibodies to CRP.

The prevalence and clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis

Published data were reviewed to evaluate the occurrence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to investigate their clinical relevance in this population. The mean prevalence was calculated at 28% and the median was 22%. Few studies have found a relationship between aPL antibodies and thrombosis, particularly in combination with other risk factors. Conflicting results have been reported on the association of anticardiolipin (aCL) antibody positivity and neurologic symptoms, Reynaud's phenomenon, disease activity, radiographic erosions, extra-articular RA manifestations, rheumatoid factor, and atherosclerosis. Some studies, however, suggest that there is a correlation present between those antibodies and C-reactive protein levels, rheumatoid nodules, and antinuclear antibodies. TNF-alpha blocking agents may cause an induction of aCL antibodies, but it seems like they do not cause any clinical features related to the antiphospholipid syndrome. Higher 17beta-estradiol levels were observed in aCL antibody-positive RA patients than in aCL antibody-negative patients and especially in premenopausal women, which may predispose to a more efficient immune response.

Recurrent Pulmonary Thromboembolism in a Patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and HIV-1 Infection Associated with the Presence of Antibodies to Prothrombin: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

The coexistence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is being increasingly reported and, because of the immunological disturbances demonstrated in HIV-infected patients, diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties may arise when the 2 conditions coexist. Antiphospholipid antibodies are demonstrable in patients with both conditions, but clinical manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in HIV-infected patients, although reported, are uncommon.

METHODS

We describe a patient with HIV infection and SLE who manifested 4 episodes of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) complicated by pulmonary embolism. Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay was used to test for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, including anticardiolipin antibodies, anti- beta 2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies, and antiprothrombin antibodies (anti-PT). Additionally, we performed a computer-assisted search of the literature (via the Medline database) to identify all reported cases of HIV infection plus SLE.

RESULTS

We document the case of 35-year-old African woman with HIV infection and SLE who developed recurrent episodes of DVT and pulmonary embolism in the presence of anti-PT and discuss in depth the pathogenic role of these antibodies and the clinical challenges posed to clinicians by the coexistence of HIV and SLE in the same patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunological reconstitution in HIV-infected patients contributes to the appearance of multiple autoimmune conditions, including SLE and APS. The recognition of the coexistence of these autoimmune disorders in HIV-infected patients has important implications in the treatment of and prognosis for these individuals.

Current debates in antiphospholipid syndrome: the acquired antibody-mediated thrombophilia

Antiphospholipid (APL) syndrome is the most common form of acquired thrombophilia. It can cause significant morbidity and even mortality. The term "APL antibodies" represents a heterogeneous group of antibodies associated with this disorder. Currently no single assay can identify every APL antibody. Clinically relevant APL antibodies are mainly anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) detected by solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lupus anticoagulants (LA) demonstrated by in vitro coagulation assay. However, there are some other antibodies associated with the APL syndrome (i.e., subgroup APL antibodies). ACAs, LAs, and subgroup APL antibodies represent intersecting, but non-identical, subsets of autoantibodies. Thus, those autoantibodies may coexist or may occur independently. Any organ system and any size of vessel can be affected during the clinical course of the disease. Therefore, the APL syndrome can manifest itself in a wide variety of clinical thrombotic features. Fetal loss and pregnancy morbidity represent a specific challenge. Despite tremendous advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of APL syndrome during the past decade, the mainstay of management is still anticoagulation. However, there is no general agreement regarding the duration and intensity of anti-coagulant therapy. In this review, we focused on the current dilemmas and their present clarifications in the wide clinicopathologic spectrum of APL syndrome and APL antibody-related distinct pathologic conditions.

Antibody to serum amyloid A

INTRODUCTION

Serum amyloid A (SAA) is elevated in inflammatory states. While antibodies to CRP, the other major acute phase reactant, have been described, to our knowledge, antibodies to SAA have not. This study was therefore undertaken to determine whether antibodies to SAA could be detected in patients and whether these antibodies are associated with any disease, in particular inflammatory states, using CRP as a proxy for inflammation.

METHOD

An ELISA technique was developed for the detection of antibodies to SAA. Specificity was demonstrated by inhibition. Serum from one hundred and thirty-eight patients sent to the Clinical Immunology Laboratory for CRP evaluations were tested for anti-SAA activity. Their charts were reviewed for clinical parameters, in particular for inflammation, to determine association. Patients were also divided into those with normal and elevated levels of CRP, as a proxy for inflammation. As a control we also studied 62 normals.

RESULTS

The mean OD and 3 SD of the 62 normal blood bank donors for anti-SAA was 0.411 +/- 0.577. Thus for the purposes of this study 0.988 was determined as the cutoff between normality and abnormality. Sixty-one normals and 114 patients had "normal" levels. Elevated levels were observed in 24 patients and 1 normal. There was an association between elevated levels and aortic stenosis, deep vein thrombosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus, seizures, stroke, and atrial fibrillation. There was no association between anti-SAA levels and CRP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that antibodies to SAA develop in some patients. There was some association with inflammatory cardiovascular diseases.

Antiprothombin antibodies and the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

The preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) include the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and/or lupus anticoagulant (LA) as laboratory criteria. However, antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are a heterogeneous group of antibodies comprising also antibodies against phospholipid-binding proteins or their complexes with phospholipids. Prothrombin is one of the antigen recognized by aPL. In the last decade, there has been increasing interest in antibodies against prothrombin alone and those against phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex. The latter, phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibodies (aPT), have been closely associated with APS and LA. In this paper, we review the properties of antiprothrombin antibodies.

Antiprothrombin antibodies—are they worth assaying?

According to the preliminary classification criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (Sapporo Criteria), beta2-glycoprotein I (beta2GPI)-dependent anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) are the only laboratory tests considered as criteria for the classification of the APS. Recently, antibodies against phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex (aPS/PT) have been detected and these antibodies, rather than antibodies against prothrombin alone, are closely associated with APS and LA. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of aPS/PT for the diagnosis of APS in our population of patients with a variety of autoimmune disorders and investigated whether aPS/PT could be used as diagnostic test in patients suspected of having APS. The study population comprised 219 patients with autoimmune diseases including 82 patients with APS and 137 without APS (55 systemic lupus erythematosus, 32 rheumatoid arthritis, 10 primary Sjogren's syndrome, 8 scleroderma, 5 Behcet's disease and 27 other rheumatic diseases). IgG/M aPS/PT were measured by ELISA using phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex as antigen immobilized on ELISA plates in the presence of CaCl2. IgG/M aCL were measured by standard methods and LA was detected by clotting assays. aPS/PT, aCL and LA were more frequently found in patients with APS (47, 46 and 69, respectively) than in those without APS (11, 19 and 29, respectively) (OR 95% [CI]; 15.4 [7.2-32.7], 7.9 [4.1-15.2, 19.8 [9.6-40.6], respectively]. The sensitivity of each assay for the diagnosis of APS was 57%, 56% and 86% with a specificity of 92%, 86% and 79%, respectively. aPS/PT and aCL have similar diagnostic value for APS, therefore, we propose that aPS/PT should be further explored, not only for research purposes, but also as a candidate of one of the laboratory criteria for the classification of the APS.

The antiphospholipid syndrome

The antiphospholipid (aPL) antibody syndrome is an autoimmune condition in which vascular thrombosis and/or recurrent pregnancy losses occur in patients with laboratory evidence for antibodies that bind to phospholipids. There have been significant advances in the recognition of the role of phospholipid-binding cofactors, primarily beta2GPI, as the true immunologic targets of the antibodies. Recent evidence suggests that the antibodies disrupt phospholipid-dependent anticoagulant mechanisms and/or that aPL antibodies induce the expression of procoagulant and proadhesive molecules on endothelial cells. Current diagnosis is based on clinical findings and empirically derived tests, such as assays for antibodies that bind to phospholipids or putative cofactors and coagulation assays that detect inhibition of phospholipid-dependent coagulation reactions. Current treatment relies primarily on anticoagulant therapy. Research advances are expected to bring mechanistically based diagnostic tests and improved therapy that target the roots of the disease process.

Autoimmune disease as a cause of reproductive failure

High-risk pregnancy is the most common clinical association with antiphospholipid antibodies; the principal manifestations are pregnancy loss and early preeclampsia. Membership in this family of antibodies is continually growing and includes antibodies against a variety of phospholipids, phospholipid-protein complexes, and phospholipid-binding proteins. The current information in the literature is inadequate to clearly implicate a subgroup of antiphospholipid antibodies or a particular pathophysiologic mechanism as being responsible for poor pregnancy outcomes. It is clear, however, that prevalent diagnostic tests for LA and aCL are extremely useful to identify many of these patients, but are inadequate for diagnosis of all patients with autoimmune pregnancy loss or to elucidate the pathophysiology. Many patients who present clinically with autoimmune-like pregnancy complications currently are negative in tests for LA or aCL, but have antibodies against annexin V, phosphatidylserine, or other relevant antigens. The greatest risk for a complicated pregnancy is conveyed by a subgroup of antibodies that affect the normal function of placental trophoblast. As clinical laboratory tests designed to detect more members of the antiphospholipid antibody family become available, understanding of this complicated disease (APS) will increase.

Platelet-endothelial interactions: sepsis, HIT, and antiphospholipid syndrome

Acquired abnormalities in platelets, endothelium, and their interaction occur in sepsis, immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and the antiphospholipid syndrome. Although of distinct pathogeneses, these three disorders have several clinical features in common, including thrombocytopenia and the potential for life- and limb-threatening thrombotic events, ranging from microvascular (sepsis > antiphospholipid > HIT) to macrovascular (HIT > antiphospholipid > sepsis) thrombosis, both venous and arterial. In Section I, Dr. William Aird reviews basic aspects of endothelial-platelet interactions as a springboard to considering the common problem of thrombocytopenia (and its mechanism) in sepsis. The relationship between thrombocytopenia and other aspects of the host response in sepsis, including activation of coagulation/inflammation pathways and the development of organ dysfunction, is discussed. Practical issues of platelet count triggers and targeted use of activated protein C concentrates are reviewed. In Section II, Dr. Theodore Warkentin describes HIT as a clinicopathologic syndrome, i.e., the diagnosis should be based on the concurrence of an appropriate clinical picture together with detection of platelet-activating and/or platelet factor 4-dependent antibodies (usually in high levels). HIT is a profound prothrombotic state (odds ratio for thrombosis, 20-40), and the risk for thrombosis persists for a time even when heparin is stopped. Thus, pharmacologic control of thrombin (or its generation), and postponing oral anticoagulation pending substantial resolution of thrombocytopenia, is appropriate. Indeed, coumarin-associated protein C depletion during uncontrolled thrombin generation of HIT can explain limb loss (coumarin-associated venous limb gangrene) or skin necrosis syndromes in some patients. In Section III, Dr. Jacob Rand presents the most recent concepts on the mechanisms of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome, and focuses on the role of beta(2)-glycoprotein I as a major antigenic target in this condition. Diagnosis of the syndrome is often complicated because the clinical laboratory tests to identify this condition have been empirically derived. Dr. Rand addresses the practical aspects of current testing for the syndrome and current recommendations for treating patients with thrombosis and with spontaneous pregnancy losses.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in Chilean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are a heterogeneous family of antibodies found in autoimmune disorders, infectious diseases, and other situations. The presence of different aPLs has been associated with various clinical manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of aPLs in a group of 90 Chilean patients with systemic lupus erytematosus (SLE) and 90 healthy controls. We measured anticardiolipin antibodies (aCLs), antiphosphatidylserine antibodies (aPSs), anti-beta(2) glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-beta(2)GPIs), and antiprothrombin antibodies (aPTs) with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent technique using "in-house" assays. Fifty-four of 90 SLE patients (60.0%) had some type of aPL. Forty of 90 (44.4%) were positive for aCLs, 9 of 61 (14.8%) had aPSs, 21 of 90 (23.3%) had anti-beta(2)GPIs, and 18 of 90 (20.0%) had aPTs. In the control group, prevalences were as follows: aCLs, 3.3%; aPSs, 1.1%; anti-beta(2)GPIs, 1.1%; aPTs, 2.2%. In most cases, values were in the low-positive range. Of all aPL detected, 29.5% was of the IgG isotype, 37.5% IgM, and 33.0% IgA. We observed a correlation between aCLs and aPSs and of these antibodies with anti-beta(2)GPIs and aPTs but not between anti-beta(2)GPIs and aPTs. Our results show a high prevalence of aPLs in SLE patients. An association between different specificities and isotypes of aPLs was also observed.

Recent advances in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid antibodies are autoantibodies directed against anionic phospholipids or protein-phospholipid complexes measured in solid-phase immunoassays such as anticardiolipin (aCL) antibody or detected in phospholipid-dependent clotting tests as lupus anticoagulant (LA). The term "antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)" was first coined to denote the clinical association between antiphospholipid antibodies and a syndrome of episodes of thrombosis in arteries and/or veins, pregnancy loss, and thrombocytopenia. The diagnosis of APS is based on the finding of "moderate-to-high" aCL antibody titer and/or an LA test with any one of the characteristic clinical features presented. Recently, the diagnostic criteria of APS was revised and several newer assays that use phosphatidylserine, a mixture of negatively charged phospholipids or beta2-glycoprotein 1 (beta2-GP1) have been proposed for more specific measurements of antibodies present in APS. In this section, recent progress in the laboratory diagnosis of antiphopholipid syndrome will be discussed.

Thrombophilia: what's a practitioner to do?

Management of thrombophilia is an ever-changing field as new disorders are described and additional clinical experience accrues. This paper addresses three common management issues in the care of patients with thrombophilia. The first two topics are updates for common but perplexing hypercoagulable states and the last topic introduces a new option for optimal management of oral anticoagulant therapy. Dr. Jacob Rand updates and organizes the approach to patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. This syndrome is a common acquired thrombophilic state, but the diagnosis and treatment of patients remains a challenge. Dr. Rand outlines his diagnostic and treatment strategies based on the current understanding of this complicated syndrome. Dr. Barbara Konkle addresses the special concerns of managing women with thrombophilia. Hematologists are often asked to advise on the risks of hormonal therapy or pregnancy in a woman with a personal or family history of thrombosis or with an abnormal laboratory finding. Dr. Konkle reviews the available data on the risks of hormonal therapy and pregnancy in women with and without known underlying thrombophilic risk factors. In Section III, Dr. Gail Macik will discuss a new approach to warfarin management. Several instruments are now available for home prothrombin time (PT) monitoring. Self-testing and self management of warfarin are slowly emerging as reliable alternatives to traditional provider-based care and Dr. Macik reviews the instruments available and the results of studies that support this new management option.

Update on the management of the pregnant patient with antiphospholipid antibody

Management of the pregnant patient with antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) is reviewed, with emphasis on recent randomized controlled clinical trials. These support the use of subcutaneous heparin and low dose aspirin, current standard therapy for women with aPL and a history of fetal loss. Prednisone is rarely used due to high risk of maternal and fetal morbidity. Intravenous immunoglobulin may represent an important additional therapy for women who fail aspirin and heparin. Patients with a history of thrombosis require full, therapeutic anticoagulation during pregnancy. Recommendations are less clear for newly described antibodies to phospholipid-binding protein, for low titer antibodies, and for infertility treatment in the setting of aPL.

Prevalence of anti-cardiolipin, anti-beta2 glycoprotein I, and anti-prothrombin antibodies in young patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE

To measure anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (anti-beta2GPI), and anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies in young patients with epilepsy, and to correlate their presence with demographic data, clinical diagnoses, laboratory and neuroradiologic findings, and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHODS

Sera from one hundred forty-two consecutive patients with epilepsy with a median age of 10 years were tested for aCL and anti-beta2GPI autoantibodies by solid-phase assays. aPT antibodies also were assayed in sera from 90 patients. Positive results were confirmed after a minimum of 6 weeks. Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and antibodies against extractable nuclear antigens (ENAs) also were tested.

RESULTS

An overall positivity of 41 (28.8%) of 142 sera was found. Fifteen patients were positive for aCL, 25 for anti-beta2GPI, and 18 for aPT antibodies. Several patients (12%) displayed more than one specificity in their serum. Only one of these patients had a concurrent positivity for ANAs and ENAs. A predominance of younger patients was found in the antibody-positive group. All types of epilepsy were represented in the positive group. No relation between antibody positivity and AEDs was found. Diffuse ischemic lesions at computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were present in higher percentages in patients who were antibody positive. No positive patient had a history of previous thrombosis or other features related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and no patient was born of a mother with SLE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests a relation between epilepsy and aPL in young patients. A pathogenetic role for these autoantibodies cannot be excluded, and their determination might prove useful even from a therapeutic point of view.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, factor V Leiden and antiphospholipid syndrome: a case report

We report on a 57-year-old woman with three episodes of ischemic strokes and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). Tests for inherited and acquired thrombophilia showed elevated anticardiolipin immunoglobulin (Ig)M antibodies (on three separate occasions), anti-prothrombin IgG antibodies, and the heterozygous form of factor V Leiden. This is the first case of HHT, a primary antiphospholipid syndrome, combined with factor V Leiden. No detectable arteriovenous malformation was found and ischemic episodes, documented by computer tomography, were related to the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and possibly the carriership of factor V Leiden mutation. Since aspirin provoked severe nasal hemorrhages, treatment with ticlopidine was initiated after the third stroke. Over an 18-month follow-up, ischemic episodes were absent and we regarded oral anticoagulation as unjustifiable.

Classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome

The major purpose of the 1999 international consensus criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is to facilitate the selection of uniform groups of patients for clinical and experimental studies. An early evaluation suggests that the criteria fulfill this purpose when tested in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or lupus-like diseases. The criteria will likely need modification as investigators appraise and reach consensus about new information on APS. The international APS symposium has had an important role in this process and provides a mechanism for facilitating future advances in this subject.

Thrombophilia: What's a Practitioner to Do?

Management of thrombophilia is an ever-changing field as new disorders are described and additional clinical experience accrues. This paper addresses three common management issues in the care of patients with thrombophilia. The first two topics are updates for common but perplexing hypercoagulable states and the last topic introduces a new option for optimal management of oral anticoagulant therapy. Dr. Jacob Rand updates and organizes the approach to patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. This syndrome is a common acquired thrombophilic state, but the diagnosis and treatment of patients remains a challenge. Dr. Rand outlines his diagnostic and treatment strategies based on the current understanding of this complicated syndrome. Dr. Barbara Konkle addresses the special concerns of managing women with thrombophilia. Hematologists are often asked to advise on the risks of hormonal therapy or pregnancy in a woman with a personal or family history of thrombosis or with an abnormal laboratory finding. Dr. Konkle reviews the available data on the risks of hormonal therapy and pregnancy in women with and without known underlying thrombophilic risk factors. In Section III, Dr. Gail Macik will discuss a new approach to warfarin management. Several instruments are now available for home prothrombin time (PT) monitoring. Self-testing and self management of warfarin are slowly emerging as reliable alternatives to traditional provider-based care and Dr. Macik reviews the instruments available and the results of studies that support this new management option.