Sigma competition: the contest between bacteriophage T4 middle and late transcription

Phage-based biosensors: in vivo analysis of native T4 phage promoters to enhance reporter enzyme expression

Phage-based biosensors have shown significant promise in meeting the present needs of the food and agricultural industries due to a combination of sufficient portability, speed, ease of use, sensitivity, and low production cost. Although current phage-based methods do not meet the bacteria detection limit imposed by the EPA, FDA, and USDA, a better understanding of phage genetics can significantly increase their sensitivity as biosensors. In the current study, the signal sensitivity of a T4 phage-based detection system was improved via transcriptional upregulation of the reporter enzyme Nanoluc luciferase (Nluc). An efficient platform to evaluate the promoter activity of reporter T4 phages was developed. The ability to upregulate Nluc within T4 phages was evaluated using 15 native T4 promoters. Data indicates a six-fold increase in reporter enzyme signal from integration of the selected promoters. Collectively, this work demonstrates that fine tuning the expression of reporter enzymes such as Nluc through optimization of transcription can significantly reduce the limits of detection.

Escherichia coli Cells Exposed to Lethal Doses of Electron Beam Irradiation Retain Their Ability to Propagate Bacteriophages and Are Metabolically Active

Reports in the literature suggest that bacteria exposed to lethal doses of ionizing radiation, i.e., electron beams, are unable to replicate yet they remain metabolically active. To investigate this phenomenon further, we electron beam irradiated Escherichia coli cells to a lethal dose and measured their membrane integrity, metabolic activity, ATP levels and overall cellular functionality via bacteriophage infection. We also visualized the DNA double-strand breaks in the cells. We used non-irradiated (live) and heat-killed cells as positive and negative controls, respectively. Our results show that the membrane integrity of E. coli cells is maintained and that the cells remain metabolically active up to 9 days post-irradiation when stored at 4°C. The ATP levels in lethally irradiated cells are similar to non-irradiated control cells. We also visualized extensive DNA damage within the cells and confirmed their cellular functionality based on their ability to propagate bacteriophages for up to 9 days post-irradiation. Overall, our findings indicate that lethally irradiated E. coli cells resemble live non-irradiated cells more closely than heat-killed (dead) cells.

The Small RNA GcvB Promotes Mutagenic Break Repair by Opposing the Membrane Stress Response

Microbes and human cells possess mechanisms of mutagenesis activated by stress responses. Stress-inducible mutagenesis mechanisms may provide important models for mutagenesis that drives host-pathogen interactions, antibiotic resistance, and possibly much of evolution generally. In Escherichia coli, repair of DNA double-strand breaks is switched to a mutagenic mode, using error-prone DNA polymerases, via the SOS DNA damage and general (σ^S) stress responses. We investigated small RNA (sRNA) clients of Hfq, an RNA chaperone that promotes mutagenic break repair (MBR), and found that GcvB promotes MBR by allowing a robust σ^S response, achieved via opposing the membrane stress (σ^E) response. Cells that lack gcvB were MBR deficient and displayed reduced σ^S-dependent transcription but not reduced σ^S protein levels. The defects in MBR and σ^S-dependent transcription in ΔgcvB cells were alleviated by artificially increasing σ^S levels, implying that GcvB promotes mutagenesis by allowing a normal σ^S response. ΔgcvB cells were highly induced for the σ^E response, and blocking σ^E response induction restored both mutagenesis and σ^S-promoted transcription. We suggest that GcvB may promote the σ^S response and mutagenesis indirectly, by promoting membrane integrity, which keeps σ^E levels lower. At high levels, σ^E might outcompete σ^S for binding RNA polymerase and so reduce the σ^S response and mutagenesis. The data show the delicate balance of stress response modulation of mutagenesis.

IMPORTANCE

Mutagenesis mechanisms upregulated by stress responses promote de novo antibiotic resistance and cross-resistance in bacteria, antifungal drug resistance in yeasts, and genome instability in cancer cells under hypoxic stress. This paper describes the role of a small RNA (sRNA) in promoting a stress-inducible-mutagenesis mechanism, mutagenic DNA break repair in Escherichia coli The roles of many sRNAs in E. coli remain unknown. This study shows that ΔgcvB cells, which lack the GcvB sRNA, display a hyperactivated membrane stress response and reduced general stress response, possibly because of sigma factor competition for RNA polymerase. This results in a mutagenic break repair defect. The data illuminate a function of GcvB sRNA in opposing the membrane stress response, and thus indirectly upregulating mutagenesis.

A model for sigma factor competition in bacterial cells

Sigma factors control global switches of the genetic expression program in bacteria. Different sigma factors compete for binding to a limited pool of RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzymes, providing a mechanism for cross-talk between genes or gene classes via the sharing of expression machinery. To analyze the contribution of sigma factor competition to global changes in gene expression, we develop a theoretical model that describes binding between sigma factors and core RNAP, transcription, non-specific binding to DNA and the modulation of the availability of the molecular components. The model is validated by comparison with in vitro competition experiments, with which excellent agreement is found. Transcription is affected via the modulation of the concentrations of the different types of holoenzymes, so saturated promoters are only weakly affected by sigma factor competition. However, in case of overlapping promoters or promoters recognized by two types of sigma factors, we find that even saturated promoters are strongly affected. Active transcription effectively lowers the affinity between the sigma factor driving it and the core RNAP, resulting in complex cross-talk effects. Sigma factor competition is not strongly affected by non-specific binding of core RNAPs, sigma factors and holoenzymes to DNA. Finally, we analyze the role of increased core RNAP availability upon the shut-down of ribosomal RNA transcription during the stringent response. We find that passive up-regulation of alternative sigma-dependent transcription is not only possible, but also displays hypersensitivity based on the sigma factor competition. Our theoretical analysis thus provides support for a significant role of passive control during that global switch of the gene expression program.

Bacteria respond to changing environmental conditions by switching the global pattern of expressed genes. A key mechanism for global switches of the transcriptional program depends on alternative sigma factors that bind the RNA polymerase core enzyme and direct it towards the appropriate stress response genes. Competition of different sigma factors for a limited amount of RNA polymerase is believed to play a central role in this global switch. Here, a theoretical approach is used towards a quantitative understanding of sigma factor competition and its effects on gene expression. The model is used to quantitatively describe in vitro competition assays and to address the question of indirect or passive control in the stringent response upon amino acids starvation. We show that sigma factor competition provides a mechanism for a passive up-regulation of the stress specific sigma-driven genes due to the increased availability of RNA polymerase in the stringent response. Moreover, we find that active separation of sigma factor from the RNA polymerase during early transcript elongation weakens the sigma factor-RNA polymerase equilibrium constant, raising the question of how their in vitro measure is relevant in the cell.

Learning from bacteriophages - advantages and limitations of phage and phage-encoded protein applications

The emergence of bacteria resistance to most of the currently available antibiotics has become a critical therapeutic problem. The bacteria causing both hospital and community-acquired infections are most often multidrug resistant. In view of the alarming level of antibiotic resistance between bacterial species and difficulties with treatment, alternative or supportive antibacterial cure has to be developed. The presented review focuses on the major characteristics of bacteriophages and phage-encoded proteins affecting their usefulness as antimicrobial agents. We discuss several issues such as mode of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, resistance and manufacturing aspects of bacteriophages and phage-encoded proteins application.

Post-transcriptional control by bacteriophage T4: mRNA decay and inhibition of translation initiation

Over 50 years of biological research with bacteriophage T4 includes notable discoveries in post-transcriptional control, including the genetic code, mRNA, and tRNA; the very foundations of molecular biology. In this review we compile the past 10 - 15 year literature on RNA-protein interactions with T4 and some of its related phages, with particular focus on advances in mRNA decay and processing, and on translational repression. Binding of T4 proteins RegB, RegA, gp32 and gp43 to their cognate target RNAs has been characterized. For several of these, further study is needed for an atomic-level perspective, where resolved structures of RNA-protein complexes are awaiting investigation. Other features of post-transcriptional control are also summarized. These include: RNA structure at translation initiation regions that either inhibit or promote translation initiation; programmed translational bypassing, where T4 orchestrates ribosome bypass of a 50 nucleotide mRNA sequence; phage exclusion systems that involve T4-mediated activation of a latent endoribonuclease (PrrC) and cofactor-assisted activation of EF-Tu proteolysis (Gol-Lit); and potentially important findings on ADP-ribosylation (by Alt and Mod enzymes) of ribosome-associated proteins that might broadly impact protein synthesis in the infected cell. Many of these problems can continue to be addressed with T4, whereas the growing database of T4-related phage genome sequences provides new resources and potentially new phage-host systems to extend the work into a broader biological, evolutionary context.

Transcriptional control in the prereplicative phase of T4 development

Control of transcription is crucial for correct gene expression and orderly development. For many years, bacteriophage T4 has provided a simple model system to investigate mechanisms that regulate this process. Development of T4 requires the transcription of early, middle and late RNAs. Because T4 does not encode its own RNA polymerase, it must redirect the polymerase of its host, E. coli, to the correct class of genes at the correct time. T4 accomplishes this through the action of phage-encoded factors. Here I review recent studies investigating the transcription of T4 prereplicative genes, which are expressed as early and middle transcripts. Early RNAs are generated immediately after infection from T4 promoters that contain excellent recognition sequences for host polymerase. Consequently, the early promoters compete extremely well with host promoters for the available polymerase. T4 early promoter activity is further enhanced by the action of the T4 Alt protein, a component of the phage head that is injected into E. coli along with the phage DNA. Alt modifies Arg265 on one of the two α subunits of RNA polymerase. Although work with host promoters predicts that this modification should decrease promoter activity, transcription from some T4 early promoters increases when RNA polymerase is modified by Alt. Transcription of T4 middle genes begins about 1 minute after infection and proceeds by two pathways: 1) extension of early transcripts into downstream middle genes and 2) activation of T4 middle promoters through a process called sigma appropriation. In this activation, the T4 co-activator AsiA binds to Region 4 of σ⁷⁰, the specificity subunit of RNA polymerase. This binding dramatically remodels this portion of σ⁷⁰, which then allows the T4 activator MotA to also interact with σ⁷⁰. In addition, AsiA restructuring of σ⁷⁰ prevents Region 4 from forming its normal contacts with the -35 region of promoter DNA, which in turn allows MotA to interact with its DNA binding site, a MotA box, centered at the -30 region of middle promoter DNA. T4 sigma appropriation reveals how a specific domain within RNA polymerase can be remolded and then exploited to alter promoter specificity.

The role of interactions between phage and bacterial proteins within the infected cell: a diverse and puzzling interactome

Interactions between bacteriophage proteins and bacterial proteins are important for efficient infection of the host cell. The phage proteins involved in these bacteriophage-host interactions are often produced immediately after infection. A survey of the available set of published bacteriophage-host interactions reveals the targeted host proteins are inhibited, activated or functionally redirected by the phage protein. These interactions protect the bacteriophage from bacterial defence mechanisms or adapt the host-cell metabolism to establish an efficient infection cycle. Regrettably, a large majority of bacteriophage early proteins lack any identified function. Recent research into the antibacterial potential of bacteriophage-host interactions indicates that phage early proteins seem to target a wide variety of processes in the host cell - many of them non-essential. Since a clear understanding of such interactions may become important for regulations involving phage therapy and in biotechnological applications, increased scientific emphasis on the biological elucidation of such proteins is warranted.

RNA processing and decay in bacteriophage T4

Bacteriophage T4 is the archetype of virulent phage. It has evolved very efficient strategies to subvert host functions to its benefit and to impose the expression of its genome. T4 utilizes a combination of host and phage-encoded RNases and factors to degrade its mRNAs in a stage-dependent manner. The host endonuclease RNase E is used throughout the phage development. The sequence-specific, T4-encoded RegB endoribonuclease functions in association with the ribosomal protein S1 to functionally inactivate early transcripts and expedite their degradation. T4 polynucleotide kinase plays a role in this process. Later, the viral factor Dmd protects middle and late mRNAs from degradation by the host RNase LS. T4 codes for a set of eight tRNAs and two small, stable RNA of unknown function that may contribute to phage virulence. Their maturation is assured by host enzymes, but one phage factor, Cef, is required for the biogenesis of some of them. The tRNA gene cluster also codes for a homing DNA endonuclease, SegB, responsible for spreading the tRNA genes to other T4-related phage.

Dissection of the bacteriophage T4 late promoter complex

Activated transcription of the bacteriophage T4 late genes is generated by a mechanism that stands apart from the common modalities of transcriptional regulation: the activator is gp45, the viral replisome's sliding clamp; two sliding-clamp-binding proteins, gp33 and gp55, replace the host RNA polymerase (RNAP) sigma subunit. We have mutagenized, reconfigured and selectively disrupted individual interactions of the sliding clamp with gp33 and gp55 and have monitored effects on transcription. The C-terminal sliding-clamp-binding epitopes of gp33 and gp55 are perfectly interchangeable, but the functions of these two RNAP-sliding clamp connections differ: only the gp33-gp45 linkage is essential for activation, while loss of the gp55-gp45 linkage impairs but does not abolish activation. Formation of transcription-ready promoter complexes by the sliding-clamp-activated wild-type T4 RNAP resists competition by high concentrations of the polyanion heparin. This avid formation of promoter complexes requires both linkages of the T4 late RNAP to the sliding clamp. Preopening the promoter compensates for loss of the gp55-gp45 but not the gp33-gp45 linkage. We interpret the relationship of these findings and our prior analysis to the common model of transcriptional initiation in bacteria in terms of two parallel pathways, with two RNAP holoenzymes and two DNA templates: (1) gp55-RNAP and the T4 late promoter execute basal transcription; (2) gp55-gp33-RNAP and the T4 late promoter with its mobile enhancer, the T4 sliding clamp, execute activated transcription. gp55 and gp33 perform sigma-like functions, gp55 in promoter recognition and gp33 (as well as gp55) in enhancer recognition. gp33 operates the switch between these two pathways by repressing basal transcription.

The role of an upstream promoter interaction in initiation of bacterial transcription

The bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) recognizes promoters through sequence-specific contacts of its promoter-specificity components (sigma) with two DNA sequence motifs. Contacts with the upstream ('-35') promoter motif are made by sigma domain 4 attached to the flap domain of the RNAP beta subunit. Bacteriophage T4 late promoters consist solely of an extended downstream ('-10') motif specifically recognized by the T4 gene 55 protein (gp55). Low level basal transcription is sustained by gp55-RNAP holoenzyme. The late transcription coactivator gp33 binds to the beta flap and represses this basal transcription. Gp33 can also repress transcription by Escherichia coli sigma70-RNAP holoenzyme mutated to allow gp33 access to the beta flap. We propose that repression is due to gp33 blocking an upstream sequence-independent DNA-binding site on RNAP (as sigma70 domain 4 does) but, unlike sigma70 domain 4, providing no new DNA interaction. We show that this upstream interaction is essential only at an early step of transcription initiation, and discuss the role of this interaction in promoter recognition and transcriptional regulation.

Both regions 4.1 and 4.2 of E. coli sigma(70) are together required for binding to bacteriophage T4 AsiA in vivo

The T4 AsiA is an anti-sigma factor encoded by one of the early genes of Bacteriophage T4. It has been shown that AsiA inhibits transcription from promoters containing -10 and -35 consensus sequence by binding to sigma(70) of E. coli. Binding of AsiA to sigma(70) in vivo, in E. coli, leads to inhibition of transcription of essential genes resulting in killing of the organism. By using various in vitro methods, the region of sigma(70) binding to AsiA have been mapped to domain 4.2. Additionally, mutational analysis of sigma(70) has also identified amino acid residues in domain 4.1 which are critical for interaction with AsiA. Based on NMR studies it has been suggested that either of these regions can bind to AsiA, a conclusion which was supported by high degree of amino acid homology between domain 4.1 and 4.2. However, it is not clear whether under in vivo conditions, AsiA exerts its transcription inhibitory effect by binding to one of these regions or both the regions together. In order to understand the mechanism of AsiA mediated inhibition of E. coli transcription in vivo, in terms of specific binding requirements to region 4.1 and/or 4.2, we have studied the interaction of these sub-domains with AsiA by Yeast two hybrid system as well as by co-expressing and affinity purification of the interacting partners in vivo in E. coli. It was observed that minimum fragment of sigma(70) showing observable binding to AsiA, must possess sub-domains 4.1 and 4.2 together. No binding could be detected in sigma(70) fragments lacking a part of either domain 4.1 or 4.2, in any of the assays. This data was also supported by in vitro binding studies wherein only sigma(70) fragments carrying both region 4.1 and 4.2 showed binding to AsiA. Co-expression of region 4.1 and 4.2 fragments together also did not show any interaction with AsiA. The results presented here suggest that binding of AsiA to sigma(70), in vivo, requires the presence of both sub-domains of region 4 of sigma(70).

Transcription regulation by bacteriophage T4 AsiA

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA, a strong inhibitor of bacterial RNA polymerase, was the first antisigma protein to be discovered. Recent advances that made it possible to purify large amounts of this highly toxic protein led to an increased understanding of AsiA function and structure. In this review, we discuss how the small 10-KDa AsiA protein plays a key role in T4 development through its ability to both inhibit and activate bacterial RNA polymerase transcription.

The bacteriophage T4 late-transcription coactivator gp33 binds the flap domain of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Transcription of bacteriophage T4 late genes requires concomitant DNA replication. T4 late promoters, which consist of a single 8-bp -10 motif, are recognized by a holoenzyme containing Escherichia coli RNA polymerase core and the T4-encoded promoter specificity subunit, gp55. Initiation of transcription at these promoters by gp55-holoenzyme is inefficient, but is greatly activated by the DNA-loaded DNA polymerase sliding clamp, gp45, and the coactivator, gp33. We report that gp33 attaches to the flap domain of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase beta-subunit and that this interaction is essential for activation. The beta-flap also mediates recognition of -35 promoter motifs by binding to sigma(70) domain 4. The results suggest that gp33 is an analogue of sigma(70) domain 4 and that gp55 and gp33 together constitute two parts of the T4 late sigma. We propose a model for the role of the gp45 sliding clamp in activation of T4 late-gene transcription.

Phage T4 early promoters are resistant to inhibition by the anti-sigma factor AsiA

Phage T4 early promoters are transcribed in vivo and in vitro by the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme Esigma(70). We studied in vitro the effects of the T4 anti-sigma(70) factor AsiA on the activity of several T4 early promoters. In single-round transcription, promoters motB, denV, mrh.2, motA wild type and UP element-deleted motA are strongly resistant to inhibition by AsiA. The alpha-C-terminal domain of Esigma(70) is crucial to this resistance. DNase I footprinting of Esigma(70) and Esigma(70)AsiA on motA and mrh.2 shows extended contacts between the holoenzyme with or without AsiA and upstream regions of these promoters. A TG --> TC mutation of the extended -10 motif in the motA UP element-deleted promoter strongly increases susceptibility to inhibition by AsiA, but has no effect on the motA wild-type promoter: either the UP element or the extended -10 site confers resistance to AsiA. Potassium permanganate reactivity shows that the two structure elements are not equivalent: with AsiA, the motA UP element-deleted promoter opens more slowly whereas the motA TC promoter opens like the wild type. Changes in UV laser photoreactivity at position +4 on variants of motA reveal an analogous distinction in the roles of the extended -10 and UP promoter elements.

T4 AsiA blocks DNA recognition by remodeling sigma70 region 4

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA is a versatile transcription factor capable of inhibiting host gene expression as an 'anti-sigma' factor while simultaneously promoting gene-specific expression of T4 middle genes in conjunction with T4 MotA. To accomplish this task, AsiA engages conserved region 4 of Eschericia coli sigma70, blocking recognition of most host promoters by sequestering the DNA-binding surface at the AsiA/sigma70 interface. The three-dimensional structure of an AsiA/region 4 complex reveals that the C-terminal alpha helix of region 4 is unstructured, while four other helices adopt a completely different conformation relative to the canonical structure of unbound region 4. That AsiA induces, rather than merely stabilizes, this rearrangement can be realized by comparison to the homologous structures of region 4 solved in a variety of contexts, including the structure of Thermotoga maritima sigmaA region 4 described herein. AsiA simultaneously occupies the surface of region 4 that ordinarily contacts core RNA polymerase (RNAP), suggesting that an AsiA-bound sigma70 may also undergo conformational changes in the context of the RNAP holoenzyme.

Bacteriophage-induced modifications of host RNA polymerase

Bacteriophages have developed an impressive array of ingenious mechanisms to modify bacterial host RNA polymerase to make it serve viral needs. In this review we summarize the current knowledge about two types of host RNA polymerase modifications induced by double-stranded DNA phages: covalent modifications and modifications through RNA polymerase-binding proteins. We interpret the biochemical and genetic data within the framework of a structure-function model of bacterial RNA polymerase and viral biology.

Tethering sigma70 to RNA polymerase reveals high in vivo activity of sigma factors and sigma70-dependent pausing at promoter-distal locations

Bacterial sigma factors compete for binding to RNA polymerase (RNAP) to control promoter selection, and in some cases interact with RNAP to regulate at least the early stages of transcript elongation. However, the effective concentration of sigmas in vivo, and the extent to which sigma can regulate transcript elongation generally, are unknown. We report that tethering sigma70 to all RNAP molecules via genetic fusion of rpoD to rpoC (encoding sigma70 and RNAP's beta' subunit, respectively) yields viable Escherichia coli strains in which alternative sigma-factor function is not impaired. beta'::sigma70 RNAP transcribed DNA normally in vitro, but allowed sigma70-dependent pausing at extended -10-like sequences anywhere in a transcriptional unit. Based on measurement of the effective concentration of tethered sigma70, we conclude that the effective concentration of sigma70 in E. coli (i.e., its thermodynamic activity) is close to its bulk concentration. At this level, sigma70 would be a bona fide elongation factor able to direct transcriptional pausing even after its release from RNAP during promoter escape.

Complete genome sequence of the broad-host-range vibriophage KVP40: comparative genomics of a T4-related bacteriophage

The complete genome sequence of the T4-like, broad-host-range vibriophage KVP40 has been determined. The genome sequence is 244,835 bp, with an overall G+C content of 42.6%. It encodes 386 putative protein-encoding open reading frames (CDSs), 30 tRNAs, 33 T4-like late promoters, and 57 potential rho-independent terminators. Overall, 92.1% of the KVP40 genome is coding, with an average CDS size of 587 bp. While 65% of the CDSs were unique to KVP40 and had no known function, the genome sequence and organization show specific regions of extensive conservation with phage T4. At least 99 KVP40 CDSs have homologs in the T4 genome (Blast alignments of 45 to 68% amino acid similarity). The shared CDSs represent 36% of all T4 CDSs but only 26% of those from KVP40. There is extensive representation of the DNA replication, recombination, and repair enzymes as well as the viral capsid and tail structural genes. KVP40 lacks several T4 enzymes involved in host DNA degradation, appears not to synthesize the modified cytosine (hydroxymethyl glucose) present in T-even phages, and lacks group I introns. KVP40 likely utilizes the T4-type sigma-55 late transcription apparatus, but features of early- or middle-mode transcription were not identified. There are 26 CDSs that have no viral homolog, and many did not necessarily originate from Vibrio spp., suggesting an even broader host range for KVP40. From these latter CDSs, an NAD salvage pathway was inferred that appears to be unique among bacteriophages. Features of the KVP40 genome that distinguish it from T4 are presented, as well as those, such as the replication and virion gene clusters, that are substantially conserved.

Thermoirreversible and thermoreversible promoter opening by two Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzymes

Promoter opening, in which the complementary DNA strands separate around the transcriptional start site, is generally thermoreversible. An exceptional case of thermoirreversible opening of the T4 late promoter has been analyzed by KMnO4 footprinting and transcription. T4 late promoters, which consist of an 8-base pair (bp) TATA box "-10" element, are recognized by the small, phage-encoded, highly diverged sigma-family initiation subunit gp55. The T4 late promoter only opens above 15-20 degrees C, but once it has been formed remains open and transcriptionally active for days at -0.5 degrees C. The low temperature-trapped open complex and its isothermally formed state are shown to be structurally distinctive. Two "extended -10" sigma 70 promoters, which, like the T4 late promoter, lack "-35" sites, have been subjected to a comparative analysis: the T4 middle promoter PrIIB2 opens and closes thermoreversibly under conditions of basal and MotA- and AsiA-activated transcription. The open galP1 promoter complex, whose transcription bubble is very AT-rich, also closes reversibly upon shift to -0.5 degrees C, but more slowly than does the rIIB2 promoter. Formation of a trapped-open low temperature state of the promoter complex appears to be a singular property of gp55-RNA polymerase holoenzyme.

Twelve new MotA-dependent middle promoters of bacteriophage T4: consensus sequence revised

Bacteriophage T4 middle-mode transcription requires Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, phage-encoded transcriptional activator MotA and co-activator AsiA that form a complex at a middle promoter DNA. T4 middle promoters have been defined by a consensus sequence deduced from the list of 14 middle promoters identified in earlier studies. To date, 33 middle promoters have been mapped on the T4 genome. Of these, 12 contain differences even at the highly conserved positions of the consensus sequence. In the T4 prereplicative gene cluster between genes e and rpbA, we have identified 12 new middle promoters, most of which contain differences from the consensus sequence deduced previously. Analysis of base conservation in the different sequence positions of new middle promoters, as well as those identified previously, revealed some new features of middle T4 promoters. We propose to define these promoters by a MotA box (a/t)(a/t)(a/t)TGCTTtA centred at the position -30, the sequence TAtaAT centred at -10 relative to the transcriptional start site, and the spacer region of 12(+/-1) base-pairs between them.

Bacteriophage T4 genome

Phage T4 has provided countless contributions to the paradigms of genetics and biochemistry. Its complete genome sequence of 168,903 bp encodes about 300 gene products. T4 biology and its genomic sequence provide the best-understood model for modern functional genomics and proteomics. Variations on gene expression, including overlapping genes, internal translation initiation, spliced genes, translational bypassing, and RNA processing, alert us to the caveats of purely computational methods. The T4 transcriptional pattern reflects its dependence on the host RNA polymerase and the use of phage-encoded proteins that sequentially modify RNA polymerase; transcriptional activator proteins, a phage sigma factor, anti-sigma, and sigma decoy proteins also act to specify early, middle, and late promoter recognition. Posttranscriptional controls by T4 provide excellent systems for the study of RNA-dependent processes, particularly at the structural level. The redundancy of DNA replication and recombination systems of T4 reveals how phage and other genomes are stably replicated and repaired in different environments, providing insight into genome evolution and adaptations to new hosts and growth environments. Moreover, genomic sequence analysis has provided new insights into tail fiber variation, lysis, gene duplications, and membrane localization of proteins, while high-resolution structural determination of the "cell-puncturing device," combined with the three-dimensional image reconstruction of the baseplate, has revealed the mechanism of penetration during infection. Despite these advances, nearly 130 potential T4 genes remain uncharacterized. Current phage-sequencing initiatives are now revealing the similarities and differences among members of the T4 family, including those that infect bacteria other than Escherichia coli. T4 functional genomics will aid in the interpretation of these newly sequenced T4-related genomes and in broadening our understanding of the complex evolution and ecology of phages-the most abundant and among the most ancient biological entities on Earth.

Mutational and functional analysis of a segment of the sigma family bacteriophage T4 late promoter recognition protein gp55

Bacteriophage T4 late promoters, which consist of a simple 8-base pair TATA box, are recognized by the gene 55 protein (gp55), a small, highly diverged member of the sigma family proteins that replaces sigma(70) during the final phase of the T4 multiplication cycle. A 16-amino acid segment of gp55 that is proposed to be homologous to the sigma(70) region 2.2 has been subjected to alanine scanning and other mutagenesis. The corresponding proteins have been examined in vitro for binding to Escherichia coli RNA polymerase core enzyme and for the ability to generate accurately initiating basal as well as sliding clamp-activated T4 late transcription. Mutations in the amino acid 68-83 segment of gp55 generate a wide range of effects on these functions. The changes are interpreted in terms of the multiple steps of involvement of gp55, like other sigma proteins, in transcription. Effects of mutations on RNA polymerase core binding are consistent with the previously proposed homology of amino acids 68-82 of gp55 with sigma(70) region 2.2 and the recently determined structures of the Thermus thermophilus and Thermus aquaticus sigma(70)-RNA polymerase holoenzymes.

Interaction of T4 AsiA with its target sites in the RNA polymerase sigma70 subunit leads to distinct and opposite effects on transcription

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA is a homodimeric protein that orchestrates a switch from the host and early viral transcription to middle viral transcription by binding to the sigma(70) subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme (Esigma(70)) and preventing promoter complex formation on most E.coli and early T4 promoters. In addition, Esigma(70)AsiA, but not Esigma(70), is a substrate of transcription activation by T4-encoded DNA-binding protein MotA, a co-activator of transcription from middle viral promoters. The molecular determinants of sigma(70)-AsiA interaction necessary for transcription inhibition reside in the sigma(70) conserved region 4.2, which recognizes the -35 promoter consensus element. The molecular determinants of sigma(70)-AsiA interaction necessary for MotA-dependent transcription activation have not been identified. Here, we show that in the absence of sigma(70) region 4.2, AsiA interacts with sigma(70) conserved region 4.1 and activates transcription in a MotA-independent manner. Further, we show that the AsiA dimer must dissociate to interact with either region 4.2 or region 4.1 of sigma(70). We propose that MotA may co-activate transcription by restricting AsiA binding to sigma(70) region 4.1.

The mechanism of transcriptional activation by the topologically DNA-linked sliding clamp of bacteriophage T4

Three viral proteins participate directly in transcription of bacteriophage T4 late genes: the sigma-family protein gp55 provides promoter recognition, gp33 is the co-activator, and gp45 is the activator of transcription; gp33 also represses transcription in the absence of gp45. Transcriptional activation by gp45, the toroidal sliding clamp of the T4 DNA polymerase holoenzyme, requires assembly at primer-template junctions by its clamp loader. The mechanism of transcriptional activation has been analyzed by examining rates of formation of open promoter complexes. The basal gp55-RNA polymerase holoenzyme is only weakly held in its initially formed closed promoter complex, which subsequently opens very slowly. Activation ( approximately 320-fold in this work) increases affinity in the closed complex and accelerates promoter opening. Promoter opening by gp55 is also thermo-irreversible: the T4 late promoter does not open at 0 degrees C, but once opened at 30 degrees C remains open upon shift to the lower temperature. At a hybrid promoter for sigma(70) and gp55-holoenzymes, only gp55 confers thermo-irreversibility of promoter opening. Interaction of gp45 with a C-terminal epitope of gp33 is essential for the co-activator function of gp33.

Flipping a genetic switch by subunit exchange

The bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein is a multifunctional protein that simultaneously acts as both a repressor and activator of gene expression during the phage life cycle. These dual roles with opposing transcriptional consequences are achieved by modification of the host RNA polymerase in which AsiA binds to conserved region 4 (SR4) of sigma(70), altering the pathway of promoter selection by the holoenzyme. The mechanism by which AsiA flips this genetic switch has now been revealed, in part, from the three-dimensional structure of AsiA and the elucidation of its interaction with SR4. The structure of AsiA is that of a novel homodimer in which each monomer is constructed as a seven-helix bundle arranged in four overlapping helix-loop-helix elements. Identification of the protein interfaces for both the AsiA homodimer and the AsiA-sigma(70) complex reveals that these interfaces are coincident. Thus, the AsiA interaction with sigma(70) necessitates that the AsiA homodimer dissociate to form an AsiA-SR4 heterodimer, exchanging one protein subunit for another to alter promoter choice by RNA polymerase.

The Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.anti-sigma 70 AsiA complex utilizes alpha-carboxyl-terminal domain upstream promoter contacts to transcribe from a -10/-35 promoter

During infection of Escherichia coli, the phage T4 early protein AsiA inhibits open complex formation by the RNA polymerase holoenzyme Efinal sigma(70) at -10/-35 bacterial promoters through binding to region 4.2 of the final sigma(70) subunit. We used the -10/-35 lacUV5 promoter to study the properties of the Efinal sigma(70). AsiA complex in the presence of the glutamate anion. Under these experimental conditions, inhibition by AsiA was significantly decreased. KMnO(4) probing showed that the observed residual transcriptional activity was due to the slow transformation of the ternary complex Efinal sigma(70). AsiA.lacUV5 into an open complex. In agreement with this observation, affinity of the enzyme for the promoter was 10-fold lower in the ternary complex than in the binary complex Efinal sigma(70).lacUV5. A tau plot analysis of abortive transcription reactions showed that AsiA binding to Efinal sigma(70) resulted in a 120-fold decrease in the second-order on-rate constant of the reaction of Efinal sigma(70) with lacUV5 and a 55-fold decrease in the rate constant of the isomerization step leading to the open complex. This ternary complex still responded to activation by the cAMP.catabolite activator protein complex. We show that compensatory Efinal sigma(70)/promoter upstream contacts involving the C-terminal domains of alpha subunits in Efinal sigma(70) become essential for the binding of Efinal sigma(70). AsiA to the lacUV5 promoter.

Solution structure of the transcriptional activation domain of the bacteriophage T4 protein, MotA

Bacteriophage T4 encodes a transcription factor, MotA, that binds to the -30 region of middle-mode promoters and activates transcription by host RNA polymerase. The crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of MotA (MotNF) revealed a six-helix domain in which the two C-terminal alpha-helices mediate the formation of a dimer via a coiled-coil motif and hydrophobic interactions. This structure suggested that full-length MotA binds DNA as a dimer, but subsequent biochemical results have shown that a monomeric form of MotA binds DNA. In this study, gel filtration chromatography, dynamic light scattering, and NMR-based diffusion measurements show conclusively that MotNF is a monomer, and not a dimer, in solution. In addition, we have determined the monomeric solution structure of MotNF using NMR spectroscopy, and have compared this with the dimer structure observed in crystals. The core of the protein assumes the same helical conformation in solution and in crystals, but important differences are observed at the extreme C-terminus. In solution, helix alpha5 is followed by five disordered residues that probably link the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of MotA. In crystals, helix alpha5 forms the dimer interface and is followed by a short sixth helix that further stabilizes the dimer configuration. The solution structure of MotNF supports the conclusion that MotA functions as a monomer, and suggests that the existence of the sixth helix in crystals is a consequence of crystal packing. Our work highlights the importance of investigating protein structures in both crystals and solution to fully understand biomolecular structure and to accurately deduce relationships between structure and function.

Mapping the molecular interface between the sigma(70) subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase and T4 AsiA

Bacteriophage T4 antisigma protein AsiA (10 kDa) orchestrates a switch from the host and early viral transcription to middle viral transcription by binding to the sigma(70) subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase. The molecular determinants of sigma(70)-AsiA complex formation are not known. Here, we used combinatorial peptide chemistry, protein-protein crosslinking, and mutational analysis to study the interaction between AsiA and its target, the 33 amino acid residues-long sigma(70) peptide containing conserved region 4.2. Many region 4.2 amino acid residues contact AsiA, which likely completely occludes the DNA-binding surface of region 4.2. Though none of region 4.2 amino acid residues is singularly responsible for the very tight interaction with AsiA, sigma(70) Lys593 and Arg596 which lie outside the putative DNA recognition element of region 4.2, contribute the most. In AsiA, the first 20 amino acid residues are both necessary and sufficient for interactions with sigma(70). Our results clarify details of sigma(70)-AsiA interaction and open the way for engineering AsiA derivatives with altered specificities.

Competition among seven Escherichia coli sigma subunits: relative binding affinities to the core RNA polymerase

Seven different species of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit exist in Escherichia coli, each binding to a single species of the core enzyme and thereby directing transcription of a specific set of genes. To test the sigma competition model in the global regulation of gene transcription, all seven E.coli sigma subunits have been purified and compared for their binding affinities to the same core RNA polymerase (E). In the presence of a fixed amount of sigma(70), the principal sigma for growth-related genes, the level of Esigma(70) holoenzyme formation increased linearly with the increase in core enzyme level, giving an apparent K:(d) for the core enzyme of 0.26 nM. Mixed reconstitution experiments in the presence of a fixed amount of core enzyme and increasing amounts of an equimolar mixture of all seven sigma subunits indicated that sigma(70) is strongest in terms of core enzyme binding, followed by sigma(N), sigma(F), sigma(E)/sigma(FecI), sigma(H) and sigma(S) in decreasing order. The orders of core binding affinity between sigma(70) and sigma(N) and between sigma(70) and sigma(H) were confirmed by measuring the replacement of one core-associated sigma by another sigma subunit. Taken together with the intracellular sigma levels, we tried to estimate the number of each holoenzyme form in growing E. coli cells.

The bacteriophage T4 anti-sigma factor AsiA is not necessary for the inhibition of early promoters in vivo

Bacteriophage T4 early promoters are utilized immediately after infection and are abruptly turned off 2-3 min later (at 30 degrees C) when the middle promoters are activated. The viral early protein AsiA has been suspected to bring about this transcriptional switch: not only does it activate transcription at middle promoters in vivo and in vitro but it also shows potent anti-sigma70 activity in vitro, suggesting that it is responsible for the shut-off of early transcription. We show here that after infection with a phage deleted for the asiA gene the inhibition of early transcription occurs to the same extent and with the same kinetics as in a wild-type infection. Thus, another AsiA-independent circuit efficiently turns off early transcription. The association of a mutation in asiA with a mutation in mod, rpbA, motA or motB has no effect on the inhibition of early promoters, showing that none of these phage-encoded transcriptional regulators is necessary for AsiA-independent shut-off. It is not known whether AsiA is able to inhibit early promoters in vivo, but host transcription is strongly inhibited in vivo upon induction of AsiA from a multicopy plasmid.