Site-specific in vivo cleavages by DNA topoisomerase I in the regulatory regions of the 35 S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are transcription independent

rDNA transcription, replication and stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The ribosomal DNA locus (rDNA) is central for the functioning of cells because it encodes ribosomal RNAs, key components of ribosomes, and also because of its links to fundamental metabolic processes, with significant impact on genome integrity and aging. The repetitive nature of the rDNA gene units forces the locus to maintain sequence homogeneity through recombination processes that are closely related to genomic stability. The co-presence of basic DNA transactions, such as replication, transcription by major RNA polymerases, and recombination, in a defined and restricted area of the genome is of particular relevance as it affects the stability of the rDNA locus by both direct and indirect mechanisms. This condition is well exemplified by the rDNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this review we summarize essential knowledge on how the complexity and overlap of different processes contribute to the control of rDNA and genomic stability in this model organism.

Why Should DNA Topoisomerase I Have a Scaffold Activity?

Simple Summary

DNA topoisomerases are enzymes responsible for controlling DNA topology. Their activity consists of relaxing the supercoiling that is derived from the basic processes that DNA undergoes, such as replication, transcription, and recombination. DNA topoisomerase actions have been observed in all organisms that have DNA as their genetic material. Although they are mainly involved in DNA relaxation, some observations show that type IB DNA topoisomerases are also involved in other processes, such as splicing, and have a role in promoting DNA transcription without using their catalytic activity. In this review, we describe the additional capacity of the DNA topoisomerase IB, beyond the main one that releases torsional stress by its catalytic activity, to act as a scaffold protein able to recruit several factors needed for transcription and regulation of gene expression.

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, in vitro studies have demonstrated that DNA topoisomerase I promotes RNA polymerase II transcription, acting as a cofactor, regardless of its catalytic activity. Recent studies, carried in vivo, using yeast as a model system, also demonstrate that DNA topoisomerase I is able to recruit, without the involvement of its catalytic activity, the Sir2p deacetylase on ribosomal genes thus contributes to achieve their silencing. In this review, the DNA topoisomerase I capability, acting as a scaffold protein, as well as its involvement and role in several macromolecular complexes, will be discussed, in light of several observations reported in the literature, pointing out how its role goes far beyond its well-known ability to relax DNA.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae rDNA as super-hub: the region where replication, transcription and recombination meet

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal DNA, the repeated region where rRNAs are synthesized by about 150 encoding units, hosts all the protein machineries responsible for the main DNA transactions such as replication, transcription and recombination. This and its repetitive nature make rDNA a unique and complex genetic locus compared to any other. All the different molecular machineries acting in this locus need to be accurately and finely controlled and coordinated and for this reason rDNA is one of the most impressive examples of highly complex molecular regulated loci. The region in which the large molecular complexes involved in rDNA activity and/or regulation are recruited is extremely small: that is, the 2.5 kb long intergenic spacer, interrupting each 35S RNA coding unit from the next. All S. cerevisiae RNA polymerases (I, II and III) transcribing the different genetic rDNA elements are recruited here; a sequence responsible for each rDNA unit replication, which needs its molecular apparatus, also localizes here; moreover, it is noteworthy that the rDNA replication proceeds almost unidirectionally because each replication fork is stopped in the so-called replication fork barrier. These localized fork blocking events induce, with a given frequency, the homologous recombination process by which cells maintain a high identity among the rDNA repeated units. Here, we describe the different processes involving the rDNA locus, how they influence each other and how these mutual interferences are highly regulated and coordinated. We propose that an rDNA conformation as a super-hub could help in optimizing the micro-environment for all basic DNA transactions.

Endogenous single-strand DNA breaks at RNA polymerase II promoters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Molecular combing and gel electrophoretic studies revealed endogenous nicks with free 3'OH ends at ∼100 kb intervals in the genomic DNA (gDNA) of unperturbed and G1-synchronized Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Analysis of the distribution of endogenous nicks by Nick ChIP-chip indicated that these breaks accumulated at active RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) promoters, reminiscent of the promoter-proximal transient DNA breaks of higher eukaryotes. Similar periodicity of endogenous nicks was found within the ribosomal rDNA cluster, involving every ∼10th of the tandemly repeated 9.1 kb units of identical sequence. Nicks were mapped by Southern blotting to a few narrow regions within the affected units. Three of them were overlapping the RNAP II promoters, while the ARS-containing IGS2 region was spared of nicks. By using a highly sensitive reverse-Southwestern blot method to map free DNA ends with 3'OH, nicks were shown to be distinct from other known rDNA breaks and linked to the regulation of rDNA silencing. Nicks in rDNA and the rest of the genome were typically found at the ends of combed DNA molecules, occasionally together with R-loops, comprising a major pool of vulnerable sites that are connected with transcriptional regulation.

Fob1p recruits DNA topoisomerase I to ribosomal genes locus and contributes to its transcriptional silencing maintenance

S. cerevisiae ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus hosts a series of highly complex regulatory machineries for RNA polymerase I, II and III transcription, DNA replication and units recombination, all acting in the Non Transcribed Spacers (NTSs) interposed between the repeated units by which it is composed. DNA topoisomerase I (Top1p) contributes, recruiting Sir2p, to the maintenance of transcriptional silencing occurring at the RNA Polymerase II cryptic promoters, located in the NTS region. In this paper we found that Fob1p presence is crucial for Top1p recruitment at NTS, allowing transcriptional silencing to be established and maintained. We also showed the role of Nsr1p in Top1p recruitment to rDNA locus. Our work allows to hypothesize that Nsr1p targets Top1p into the nucleolus while Fob1p is responsible for its preferential distribution at RFB.

Molecular Mechanism of DNA Topoisomerase I-Dependent rDNA Silencing: Sir2p Recruitment at Ribosomal Genes

Saccharomyces cerevisiae sir2Δ or top1Δ mutants exhibit similar phenotypes involving ribosomal DNA, including (i) loss of transcriptional silencing, resulting in non-coding RNA hyperproduction from cryptic RNA polymerase II promoters; (ii) alterations in recombination; and (iii) a general increase in histone acetylation. Given the distinct enzymatic activities of Sir2 and Top1 proteins, a histone deacetylase and a DNA topoisomerase, respectively, we investigated whether genetic and/or physical interactions between the two proteins could explain the shared ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) phenotypes. We employed an approach of complementing top1Δ cells with yeast, human, truncated, and chimeric yeast/human TOP1 constructs and of assessing the extent of non-coding RNA silencing and histone H4K16 deacetylation. Our findings demonstrate that residues 115-125 within the yeast Top1p N-terminal domain are required for the complementation of the top1∆ rDNA phenotypes. In chromatin immunoprecipitation and co-immunoprecipitation experiments, we further demonstrate the physical interaction between Top1p and Sir2p. Our genetic and biochemical studies support a model whereby Top1p recruits Sir2p to the rDNA and clarifies a structural role of DNA topoisomerase I in the epigenetic regulation of rDNA, independent of its known catalytic activity.

Reversible Top1 cleavage complexes are stabilized strand-specifically at the ribosomal replication fork barrier and contribute to ribosomal DNA stability

Various topological constraints at the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus impose an extra challenge for transcription and DNA replication, generating constant torsional DNA stress. The topoisomerase Top1 is known to release such torsion by single-strand nicking and re-ligation in a process involving transient covalent Top1 cleavage complexes (Top1cc) with the nicked DNA. Here we show that Top1ccs, despite their usually transient nature, are specifically targeted to and stabilized at the ribosomal replication fork barrier (rRFB) of budding yeast, establishing a link with previously reported Top1 controlled nicks. Using ectopically engineered rRFBs, we establish that the rRFB sequence itself is sufficient for induction of DNA strand-specific and replication-independent Top1ccs. These Top1ccs accumulate only in the presence of Fob1 and Tof2, they are reversible as they are not subject to repair by Tdp1- or Mus81-dependent processes, and their presence correlates with Top1 provided rDNA stability. Notably, the targeted formation of these Top1ccs accounts for the previously reported broken replication forks at the rRFB. These findings implicate a novel and physiologically regulated mode of Top1 action, suggesting a mechanism by which Top1 is recruited to the rRFB and stabilized in a reversible Top1cc configuration to preserve the integrity of the rDNA.

RNA polymerase I transcription silences noncoding RNAs at the ribosomal DNA locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the repeated units of the ribosomal locus, transcribed by RNA polymerase I (Pol I), are interrupted by nontranscribed spacers (NTSs). These NTS regions are transcribed by RNA polymerase III to synthesize 5S RNA and by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to synthesize, at low levels, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). While transcription of both RNA polymerase I and III is highly characterized, at the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus only a few studies have been performed on Pol II, whose repression correlates with the SIR2-dependent silencing. The involvement of both chromatin organization and Pol I transcription has been proposed, and peculiar chromatin structures might justify "ribosomal" Pol II silencing. Reporter genes inserted within the rDNA units have been employed for these studies. We studied, in the natural context, yeast mutants differing in Pol I transcription in order to find whether correlations exist between Pol I transcription and Pol II ncRNA production. Here, we demonstrate that silencing at the rDNA locus represses ncRNAs with a strength inversely proportional to Pol I transcription. Moreover, localized regions of histone hyperacetylation appear in cryptic promoter elements when Pol II is active and in the coding region when Pol I is functional; in addition, DNA topoisomerase I site-specific activity follows RNA polymerase I transcription. The repression of ncRNAs at the rDNA locus, in response to RNA polymerase I transcription, could represent a physiological circuit control whose mechanism involves modification of histone acetylation.

A specific transcriptional response of yeast cells to camptothecin dependent on the Swi4 and Mbp1 factors

Topoisomerase I (Top1) is the specific target of the anticancer drug camptothecin (CPT) that interferes with enzyme activity promoting Top1-mediated DNA breaks and inhibition of DNA and RNA synthesis. To define the specific transcriptional response to CPT, we have determined the CPT-altered transcription profiles in yeast by using a relatively low concentration of the drug. CPT could alter global expression profiles only if a catalytically active Top1p was expressed in the cell, demonstrating that drug interference with Top1 was the sole trigger of the response. A total of 95 genes showed a statistically-significant alterations. Gene Ontology term analyses suggested that the cell response was mainly to the inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis and cell cycle progression. Promoter sequence analyses of the 22 up-regulated genes and expression studies in gene-deleted strains showed that the transcription factors, Swi4p and Mbp1p, mediate at least partially the transcriptional response to CPT. The MBP1 gene deletion abrogates a transient cell growth delay caused by CPT whereas the SWI4 gene deletion increases yeast resistance to CPT. Thus, the findings show that yeast cells have a highly selective and sensitive transcriptional response to CPT depending on SWI4 and MBP1 genes suggesting a complex regulation of cell cycle progression by the two factors in the presence of CPT.

Nucleosomes represent a physical barrier for cleavage activity of DNA topoisomerase I in vivo

DNA topoisomerase I together with the other cellular DNA topoisomerases releases the torsional stress from DNA caused by processes such as replication, transcription and recombination. Despite the well-defined knowledge of its mechanism of action, DNA topoisomerase I in vivo activity has been only partially characterized. In fact the basic question concerning the capability of the enzyme to cleave and rejoin DNA wrapped around a histone octamer remains still unanswered. By studying both in vivo and in vitro the cleavage activity of DNA topoisomerase I in the presence of camptothecin on a repeated trinucleotide sequence, (TTA)(35), lying in chromosome XIII of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we can conclude that nucleosomes represent a physical barrier for the enzyme activity.

The functional response of upstream DNA to dynamic supercoiling in vivo

Because RNA polymerase is a powerful motor, transmission of transcription-generated forces might directly alter DNA structure, chromatin or gene activity in mammalian cells. Here we show that transcription-generated supercoils streaming dynamically from active promoters have considerable consequences for DNA structure and function in cells. Using a tamoxifen-activatable Cre recombinase to excise a test segment of chromatin positioned between divergently transcribed metallothionein-IIa promoters, we found the degree of dynamic supercoiling to increase as transcription intensified, and it was very sensitive to the specific arrangement of promoters and cis elements. Using psoralen as an in vivo probe confirmed that, during transcription, sufficient supercoiling is produced to enable transitions to conformations other than B-DNA in elements such as the human MYC far upstream element (FUSE), which in turn recruit structure-sensitive regulatory proteins, such as FUSE Binding Protein (FBP) and FBP-Interacting Repressor (FIR). These results indicate that mechanical stresses, constrained by architectural features of DNA and chromatin, may broadly contribute to gene regulation.

FOB1 affects DNA topoisomerase I in vivo cleavages in the enhancer region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal DNA locus

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the FOB1 gene affects replication fork blocking activity at the replication fork block (RFB) sequences and promotes recombination events within the rDNA cluster. Using in vivo footprinting assays we mapped two in vivo Fob1p-binding sites, RFB1 and RFB3, located in the rDNA enhancer region and coincident with those previously reported to be in vitro binding sites. We previously provided evidences that DNA topoisomerase I is able to cleave two sites within this region. The results reported in this paper, indicate that the DNA topoisomerase I cleavage specific activity at the enhancer region is affected by the presence of Fob1p and independent of replication and transcription activities. We thus hypothesize that the binding to DNA of Fob1p itself may be the cause of the DNA topoisomerase I activity in the rDNA enhancer.

Identifying gene-independent noncoding functional elements in the yeast ribosomal DNA by phylogenetic footprinting

Sequences involved in the regulation of genetic and genomic processes are primarily located in noncoding regions. Identifying such cis-acting sequences from sequence data is difficult because their patterns are not readily apparent, and, to date, identification has concentrated on regions associated with gene-coding functions. Here, we used phylogenetic footprinting to look for gene-independent noncoding elements in the ribosomal RNA gene repeats from several Saccharomyces species. Similarity plots of ribosomal intergenic spacer alignments from six closely related Saccharomyces species allowed the identification of previously characterized functional elements, such as the origin-of-replication and replication-fork barrier sites, demonstrating that this method is a powerful predictor of noncoding functional elements. Seventeen previously uncharacterized elements, showing high levels of conservation, were also discovered. The conservation of these elements suggests that they are functional, and we demonstrate the functionality of two classes of these elements, a putative bidirectional noncoding promoter and a series of conserved peaks with matches to the origin-of-replication core consensus. Our results paint a comprehensive picture of the functionality of the Saccharomyces ribosomal intergenic region and demonstrate that functional elements not involved in gene-coding function can be identified by using comparative genomics based on sequence conservation.

New principles of cell plasticity

Recent discoveries demonstrating surprising cell plasticity in animals and humans call into question many long held assumptions regarding differentiative potential of adult cells. These assumptions reflect a classical paradigm of cell lineage development projected onto both prenatal development and post-natal maintenance and repair of tissues. The classical paradigm describes unidirectional, hierarchical lineages proceedings step-wise from totipotent or pluripotent stem cells through intermediate, ever more restricted progenitor cells, leading finally to 'terminally differentiated' cells. However, in light of both the recent discoveries and older clinical or experimental findings, we have suggested principles comprising a new paradigm of cell plasticity, summarized here.

In vivo binding and hierarchy of assembly of the yeast RNA polymerase I transcription factors

Transcription by RNA polymerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a series of transcription factors that have been genetically and biochemically identified. In particular, the core factor (CF) and the upstream activation factor (UAF) have been shown in vitro to bind the core element and the upstream promoter element, respectively. We have analyzed in vivo the DNAse I footprinting of the 35S promoter in wild-type and mutant strains lacking one specific transcription factor at the time. In this way we were able to unambiguously attribute the protections by the CF and the UAF to their respective putative binding sites. In addition, we have found that in vivo a binding hierarchy exists, the UAF being necessary for CF binding. Because the CF footprinting is lost in mutants lacking a functional RNA polymerase I, we also conclude that the final step of preinitiation-complex assembly affects binding of the CF, stabilizing its contact with DNA. Thus, in vivo, the CF is recruited to the core element by the UAF and stabilized on DNA by the presence of a functional RNA polymerase I.

To be or not to be in the nucleolus

Compartmentalization has long been known to have a key role in regulation of cellular processes. By keeping enzymes and regulatory complexes in compartments where the delivery of substrate or exit of product is controlled, competing reactions can occur simultaneously in different parts of the cell. Moreover, spatial confinement facilitates the working of molecules participating in reaction chains and is crucial for coupling unfavourable with energetically favourable chemical reactions. Although in many cases intracellular compartmentalization relies on boundaries imposed by membranes, several non-membrane-bounded compartments exist in eukaryotic cells. One of these, the nucleolus, has recently attracted much attention. The emerging view is that molecular confinement in the nucleolus actively contributes to the control of cellular survival and proliferation.