The anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB forms a 2:1 complex with sigma(F), contacting multiple conserved regions of the sigma factor

Alternative Sigma Factor of Staphylococcus aureus Interacts with the Cognate Antisigma Factor Primarily Using Its Domain 3

σ^B, an alternative sigma factor, is usually employed to tackle the general stress response in Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive bacteria. This protein, involved in S. aureus-mediated pathogenesis, is typically blocked by RsbW, an antisigma factor having serine kinase activity. σ^B, a σ⁷⁰-like sigma factor, harbors three conserved domains designated σ^B2, σ^B3, and σ^B4. To better understand the interaction between RsbW and σ^B or its domains, we have studied their recombinant forms, rRsbW, rσ^B, rσ^B2, rσ^B3, and rσ^B4, using different probes. The results show that none of the rσ^B domains, unlike rσ^B, showed binding to a cognate DNA in the presence of a core RNA polymerase. However, both rσ^B2 and rσ^B3, like rσ^B, interacted with rRsbW, and the order of their rRsbW binding affinity looks like rσ^B > rσ^B3 > rσ^B2. Furthermore, the reaction between rRsbW and rσ^B or rσ^B3 was exothermic and occurred spontaneously. rRsbW and rσ^B3 also associate with each other at a stoichiometry of 2:1, and different types of noncovalent bonds might be responsible for their interaction. A structural model of the RsbW-σ^B3 complex that has supported our experimental results indicated the binding of rσ^B3 at the putative dimeric interface of RsbW. A genetic study shows that the tentative dimer-forming region of RsbW is crucial for preserving its rσ^B binding ability, serine kinase activity, and dimerization ability. Additionally, a urea-induced equilibrium unfolding study indicated a notable thermodynamic stabilization of σ^B3 in the presence of RsbW. Possible implications of the stabilization data in drug discovery were discussed at length.

Structural and Functional Insights into Bacillus subtilis Sigma Factor Inhibitor, CsfB

Global changes in bacterial gene expression can be orchestrated by the coordinated activation/deactivation of alternative sigma (σ) factor subunits of RNA polymerase. Sigma factors themselves are regulated in myriad ways, including via anti-sigma factors. Here, we have determined the solution structure of anti-sigma factor CsfB, responsible for inhibition of two alternative sigma factors, σG and σE, during spore formation by Bacillus subtilis. CsfB assembles into a symmetrical homodimer, with each monomer bound to a single Zn2+ ion via a treble-clef zinc finger fold. Directed mutagenesis indicates that dimer formation is critical for CsfB-mediated inhibition of both σG and σE, and we have characterized these interactions in vitro. This work represents an advance in our understanding of how CsfB mediates inhibition of two alternative sigma factors to drive developmental gene expression in a bacterium.

Promoter-specific transcription inhibition in Staphylococcus aureus by a phage protein

Phage G1 gp67 is a 23 kDa protein that binds to the Staphylococcus aureus (Sau) RNA polymerase (RNAP) σ(A) subunit and blocks cell growth by inhibiting transcription. We show that gp67 has little to no effect on transcription from most promoters but is a potent inhibitor of ribosomal RNA transcription. A 2.0-Å-resolution crystal structure of the complex between gp67 and Sau σ(A) domain 4 (σ(A)(4)) explains how gp67 joins the RNAP promoter complex through σ(A)(4) without significantly affecting σ(A)(4) function. Our results indicate that gp67 forms a complex with RNAP at most, if not all, σ(A)-dependent promoters, but selectively inhibits promoters that depend on an interaction between upstream DNA and the RNAP α-subunit C-terminal domain (αCTD). Thus, we reveal a promoter-specific transcription inhibition mechanism by which gp67 interacts with the RNAP promoter complex through one subunit (σ(A)), and selectively affects the function of another subunit (αCTD) depending on promoter usage.

FlgM proteins from different bacteria exhibit different structural characteristics

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are a unique class of proteins that do not require a stable structure for function. The importance of IDPs in many biological processes has been established but there remain unanswered questions about their evolution and conservation of their disordered state within a protein family. Our group has been studying the structural similarities among orthologous FlgM proteins, a model class of IDPs. We have previously shown that the FlgM protein from the thermophile Aquifex aeolicus has more structure at A. aeolicus' physiological temperature (85°C) than is observed for the Salmonella typhimurium FlgM, suggesting that the disordered nature of FlgM varies among organisms and is not universally conserved. In this work, we extend these studies to the FlgM proteins from Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, and Bacillus subtilis. We demonstrate that the B. subtilis, E. coli, and S. typhimurium FlgMs exist in a premolten globule-like conformation, though the B. subtilis FlgM is in a more compacted conformation than the other two. The P. aeruginosa and P. mirabilis FlgM proteins exist in a currently unknown conformation that is not either coil-like or premolten globule-like. The P. aeruginosa FlgM appears to contain more weak intramolecular contacts given its more compacted state than the P. mirabilis FlgM. These results provide experimental evidence that members of the same protein family can exhibit different degrees of disorder, though understanding how different disordered states evolve in the same protein family will require more study.

Crystal structure of the bacteriophage T4 late-transcription coactivator gp33 with the β-subunit flap domain of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Activated transcription of the bacteriophage T4 late genes, which is coupled to concurrent DNA replication, is accomplished by an initiation complex containing the host RNA polymerase associated with two phage-encoded proteins, gp55 (the basal promoter specificity factor) and gp33 (the coactivator), as well as the DNA-mounted sliding-clamp processivity factor of the phage T4 replisome (gp45, the activator). We have determined the 3.0 Å-resolution X-ray crystal structure of gp33 complexed with its RNA polymerase binding determinant, the β-flap domain. Like domain 4 of the promoter specificity σ factor (σ(4)), gp33 interacts with RNA polymerase primarily by clamping onto the helix at the tip of the β-flap domain. Nevertheless, gp33 and σ(4) are not structurally related. The gp33/β-flap structure, combined with biochemical, biophysical, and structural information, allows us to generate a structural model of the T4 late promoter initiation complex. The model predicts protein/protein interactions within the complex that explain the presence of conserved patches of surface-exposed residues on gp33, and provides a structural framework for interpreting and designing future experiments to functionally characterize the complex.

Complete structural model of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase from a hybrid approach

A combination of structural approaches yields a complete atomic model of the highly biochemically characterized Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, enabling fuller exploitation of E. coli as a model for understanding transcription.

The Escherichia coli transcription system is the best characterized from a biochemical and genetic point of view and has served as a model system. Nevertheless, a molecular understanding of the details of E. coli transcription and its regulation, and therefore its full exploitation as a model system, has been hampered by the absence of high-resolution structural information on E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP). We use a combination of approaches, including high-resolution X-ray crystallography, ab initio structural prediction, homology modeling, and single-particle cryo-electron microscopy, to generate complete atomic models of E. coli core RNAP and an E. coli RNAP ternary elongation complex. The detailed and comprehensive structural descriptions can be used to help interpret previous biochemical and genetic data in a new light and provide a structural framework for designing experiments to understand the function of the E. coli lineage-specific insertions and their role in the E. coli transcription program.

Transcription, or the synthesis of RNA from DNA, is one of the most important processes in the cell. The central enzyme of transcription is the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP), a large, macromolecular assembly consisting of at least five subunits. Historically, much of our fundamental information on the process of transcription has come from genetic and biochemical studies of RNAP from the model bacterium Escherichia coli. More recently, major breakthroughs in our understanding of the mechanism of action of RNAP have come from high resolution crystal structures of various bacterial, archaebacterial, and eukaryotic enzymes. However, all of our high-resolution bacterial RNAP structures are of enzymes from the thermophiles Thermus aquaticus or T. thermophilus, organisms with poorly characterized transcription systems. It has thus far proven impossible to obtain a high-resolution structure of E. coli RNAP, which has made it difficult to relate the large collection of genetic and biochemical data on RNAP function directly to the available structural information. Here, we used a combination of approaches—high-resolution X-ray crystallography of E. coli RNAP fragments, ab initio structure prediction, homology modeling, and single-particle cryo-electron microscopy—to generate complete atomic models of E. coli RNAP. Our detailed and comprehensive structural models provide the heretofore missing structural framework for understanding the function of the highly characterized E. coli RNAP.

Structural basis for the bacterial transcription-repair coupling factor/RNA polymerase interaction

The transcription-repair coupling factor (TRCF, the product of the mfd gene) is a widely conserved bacterial protein that mediates transcription-coupled DNA repair. TRCF uses its ATP-dependent DNA translocase activity to remove transcription complexes stalled at sites of DNA damage, and stimulates repair by recruiting components of the nucleotide excision repair pathway to the site. A protein/protein interaction between TRCF and the β-subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP) is essential for TRCF function. CarD (also called CdnL), an essential regulator of rRNA transcription in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, shares a homologous RNAP interacting domain with TRCF and also interacts with the RNAP β-subunit. We determined the 2.9-Å resolution X-ray crystal structure of the RNAP interacting domain of TRCF complexed with the RNAP-β1 domain, which harbors the TRCF interaction determinants. The structure reveals details of the TRCF/RNAP protein/protein interface, providing a basis for the design and interpretation of experiments probing TRCF, and by homology CarD, function and interactions with the RNAP.

Aquifex aeolicus FlgM protein exhibits a temperature-dependent disordered nature

Studies on the nature and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDP) over the past 10 years have demonstrated the importance of IDPs in normal cellular function. Although many proteins predicted to be IDPs have been experimentally characterized on an individual basis, the conservation of disorder between homologous proteins from different organisms has not been fully studied. We now demonstrate that the FlgM protein from the thermophile Aquifex aeolicus exhibits a more ordered conformation at 20 degrees C than the previously characterized FlgM protein from Salmonella typhimurium. FlgM is an inhibitor of the RNA transcription factor sigma28, which is involved in regulation of the late-stage genes involved in flagella synthesis. Previous work has shown that the S. typhimurium FlgM protein is an intrinsically disordered protein, though the C-terminus becomes ordered when bound to sigma28 or under crowded solution conditions. In this work, we demonstrate that at 20 degrees C the A. aeolicus FlgM protein exhibits alpha-helical character in circular dichroism (CD) experiments, though the percentage of alpha-helical content decreases with increased temperature, consistent with the FlgM assuming a less folded conformation. We also show that the A. aeolicus FlgM exhibits cooperativity in chemical denaturation experiments, consistent with a globular nature. Furthermore, we use the fluorescent probe FlAsH to show that the H2 helix is ordered, even in the unbound state and that the H1 and H2 helices appear to be associated with each other in the absence of the sigma28 protein. Finally, we demonstrate that the H2 helix assumes an extended conformation at 85 degrees C. Based on our results, we propose that at 20 degrees C the A. aeolicus FlgM assumes a four-helix bundle-like conformation that becomes a more extended conformation at the A. aeolicus' physiological temperature of 85 degrees C.

How to switch off a histidine kinase: crystal structure of Geobacillus stearothermophilus KinB with the inhibitor Sda

Entry to sporulation in bacilli is governed by a histidine kinase phosphorelay, a variation of the predominant signal transduction mechanism in prokaryotes. Sda directly inhibits sporulation histidine kinases in response to DNA damage and replication defects. We determined a 2.0-A-resolution X-ray crystal structure of the intact cytoplasmic catalytic core [comprising the dimerization and histidine phosphotransfer domain (DHp domain), connected to the ATP binding catalytic domain] of the Geobacillus stearothermophilus sporulation kinase KinB complexed with Sda. Structural and biochemical analyses reveal that Sda binds to the base of the DHp domain and prevents molecular transactions with the DHp domain to which it is bound by acting as a simple molecular barricade. Sda acts to sterically block communication between the catalytic domain and the DHp domain, which is required for autophosphorylation, as well as to sterically block communication between the response regulator Spo0F and the DHp domain, which is required for phosphotransfer and phosphatase activities.

An anti-antisigma factor in the response of the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus to blue light

Cells of the Gram-negative bacterium Myxococcus xanthus respond to blue light by producing carotenoids, pigments that play a protective role against the oxidative effects of light. Blue light triggers a network of regulatory actions that lead to the transcriptional activation of the structural genes for carotenoid synthesis. The product of carF, similar to a family of proteins of unknown function called Kua, is an early regulator of this process. Previous genetic data indicate that CarF participates in the light-dependent inactivation of the antisigma factor CarR. In the dark, CarR sequesters the ECF-sigma factor CarQ to the membrane, thereby preventing the activation of the structural genes for carotenoid synthesis. Using a bacterial two-hybrid system, we show here that both CarF and CarQ physically interact with CarR. These results, together with the finding that CarF is located at the membrane, support the hypothesis that CarF acts as an anti-antisigma factor. Comparison of CarF with other Kua proteins shows a remarkable conservation of a number of histidine residues. The effects on CarF function of several histidine to alanine substitutions and of the truncation of specific CarF domains are also reported here.

RsmA is an anti-sigma factor that modulates its activity through a [2Fe-2S] cluster cofactor

The rsmA gene of Streptomyces coelicolor lies directly upstream of the gene encoding the group 3 sigma factor sigma(M). The RsmA protein is a putative member of the HATPase_c family of anti-sigma factors but is unusual in that it contains seven cysteine residues. Bacterial two-hybrid studies demonstrate that it interacts specifically with sigma(M), and in vitro studies of the purified proteins by native PAGE and transcription assays confirmed that they form a complex. Characterization of RsmA revealed that it binds ATP and that, as isolated, it contains significant quantities of iron and inorganic sulfide, in equal proportion, with spectroscopic properties characteristic of a [2Fe-2S] cluster-containing protein. Importantly, the interaction between RsmA and sigma(M) is dependent on the presence of the iron-sulfur cluster. We propose a model in which RsmA regulates the activity of sigma(M). Loss of the cluster, in response to an as yet unidentified signal, activates sigma(M) by abolishing its interaction with the anti-sigma factor. This represents a major extension of the functional diversity of iron-sulfur cluster proteins.

Clostridium difficile toxin expression is inhibited by the novel regulator TcdC

Clostridium difficile, an emerging nosocomial pathogen of increasing clinical significance, produces two large protein toxins that are responsible for the cellular damage associated with the disease. The precise mechanisms by which toxin synthesis is regulated in response to environmental change have yet to be discovered. The toxin genes (tcdA and tcdB) are located in a pathogenicity locus (PaLoc), along with tcdR and tcdC. TcdR is an alternative RNA polymerase sigma factor that directly activates toxin gene expression, while the inverse relationship between expression of tcdR, tcdA and tcdB genes on the one hand and tcdC on the other has led to the suggestion that TcdC somehow interferes with toxin gene expression. This idea is further supported by the finding that many recent C. difficile epidemic strains in which toxin production is increased carry a common tcdC deletion mutation. In this report we demonstrate that TcdC negatively regulates toxin synthesis both in vivo and in vitro. TcdC destabilizes the TcdR-containing holoenzyme before open complex formation, apparently by interaction with TcdR or TcdR-containing RNA polymerase holoenzyme or both. In addition, we show that the hypertoxigenicity phenotype of C. difficile epidemic strains is not due to their common 18 bp in-frame deletion in tcdC.

Crystal structure of the Escherichia coli regulator of sigma70, Rsd, in complex with sigma70 domain 4

The Escherichia coli Rsd protein binds tightly and specifically to the RNA polymerase (RNAP) sigma(70) factor. Rsd plays a role in alternative sigma factor-dependent transcription by biasing the competition between sigma(70) and alternative sigma factors for the available core RNAP. Here, we determined the 2.6 A-resolution X-ray crystal structure of Rsd bound to sigma(70) domain 4 (sigma(70)(4)), the primary determinant for Rsd binding within sigma(70). The structure reveals that Rsd binding interferes with the two primary functions of sigma(70)(4), core RNAP binding and promoter -35 element binding. Interestingly, the most highly conserved Rsd residues form a network of interactions through the middle of the Rsd structure that connect the sigma(70)(4)-binding surface with three cavities exposed on distant surfaces of Rsd, suggesting functional coupling between sigma(70)(4) binding and other binding surfaces of Rsd, either for other proteins or for as yet unknown small molecule effectors. These results provide a structural basis for understanding the role of Rsd, as well as its ortholog, AlgQ, a positive regulator of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence, in transcription regulation.

Signalling network with a bistable hysteretic switch controls developmental activation of the sigma transcription factor in Bacillus subtilis

The sporulation process of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis unfolds by means of separate but co-ordinated programmes of gene expression within two unequal cell compartments, the mother cell and the smaller forespore. sigmaF is the first compartment-specific transcription factor activated during this process, and it is controlled at the post-translational level by a partner-switching mechanism that restricts sigmaF activity to the forespore. The crux of this mechanism lies in the ability of the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB (AB) to form alternative complexes either with sigmaF, holding it in an inactive form, or with the anti-anti-sigma factor SpoIIAA (AA) and a nucleotide, either ATP or ADP. In the complex with AB and ATP, AA is phosphorylated on a serine residue and released, making AB available to capture sigmaF in an inactive complex. Subsequent activation of sigmaF requires the intervention of the SpoIIE serine phosphatase to dephosphorylate AA, which can then attack the AB-sigmaF complex to induce the release of sigmaF. By incorporating biochemical, biophysical and genetic data from the literature we have constructed an integrative mathematical model of this partner-switching network. The model predicts that the self-enhancing formation of a long-lived complex of AA, AB and ADP transforms the network into an essentially irreversible hysteretic switch, thereby explaining the sharp, robust and irreversible activation of sigmaF in the forespore compartment. The model also clarifies the contributions of the partly redundant mechanisms that ensure correct spatial and temporal activation of sigmaF, reproduces the behaviour of various mutants and makes strong, testable predictions.

Solution structures of the putative anti-sigma-factor antagonist TM1442 from Thermotoga maritima in the free and phosphorylated states

The NMR structures of the unphosphorylated Thermotoga maritima protein TM1442 at pH 4.8 and of the phosphorylated TM1442 (TM1442-P) at pH 7.0 are presented, and a functional interaction of TM1442 with TM0733 is characterized. Although the NMR spectra of TM1442-P at pH 7.0 are of high quality, detailed NMR studies of unphosphorylated TM1442 could be performed only at slightly acidic pH values and high salt concentration. TM1442 is a putative anti-sigma-factor antagonist related to the sigmaF and sigmaB regulation systems in Bacillus subtilis, which is the component in this system that can be phosphorylated. The kinase TM0733, which shows sequence similarity to the GHKL ATPase/kinase superfamily, was identified as the possible anti-sigma-factor of TM1442 using a bioinformatics analysis. Phosphorylation of TM1442 by TM0733 was confirmed by NMR, mass spectroscopy and native gel electrophoresis, and Ser59 was identified as the phosphorylation site using site-directed mutational analysis. The solution structure of TM1442-P at pH 7.0 has the same global fold as free TM1442 at pH 4.8, with an alpha/beta topology consisting of a central four-stranded beta sheet and three alpha helices, but the regular secondary structure elements wrapping the hydrophobic core of the protein undergo subtle conformational changes upon phosphorylation.

Where asymmetry in gene expression originates

A general problem in developmental biology concerns the process by which cells of one type divide to give dissimilar daughter cells. Even though these daughter cells may be genetically identical, they can differ morphologically and physiologically and have different fates. As one of the simplest differentiation processes, Bacillus subtilis sporulation represents an excellent model system for studying cell differentiation. Several decades of study of this process have provided insight into cell cycle regulation and development. This review summarizes important advances in our understanding of asymmetric gene expression during spore formation with an emphasis on developmental stages that lead to asymmetric septum formation and especially to activation of the first compartment-specific sigma factor -sigma(F).

Differential gene expression in genetically identical sister cells: the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

Early in sporulation, the cell divides asymmetrically to give two sister compartments, a smaller prespore and a larger mother cell. Differential gene expression in these compartments depends on the regulation of the first sporulation-specific sigma factor, sigma(F), which is activated only in the prespore. Regulation relies on the interactions of four proteins -sigma(F), its antisigma SpoIIAB (which also has protein kinase activity), the anti-antisigma SpoIIAA and the protein phosphatase SpoIIE. Before asymmetric division, and in the mother cell after division, sigma(F) is held in an inactive complex with SpoIIAB and ATP; SpoIIAA is in its phosphorylated form. To disrupt the complex so as to liberate sigma(F) in the prespore, dephosphorylated SpoIIAA is needed, and this is made available by SpoIIE. Thereafter, SpoIIAB and SpoIIE are active simultaneously in the prespore, cycling SpoIIAA through phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms. This cycle detains SpoIIAB in a state in which it cannot inhibit sigma(F). Results from biophysical techniques, mathematical simulations and enzyme kinetics have now helped to elucidate the dynamics of the protein-protein interactions involved. An understanding of these dynamics largely accounts for the regulation of sigma(F). We show that the system is tuned to be highly efficient in its use of components and extremely economical in conserving ATP.

Efficient regulation of sigmaF, the first sporulation-specific sigma factor in B.subtilis

Differential gene expression is established in the prespore and mother-cell compartments of Bacillus subtilis through the successive activation of a series of cell-type-specific sigma factors. Crucial to the success of this process is the control of the first prespore-specific sigma factor, sigmaF. sigmaF is regulated by the proteins SpoIIAB, SpoIIAA and SpoIIE. SpoIIAB forms an inhibitory complex with sigmaF, which can be dissociated by interaction with SpoIIAA. During this interaction SpoIIAA is phosphorylated. SpoIIE is a membrane-bound phosphatase that dephosphorylates SpoIIAA, thereby re-activating it. It is not understood how sigmaF is activated specifically in the prespore but not in the mother cell. Here, we use a recently developed fluorescence spectroscopy technique to follow in real time the formation of sigmaF.SpoIIAB complexes and their dissociation by SpoIIAA. We show that complete activation of sigmaF is induced by a tenfold increase in SpoIIE activity. This result demonstrates that relatively small changes in SpoIIE activity, which could arise from asymmetric septation, can achieve the all-or-nothing response in sigmaF activity required by the cell. For long-term sigmaF activation, we find that sustained SpoIIE activity is required to counteract the activity of SpoIIAB. Even though the continual phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of SpoIIAA by these two enzymes will expend some ATP, the formation of SpoIIAA.SpoIIAB.ADP complexes greatly diminishes the rate of the phosphorylation reaction, and thus minimizes the wastage of energy. These features provide a very efficient system for regulating sigmaF.

Crystal structures of the ADP and ATP bound forms of the Bacillus anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB in complex with the anti-anti-sigma SpoIIAA

Cell type-specific transcription during Bacillus sporulation is established by sigma(F), the activity of which is controlled by a regulatory circuit involving the anti-sigma factor and serine kinase SpoIIAB, and the anti-anti-sigma SpoIIAA. When ATP is present in the nucleotide-binding site of SpoIIAB, SpoIIAA is phosphorylated, followed by dissociation. The nucleotide-binding site of SpoIIAB is left bound to ADP. SpoIIAB(ADP) can bind an unphosphorylated molecule of SpoIIAA as a stable binding partner. Thus, in this circuit, SpoIIAA plays a dual role as a substrate of the SpoIIAB kinase activity, as well as a tight binding inhibitor. Crystal structures of both the pre-phosphorylation complex and the inhibitory complex, SpoIIAB(ATP) and SpoIIAB(ADP) bound to SpoIIAA, respectively, have been determined. The structural differences between the two forms are subtle and confined to interactions with the phosphoryl groups of the nucleotides. The structures reveal details of the SpoIIAA:SpoIIAB interactions and how phosphorylated SpoIIAA dissociates from SpoIIAB(ADP). Finally, the results confirm and expand upon the docking model for SpoIIAA function as an anti-anti-sigma in releasing sigma(F) from SpoIIAB.

Physical evidence for the induced release of the Bacillus subtilis transcription factor, sigma(F), from its inhibitory complex

The release of the transcription factor sigma(F) from its inhibitory complex with SpoIIAB is a key regulatory step in the control of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis as it initiates a pattern of differential gene expression in the mother cell and prespore compartments. The sigma(F).SpoIIAB complex is dissociated by the unphosphorylated form of the protein SpoIIAA, the alternative binding partner of SpoIIAB. Here, we employ fluorescence spectroscopy to examine the mechanism by which SpoIIAA acts on the sigma(F).SpoIIAB complex. We constructed a mutant of sigma(F), sigma(F)-W46L, which displayed a reproducible fluorescence response on binding to SpoIIAB. Using this mutant we were able to quantify the amount of sigma(F) bound to SpoIIAB in real time. The results provide physical evidence for the "induced release" mechanism of sigma(F) activation. We demonstrate that SpoIIAA interacts directly with the sigma(F).SpoIIAB complex, greatly decreasing the affinity of SpoIIAB for sigma(F) and thus causing the release of the latter. We also demonstrate that sigma(F) is released before SpoIIAA is phosphorylated and that release occurs on a similar time scale to the binding of SpoIIAA to SpoIIAB.

Compartmentalization of gene expression during Bacillus subtilis spore formation

Gene expression in members of the family Bacillaceae becomes compartmentalized after the distinctive, asymmetrically located sporulation division. It involves complete compartmentalization of the activities of sporulation-specific sigma factors, sigma(F) in the prespore and then sigma(E) in the mother cell, and then later, following engulfment, sigma(G) in the prespore and then sigma(K) in the mother cell. The coupling of the activation of sigma(F) to septation and sigma(G) to engulfment is clear; the mechanisms are not. The sigma factors provide the bare framework of compartment-specific gene expression. Within each sigma regulon are several temporal classes of genes, and for key regulators, timing is critical. There are also complex intercompartmental regulatory signals. The determinants for sigma(F) regulation are assembled before septation, but activation follows septation. Reversal of the anti-sigma(F) activity of SpoIIAB is critical. Only the origin-proximal 30% of a chromosome is present in the prespore when first formed; it takes approximately 15 min for the rest to be transferred. This transient genetic asymmetry is important for prespore-specific sigma(F) activation. Activation of sigma(E) requires sigma(F) activity and occurs by cleavage of a prosequence. It must occur rapidly to prevent the formation of a second septum. sigma(G) is formed only in the prespore. SpoIIAB can block sigma(G) activity, but SpoIIAB control does not explain why sigma(G) is activated only after engulfment. There is mother cell-specific excision of an insertion element in sigK and sigma(E)-directed transcription of sigK, which encodes pro-sigma(K). Activation requires removal of the prosequence following a sigma(G)-directed signal from the prespore.

Role of the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB in regulation of sigmaG during Bacillus subtilis sporulation

RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma(F) initiates the prespore-specific program of gene expression during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. sigma(F) governs transcription of spoIIIG, encoding the late prespore-specific regulator sigma(G). However, transcription of spoIIIG is delayed relative to other genes under the control of sigma(F), and after synthesis, sigma(G) is initially kept in an inactive form. Activation of sigma(G) requires the complete engulfment of the prespore by the mother cell and expression of the spoIIIA and spoIIIJ loci. We screened for random mutations in spoIIIG that bypassed the requirement for spoIIIA for the activation of sigma(G). We found a mutation (spoIIIGE156K) that resulted in an amino acid substitution at position 156, which is adjacent to the position of a mutation (E155K) previously shown to prevent interaction of SpoIIAB with sigma(G). Comparative modelling techniques and in vivo studies suggested that the spoIIIGE156K mutation interferes with the interaction of SpoIIAB with sigma(G). The sigma(GE156K) isoform restored sigma(G)-directed gene expression to spoIIIA mutant cells. However, expression of sspE-lacZ in the spoIIIA spoIIIGE156K double mutant was delayed relative to completion of the engulfment process and was not confined to the prespore. Rather, beta-galactosidase accumulated throughout the entire cell at late times in development. This suggests that the activity of sigma(GE156K) is still regulated in the prespore of a spoIIIA mutant, but not by SpoIIAB. In agreement with this suggestion, we also found that expression of spoIIIGE156K from the promoter for the early prespore-specific gene spoIIQ still resulted in sspE-lacZ induction at the normal time during sporulation, coincidently with completion of the engulfment process. In contrast, transcription of spoIIIGE156K, but not of the wild-type spoIIIG gene, from the mother cell-specific spoIID promoter permitted the rapid induction of sspE-lacZ expression. Together, the results suggest that SpoIIAB is either redundant or has no role in the regulation of sigma(G) in the prespore.

Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation

The key regulators of bacterial transcription initiation are the sigma factors, which direct promoter recognition and melting but only after binding to the core RNA polymerase to form the holoenzyme. X-ray crystal structures of the flagellar sigma, sigma(28), in complex with its anti-sigma, FlgM, explain the inhibition mechanism of FlgM, including its ability to attack and destabilize the sigma(28)-holoenzyme. The sigma domains (sigma(2), sigma(3), and sigma(4)) pack together in a compact unit with extensive interdomain interfaces that bury the promoter binding determinants, including the -35 element recognition helix of sigma(4), which fits in an acidic groove on the surface of sigma(3). The structure illustrates the large rearrangements that sigma(28) must undergo to form the holoenzyme and provides insights into the regulation of sigma(28) promoter binding activity that may extend, at least in principle, to other sigmas.

Studies of the Escherichia coli Rsd-sigma70 complex

Escherichia coli Rsd protein was previously identified on the basis of its binding to the RNA polymerase sigma(70) subunit. The Rsd-sigma(70) complex has been studied using different methods. Our data show that Rsd associates with sigma(70) to form a complex with a stoichiometry of 1:1. Alanine scanning and deletion mutagenesis were used to locate regions of sigma(70) that are required for the formation of the Rsd-sigma(70) complex.

Expression of spoIIIJ in the prespore is sufficient for activation of sigma G and for sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

During sporulation in Bacillus subtilis, the prespore-specific developmental program is initiated soon after asymmetric division of the sporangium by the compartment-specific activation of RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma(F). sigma(F) directs transcription of spoIIIG, encoding the late forespore-specific regulator sigma(G). Following synthesis, sigma(G) is initially kept in an inactive form, presumably because it is bound to the SpoIIAB anti-sigma factor. Activation of sigma(G) occurs only after the complete engulfment of the prespore by the mother cell. Mutations in spoIIIJ arrest sporulation soon after conclusion of the engulfment process and prevent activation of sigma(G). Here we show that sigma(G) accumulates but is mostly inactive in a spoIIIJ mutant. We also show that expression of the spoIIIGE155K allele, encoding a form of sigma(G) that is not efficiently bound by SpoIIAB in vitro, restores sigma(G)-directed gene expression to a spoIIIJ mutant. Expression of spoIIIJ occurs during vegetative growth. However, we show that expression of spoIIIJ in the prespore is sufficient for sigma(G) activation and for sporulation. Mutations in the mother cell-specific spoIIIA locus are known to arrest sporulation just after completion of the engulfment process. Previous work has also shown that sigma(G) accumulates in an inactive form in spoIIIA mutants and that the need for spoIIIA expression for sigma(G) activation can be circumvented by the spoIIIGE155K allele. However, in contrast to the case for spoIIIJ, we show that expression of spoIIIA in the prespore does not support efficient sporulation. The results suggest that the activation of sigma(G) at the end of the engulfment process involves the action of spoIIIA from the mother cell and of spoIIIJ from the prespore.

Crystal structure of Escherichia coli sigmaE with the cytoplasmic domain of its anti-sigma RseA

The sigma factors are the key regulators of bacterial transcription. ECF (extracytoplasmic function) sigma's are the largest and most divergent group of sigma(70) family members. ECF sigma's are normally sequestered in an inactive complex by their specific anti-sigma factor, which often spans the inner membrane. Here, we determined the 2 A resolution crystal structure of the Escherichia coli ECF sigma factor sigma(E) in an inhibitory complex with the cytoplasmic domain of its anti-sigma, RseA. Despite extensive sequence variability, the two major domains of sigma(E) are virtually identical in structure to the corresponding domains of other sigma(70) family members. In combination with a model of the sigma(E) holoenzyme and biochemical data, the structure reveals that RseA functions by sterically occluding the two primary binding determinants on sigma(E) for core RNA polymerase.

Evidence in support of a docking model for the release of the transcription factor sigma F from the antisigma factor SpoIIAB in Bacillus subtilis

Cell-specific activation of the transcription factor sigmaF during the process of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is governed by an antisigma factor SpoIIAB and an anti-antisigma factor SpoIIAA. SpoIIAB, which exists as a dimer, binds to sigmaF in a complex of stoichiometry sigmaF.SpoIIAB2. Escape from the complex is mediated by SpoIIAA, which reacts with the complex to cause the release of free sigmaF. Previous evidence indicated that Arg-20 in SpoIIAB is a contact site for both sigmaF and SpoIIAA and that contact with sigmaF is mediated by Arg-20 on only one of the two subunits in the sigmaF.SpoIIAB2 complex. Here we report the construction of heterodimers of SpoIIAB in which one subunit is wild type and the other subunit is a mutant for Arg-20. We show that the dissociation constant for the binding of sigmaF to the heterodimer was similar to that for the wild type, a finding consistent with the idea that sigmaF contacts Arg-20 on only one of the two subunits. Although SpoIIAA was highly effective in causing the release of sigmaF from the wild type homodimer, the anti-antisigma factor had little effect on the release of sigmaF from the heterodimer. This finding is consistent with a model in which SpoIIAA docks on the sigmaF.SpoIIAB2 complex, making contact with the subunit in which Arg-20 is not in contact with sigmaF. SpoIIAB is both an anti-sigmaF factor and a protein kinase that phosphorylates and thereby inactivates SpoIIAA. We show that SpoIIAA effectively displaces sigmaF from a complex of sigmaF with a mutant (SpoIIABR105A) that is impaired in the kinase function of SpoIIAB. This result shows that SpoIIAA-mediated displacement of sigmaF from SpoIIAB does not require concomitant phosphorylation of SpoIIAA.

Light-induced carotenogenesis in Myxococcus xanthus: functional characterization of the ECF sigma factor CarQ and antisigma factor CarR

Illumination of dark-grown Myxococcus xanthus with blue light leads to the induction of carotenoid synthesis. Central to this response is the activation of the light-inducible promoter, PcarQRS, and the transcription of three downstream genes, carQ, carR and carS. Sequence analysis predicted that CarQ is a member of the ECF (extracytoplasmic function) subfamily of RNA polymerase sigma factors, and that CarR is an inner membrane protein. Genetic analysis strongly implied that CarR is an antisigma factor that sequesters CarQ in a transcriptionally inactive complex. Using in vitro transcription run-off assays, we present biochemical evidence that CarQ functions as a bacterial sigma factor and is responsible for transcription initiation at PcarQRS. Similar experiments using the crtI promoter failed to implicate CarQ in direct transcription of the crtI gene. Experiments using the yeast two-hybrid system demonstrated a protein-protein interaction between CarQ and CarR, providing evidence of a CarQ-CarR complex. The yeast two-hybrid system data also indicated that CarR is capable of oligomerization. Fractionation of M. xanthus membranes with the detergent sarkosyl showed that CarR was associated with the inner membrane. Furthermore, CarR was found to be unstable in illuminated stationary phase cells, providing a possible mechanism by which the CarR-CarQ complex is disrupted.

Regulation by proteolysis in bacterial cells

Regulation by proteolysis plays a major role in bacterial stress responses, the cell cycle and development. Key regulators of these processes are subject to conditional proteolysis that depends on complex cellular information processing. This information includes temporal and spatial cues, and recent research has revealed a striking potential for multiple signal integration.

Transient genetic asymmetry and cell fate in a bacterium

Certain species of Gram-positive bacteria can initiate a developmental program that results in the formation of two daughter cells with different fates. One cell develops into a spore and the other cell undergoes programmed lysis, with each process being mediated by a cascade of cell-type-specific transcription factors. An early and critical step in this developmental pathway is the formation of a division septum near one pole, creating two compartments of different sizes. But how is this morphological asymmetry translated into the transcriptional asymmetry of the two compartments? Recent results suggest that the chromosomal position of the genes encoding several key components of the transcriptional regulatory network has an important role in this process.

Post-transcriptional regulation of the Streptomyces coelicolor stress responsive sigma factor, SigH, involves translational control, proteolytic processing, and an anti-sigma factor homolog

The sigH gene encodes a sigma factor whose transcription is controlled by stress regulatory systems and the developmental program in Streptomyces coelicolor. Here, we describe developmentally regulated post-transcriptional control systems for SigH. sigH is expressed as three primary translation products, SigH-sigma(37), SigH-sigma(51), and SigH-sigma(52). In vitro, SigH-sigma(52) was comparable to SigH-sigma(37) in its ability to associate with RNA polymerase core enzyme and specifically initiate transcription in vitro. While SigH-sigma(51/52) were the primary gene products observed throughout early phases of growth, their abundance decreased during later stages in liquid or solid phase cultures while levels of shorter, C-terminally encoded products increased. These included SigH-sigma(37), a product of the downstream translational initiation site, as well as two proteolytic derivatives of SigH-sigma(51/52) (34kDa and 38kDa). Accumulation of SigH-sigma(37) and processing of SigH-sigma(51/52) into these stable 34kDa and 38kDa derivatives correlated with morphological changes on solid medium and physiological maturation in liquid medium. SigH-sigma(51/52) processing did not occur on medium non-permissive for aerial mycelium formation or in one particular developmental mutant (brgA). The proteolytic activity could be detected in vitro using crude extracts of stationary phase cultures, but was absent from exponential phase cultures. prsH, the gene upstream of sigH having sequence similarity to known anti-sigma factors, was able to bind to, and thus presumably inactivate SigH-sigma(52), SigH-sigma(51), and SigH-sigma(37). We have shown elsewhere that prsH was conditionally required for colonial development. Thus, while at least one transcriptional regulator is known to bring about the accumulation of sigH mRNA at different times and different locations in colonies, the post-transcriptional processes described here regulate the activity of different SigH isoforms and program their temporal accumulation pattern, i.e. the elimination of SigH-sigma(51/52) and accumulation of SigH-sigma(37)-like proteins, as a function of development.

Characterization of transcription factors by mass spectrometry and the role of SELDI-MS

Over the last decade, much progress has been made in the field of biological mass spectrometry, with numerous advances in technology, resolution, and affinity capture. The field of genomics has also been transformed by the sequencing and characterization of entire genomes. Some of the next challenges lie in understanding the relationship between the genome and the proteome, the protein complement of the genome, and in characterizing the regulatory processes involved in progressing from gene to functional protein. In this new age of proteomics, development of mass spectrometry methods to characterize transcription factors promises to add greatly to our understanding of regulatory networks that govern expression. However, at this time, regulatory networks of transcription factors are mostly uncharted territory. In this review, we summarize the latest advances in characterization of transcription factors by mass spectrometry including affinity capture, identification of complexes of DNA-binding proteins, structural characterization, determination of protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions, assessment of modification sites and metal binding, studies of functional activity, and the latest chip technologies that use SELDI-MS that allow the rapid capture and identification of transcription factors.

Protein-protein interactions that regulate the energy stress activation of sigma(B) in Bacillus subtilis

Sigma(B) is an alternative sigma factor that controls the general stress response in Bacillus subtilis. In the absence of stress, sigma(B) is negatively regulated by anti-sigma factor RsbW. RsbW is also a protein kinase which can phosphorylate RsbV. When cells are stressed, RsbW binds to unphosphorylated RsbV, produced from the phosphorylated form of RsbV by two phosphatases (RsbU and RsbP) which are activated by stress. We now report the values of the K(m) for ATP and the K(i) for ADP of RsbW (0.9 and 0.19 mM, respectively), which reinforce the idea that the kinase activity of RsbW is directly regulated in vivo by the ratio of these nucleotides. RsbW, purified as a dimer, forms complexes with RsbV and sigma(B) with different stoichiometries, i.e., RsbW(2)-RsbV(2) and RsbW(2)-sigma(B)(1). As determined by surface plasmon resonance, the dissociation constants of the RsbW-RsbV and RsbW-sigma(B) interactions were found to be similar (63 and 92 nM, respectively). Nonetheless, an analysis of the complexes by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in competition assays suggested that the affinity of RsbW(2) for RsbV is much higher than that for sigma(B). The intracellular concentrations of RsbV, RsbW (as a monomer), and sigma(B) measured before stress were similar (1.5, 2.6, and 0.9 micro M, respectively). After ethanol stress they all increased. The increase was greatest for RsbV, whose concentration reached 13 micro M, while those of RsbW (as a monomer) and sigma(B) reached 11.8 and 4.9 micro M, respectively. We conclude that the higher affinity of RsbW for RsbV than for sigma(B), rather than a difference in the concentrations of RsbV and sigma(B), is the driving force that is responsible for the switch of RsbW to unphosphorylated RsbV.

Identification and structure of the anti-sigma factor-binding domain of the disulphide-stress regulated sigma factor sigma(R) from Streptomyces coelicolor

The extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor sigma(R) is a global regulator of redox homeostasis in the antibiotic-producing bacterium Streptomyces coelicolor, with a similar role in other actinomycetes such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Normally maintained in an inactive state by its bound anti-sigma factor RsrA, sigma(R) dissociates in response to intracellular disulphide-stress to direct core RNA polymerase to transcribe genes, such as trxBA and trxC that encode the enzymes of the thioredoxin disulphide reductase pathway, that re-establish redox homeostasis. Little is known about where RsrA binds on sigma(R) or how it suppresses sigma(R)-dependent transcriptional activity. Using a combination of proteolysis, surface-enhanced laser desorption ionisation mass spectrometry and pull-down assays we identify an N-terminal, approximately 10kDa domain (sigma(RN)) that encompasses region 2 of sigma(R) that represents the major RsrA binding site. We show that sigma(RN) inhibits transcription by an unrelated sigma factor and that this inhibition is relieved by RsrA binding, reaffirming that region 2 is involved in binding to core RNA polymerase but also demonstrating that the likely mechanism by which RsrA inhibits sigma(R) activity is by blocking this association. We also report the 2.4A resolution crystal structure of sigma(RN) that reveals extensive structural conservation with the equivalent region of sigma(70) from Escherichia coli as well as with the cyclin-box, a domain-fold found in the eukaryotic proteins TFIIB and cyclin A. sigma(RN) has a propensity to aggregate, due to steric complementarity of oppositely charged surfaces on the domain, but this is inhibited by RsrA, an observation that suggests a possible mode of action for RsrA which we compare to other well-studied sigma factor-anti-sigma factor systems.

Interaction of the conserved region 4.2 of sigma(E) with the RseA anti-sigma factor

Esigma(E) RNA polymerase transcribes a regulon of folding factors for the bacterial envelope and is induced by physical and chemical stresses. The RseA anti-sigma factor inhibits the activity of Esigma(E) RNA polymerase. It is shown here that the N-terminal portion of sigma(E), residues 1-153, binds core RNA polymerase. RseA interacts with residues 154-191 of sigma(E), a site that is homologous to region 4, the sigma factor binding site for promoter DNA. Mutations that reduce transcription of Esigma(E) RNA polymerase map to sigma(E) residues 178, 181, and 183. Variant sigma(E) proteins with amino acid substitutions at residues 178, 181, or 183 do not associate with RseA. A regulatory mechanism is proposed whereby RseA binds to a C-terminal peptide of sigma(E) and inhibits the transcription of Esigma(E) RNA polymerase by blocking promoter recognition.

Crystal structure of the Bacillus stearothermophilus anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB with the sporulation sigma factor sigmaF

Cell type-specific transcription during Bacillus sporulation is established by sigmaF. SpoIIAB is an anti-sigma that binds and negatively regulates sigmaF, as well as a serine kinase that phosphorylates and inactivates the anti-anti-sigma SpoIIAA. The crystal structure of sigmaF bound to the SpoIIAB dimer in the low-affinity, ADP form has been determined at 2.9 A resolution. SpoIIAB adopts the GHKL superfamily fold of ATPases and histidine kinases. A domain of sigmaF contacts both SpoIIAB monomers, while 80% of the sigma factor is disordered. The interaction occludes an RNA polymerase binding surface of sigmaF, explaining the SpoIIAB anti-sigma activity. The structure also explains the specificity of SpoIIAB for its target sigma factors and, in combination with genetic and biochemical data, provides insight into the mechanism of SpoIIAA anti-anti-sigma activity.

Structure of the bacterial RNA polymerase promoter specificity sigma subunit

The sigma subunit is the key regulator of bacterial transcription. Proteolysis of Thermus aquaticus sigma(A), which occurred in situ during crystallization, reveals three domains, sigma(2), sigma(3), and sigma(4), connected by flexible linkers. Crystal structures of each domain were determined, as well as of sigma(4) complexed with -35 element DNA. Exposed surfaces of each domain are important for RNA polymerase binding. Universally conserved residues important for -10 element recognition and melting lie on one face of sigma(2), while residues important for extended -10 recognition lie on sigma(3). Genetic studies correctly predicted that a helix-turn-helix motif in sigma(4) recognizes the -35 element but not the details of the protein-DNA interactions. Positive control mutants in sigma(4) cluster in two regions, positioned to interact with activators bound just upstream or downstream of the -35 element.

Solution structure and stability of the anti-sigma factor AsiA: implications for novel functions

Anti-sigma factors regulate prokaryotic gene expression through interactions with specific sigma factors. The bacteriophage T4 anti-sigma factor AsiA is a molecular switch that both inhibits transcription from bacterial promoters and phage early promoters and promotes transcription at phage middle promoters through its interaction with the primary sigma factor of Escherichia coli, sigma(70). AsiA is an all-helical, symmetric dimer in solution. The solution structure of the AsiA dimer reveals a novel helical fold for the protomer. Furthermore, the AsiA protomer, surprisingly, contains a helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif, predicting a potential new role for AsiA. The AsiA dimer interface includes a substantial hydrophobic component, and results of hydrogen/deuterium exchange studies suggest that the dimer interface is the most stable region of the AsiA dimer. In addition, the residues that form the dimer interface are those that are involved in binding to sigma(70). The results promote a model whereby the AsiA dimer maintains the active hydrophobic surfaces and delivers them to sigma(70), where an AsiA protomer is displaced from the dimer via the interaction of sigma(70) with the same residues in AsiA that constitute the dimer interface.

Flipping a genetic switch by subunit exchange

The bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein is a multifunctional protein that simultaneously acts as both a repressor and activator of gene expression during the phage life cycle. These dual roles with opposing transcriptional consequences are achieved by modification of the host RNA polymerase in which AsiA binds to conserved region 4 (SR4) of sigma(70), altering the pathway of promoter selection by the holoenzyme. The mechanism by which AsiA flips this genetic switch has now been revealed, in part, from the three-dimensional structure of AsiA and the elucidation of its interaction with SR4. The structure of AsiA is that of a novel homodimer in which each monomer is constructed as a seven-helix bundle arranged in four overlapping helix-loop-helix elements. Identification of the protein interfaces for both the AsiA homodimer and the AsiA-sigma(70) complex reveals that these interfaces are coincident. Thus, the AsiA interaction with sigma(70) necessitates that the AsiA homodimer dissociate to form an AsiA-SR4 heterodimer, exchanging one protein subunit for another to alter promoter choice by RNA polymerase.

Conserved regions 4.1 and 4.2 of sigma(70) constitute the recognition sites for the anti-sigma factor AsiA, and AsiA is a dimer free in solution

The association of the bacteriophage T4-encoded AsiA protein with the final sigma(70) subunit of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is one of the principal events governing transcription of the T4 genome. Analytical ultracentrifugation and NMR studies indicate that free AsiA is a symmetric dimer and the dimers can exchange subunits. Using NMR, the mutual recognition sites on AsiA and final sigma(70) have been elucidated. Residues throughout the N-terminal half of AsiA are involved either directly or indirectly in binding to final sigma(70) whereas the two highly conserved C-terminal regions of final sigma(70), denoted 4.1 and 4.2, constitute the entire AsiA binding domain. Peptides corresponding to these regions bind tightly to AsiA individually and simultaneously. Simultaneous binding promotes structural changes in AsiA that mimic interaction with the complete AsiA binding determinant of final sigma(70). Moreover, the results suggest that a significant rearrangement of the dimer accompanies peptide binding. Thus, both conserved regions 4.1 and 4.2 are intimately involved in recognition of AsiA by final sigma(70). The interaction of AsiA with 4.1 provides a potential explanation of the differential abilities of DNA and AsiA to bind to free final sigma(70) and a mechanistic alternative to models of AsiA function that rely on binding to a single site on final sigma(70).

Self-reinforcing activation of a cell-specific transcription factor by proteolysis of an anti-sigma factor in B. subtilis

The transcription factor sigma(F), which is activated in a cell-specific manner during sporulation in B. subtilis, is initially held in an inactive complex by the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB. The anti-anti-sigma factor SpoIIAA reacts with SpoIIAB.sigma(F) to induce the release of free sigma(F) and free SpoIIAB. We now report that free SpoIIAB is subject to proteolysis and that it is protected from degradation by sigma(F) in the SpoIIAB.sigma(F) complex and by SpoIIAA in an alternative complex. Proteolysis requires residues located near the extreme C terminus of SpoIIAB and is dependent upon the ClpCP protease. The reaction of SpoIIAA with SpoIIAB.sigma(F) and the resulting degradation of newly released SpoIIAB could set up a self-reinforcing cycle that locks on the activation of sigma(F).

A multipartite interaction between Salmonella transcription factor sigma28 and its anti-sigma factor FlgM: implications for sigma28 holoenzyme destabilization through stepwise binding

Transcription of the late (Class 3) flagellar promoters in Salmonella typhimurium is dependent upon the flagellar specific sigma factor, sigma28, encoded by the fliA gene. sigma28-dependent transcription is inhibited by an anti-sigma factor, FlgM, through a direct interaction. FlgM can bind both to free sigma28 to prevent it from forming a complex with core RNA polymerase, and to sigma28 holoenzyme to destabilize the complex. A collection of fliA mutants defective for negative regulation by FlgM (fliA* mutants) were isolated. This collection included 27 substitution mutations that conferred insensitivity to FlgM in vivo. The distribution of mutations defined three potential FlgM binding domains in conserved sigma factor regions 2.1, 3.1 and 4 of sigma28. A subset of mutants from each region was assayed for FlgM binding and transcriptional activity in vitro. The results strongly support a multipartite interaction between sigma28 and FlgM. Region 4 mutations, but not region 2.1 or 3.1 mutations, interfered with the ability of FlgM to destabilize sigma28 from core RNA polymerase. We present refined models for FlgM inhibition of sigma28, and for FlgM destabilization of sigma28 holoenzyme.