Overexpression and purification of elongation factor 3 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Tight interaction of eEF2 in the presence of Stm1 on ribosome

The stress-related protein Stm1 interacts with ribosomes, and is implicated in repressing translation. Stm1 was previously studied both in vivo and in vitro by cell-free translation systems using crude yeast lysates, but its precise functional mechanism remains obscure. Using an in vitro reconstituted translation system, we now show that Stm1 severely inhibits translation through its N-terminal region, aa 1 to 107, and this inhibition is antagonized by eEF3. We found that Stm1 stabilizes eEF2 on the 80 S ribosome in the GTP-bound form, independently of eEF2's diphthamide modification, a conserved post-translational modification at the tip of domain IV. Systematic analyses of N- or C-terminal truncated mutants revealed that the core region of Stm1, aa 47 to 143, is crucial for its ribosome binding and eEF2 stabilization. Stm1 does not inhibit the 80 S-dependent GTPase activity of eEF2, at least during the first round of GTP-hydrolysis. The mechanism and the role of the stable association of eEF2 with the ribosome in the presence of Stm1 are discussed in relation to the translation repression by Stm1.

Human G-proteins, ObgH1 and Mtg1, associate with the large mitochondrial ribosome subunit and are involved in translation and assembly of respiratory complexes

The bacterial homologues of ObgH1 and Mtg1, ObgE and RbgA, respectively, have been suggested to be involved in the assembly of large ribosomal subunits. We sought to elucidate the functions of ObgH1 and Mtg1 in ribosome biogenesis in human mitochondria. ObgH1 and Mtg1 are localized in mitochondria in association with the inner membrane, and are exposed on the matrix side. Mtg1 and ObgH1 specifically associate with the large subunit of the mitochondrial ribosome in GTP-dependent manner. The large ribosomal subunit stimulated the GTPase activity of Mtg1, whereas only the intrinsic GTPase activity was detectable with ObgH1. The knockdown of Mtg1 decreased the overall mitochondrial translation activity, and caused defects in the formation of respiratory complexes. On the other hand, the depletion of ObgH1 led to the specific activation of the translation of subunits of Complex V, and disrupted its proper formation. Our results suggested that Mtg1 and ObgH1 function with the large subunit of the mitochondrial ribosome, and are also involved in both the translation and assembly of respiratory complexes. The fine coordination of ribosome assembly, translation and respiratory complex formation in mammalian mitochondria is affirmed.

Overexpression of eukaryotic translation elongation factor 3 impairs Gcn2 protein activation

In eukaryotes, phosphorylation of translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) by the kinase Gcn2 (general control nonderepressible 2) is a key response to amino acid starvation. Sensing starvation requires that Gcn2 directly contacts its effector protein Gcn1, and both must contact the ribosome. We have proposed that Gcn2 is activated by uncharged tRNA bound to the ribosomal decoding (A) site, in a manner facilitated by ribosome-bound Gcn1. Protein synthesis requires cyclical association of eukaryotic elongation factors (eEFs) with the ribosome. Gcn1 and Gcn2 are large proteins, raising the question of whether translation and monitoring amino acid availability can occur on the same ribosome. Part of the ribosome-binding domain in Gcn1 has homology to one of the ribosome-binding domains in eEF3, suggesting that these proteins utilize overlapping binding sites on the ribosome and consequently cannot function simultaneously on the same ribosome. Supporting this idea, we found that eEF3 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae diminished growth on amino acid starvation medium (Gcn(-) phenotype) and decreased eIF2α phosphorylation, and that the growth defect associated with constitutively active Gcn2 was diminished by eEF3 overexpression. Overexpression of the eEF3 HEAT domain, or C terminus, was sufficient to confer a Gcn(-) phenotype, and both fragments have ribosome affinity. eEF3 overexpression did not significantly affect Gcn1-ribosome association, but it exacerbated the Gcn(-) phenotype of Gcn1-M7A that has reduced ribosome affinity. Together, this suggests that eEF3 blocks Gcn1 regulatory function on the ribosome. We propose that the Gcn1-Gcn2 complex only functions on ribosomes with A-site-bound uncharged tRNA, because eEF3 does not occupy these stalled complexes.

EF-G2mt is an exclusive recycling factor in mammalian mitochondrial protein synthesis

Bacterial translation elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes translocation during peptide elongation and mediates ribosomal disassembly during ribosome recycling in concert with the ribosomal recycling factor (RRF). Two homologs of EF-G have been identified in mitochondria from yeast to man, EF-G1mt and EF-G2mt. Here, we demonstrate that the dual function of bacterial EF-G is divided between EF-G1mt and EF-G2mt in human mitochondria (RRFmt). EF-G1mt specifically catalyzes translocation, whereas EF-G2mt mediates ribosome recycling with human mitochondrial RRF but lacks translocation activity. Domain swapping experiments suggest that the functional specificity for EF-G2mt resides in domains III and IV. Furthermore, GTP hydrolysis by EF-G2mt is not necessary for ribosomal splitting, in contrast to the bacterial-recycling mode. Because EF-G2mt represents a class of translational GTPase that is involved in ribosome recycling, we propose to rename this factor mitochondrial ribosome recycling factor 2 (RRF2mt).

Domain and nucleotide dependence of the interaction between Saccharomyces cerevisiae translation elongation factors 3 and 1A

Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 3 (eEF3) is a fungal-specific ATPase proposed to catalyze the release of deacylated-tRNA from the ribosomal E-site. In addition, it has been shown to interact with the aminoacyl-tRNA binding GTPase elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), perhaps linking the E and A sites. Domain mapping demonstrates that amino acids 775-980 contain the eEF1A binding sites. Domain III of eEF1A, which is also involved in actin-related functions, is the site of eEF3 binding. The binding of eEF3 to eEF1A is enhanced by ADP, indicating the interaction is favored post-ATP hydrolysis but is not dependent on the eEF1A-bound nucleotide. A temperature-sensitive P915L mutant in the eEF1A binding site of eEF3 has reduced ATPase activity and affinity for eEF1A. These results support the model that upon ATP hydrolysis, eEF3 interacts with eEF1A to help catalyze the delivery of aminoacyl-tRNA at the A-site of the ribosome. The dynamics of when eEF3 interacts with eEF1A may be part of the signal for transition of the post to pre-translocational ribosomal state in yeast.

Functional interactions between yeast translation eukaryotic elongation factor (eEF) 1A and eEF3

The translation elongation machinery in fungi differs from other eukaryotes in its dependence upon eukaryotic elongation factor 3 (eEF3). eEF3 is essential in vivo and required for each cycle of the translation elongation process in vitro. Models predict eEF3 affects the delivery of cognate aminoacyl-tRNA, a function performed by eEF1A, by removing deacylated tRNA from the ribosomal Exit site. To dissect eEF3 function and its link to the A-site activities of eEF1A, we have identified a temperature-sensitive allele of the YEF3 gene. The F650S substitution, located between the two ATP binding cassettes, reduces both ribosome-dependent and intrinsic ATPase activities. In vivo this mutation increases sensitivity to aminoglycosidic drugs, causes a 50% reduction of total protein synthesis at permissive temperatures, slows run-off of polyribosomes, and reduces binding to eEF1A. Reciprocally, excess eEF3 confers synthetic slow growth, increased drug sensitivity, and reduced translation in an allele specific fashion with an E122K mutation in the GTP binding domain of eEF1A. In addition, this mutant form of eEF1A shows reduced binding of eEF3. Thus, optimal in vivo interactions between eEF3 and eEF1A are critical for protein synthesis.

Limited proteolysis of yeast elongation factor 3. Sequence and location of the subdomains

Elongation factor 3 (EF-3) is an ATPase essential for polypeptide chain synthesis in a variety of yeasts and fungi. We used limited proteolysis to study the organization of the subdomains of EF-3. Trypsinolysis of EF-3 at 30 degrees C resulted in the formation of three fragments with estimated molecular masses of 90, 70, and 50 kDa. Yeast ribosomes protected EF-3 and the large fragments from further degradation. ATP exposed a new tryptic cleavage site and stabilized the 70- and 50-kDa fragments. The conformation of EF-3 as measured by fluorescence spectroscopy did not change upon ATP binding. Poly(G) stimulated proteolysis and quenched the intrinsic fluorescence of EF-3. Using gel mobility shift, we demonstrated a direct interaction between EF-3 and tRNA. Neither tRNA nor rRNA altered the tryptic cleavage pattern. The proteolytic products were sequenced by mass spectrometric analysis. EF-3 is blocked NH(2)-terminally by an acetylated serine. The 90-, 70-, and 50-kDa fragments are also blocked NH(2)-terminally, confirming their origin. The 50-kDa fragment (Ser(2)-Lys(443)) is the most stable domain in EF-3 with no known function. The 70-kDa fragment (Ser(2)-Lys(668)) containing the first nucleotide-binding sequence motif forms the core ATP binding subdomain within the 90-kDa domain. The primary ribosome binding site is located near the loosely structured carboxyl-terminal end.

A highly conserved intraspecies homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae elongation factor-3 encoded by the HEF3 gene

A paralog (intraspecies homolog) of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae YEF3 gene, encoding elongation factor-3, has been sequenced in the course of the yeast genome project, and identified by database searching; this gene has been designated HEF3. Bioinformatic and Northern blot analysis indicate that the HEF3 gene is not expressed during vegetative growth. Deletion of the HEF3 gene reveals no growth defects, nor any defects in mating or sporulation. A high copy 2 mu clone of HEF3 was constructed, and was shown to be unable to complement a null allele of yef3. Finally, an in vitro assay for ribosome-stimulated ATPase activity was performed with isogenic HEF3 and delta hef3 strains; no difference in biochemical activity could be detected in these strains. From these results, we conclude that the HEF3 gene does not encode a functional homolog of YEF3.