Expression, purification, and characterization of deglycosylated human pro-prostate-specific antigen

Effects of Glycosylation on the Enzymatic Activity and Mechanisms of Proteases

Posttranslational modifications are an important feature of most proteases in higher organisms, such as the conversion of inactive zymogens into active proteases. To date, little information is available on the role of glycosylation and functional implications for secreted proteases. Besides a stabilizing effect and protection against proteolysis, several proteases show a significant influence of glycosylation on the catalytic activity. Glycans can alter the substrate recognition, the specificity and binding affinity, as well as the turnover rates. However, there is currently no known general pattern, since glycosylation can have both stimulating and inhibiting effects on activity. Thus, a comparative analysis of individual cases with sufficient enzyme kinetic and structural data is a first approach to describe mechanistic principles that govern the effects of glycosylation on the function of proteases. The understanding of glycan functions becomes highly significant in proteomic and glycomic studies, which demonstrated that cancer-associated proteases, such as kallikrein-related peptidase 3, exhibit strongly altered glycosylation patterns in pathological cases. Such findings can contribute to a variety of future biomedical applications.

A Single Glycan at the 99-Loop of Human Kallikrein-related Peptidase 2 Regulates Activation and Enzymatic Activity

Human kallikrein-related peptidase 2 (KLK2) is a key serine protease in semen liquefaction and prostate cancer together with KLK3/prostate-specific antigen. In order to decipher the function of its potential N-glycosylation site, we produced pro-KLK2 in Leishmania tarentolae cells and compared it with its non-glycosylated counterpart from Escherichia coli expression. Mass spectrometry revealed that Asn-95 carries a core glycan, consisting of two GlcNAc and three hexoses. Autocatalytic activation was retarded in glyco-pro-KLK2, whereas the activated glyco-form exhibited an increased proteolytic resistance. The specificity patterns obtained by the PICS (proteomic identification of protease cleavage sites) method are similar for both KLK2 variants, with a major preference for P1-Arg. However, glycosylation changes the enzymatic activity of KLK2 in a drastically substrate-dependent manner. Although glyco-KLK2 has a considerably lower catalytic efficiency than glycan-free KLK2 toward peptidic substrates with P2-Phe, the situation was reverted toward protein substrates, such as glyco-pro-KLK2 itself. These findings can be rationalized by the glycan-carrying 99-loop that prefers to cover the active site like a lid. By contrast, the non-glycosylated 99-loop seems to favor a wide open conformation, which mostly increases the apparent affinity for the substrates (i.e. by a reduction of K_m). Also, the cleavage pattern and kinetics in autolytic inactivation of both KLK2 variants can be explained by a shift of the target sites due to the presence of the glycan. These striking effects of glycosylation pave the way to a deeper understanding of kallikrein-related peptidase biology and pathology.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) protein does not affect growth of prostate cancer cells in vitro or prostate cancer xenografts in vivo

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is produced in high amounts by normal and malignant prostate cancer cells. PSA is a serine protease with substrates that include semenogelin I and II, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3, fibronectin, and laminin. PSA, via its enzymatic activity, may play a role in growth, invasion, and metastasis of prostate cancer cells. Recent data also suggest that the PSA protein itself, independent of enzymatic activity, may also function as an endothelial cell-specific inhibitor of angiogenesis.

METHODS

Human (PC3, DU145) and rat (AT2, AT6) prostate cancer cell lines were transfected with the full PSA gene encoding preproPSA protein. PSA-producing clones of each cell line were selected and the amount of enzymatically active PSA produced by each cell line determined using a PSA-specific fluorescent peptide substrate. In vitro and in vivo growth characteristics of PSA-producing transfectants were compared to neomycin controls and wild type cells.

RESULTS

All selected clones produced and secreted PSA (5-120 ng/ml/10(5) cells). None of the PSA-transfected cell lines produced detectable amounts of enzymatically active PSA. Production of enzymatically inactive PSA by prostate cancer cell lines did not alter growth kinetics in vitro. PSA-producing xenograft doubling times in vivo were similar to neomycin controls and wild type.

CONCLUSION

Although recent reports suggest the PSA protein itself may be antiangiogenic, our results demonstrate that production of PSA protein by prostate cancer cells does not significantly alter growth in vitro or in vivo.

Concentration of enzymatically active prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the extracellular fluid of primary human prostate cancers and human prostate cancer xenograft models

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) targeted prodrugs are under development in our laboratory. Concentrations of total PSA and enzymatically active PSA produced by various human prostate cancer xenograft models have not been well characterized.

METHODS

The concentration of PSA secreted into the extracellular fluid (ECF) in normal human prostate tissue, primary prostate cancers obtained directly from patients, and serially passageable human prostate cancer xenografts (PC-82, LNCaP, LAPC-4) were determined using Tandem assays. Percent enzymatically active PSA in the ECF and in conditioned media was also determined using a previously validated assay employing a monoclonal antibody to the PSA catalytic site. In addition, the concentration and activity of PSA within sera from men with and without prostate cancer, as well as from tumor-bearing animals, was likewise assayed.

RESULTS

Normal human prostate tissue and primary human prostate cancers have high concentrations of PSA in the ECF (i.e., 1600-2100 nM). The majority of this PSA is enzymatically active (i.e., 80-90%). Human PC-82 prostate cancer xenografts also have high concentrations of PSA in the ECF (624 +/- 360 nM), and the majority of this PSA is also enzymatically active (i.e., 66 +/- 4%). In contrast, much lower concentrations of PSA are found in the ECF from LNCaP (45 +/- 9 nM) and LAPC-4 (7.3 +/- 0.6 nM). Only a small portion of the total PSA isolated from DHT-containing, serum-free, conditioned media from these cell lines is enzymatically active (i.e., approximately 18%). While PSA was detected in all serum samples regardless of the type of host, no enzymatically active PSA was detected in any of these serum samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate cancers obtained directly from patients produce and secrete large amounts of PSA, the majority of which is highly enzymatically active. In contrast, while PSA was detected in the sera, none of this PSA was enzymatically active. This is also the case for the human PC-82 prostate cancer xenografts. In contrast, LNCaP and LAPC-4 human prostate cancer xenograft models secrete approximately 70-300-fold less PSA in the ECF than prostate cancers from patients and the majority of this PSA is enzymatically inactive. Also, the serum from these animals had detectable PSA, but none of this PSA was enzymatically active. Thus, these latter two prostate cancer models define the least and the PC-82, the most, optimized xenograft model for screening PSA targeted prodrugs.