The molecular pathways induced by radiation and leading to thyroid carcinogenesis

Kinase-inhibitors for iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: still far from a structured therapeutic algorithm

The kinase-inhibitors (KIs) sorafenib and lenvatinib demonstrated efficacy in iodine-refractory DTC upon phase III studies. However, evidence allowing a punctual balance of benefits and risks is poor. Furthermore, the lack of a direct comparison hampers to establish the proper sequence of administration. However, some insights may provided: a) indirect comparison between phase III trials showed milder toxicity for sorafenib, which should be preferred in case of cardiovascular comorbidities; b) prospective evidence of efficacy in KIs pre-treated patients is available only for lenvatinib, which should be used as second-line. Promising activity was found for the majority of other tested KIs, but no placebo-controlled trials are available. Emerging, but still early, frontiers include the restoration of iodine-sensitivity and the selective activity on pathogenic mutations. In conclusion, the use of KIs in iodine-refractory DTC is far from a structured therapeutic algorithm.

Application of molecular biology of differentiated thyroid cancer for clinical prognostication

Although cancer outcome results from the interplay between genetics and environment, researchers are making a great effort for applying molecular biology in the prognostication of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Nevertheless, role of molecular characterisation in the prognostic setting of DTC is still nebulous. Among the most common and well-characterised genetic alterations related to DTC, including mutations of BRAF and RAS and RET rearrangements, BRAF^V600E is the only mutation showing unequivocal association with clinical outcome. Unfortunately, its accuracy is strongly limited by low specificity. Recently, the introduction of next-generation sequencing techniques led to the identification of TERT promoter and TP53 mutations in DTC. These genetic abnormalities may identify a small subgroup of tumours with highly aggressive behaviour, thus improving specificity of molecular prognostication. Although knowledge of prognostic significance of TP53 mutations is still anecdotal, mutations of the TERT promoter have showed clear association with clinical outcome. Nevertheless, this genetic marker needs to be analysed according to a multigenetic model, as its prognostic effect becomes negligible when present in isolation. Given that any genetic alteration has demonstrated, taken alone, enough specificity, the co-occurrence of driving mutations is emerging as an independent genetic signature of aggressiveness, with possible future application in clinical practice. DTC prognostication may be empowered in the near future by non-tissue molecular prognosticators, including circulating BRAF^V600E and miRNAs. Although promising, use of these markers needs to be refined by the technical sight, and the actual prognostic value is still yet to be validated.