Bacterial Glycoengineering as a Biosynthetic Route to Customized Glycomolecules

Glycomolecules: from "sweet immunity" to "sweet biostimulation"?

Climate changes and environmental contaminants are daunting challenges that require an urgent change from current agricultural practices to sustainable agriculture. Biostimulants are natural solutions that adhere to the principles of organic farming and are believed to have low impacts on the environment and human health. Further, they may contribute to reducing the use of chemical inputs while maintaining productivity in adverse environments. Biostimulants are generally defined as formulated substances and microorganisms showing benefits for plant growth, yield, rhizosphere function, nutrient-use efficiency, quality of harvested products, or abiotic stress tolerance. These biosolutions are categorized in different subclasses. Several of them are enriched in glycomolecules and their oligomers. However, very few studies have considered them as active molecules in biostimulation and as a subclass on their own. Herein, we describe the structure and the functions of complex polysaccharides, glycoproteins, and glycolipids in relation to plant defense or biostimulation. We also discuss the parallels between sugar-enhanced plant defense and biostimulation with glycomolecules and introduce the concept of sweet biostimulation or glycostimulation.

Development of a scalable recombinant system for cyclic beta-1,2-glucans production

BACKGROUND

Cyclic β-1,2-glucans (CβG) are bacterial cyclic homopolysaccharides with interesting biotechnological applications. These ring-shaped molecules have a hydrophilic surface that confers high solubility and a hydrophobic cavity able to include poorly soluble molecules. Several studies demonstrate that CβG and many derivatives can be applied in drug solubilization and stabilization, enantiomer separation, catalysis, synthesis of nanomaterials and even as immunomodulators, suggesting these molecules have great potential for their industrial and commercial exploitation. Nowadays, there is no method to produce CβG by chemical synthesis and bacteria that synthesize them are slow-growing or even pathogenic, which makes the scaling up of the process difficult and expensive. Therefore, scalable production and purification methods are needed to afford the demand and expand the repertoire of applications of CβG.

RESULTS

We present the production of CβG in specially designed E. coli strains by means of the deletion of intrinsic polysaccharide biosynthetic genes and the heterologous expression of enzymes involved in CβG synthesis, transport and succinilation. These strains produce different types of CβG: unsubstituted CβG, anionic CβG and CβG of high size. Unsubstituted CβG with a degree of polymerization of 17 to 24 glucoses were produced and secreted to the culture medium by one of the strains. Through high cell density culture (HCDC) of that strain we were able to produce 4,5 g of pure unsubstituted CβG /L in culture medium within 48 h culture.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a new recombinant bacterial system for the synthesis of cyclic β-1,2-glucans, expanding the use of bacteria as a platform for the production of new polysaccharides with biotechnological applications. This new approach allowed us to produce CβG in E. coli with high yields and the highest volumetric productivity reported to date. We expect this new highly scalable system facilitates CβG availability for further research and the widespread use of these promising molecules across many application fields.

Strategies for Glycoengineering Therapeutic Proteins

Almost all therapeutic proteins are glycosylated, with the carbohydrate component playing a long-established, substantial role in the safety and pharmacokinetic properties of this dominant category of drugs. In the past few years and moving forward, glycosylation is increasingly being implicated in the pharmacodynamics and therapeutic efficacy of therapeutic proteins. This article provides illustrative examples of drugs that have already been improved through glycoengineering including cytokines exemplified by erythropoietin (EPO), enzymes (ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase 1, ENPP1), and IgG antibodies (e.g., afucosylated Gazyva®, Poteligeo®, Fasenra™, and Uplizna®). In the future, the deliberate modification of therapeutic protein glycosylation will become more prevalent as glycoengineering strategies, including sophisticated computer-aided tools for "building in" glycans sites, acceptance of a broad range of production systems with various glycosylation capabilities, and supplementation methods for introducing non-natural metabolites into glycosylation pathways further develop and become more accessible.

Protein Glycoengineering: An Approach for Improving Protein Properties

Natural proteins are an important source of therapeutic agents and industrial enzymes. While many of them have the potential to be used as highly effective medical treatments for a wide range of diseases or as catalysts for conversion of a range of molecules into important product types required by modern society, problems associated with poor biophysical and biological properties have limited their applications. Engineering proteins with reduced side-effects and/or improved biophysical and biological properties is therefore of great importance. As a common protein modification, glycosylation has the capacity to greatly influence these properties. Over the past three decades, research from many disciplines has established the importance of glycoengineering in overcoming the limitations of proteins. In this review, we will summarize the methods that have been used to glycoengineer proteins and briefly discuss some representative examples of these methods, with the goal of providing a general overview of this research area.

Genetic engineering approaches to improve posttranslational modification of biopharmaceuticals in different production platforms

The number of approved biopharmaceuticals, where product quality attributes remain of major importance, is increasing steadily. Within the available variety of expression hosts, the production of biopharmaceuticals faces diverse limitations with respect to posttranslational modifications (PTM), while different biopharmaceuticals demand different forms and specifications of PTMs for proper functionality. With the growing toolbox of genetic engineering technologies, it is now possible to address general as well as host- or biopharmaceutical-specific product quality obstacles. In this review, we present diverse expression systems derived from mammalians, bacteria, yeast, plants, and insects as well as available genetic engineering tools. We focus on genes for knockout/knockdown and overexpression for meaningful approaches to improve biopharmaceutical PTMs and discuss their applicability as well as future trends in the field.

Klebsiella pneumoniae O1 and O2ac antigens provide prototypes for an unusual strategy for polysaccharide antigen diversification

A limited range of different structures is observed in O-antigenic polysaccharides (OPSs) from Klebsiella pneumoniae lipopolysaccharides. Among these, several are based on modifications of a conserved core element of serotype O2a OPS, which has a disaccharide repeat structure [→3)-α-d-Galp-(1→3)-β-d-Galf-(1→]. Here, we describe the enzymatic pathways for a highly unusual modification strategy involving the attachment of a second glycan repeat-unit structure to the nonreducing terminus of O2a. This occurs by the addition of the O1 [→3)-α-d-Galp-(1→3)-β-d-Galp-(1→] or O2c [→3)-β-d-GlcpNAc-(1→5)-β-d-Galf-(1→] antigens. The organization of the enzyme activities performing these modifications differs, with the enzyme WbbY possessing two glycosyltransferase catalytic sites solely responsible for O1 antigen polymerization and forming a complex with the O2a glycosyltransferase WbbM. In contrast, O2c polymerization requires glycosyltransferases WbmV and WbmW, which interact with one another but apparently not with WbbM. Using defined synthetic acceptors and site-directed mutants to assign the activities of the WbbY catalytic sites, we found that the C-terminal WbbY domain is a UDP-Galp-dependent GT-A galactosyltransferase adding β-(1→3)-linked d-Galp, whereas the WbbY N terminus includes a GT-B enzyme adding α-(1→3)-linked d-Galp These activities build the O1 antigen on a terminal Galp in the O2a domain. Using similar approaches, we identified WbmV as the UDP-GlcNAc transferase and noted that WbmW represents a UDP-Galf-dependent enzyme and that both are GT-A members. WbmVW polymerizes the O2c antigen on a terminal Galf. Our results provide mechanistic and conceptual insights into an important strategy for polysaccharide antigen diversification in bacteria.