Cadaver Validation of Intensity-Based Ultrasound to CT Registration

Feasibility of tracked ultrasound registration for pelvic-abdominal tumor navigation: a patient study

PURPOSE

Surgical navigation techniques can guide surgeons in localizing pelvic-abdominal malignancies. For abdominal navigation, accurate patient registration is crucial and is generally performed using an intra-operative cone-beam CT (CBCT). However, this method causes 15-min surgical preparation workflow interruption and radiation exposure, and more importantly, it cannot be repeated during surgery to compensate for large patient movement. As an alternative, the accuracy and feasibility of tracked ultrasound (US) registration are assessed in this patient study.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for surgical navigation during laparotomy of pelvic-abdominal malignancies were prospectively included. In the operating room, two percutaneous tracked US scans of the pelvic bone were acquired: one in supine and one in Trendelenburg patient position. Postoperatively, the bone surface was semiautomatically segmented from US images and registered to the bone surface on the preoperative CT scan. The US registration accuracy was computed using the CBCT registration as a reference and acquisition times were compared. Additionally, both US measurements were compared to quantify the registration error caused by patient movement into Trendelenburg.

RESULTS

In total, 18 patients were included and analyzed. US registration resulted in a mean surface registration error of 1.2 ± 0.2 mm and a mean target registration error of 3.3 ± 1.4 mm. US acquisitions were 4 × faster than the CBCT scans (two-sample t-test P < 0.05) and could even be performed during standard patient preparation before skin incision. Patient repositioning in Trendelenburg caused a mean target registration error of 7.7 ± 3.3 mm, mainly in cranial direction.

CONCLUSION

US registration based on the pelvic bone is accurate, fast and feasible for surgical navigation. Further optimization of the bone segmentation algorithm will allow for real-time registration in the clinical workflow. In the end, this would allow intra-operative US registration to correct for large patient movement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05637359).

Three-dimensional ultrasound for knee osteophyte depiction: a comparative study to computed tomography

Purpose

Osteophytes are common radiographic markers of osteoarthritis. However, they are not accurately depicted using conventional imaging, thus hampering surgical interventions that rely on pre-operative images. Studies have shown that ultrasound (US) is promising at detecting osteophytes and monitoring the progression of osteoarthritis. Furthermore, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound reconstructions may offer a means to quantify osteophytes. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of osteophyte depiction in the knee joint between 3D US and conventional computed tomography (CT).

Methods

Eleven human cadaveric knees were pre-screened for the presence of osteophytes. Three osteoarthritic knees were selected, and then, 3D US and CT images were obtained, segmented, and digitally reconstructed in 3D. After dissection, high-resolution structured light scanner (SLS) images of the joint surfaces were obtained. Surface matching and root mean square (RMS) error analyses of surface distances were performed to assess the accuracy of each modality in capturing osteophytes. The RMS errors were compared between 3D US, CT and SLS models.

Results

Average RMS error comparisons for 3D US versus SLS and CT versus SLS models were 0.87 mm ± 0.33 mm (average ± standard deviation) and 0.95 mm ± 0.32 mm, respectively. No statistical difference was found between 3D US and CT. Comparative observations of imaging modalities suggested that 3D US better depicted osteophytes with cartilage and fibrocartilage tissue characteristics compared to CT.

Conclusion

Using 3D US can improve the depiction of osteophytes with a cartilaginous portion compared to CT. It can also provide useful information about the presence and extent of osteophytes. Whilst algorithm improvements for automatic segmentation and registration of US are needed to provide a more robust investigation of osteophyte depiction accuracy, this investigation puts forward the potential application for 3D US in routine diagnostic evaluations and pre-operative planning of osteoarthritis.

Registration of 3D freehand ultrasound to a bone model for orthopedic procedures of the forearm

PURPOSE

For guidance of orthopedic surgery, the registration of preoperative images and corresponding surgical plans with the surgical setting can be of great value. Ultrasound (US) is an ideal modality for surgical guidance, as it is non-ionizing, real time, easy to use, and requires minimal (magnetic/radiation) safety limitations. By extracting bone surfaces from 3D freehand US and registering these to preoperative bone models, complementary information from these modalities can be fused and presented in the surgical realm.

METHODS

A partial bone surface is extracted from US using phase symmetry and a factor graph-based approach. This is registered to the detailed 3D bone model, conventionally generated for preoperative planning, based on a proposed multi-initialization and surface-based scheme robust to partial surfaces.

RESULTS

36 forearm US volumes acquired using a tracked US probe were independently registered to a 3D model of the radius, manually extracted from MRI. Given intraoperative time restrictions, a computationally efficient algorithm was determined based on a comparison of different approaches. For all 36 registrations, a mean (± SD) point-to-point surface distance of [Formula: see text] was obtained from manual gold standard US bone annotations (not used during the registration) to the 3D bone model.

CONCLUSIONS

A registration framework based on the bone surface extraction from 3D freehand US and a subsequent fast, automatic surface alignment robust to single-sided view and large false-positive rates from US was shown to achieve registration accuracy feasible for practical orthopedic scenarios and a qualitative outcome indicating good visual image alignment.

Integrating diagnostic B-mode ultrasonography into CT-based radiation treatment planning

This paper presents methods and a clinical procedure for integrating B-mode ultrasound images tagged with position information with a planning computed tomography (CT) scan for radiotherapy. A workflow is described that allows the integration of these modalities into the clinic. A surface mapping approach provides a preregistration of the ultrasound image borders onto the patient's skin. Successively, a set of individual ultrasound images from a freehand sweep is chosen by the physician. These images are automatically registered with the planning CT scan using novel intensity-based methods. We put a particular focus on deriving an appropriate similarity measure based on the physical properties and artifacts of ultrasound. A combination of a weighted mutual information term, edge correlation, clamping to the skin surface, and occlusion detection is able to assess the alignment of structures in ultrasound images and information reconstructed from the CT data. We demonstrate the practicality of our methods on five patients with head and neck tumors and cervical lymph node metastases and provide a detailed report on the conducted experiments, including the setup, calibration, acquisition, and verification of our algorithms. The mean target registration error on nine data sets is 3.9 mm. Thus, the additional information about intranodal architecture and fulfillment of malignancy criteria derived from a high-resolution ultrasonography of lymph nodes can be localized and visualized in the CT scan coordinate space and is made available for further radiation treatment planning.