Neuronal Functions and Emerging Pharmacology of TAAR1

TAARs as Novel Therapeutic Targets for the Treatment of Depression: A Narrative Review of the Interconnection with Monoamines and Adult Neurogenesis

Depression is a common mental illness of great concern. Current therapy for depression is only suitable for 80% of patients and is often associated with unwanted side effects. In this regard, the search for and development of new antidepressant agents remains an urgent task. In this review, we discuss the current available evidence indicating that G protein-coupled trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) might represent new targets for depression treatment. The most frequently studied receptor TAAR1 has already been investigated in the treatment of schizophrenia, demonstrating antidepressant and anxiolytic properties. In fact, the TAAR1 agonist Ulotaront is currently undergoing phase 2/3 clinical trials testing its safety and efficacy in the treatment of major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Other members of the TAAR family (TAAR2, TAAR5, TAAR6, TAAR8, and TAAR9) are not only involved in the innate olfaction of volatile amines, but are also expressed in the limbic brain areas. Furthermore, animal studies have shown that TAAR2 and TAAR5 regulate emotional behaviors and thus may hold promise as potential antidepressant targets. Of particular interest is their connection with the dopamine and serotonin systems of the brain and their involvement in the regulation of adult neurogenesis, known to be affected by the antidepressant drugs currently in use. Further non-clinical and clinical studies are necessary to validate TAAR1 (and potentially other TAARs) as novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of depression.

Central and peripheral methylamine-induced hypophagia is mediated via nitric oxide and TAAR1 in neonatal layer-type chicken

The aim of the current study was to determine effects of intracerebroventricular (ICV) and intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of Methylamine (MET) and possible interactions with nitric oxide (NO) and TAAR₁ pathways in 24-h fasted (FD₂₄) and ad libitum layer-type chicken. In experiment 1, FD₂₄ chicken ICV injected with MET (15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 μg). In experiment 2, ICV injection of MET (15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 μg) was injected in the ad libitum birds. Experiments 3-4 were similar to experiments 1-2, except chicken i.p. injected with MET (15, 30, 45, 60 and 75 mg/kg). In experiment 5, FD₂₄ birds ICV injected with l-NAME (NO synthesis inhibitor, 100 nmol), MET (75 μg) and co-injection of l-NAME + MET. Experiment 6 was similar to experiment 5, except, ad libitum birds received injections. In experiment 7, FD₂₄ chicken i.p. injected with l-NAME (100 mg/kg), MET (75 mg/kg) and co-injection of l-NAME + MET. In experiment 8, FD₂₄ birds ICV injected with RO5256390 (selective TAAR₁ agonist, 10, 20 and 40 μg). In experiment 9, ad libitum birds ICV injected with RO5256390 (10, 20 and 40 μg). In experiment 10, FD₂₄ birds ICV injected with RO5256390 (10 μg), MET (75 μg) and their co-injection. Experiment 11 was similar to experiment 10, except, ad libitum birds received ICV injections. In experiment 12, FD₂₄ chicken i.p. injected with RO5256390 (2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg). In experiment 13, FD₂₄ chicken i.p. injected with RO5256390 (2.5 mg/kg), MET (75 mg/kg) and RO5256390 + MET. Then cumulative food intake was determined until 120 min after injection. According to the results, ICV injection of MET decreased food intake in FD₂₄ and ad libitum chicken (P < 0.05). MET (i.p.) diminished food consumption in fasted (P < 0.05) but not in ad libitum chicken (P> 0.05). Co-injection of the l-NAME + MET significantly decreased MET-induced hypophagia in FD₂₄ and ad libitum chicken (P < 0.05). MET-induced hypophagia (i.p.) weakened by l-NAME in FD₂₄ chicken (P < 0.05). RO5256390 decreased food intake in FD₂₄ and ad libitum chicken (P < 0.05). Co-injection of RO5256390 + MET increased MET-induced hypophagia in FD₂₄ and ad libitum chicken (P < 0.05). RO5256390 decreased food intake in FD₂₄ chicken (P < 0.05). Co-injection of the RO5256390 + MET amplified MET-induced hypophagia in FD₂₄ chicken (P < 0.05). Based on the findings, MET-induced hypophagia is mediated via NO and TAAR₁ pathways on food intake in layer chicken.

Depressive disorders: Treatment failures and poor prognosis over the last 50 years

Depression like many diseases is pleiotropic but unlike cancer and Alzheimer's disease for example, is still largely stigmatized and falls into the dark shadows of human illness. The failure of depression to be in the spotlight for successful treatment options is inherent in the complexity of the disease(s), flawed clinical diagnosis, overgeneralization of the illness, inadequate and biased clinical trial design, restrictive and biased inclusion/exclusion criteria, lack of approved/robust biomarkers, expensive imaging technology along with few advances in neurobiological hypotheses in decades. Clinical trial studies summitted to the regulatory agencies (FDA/EMA) for approval, have continually failed to show significant differences between active and placebo. For decades, we have acknowledged this failure, despite vigorous debated by all stakeholders to provide adequate answers to this escalating problem, with only a few new antidepressants approved in the last 20 years with equivocal efficacy, little improvement in side effects or onset of efficacy. It is also clear that funding and initiatives for mental illness lags far behind other life-treating diseases. Thus, it is no surprise we have not achieved much success in the last 50 years in treating depression, but we are accountable for the many failures and suboptimal treatment. This review will therefore critically address where we have failed and how future advances in medical science offers a glimmer of light for the patient and aid our future understanding of the neurobiology and pathophysiology of the disease, enabling transformative therapies for the treatment of depressive disorders.

A partial trace amine-associated receptor 1 agonist exhibits properties consistent with a methamphetamine substitution treatment

Recent evidence suggests that the trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) plays a pivotal role in the regulation of dopamine (DA) transmission and psychostimulant action. Several selective TAAR1 agonists have previously shown efficacy in models of cocaine addiction. However, the effects of TAAR1 activation on methamphetamine (METH)-induced behaviours are less well understood, as indeed are the underlying neurochemical mechanisms mediating potential interactions between TAAR1 and METH. Here, in a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement the partial TAAR1 agonist, RO5263397, reduced the break-point for METH self-administration, while significantly increasing responding maintained by food reward. Following self-administration and extinction training, RO5263397 completely blocked METH-primed reinstatement of METH seeking. Moreover, when used as a substitute, unlike a low dose of METH, which sustained vigorous responding when substituting for the training dose of METH, RO5263397 was not self-administered at any dose, thus exhibiting no apparent abuse liability. Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry experiments showed that RO5263397 prevented METH-induced DA overflow in slices of the nucleus accumbens, while having no effect on DA transmission in its own right. Collectively, the present observations demonstrate that partial TAAR1 activation decreases the motivation to self-administer METH, blocks METH-primed reinstatement of METH seeking and prevents METH-induced DA elevations in the nucleus accumbens, and strongly support the candidacy of TAAR1-based medications as potential substitute treatment in METH addiction.