Symptom management and supportive care of the patient with brain metastases

Mean apparent diffusion coefficient in a single slice may predict tumor response to whole-brain radiation therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to access the performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a predictor for treatment response to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases (BMs) from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 102 NSCLC patients with BMs who underwent WBRT between 2012 and 2016. Diffusion-weighted MRI were performed pre-WBRT and within 12 weeks after WBRT started. Mean single-plane ADC value of ROIs was evaluated by two radiologists blinded to results of each other. The treatment response rate, intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed based on the ADC value and ΔADC respectively. At last, we used COX and logistic regression to do the multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There was good inter-observer agreement of mean ADC value pre-WBRT, post-WBRT, and ΔADC between the 2 radiologists (Pearson correlation 0.915 [pre-WBRT], 0.950 [post-WBRT], 0.937 [ΔADC], p < 0.001, for each one). High mean ADC value were related with better response rate (72.2% vs 37.5%, p = 0.001) and iPFS (7.6 vs 6.4 months, p = 0.031). High ΔADC were related with better response rate (73.6% vs 36.7%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis shows that histopathology, BMs number, high ADC value pre-WBRT, and high ΔADC post-WBRT were related to better treatment response of WBRT, and KPS, BMs number, and low ADC value pre-WBRT increased the risk of developing intracranial relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean single-plane ADC value pre-WBRT and ΔADC post-WBRT were potential predictor for intracranial tumor response to WBRT in NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

KEY POINTS

• ADC value is a potential predictor of intracranial treatment response to WBRT in NSCLC patients with brain metastases. • Higher mean ADC value pre-WBRT and ΔADC post-WBRT of brain metastases were related to better intracranial tumor response. • Prediction of response before WBRT using ADC value can help oncologists to make better therapy plans and avoid missing opportunities for rescue therapy.

Capacity of patients with brain metastases to make treatment decisions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate medical decision-making capacity (MDC) in patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

Participants were 41 adults with brain metastases with Karnofsky Performance Status scores of ≥70 who were recruited from an academic medical center and 41 demographically matched controls recruited from the community. We evaluated MDC using the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument and its four clinically relevant consent standards (expressing a treatment choice, appreciation, reasoning, and understanding). Capacity impairment ratings (no impairment, mild/moderate impairment, and severe impairment) on the consent standards were also assigned to each participant with brain metastasis using cutoff scores derived statistically from the performance of the control group.

RESULTS

The brain metastasis patient group performed significantly below controls on consent standards of understanding and reasoning. Capacity compromise was defined as performance ≤1.5 standard deviations below the control group mean. Using this definition, approximately 60% of the participants with brain metastases demonstrated capacity compromise on at least one MDC standard.

CONCLUSION

When defining capacity compromise as performance ≤1.5 standard deviation below the control group mean, over half of patients with brain metastases have reduced capacity to make treatment decisions. This impairment is demonstrated shortly after initial diagnosis of brain metastases and highlights the importance of routine clinical assessment of MDC following diagnosis of brain metastasis. These results also indicate a need for the development and investigation of interventions to support or improve MDC in this patient population.

Cognition in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis: profiles and implications

Cognitive impairment is a common symptom in patients with brain metastasis, and significant cognitive dysfunction is prevalent in a majority of patients who are still able to engage in basic self-care activities. In the current study, the neurocognitive performance of 32 patients with brain metastasis and 32 demographically-matched controls was examined using a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests, with the goal of comprehensively examining the cognitive functioning of newly diagnosed brain metastasis patients. The cognition of all patients was assessed within 1 week of beginning treatment for brain metastasis. Results indicated impairments in verbal memory, attention, executive functioning, and language in relation to healthy controls. Performance in relation to appropriate normative groups was also examined. Overall, cognitive deficits were prevalent and memory was the most common impairment. Given that cognitive dysfunction was present in this cohort of patients with largely minimal functional impairment, these results have implications for patients, caregivers and health care providers treating patients with brain metastasis.

Associations between objectively measured physical activity and quality of life in cancer patients with brain metastases

CONTEXT

Physical activity has demonstrated benefits for quality of life (QoL) and cancer-related fatigue earlier in the cancer trajectory; however, less is known regarding its role in patients with end-stage cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between objectively measured physical activity and QoL in cancer patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with brain metastases, aged 18 years or older, cognitively intact, and with Palliative Performance Scale scores greater than 30%, were recruited from a multidisciplinary brain metastases clinic. A cross-sectional survey interview assessed self-reported QoL (McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire), self-reported physical function (Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument), and symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System). Participants wore activPAL™ (PAL Technologies, Ltd., Glasgow, UK) accelerometers recording triaxial movement for seven days during palliative whole brain radiotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were recruited. Median survival was 171 days from time of study consent, with 90% (28 of 31) of deaths by two year follow-up. Participants who stood for 1.6 hours or more per day had better QoL (mean=1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.1 to 1.9; P=0.034). Participants who stood for 1.6 hours or more per day had better QoL (mean=1.0; 95% CI=0.1 to 1.9; P=0.034). Participants who sat or were supine for 20.7 hours or more per day had better advanced lower extremity functioning (mean=-6.1; 95% CI=-11.9 to -0.3; P=0.040) and total functioning (mean=-10.6; 95% CI=-21.1 to -0.04; P=0.049), but worse depression (mean=2.1; 95% CI=0.3 to 3.9; P=0.028), anxiety (mean=2.8; 95% CI=0.7 to 5.0; P=0.012), and feeling of well-being (mean=1.9; 95% CI=0.2 to 3.6; P=0.028).

CONCLUSION

Sedentary behavior appears to be associated with better physical functioning but worse psychosocial functioning in cancer patients with brain metastases.

Beyond palliative radiotherapy: a pilot multidisciplinary brain metastases clinic

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of a multidisciplinary palliative radiotherapy clinic for patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

We designed a 6-month pilot Rapid Access Palliative Radiotherapy Program (RAPRP) brain metastases clinic. The main goals of the clinic were: (1) to provide timely consultation and treatment, (2) to provide multidisciplinary assessment and care, (3) to facilitate accrual of patients to research studies, and (4) to be a positive experience for patients. Team members included a radiation oncologist, radiation therapist, nurse practitioner, social worker (SW), occupational therapist (OT), and registered dietitian (RD). Patients underwent multidimensional assessment with patient-reported questionnaires and completed a patient satisfaction survey. Data were collected in a prospective database and collated in a standardized fashion with descriptive statistics recorded as percentages, medians, and ranges.

RESULTS

The pilot brain metastases clinic ran weekly from August 5, 2009 to January 27, 2010. In total, 33 patients were seen. The median time from referral date to clinic date was 6 days, with 76% of patients seen within 1 week. Most patients (94%) started their radiotherapy on clinic day. Fifteen patients (45%) required assessment by a SW, 36% by an OT, and 33% by a RD. Ninety-one percent of patients participated in a research study. Eighty-six percent of patients reported being very satisfied with the clinic experience, and 97% would recommend the clinic to a patient in a similar situation.

CONCLUSIONS

The pilot RAPRP Brain Metastases Clinic was successful in providing patients with timely and multidisciplinary care and will continue beyond the pilot phase.