Surgical issues and preoperative systemic therapy

Neoadjuvant afatinib with paclitaxel for triple-negative breast cancer and the molecular characteristics in responders and non-responders

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is worse and a major proportion of TNBC expresses epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Afatinib can inhibit EGFR signal pathway; however, its treatment effect for TNBC is unknown. Thus, we aimed to assess the efficacy and biomarkers of afatinib in combination with paclitaxel in a neoadjuvant setting.

METHODS

Patients with stage II to III TNBC were enrolled. They received 40 mg of afatinib daily for 14 days, followed by daily afatinib and weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m²) every 21 days for four to six cycles. To explore the mechanisms of responsiveness and non-responsiveness, 409 cancer-associated genes were sequenced.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled and one patient achieved a complete clinical response; however, a 2 mm residual tumor was noted in the surgical specimen. Overall, 33.0% patients were responders. Fifteen patients received molecular testing. No activated mutation of EGFR or Her2 were found. Activated PI3K or JAK2 pathway were trended to associate with non-responder (p = 0.057). Mutation of homologous recombination (HR) genes were correlated with non-responsiveness (p = 0.005). Seven patients did not have altered PI3K, JAK2 or HR pathway; six (85.7%) of them were responder. Patients with the amplified DAXX gene was associated with a favorable trend of response (p = 0.109).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding afatinib to neoadjuvant paclitaxel generated a modest effect in TNBC. Exploratory molecular analysis suggested that activated PI3K, JAK2 pathways and mutation of HR genes were associated with therapeutic non-responsiveness, and amplification of DAXX genes was associated with responsiveness to afatinib in combination with paclitaxel.

Triple-negative breast cancer: an update on neoadjuvant clinical trials

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis despite the high rates of response to chemotherapy. This scenario highlights the need to develop novel therapies and/or treatment strategies to reduce the mortality associated with TNBC. The neoadjuvant setting provides a model for rapid assessment of treatment efficacy with smaller patient accruals and over shorter periods of time compared to the traditional adjuvant setting. In addition, a clear surrogate endpoint of improved survival, known as pathologic complete response, already exists in this setting. Here, we review current data from completed and ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC.