Immunosuppression

Is Systemic Immunosuppression a Risk Factor for Oral Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Even if the relationship between immunosuppression and increased incidence of systemic cancers is well known, there is less awareness about the risk of developing oral cancer in immunosuppressed patients. The aim of this review was to evaluate the association between immunosuppression and the development of oral cancer. Two authors independently and, in duplicate, conducted a systematic literature review of international journals and electronic databases (MEDLINE via OVID, Scopus, and Web of Science) from their inception to 28 April 2023. The assessment of risk of bias and overall quality of evidence was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and GRADE system. A total of 2843 articles was identified, of which 44 met the inclusion criteria and were included in either the qualitative or quantitative analysis. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally high or moderate. The quantitative analysis of the studies revealed that immunosuppression should be considered a risk factor for the development of oral cancer, with a percentage of increased risk ranging from 0.2% to 1% (95% CI: 0.2% to 1.4%). In conclusion, the results suggest that a constant and accurate follow-up should be reserved for all immunosuppressed patients as a crucial strategy to intercept lesions that have an increased potential to evolve into oral cancer.

mTOR Inhibition Is Most Beneficial After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Active Tumors

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival benefit of sirolimus in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (exploratory analysis of the SiLVER-trial).

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA

Patients receiving LT) for HCC are at a high risk for tumor recurrence. Calcineurin inhibitors have shown evidence to promote cancer growth, whereas mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors like sirolimus have anticancer effects. In the SiLVER-trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00355862), the effect of sirolimus on the recurrence of HCC after LT was investigated in a prospective randomized trial. Although the primary endpoint of improved disease-free survival (DFS) with sirolimus was not met, outcomes were improved for patients in the sirolimus-treatment arm in the first 3 to 5 years. To learn more about the key variables, a multivariate analysis was performed on the SiLVER-trial data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 508 patients of the intention-to-treat analysis were included in exploratory univariate and multivariate models for overall survival (OS), DFS and a competing risk analysis for HCC recurrence.

RESULTS

Sirolimus use for ≥3 months after LT for HCC independently reduced the hazard for death in the multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR): 0.7 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.52-0.96, P = 0.02). Most strikingly, patients with an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥10 ng/mL and having used sirolimus for ≥3 months, benefited most with regard to OS, DFS, and HCC-recurrence (HR: 0.49-0.59, P = 0.0079-0.0245).

CONCLUSIONS

mTOR-inhibitor treatment with sirolimus for ≥3 months improves outcomes in LT for HCC, especially in patients with AFP-evidence of higher tumor activity, advocating particularly for mTOR inhibitor use in this subgroup of patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2005-005362-36 CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:: NCT00355862.

[Immunosuppressive drugs and the development of skin cancer after organ transplantation]

BACKGROUND

Patients with organ transplants have a significantly increased risk of skin cancer, especially squamous cell carcinoma, as a result of long-term treatment with immunosuppressive drugs. This paper provides a brief overview of the assumed underlying mechanisms.

METHOD

The paper builds on relevant articles and studies identified in the course of many years of interest in immunopharmacology and skin cancer after organ transplantation.

RESULTS

Reduced immunological tumour surveillance as a result of chronic immunosuppression has long been assumed to underlie the increased risk of skin cancer after organ transplants. Recent studies indicate that immunosuppressive drugs may also have specific carcinogenic effects. Aziatropine, which inhibits proliferation of lymphocytes, increases oxidative DNA damage caused by UV radiation. Ciclosporin and tacrolimus, which have an immunosuppressive effect by inhibiting calcineurin, promote malignant phenotypes in cell culture and tumour growth in mouse models. Calcineurin has proved to be necessary in order for p53 protein to have a protective effect against skin cancer. A relatively new class of immunosuppressive drugs, mTOR inhibitors, have antineoplastic properties and are associated with less risk of skin cancer. A number of randomised studies are currently in progress to see whether mTOR inhibitors can reduce the risk of skin cancer after organ transplantation.

INTERPRETATION

Immunosuppressive drugs contribute to skin cancer after organ transplantation, either as a result of immunosuppression or through specific carcinogenic mechanisms. Immunosuppressive drugs with antineoplastic properties are now starting to be used.