1
|
Wang B, Lei X, Tian W, Perez-Rathke A, Tseng YY, Liang J. Structure-based pathogenicity relationship identifier for predicting effects of single missense variants and discovery of higher-order cancer susceptibility clusters of mutations. Brief Bioinform 2023; 24:bbad206. [PMID: 37332013 PMCID: PMC10359089 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
We report the structure-based pathogenicity relationship identifier (SPRI), a novel computational tool for accurate evaluation of pathological effects of missense single mutations and prediction of higher-order spatially organized units of mutational clusters. SPRI can effectively extract properties determining pathogenicity encoded in protein structures, and can identify deleterious missense mutations of germ line origin associated with Mendelian diseases, as well as mutations of somatic origin associated with cancer drivers. It compares favorably to other methods in predicting deleterious mutations. Furthermore, SPRI can discover spatially organized pathogenic higher-order spatial clusters (patHOS) of deleterious mutations, including those of low recurrence, and can be used for discovery of candidate cancer driver genes and driver mutations. We further demonstrate that SPRI can take advantage of AlphaFold2 predicted structures and can be deployed for saturation mutation analysis of the whole human proteome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boshen Wang
- Center for Bioinformatics and Quantitative Biology, Richard and Loan Hill, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, W103 Suite, 820 S Wood St, 60612 IL, USA
| | - Xue Lei
- Center for Bioinformatics and Quantitative Biology, Richard and Loan Hill, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, W103 Suite, 820 S Wood St, 60612 IL, USA
| | - Wei Tian
- Center for Bioinformatics and Quantitative Biology, Richard and Loan Hill, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, W103 Suite, 820 S Wood St, 60612 IL, USA
| | - Alan Perez-Rathke
- Center for Bioinformatics and Quantitative Biology, Richard and Loan Hill, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, W103 Suite, 820 S Wood St, 60612 IL, USA
| | - Yan-Yuan Tseng
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, 540 E. Canfield Avenue, 48201MI, USA
| | - Jie Liang
- Center for Bioinformatics and Quantitative Biology, Richard and Loan Hill, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, W103 Suite, 820 S Wood St, 60612 IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Collins KW, Copeland MM, Kotthoff I, Singh A, Kundrotas PJ, Vakser IA. Dockground resource for protein recognition studies. Protein Sci 2022; 31:e4481. [PMID: 36281025 PMCID: PMC9667896 DOI: 10.1002/pro.4481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Structural information of protein-protein interactions is essential for characterization of life processes at the molecular level. While a small fraction of known protein interactions has experimentally determined structures, computational modeling of protein complexes (protein docking) has to fill the gap. The Dockground resource (http://dockground.compbio.ku.edu) provides a collection of datasets for the development and testing of protein docking techniques. Currently, Dockground contains datasets for the bound and the unbound (experimentally determined and simulated) protein structures, model-model complexes, docking decoys of experimentally determined and modeled proteins, and templates for comparative docking. The Dockground bound proteins dataset is a core set, from which other Dockground datasets are generated. It is devised as a relational PostgreSQL database containing information on experimentally determined protein-protein complexes. This report on the Dockground resource describes current status of the datasets, new automated update procedures and further development of the core datasets. We also present a new Dockground interactive web interface, which allows search by various parameters, such as release date, multimeric state, complex type, structure resolution, and so on, visualization of the search results with a number of customizable parameters, as well as downloadable datasets with predefined levels of sequence and structure redundancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ian Kotthoff
- Computational Biology ProgramThe University of KansasKansasUSA
| | - Amar Singh
- Computational Biology ProgramThe University of KansasKansasUSA
| | | | - Ilya A. Vakser
- Computational Biology ProgramThe University of KansasKansasUSA
- Department of Molecular BiosciencesThe University of KansasKansasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akdel M, Pires DEV, Pardo EP, Jänes J, Zalevsky AO, Mészáros B, Bryant P, Good LL, Laskowski RA, Pozzati G, Shenoy A, Zhu W, Kundrotas P, Serra VR, Rodrigues CHM, Dunham AS, Burke D, Borkakoti N, Velankar S, Frost A, Basquin J, Lindorff-Larsen K, Bateman A, Kajava AV, Valencia A, Ovchinnikov S, Durairaj J, Ascher DB, Thornton JM, Davey NE, Stein A, Elofsson A, Croll TI, Beltrao P. A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2022; 29:1056-1067. [PMID: 36344848 PMCID: PMC9663297 DOI: 10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 107.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Most proteins fold into 3D structures that determine how they function and orchestrate the biological processes of the cell. Recent developments in computational methods for protein structure predictions have reached the accuracy of experimentally determined models. Although this has been independently verified, the implementation of these methods across structural-biology applications remains to be tested. Here, we evaluate the use of AlphaFold2 (AF2) predictions in the study of characteristic structural elements; the impact of missense variants; function and ligand binding site predictions; modeling of interactions; and modeling of experimental structural data. For 11 proteomes, an average of 25% additional residues can be confidently modeled when compared with homology modeling, identifying structural features rarely seen in the Protein Data Bank. AF2-based predictions of protein disorder and complexes surpass dedicated tools, and AF2 models can be used across diverse applications equally well compared with experimentally determined structures, when the confidence metrics are critically considered. In summary, we find that these advances are likely to have a transformative impact in structural biology and broader life-science research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Akdel
- Bioinformatics Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Douglas E V Pires
- School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eduard Porta Pardo
- Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), Badalona, Spain
- Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jürgen Jänes
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - Arthur O Zalevsky
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | - Patrick Bryant
- Dep of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| | - Lydia L Good
- Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Roman A Laskowski
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - Gabriele Pozzati
- Dep of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| | - Aditi Shenoy
- Dep of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| | - Wensi Zhu
- Dep of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| | - Petras Kundrotas
- Dep of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| | | | - Carlos H M Rodrigues
- School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alistair S Dunham
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - David Burke
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - Neera Borkakoti
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - Sameer Velankar
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - Adam Frost
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jérôme Basquin
- Department of Structural Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
- Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alex Bateman
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrey V Kajava
- Université de Montpellier, Centre de Recherche en Biologie Cellulaire de Montpellier (CRBM) CNRS, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Sergey Ovchinnikov
- Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Division of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | | | - David B Ascher
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Janet M Thornton
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK.
| | | | - Amelie Stein
- Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Arne Elofsson
- Dep of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden.
| | - Tristan I Croll
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Department of Haematology, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Pedro Beltrao
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge, UK.
- Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Malladi S, Powell HR, David A, Islam SA, Copeland MM, Kundrotas PJ, Sternberg MJ, Vakser IA. GWYRE: A resource for mapping variants onto experimental and modeled structures of human protein complexes. J Mol Biol 2022; 434:167608. [PMID: 35662458 PMCID: PMC9188266 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Structure of protein complexes is important for interpreting genetic variation. Data on single amino acid variants is available from high-throughput sequencing. Integrated modeling approach was applied to proteins and their complexes. GWYRE resource incorporates predicted protein complexes with mapped mutations.
Rapid progress in structural modeling of proteins and their interactions is powered by advances in knowledge-based methodologies along with better understanding of physical principles of protein structure and function. The pool of structural data for modeling of proteins and protein–protein complexes is constantly increasing due to the rapid growth of protein interaction databases and Protein Data Bank. The GWYRE (Genome Wide PhYRE) project capitalizes on these developments by advancing and applying new powerful modeling methodologies to structural modeling of protein–protein interactions and genetic variation. The methods integrate knowledge-based tertiary structure prediction using Phyre2 and quaternary structure prediction using template-based docking by a full-structure alignment protocol to generate models for binary complexes. The predictions are incorporated in a comprehensive public resource for structural characterization of the human interactome and the location of human genetic variants. The GWYRE resource facilitates better understanding of principles of protein interaction and structure/function relationships. The resource is available at http://www.gwyre.org.
Collapse
|