Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

The Knowns and Unknowns in Protein-Metabolite Interactions

Increasing attention has been focused on the study of protein-metabolite interactions (PMI), which play a key role in regulating protein functions and directing an orchestra of cellular processes. The investigation of PMIs is complicated by the fact that many such interactions are extremely short-lived, which requires very high resolution in order to detect them. As in the case of protein-protein interactions, protein-metabolite interactions are still not clearly defined. Existing assays for detecting protein-metabolite interactions have an additional limitation in the form of a limited capacity to identify interacting metabolites. Thus, although recent advances in mass spectrometry allow the routine identification and quantification of thousands of proteins and metabolites today, they still need to be improved to provide a complete inventory of biological molecules, as well as all interactions between them. Multiomic studies aimed at deciphering the implementation of genetic information often end with the analysis of changes in metabolic pathways, as they constitute one of the most informative phenotypic layers. In this approach, the quantity and quality of knowledge about PMIs become vital to establishing the full scope of crosstalk between the proteome and the metabolome in a biological object of interest. In this review, we analyze the current state of investigation into the detection and annotation of protein-metabolite interactions, describe the recent progress in developing associated research methods, and attempt to deconstruct the very term "interaction" to advance the field of interactomics further.

Jasmonate perception: Ligand-receptor interaction, regulation, and evolution

Phytohormones integrate external environmental and developmental signals with internal cellular responses for plant survival and multiplication in changing surroundings. Jasmonate (JA), which might originate from prokaryotes and benefit plant terrestrial adaptation, is a vital phytohormone that regulates diverse developmental processes and defense responses against various environmental stresses. In this review, we first provide an overview of ligand-receptor binding techniques used for the characterization of phytohormone-receptor interactions, then introduce the identification of the receptor COI1 and active JA molecules, and finally summarize recent advances on the regulation of JA perception and its evolution.

Shikonin as a WT1 Inhibitor Promotes Promyeloid Leukemia Cell Differentiation

This study aims to observe the differentiating effect of shikonin on Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1)-positive HL-60 cells and investigate the fate of the differentiated leukemia cells. WT1 overexpression unaffected cell viability but promoted resistance to H₂O₂-induced DNA injury and cell apoptosis. The binding of shikonin to the WT1 protein was confirmed by molecular docking and drug affinity reaction target stability (DARTS). Shikonin at the non-cytotoxic concentration could decrease the WT1 protein and simultaneously reduced the CD34 protein and increased the CD11b protein in a dose-dependent manner in normal HL-60 cells but not in WT1-overexpressed HL-60 cells. Shikonin unaffected HL-60 cell viability in 48 h. However, it lasted for 10 days; could attenuate cell proliferation, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and self-renewal; prevent the cell cycle; promote cell apoptosis. In a mouse leukemia model, shikonin could decrease the WT1 protein to prevent leukemia development in a dose-dependent manner. In this study, we also confirmed preliminarily the protein-protein interactions between WT1 and CD34 in molecular docking and CO-IP assay. Our results suggest that: 1. shikonin can down-regulate the WT1 protein level for leukemia differentiation therapy, and 2. the interaction between WT1 and CD34 proteins may be responsible for granulocyte/monocyte immaturity in HL-60 cells.

Exiting the tunnel of uncertainty: crystal soak to validated hit

Crystallographic fragment screens provide an efficient and effective way to identify small-molecule ligands of a crystallized protein. Due to their low molecular weight, such hits tend to have low, often unquantifiable, affinity for their target, complicating the twin challenges of validating the hits as authentic solution-phase ligands of the target and identifying the `best' hit(s) for further elaboration. In this article, approaches that address these challenges are assessed. Using retrospective analysis of a recent ATAD2 hit-identification campaign, alongside other examples of successful fragment-screening campaigns, it is suggested that hit validation and prioritization are best achieved by a `triangulation' approach in which the results of multiple available biochemical and biophysical techniques are correlated to develop qualitative structure-activity relationships (SARs). Such qualitative SARs may indeed be the only means by which to navigate a project through the tunnel of uncertainty that prevails before on-scale biophysical, biochemical and/or biological measurements become possible.

Alignment of helicases on single-stranded DNA increases activity

Helicases function in most biological processes that utilize RNA or DNA nucleic acids including replication, recombination, repair, transcription, splicing, and translation. They are motor proteins that bind ATP and then catalyze hydrolysis to release energy which is transduced for conformational changes. Different conformations correspond to different steps in a process that results in movement of the enzyme along the nucleic acid track in a unidirectional manner. Some helicases such as DEAD-box helicases do not translocate, but these enzymes transduce chemical energy from ATP hydrolysis to unwind secondary structure in DNA or RNA. Some helicases function as monomers while others assemble into defined structures, either dimers or higher order oligomers. Dda helicase from bacteriophage T4 and NS3 helicase domain from the hepatitis C virus are examples of monomeric helicases. These helicases can bind to single-stranded DNA in a manner that appears like train engines on a track. When monomeric helicases align on DNA, the activity of the enzymes increases. Helicase activity can include the rate of duplex unwinding and the total number of base pairs melted during a single binding event or processivity. Dda and NS3h are considered as having low processivity, unwinding fewer than 50 base pairs per binding event. Here, we report fusing two molecules of NS3h molecules together through genetically linking the C-terminus of one molecule to the N-terminus of a second NS3h molecule. We observed increased processivity relative to NS3h possibly arising from the increased probability that at least one of the helicases will completely unwind the DNA prior to dissociation. The dimeric enzyme also binds DNA more like the full-length NS3 helicase. Finally, the dimer can displace streptavidin from biotin-labeled oligonucleotide, whereas monomeric NS3h cannot.