A Method to Monitor the Introduction of Posttranscriptional Modifications in tRNAs with NMR Spectroscopy

Imino chemical shift assignments of tRNAAsp, tRNAVal and tRNAPhe from Escherichia coli

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are an essential component of the protein synthesis machinery. In order to accomplish their cellular functions, tRNAs go through a highly controlled biogenesis process leading to the production of correctly folded tRNAs. tRNAs in solution adopt the characteristic L-shape form, a stable tertiary conformation imperative for the cellular stability of tRNAs, their thermotolerance, their interaction with protein and RNA complexes and their activity in the translation process. The introduction of post-transcriptional modifications by modification enzymes, the global conformation of tRNAs, and their cellular stability are highly interconnected. We aim to further investigate this existing link by monitoring the maturation of bacterial tRNAs in E. coli extracts using NMR. Here, we report on the 1H, 15N chemical shift assignment of the imino groups and some amino groups of unmodified and modified E. coli tRNAAsp, tRNAVal and tRNAPhe, which are essential for characterizing their maturation process using NMR spectroscopy.

Advances in the Structural and Functional Understanding of m1A RNA Modification

ConspectusRNA modification is a co- or post-transcriptional process by which specific nucleotides are chemically altered by enzymes after their initial incorporation into the RNA chain, expanding the chemical and functional diversity of RNAs. Our understanding of RNA modifications has changed dramatically in recent years. In the past decade, RNA methyltransferases (MTases) have been highlighted in numerous clinical studies and disease models, modifications have been found to be dynamically regulated by demodification enzymes, and significant technological advances have been made in the fields of RNA sequencing, mass spectrometry, and structural biology. Among RNAs, transfer RNAs (tRNAs) exhibit the greatest diversity and density of post-transcriptional modifications, which allow for potential cross-talks and regulation during their incorporation. N1-methyladenosine (m1A) modification is found in tRNAs at positions 9, 14, 16, 22, 57, and 58, depending on the tRNA and organism.Our laboratory has used and developed a large panel of tools to decipher the different mechanisms used by m1A tRNA MTases to recognize and methylate tRNA. We have solved the structures of TrmI from Thermus thermophilus (m1A58), TrmK from Bacillus subtilis (m1A22), and human TRMT10C (m1A9). These MTases do not share the same structure or organization to recognize tRNAs, but they all modify an adenosine, forming a non-Watson-Crick (WC) interaction. For TrmK, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shift mapping of the binding interface between TrmK and tRNASer was invaluable to build a TrmK/tRNA model, where both domains of TrmK participate in the binding of a full-length L-shaped tRNA and where the non-WC purine 13-A22 base pair positions the A22 N1-atom close to the methyl of the S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) TrmK cofactor. For TRMT10C, cryoEM structures showed the MTase poised to N1-methylate A9 or G9 in tRNA and revealed different steps of tRNA maturation, where TRMT10C acts as a tRNA binding platform for sequential docking of each maturation enzyme. This work confers a role for TRMT10C in tRNA quality control and provides a framework to understand the link between mitochondrial tRNA maturation dysfunction and diseases.Methods to directly detect the incorporation of modifications during tRNA biosynthesis are rare and do not provide easy access to the temporality of their introduction. To this end, we have introduced time-resolved NMR to monitor tRNA maturation in the cellular environment. Combined with genetic and biochemical approaches involving the synthesis of specifically modified tRNAs, our methodology revealed that some modifications are incorporated in a defined sequential order, controlled by cross-talks between modification events. In particular, a strong modification circuit, namely Ψ55 → m5U54 → m1A58, controls the modification process in the T-arm of yeast elongator tRNAs. Conversely, we showed that m1A58 is efficiently introduced on unmodified initiator tRNAiMet without the need of any prior modification. Two distinct pathways are therefore followed for m1A58 incorporation in elongator and initiator tRNAs.We are undoubtedly entering an exciting period for the elucidation of the functions of RNA modifications and the intricate mechanisms by which modification enzymes identify and alter their RNA substrates. These are promising directions for the field of epitranscriptomics.

Different modification pathways for m1A58 incorporation in yeast elongator and initiator tRNAs

As essential components of the protein synthesis machinery, tRNAs undergo a tightly controlled biogenesis process, which include the incorporation of numerous posttranscriptional modifications. Defects in these tRNA maturation steps may lead to the degradation of hypomodified tRNAs by the rapid tRNA decay (RTD) and nuclear surveillance pathways. We previously identified m1A58 as a late modification introduced after modifications Ψ55 and T54 in yeast elongator tRNAPhe. However, previous reports suggested that m1A58 is introduced early during the tRNA modification process, in particular on primary transcripts of initiator tRNAiMet, which prevents its degradation by RNA decay pathways. Here, aiming to reconcile this apparent inconsistency on the temporality of m1A58 incorporation, we examined its introduction into yeast elongator and initiator tRNAs. We used specifically modified tRNAs to report on the molecular aspects controlling the Ψ55 → T54 → m1A58 modification circuit in elongator tRNAs. We also show that m1A58 is efficiently introduced on unmodified tRNAiMet, and does not depend on prior modifications. Finally, we show that m1A58 has major effects on the structural properties of initiator tRNAiMet, so that the tRNA elbow structure is only properly assembled when this modification is present. This observation provides a structural explanation for the degradation of hypomodified tRNAiMet lacking m1A58 by the nuclear surveillance and RTD pathways.