1
|
Khojasteh SC, Argikar UA, Chatzopoulou M, Cheruzel L, Cho S, Dhaware D, Johnson KM, Kalgutkar AS, Liu J, Ma B, Maw H, Rowley JA, Seneviratne HK, Wang S. Biotransformation research advances - 2023 year in review. Drug Metab Rev 2024:1-33. [PMID: 38989688 DOI: 10.1080/03602532.2024.2370330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
This annual review marks the eighth in the series starting with Baillie et al. (2016) Our objective is to explore and share articles which we deem influential and significant in the field of biotransformation. Its format is to highlight important aspects captured in synopsis followed by a commentary with relevant figure and references.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Cyrus Khojasteh
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Upendra A Argikar
- Non-clinical Development, Bill and Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Maria Chatzopoulou
- Early Clinical Development and Translational Science, UCB Biopharma UK, Slough, UK
| | - Lionel Cheruzel
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sungjoon Cho
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Kevin M Johnson
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Inotiv, MD Heights, MO, USA
| | - Amit S Kalgutkar
- Medicine Design, Pfizer Worldwide Research, Development and Medical, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Joyce Liu
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bin Ma
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hlaing Maw
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | - Jessica A Rowley
- Early Clinical Development and Translational Science, UCB Biopharma UK, Slough, UK
| | - Herana Kamal Seneviratne
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shuai Wang
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leung C, Liu J, Cunico K, Johnson K, Yan Z, Cai J. An Integrated Hepatocyte Stability Assay for Simultaneous Metabolic Stability Assessment and Metabolite Profiling. Drug Metab Dispos 2024; 52:377-389. [PMID: 38438166 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.123.001618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The determination of metabolic stability is critical for drug discovery programs, allowing for the optimization of chemical entities and compound prioritization. As such, it is common to perform high-volume in vitro metabolic stability experiments early in the lead optimization process to understand metabolic liabilities. Additional metabolite identification experiments are subsequently performed for a more comprehensive understanding of the metabolic clearance routes to aid medicinal chemists in the structural design of compounds. Collectively, these experiments require extensive sample preparation and a substantial amount of time and resources. To overcome the challenges, a high-throughput integrated assay for simultaneous hepatocyte metabolic stability assessment and metabolite profiling was developed. This assay platform consists of four parts: 1) an automated liquid-handling system for sample preparation and incubation, 2) a liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry-based system to simultaneously monitor the parent compound depletion and metabolite formation, 3) an automated data analysis and report system for hepatic clearance assessment; and 4) streamlined autobatch processing for software-based metabolite profiling. The assay platform was evaluated using eight control compounds with various metabolic rates and biotransformation routes in hepatocytes across three species. Multiple sample preparation and data analysis steps were evaluated and validated for accuracy, repeatability, and metabolite coverage. The combined utility of an automated liquid-handling instrument, a high-resolution mass spectrometer, and multiple streamlined data processing software improves the process of these highly demanding screening assays and allows for simultaneous determination of metabolic stability and metabolite profiles for more efficient lead optimization during early drug discovery. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Metabolic stability assessment and metabolite profiling are pivotal in drug discovery to fully comprehend metabolic liabilities for chemical entity optimization and lead selection. Process of these assays can be repetitive and resource demanding. Here, we developed an integrated hepatocyte stability assay that combines automation, high-resolution mass spectrometers, and batch-processing software to improve and combine the workflow of these assays. The integrated approach allows simultaneous metabolic stability assessment and metabolite profiling, significantly accelerating screening and lead optimization in a resource-effective manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Leung
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Joyce Liu
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Katherine Cunico
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Kevin Johnson
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Zhengyin Yan
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | - Jingwei Cai
- Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Andrews-Morger A, Reutlinger M, Parrott N, Olivares-Morales A. A Machine Learning Framework to Improve Rat Clearance Predictions and Inform Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling. Mol Pharm 2023; 20:5052-5065. [PMID: 37713584 DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
During drug discovery and development, achieving appropriate pharmacokinetics is key to establishment of the efficacy and safety of new drugs. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models integrating in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation have become an essential in silico tool to achieve this goal. In this context, the most important and probably most challenging pharmacokinetic parameter to estimate is the clearance. Recent work on high-throughput PBPK modeling during drug discovery has shown that a good estimate of the unbound intrinsic clearance (CLint,u,) is the key factor for useful PBPK application. In this work, three different machine learning-based strategies were explored to predict the rat CLint,u as the input into PBPK. Therefore, in vivo and in vitro data was collected for a total of 2639 proprietary compounds. The strategies were compared to the standard in vitro bottom-up approach. Using the well-stirred liver model to back-calculate in vivo CLint,u from in vivo rat clearance and then training a machine learning model on this CLint,u led to more accurate clearance predictions (absolute average fold error (AAFE) 3.1 in temporal cross-validation) than the bottom-up approach (AAFE 3.6-16, depending on the scaling method) and has the advantage that no experimental in vitro data is needed. However, building a machine learning model on the bias between the back-calculated in vivo CLint,u and the bottom-up scaled in vitro CLint,u also performed well. For example, using unbound hepatocyte scaling, adding the bias prediction improved the AAFE in the temporal cross-validation from 16 for bottom-up to 2.9 together with the bias prediction. Similarly, the log Pearson r2 improved from 0.1 to 0.29. Although it would still require in vitro measurement of CLint,u., using unbound scaling for the bottom-up approach, the need for correction of the fu,inc by fu,p data is circumvented. While the above-described ML models were built on all data points available per approach, it is discussed that evaluation comparison across all approaches could only be performed on a subset because ca. 75% of the molecules had missing or unquantifiable measurements of the fraction unbound in plasma or in vitro unbound intrinsic clearance, or they dropped out due to the blood-flow limitation assumed by the well-stirred model. Advantageously, by predicting CLint,u as the input into PBPK, existing workflows can be reused and the prediction of the in vivo clearance and other PK parameters can be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Andrews-Morger
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Reutlinger
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Neil Parrott
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andrés Olivares-Morales
- Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Najjar A, Punt A, Wambaugh J, Paini A, Ellison C, Fragki S, Bianchi E, Zhang F, Westerhout J, Mueller D, Li H, Shi Q, Gant TW, Botham P, Bars R, Piersma A, van Ravenzwaay B, Kramer NI. Towards best use and regulatory acceptance of generic physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models for in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) in chemical risk assessment. Arch Toxicol 2022; 96:3407-3419. [PMID: 36063173 PMCID: PMC9584981 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-022-03356-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
With an increasing need to incorporate new approach methodologies (NAMs) in chemical risk assessment and the concomitant need to phase out animal testing, the interpretation of in vitro assay readouts for quantitative hazard characterisation becomes more important. Physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models, which simulate the fate of chemicals in tissues of the body, play an essential role in extrapolating in vitro effect concentrations to in vivo bioequivalent exposures. As PBK-based testing approaches evolve, it will become essential to standardise PBK modelling approaches towards a consensus approach that can be used in quantitative in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (QIVIVE) studies for regulatory chemical risk assessment based on in vitro assays. Based on results of an ECETOC expert workshop, steps are recommended that can improve regulatory adoption: (1) define context and implementation, taking into consideration model complexity for building fit-for-purpose PBK models, (2) harmonise physiological input parameters and their distribution and define criteria for quality chemical-specific parameters, especially in the absence of in vivo data, (3) apply Good Modelling Practices (GMP) to achieve transparency and design a stepwise approach for PBK model development for risk assessors, (4) evaluate model predictions using alternatives to in vivo PK data including read-across approaches, (5) use case studies to facilitate discussions between modellers and regulators of chemical risk assessment. Proof-of-concepts of generic PBK modelling approaches are published in the scientific literature at an increasing rate. Working on the previously proposed steps is, therefore, needed to gain confidence in PBK modelling approaches for regulatory use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ans Punt
- Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - John Wambaugh
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC USA
| | | | | | - Styliani Fragki
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joost Westerhout
- The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis Mueller
- Research and Development, Crop Science, Bayer AG, Monheim, Germany
| | - Hequn Li
- Unilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire UK
| | - Quan Shi
- Shell Global Solutions International B.V, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Timothy W. Gant
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Phil Botham
- Syngenta, Jealott’s Hill, Bracknell, Berkshire UK
| | - Rémi Bars
- Crop Science Division, Bayer S.A.S., Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Aldert Piersma
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nynke I. Kramer
- Toxicology Division, Wageningen University, PO Box 8000, 6700 EA Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|