1
|
Callewaert E, Louisse J, Kramer N, Sanz-Serrano J, Vinken M. Adverse Outcome Pathways Mechanistically Describing Hepatotoxicity. Methods Mol Biol 2025; 2834:249-273. [PMID: 39312169 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4003-6_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) describe toxicological processes from a dynamic perspective by linking a molecular initiating event to a specific adverse outcome via a series of key events and key event relationships. In the field of computational toxicology, AOPs can potentially facilitate the design and development of in silico prediction models for hazard identification. Various AOPs have been introduced for several types of hepatotoxicity, such as steatosis, cholestasis, fibrosis, and liver cancer. This chapter provides an overview of AOPs on hepatotoxicity, including their development, assessment, and applications in toxicology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Callewaert
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Entity of In vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Nynke Kramer
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Toxicology Division, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Julen Sanz-Serrano
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Entity of In vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mathieu Vinken
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Entity of In vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bouwmeester MC, Tao Y, Proença S, van Steenbeek FG, Samsom RA, Nijmeijer SM, Sinnige T, van der Laan LJW, Legler J, Schneeberger K, Kramer NI, Spee B. Drug Metabolism of Hepatocyte-like Organoids and Their Applicability in In Vitro Toxicity Testing. Molecules 2023; 28:molecules28020621. [PMID: 36677681 PMCID: PMC9867526 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28020621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Emerging advances in the field of in vitro toxicity testing attempt to meet the need for reliable human-based safety assessment in drug development. Intrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids (ICOs) are described as a donor-derived in vitro model for disease modelling and regenerative medicine. Here, we explored the potential of hepatocyte-like ICOs (HL-ICOs) in in vitro toxicity testing by exploring the expression and activity of genes involved in drug metabolism, a key determinant in drug-induced toxicity, and the exposure of HL-ICOs to well-known hepatotoxicants. The current state of drug metabolism in HL-ICOs showed levels comparable to those of PHHs and HepaRGs for CYP3A4; however, other enzymes, such as CYP2B6 and CYP2D6, were expressed at lower levels. Additionally, EC50 values were determined in HL-ICOs for acetaminophen (24.0−26.8 mM), diclofenac (475.5−>500 µM), perhexiline (9.7−>31.5 µM), troglitazone (23.1−90.8 µM), and valproic acid (>10 mM). Exposure to the hepatotoxicants showed EC50s in HL-ICOs comparable to those in PHHs and HepaRGs; however, for acetaminophen exposure, HL-ICOs were less sensitive. Further elucidation of enzyme and transporter activity in drug metabolism in HL-ICOs and exposure to a more extensive compound set are needed to accurately define the potential of HL-ICOs in in vitro toxicity testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon C. Bouwmeester
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Regenerative Medicine Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yu Tao
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Regenerative Medicine Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Susana Proença
- Division of Toxicology, Wageningen University, 6700 EA Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank G. van Steenbeek
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Regenerative Medicine Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roos-Anne Samsom
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Regenerative Medicine Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra M. Nijmeijer
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Theo Sinnige
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luc J. W. van der Laan
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juliette Legler
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kerstin Schneeberger
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Regenerative Medicine Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nynke I. Kramer
- Division of Toxicology, Wageningen University, 6700 EA Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Spee
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Regenerative Medicine Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|