1
|
Roberts SE, Martin HL, Al-Qallaf D, Tang AA, Tiede C, Gaule TG, Dobon-Alonso A, Overman R, Shah S, Peyret H, Saunders K, Bon R, Manfield IW, Bell SM, Lomonossoff GP, Speirs V, Tomlinson DC. Affimer reagents enable targeted delivery of therapeutic agents and RNA via virus-like particles. iScience 2024; 27:110461. [PMID: 39104409 PMCID: PMC11298639 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies have revolutionized therapies, but non-immunoglobulin scaffolds are becoming compelling alternatives owing to their adaptability. Their ability to be labeled with imaging or cytotoxic compounds and to create multimeric proteins is an attractive strategy for therapeutics. Focusing on HER2, a frequently overexpressed receptor in breast cancer, this study addresses some limitations of conventional targeting moieties by harnessing the potential of these scaffolds. HER2-binding Affimers were isolated and characterized, demonstrating potency as binding reagents and efficient internalization by HER2-overexpressing cells. Affimers conjugated with cytotoxic agent achieved dose-dependent reductions in cell viability within HER2-overexpressing cell lines. Bispecific Affimers, targeting HER2 and virus-like particles, facilitated efficient internalization of virus-like particles carrying enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP)-encoding RNA, leading to protein expression. Anti-HER2 affibody or designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) fusion constructs with the anti-VLP Affimer further underscore the adaptability of this approach. This study demonstrates the versatility of scaffolds for precise delivery of cargos into cells, advancing biotechnology and therapeutic research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie E. Roberts
- School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Heather L. Martin
- School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Danah Al-Qallaf
- School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anna A. Tang
- School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Astbury Centre for Structural and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Christian Tiede
- School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Astbury Centre for Structural and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Thembaninkosi G. Gaule
- Astbury Centre for Structural and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Institutue of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Ross Overman
- Leaf Expression Systems, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Sachin Shah
- Department of Biochemistry and Metabolism, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Hadrien Peyret
- Department of Biochemistry and Metabolism, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Keith Saunders
- Department of Biochemistry and Metabolism, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Robin Bon
- Astbury Centre for Structural and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Iain W. Manfield
- School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Astbury Centre for Structural and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sandra M. Bell
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, St James’s University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - George P. Lomonossoff
- Department of Biochemistry and Metabolism, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Valerie Speirs
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Darren C. Tomlinson
- School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Astbury Centre for Structural and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eidenberger L, Kogelmann B, Steinkellner H. Plant-based biopharmaceutical engineering. NATURE REVIEWS BIOENGINEERING 2023; 1:426-439. [PMID: 37317690 PMCID: PMC10030082 DOI: 10.1038/s44222-023-00044-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Plants can be engineered to recombinantly produce high-quality proteins such as therapeutic proteins and vaccines, also known as molecular farming. Molecular farming can be established in various settings with minimal cold-chain requirements and could thus ensure rapid and global-scale deployment of biopharmaceuticals, promoting equitable access to pharmaceuticals. State of the art plant-based engineering relies on rationally assembled genetic circuits, engineered to enable the high-throughput and rapid expression of multimeric proteins with complex post-translational modifications. In this Review, we discuss the design of expression hosts and vectors, including Nicotiana benthamiana, viral elements and transient expression vectors, for the production of biopharmaceuticals in plants. We examine engineering of post-translational modifications and highlight the plant-based expression of monoclonal antibodies and nanoparticles, such as virus-like particles and protein bodies. Techno-economic analyses suggest a cost advantage of molecular farming compared with mammalian cell-based protein production systems. However, regulatory challenges remain to be addressed to enable the widespread translation of plant-based biopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Eidenberger
- Department of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Kogelmann
- Department of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
- acib — Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Herta Steinkellner
- Department of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jung E, Mao C, Bhatia M, Koellhoffer EC, Fiering SN, Steinmetz NF. Inactivated Cowpea Mosaic Virus for In Situ Vaccination: Differential Efficacy of Formalin vs UV-Inactivated Formulations. Mol Pharm 2023; 20:500-507. [PMID: 36399598 PMCID: PMC9812890 DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) has been developed as a promising nanoplatform technology for cancer immunotherapy; when applied as in situ vaccine, CPMV exhibits potent, systemic, and durable efficacy. While CPMV is not infectious to mammals, it is infectious to legumes; therefore, agronomic safety needs to be addressed to broaden the translational application of CPMV. RNA-containing formulations are preferred over RNA-free virus-like particles because the RNA and protein, each, contribute to CPMV's potent antitumor efficacy. We have previously optimized inactivation methods to develop CPMV that contains RNA but is not infectious to plants. We established that inactivated CPMV has reduced efficacy compared to untreated, native CPMV. However, a systematic comparison between native CPMV and different inactivated forms of CPMV was not done. Therefore, in this study, we directly compared the therapeutic efficacies and mechanisms of immune activation of CPMV, ultraviolet- (UV-), and formalin (Form)-inactivated CPMV to explain the differential efficacies. In a B16F10 melanoma mouse tumor model, Form-CPMV suppressed the tumor growth with prolonged survival (there were no statistical differences comparing CPMV and Form-CPMV). In comparison, UV-CPMV inhibited tumor growth significantly but not as well as Form-CPMV or CPMV. The reduced therapeutic efficacy of UV-CPMV is explained by the degree of cross-linking and aggregated state of the RNA, which renders it inaccessible for sensing by Toll-like receptor (TLR) 7/8 to activate immune responses. The mechanistic studies showed that the highly aggregated state of UV-CPMV inhibited TLR7 signaling more so than for the Form-CPMV formulation, reducing the secretion of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interferon-α (IFN-α), cytokines associated with TLR7 signaling. These findings support the translational development of Form-CPMV as a noninfectious immunotherapeutic agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Misha Bhatia
- Department of Nanoengineering, University of, California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United, States
| | - Edward C. Koellhoffer
- Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
| | - Steven N. Fiering
- Department of Microbiology and, Immunology and Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, United States
| | - Nicole F. Steinmetz
- Department of Nanoengineering, Radiology, Bioengineering, Moores Cancer Center, Center for Nano-Immuno Engineering, and Institute for Materials, Design and Discovery, University of California San Diego, La, Jolla, California 92093, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Recombinant Protein Production in Plants: A Brief Overview of Strengths and Challenges. METHODS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY (CLIFTON, N.J.) 2022; 2480:1-13. [PMID: 35616854 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2241-4_1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The first recombinant proteins were produced in microbes and animal cells cultivated in bioreactors. These systems have become the standard for industrial-scale recombinant protein manufacturing. Later, the production of recombinant proteins was demonstrated in whole plants, which differ morphologically from cell-based systems and require completely different cultivation conditions. Over time, additional plant-based production platforms were established, including hairy roots and cell suspension cultures, which are more similar to conventional cell-based systems in terms of morphology, procedures, and equipment requirements. In this brief overview of the field, we explain why plant-based systems are becoming increasingly attractive for the production of valuable proteins with scientific and commercial applications, but also highlight the challenges that these systems must overcome to achieve more widespread industrial utilization. We discuss various laboratory protocols and approaches for the production of recombinant proteins in plants, as well as strategies to optimize yields, and the regulatory and legal framework.
Collapse
|