Compression and amplification algorithms in hearing aids impair the selectivity of neural responses to speech.
Nat Biomed Eng 2021;
6:717-730. [PMID:
33941898 PMCID:
PMC7612903 DOI:
10.1038/s41551-021-00707-y]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In quiet environments, hearing aids improve the perception of low-intensity sounds. However, for high-intensity sounds in background noise, the aids often fail to provide a benefit to the wearer. Here, by using large-scale single-neuron recordings from hearing-impaired gerbils — an established animal model of human hearing — we show that hearing aids restore the sensitivity of neural responses to speech, but not their selectivity. Rather than reflecting a deficit in supra-threshold auditory processing, the low selectivity is a consequence of hearing-aid compression (which decreases the spectral and temporal contrasts of incoming sound) and of amplification (which distorts neural responses, regardless of whether hearing is impaired). Processing strategies that avoid the trade-off between neural sensitivity and selectivity should improve the performance of hearing aids.
Collapse