Malignancies of the spinal cord

Spinal biopsies: a clinicopathologic review of 53 cases diagnosed between 2011 and 2018 at a tertiary hospital in Kampala, Uganda

Background

Early diagnosis of spinal cord neoplasia serves patients from developing a number of complications and even death.

Methods

After obtaining ethical approval, retrospectively, a total of 53 tissue blocks of patients attended at the spinal ward were reviewed. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0, and p value of less than 0.05 was applied to establish the existence of statistical significance between the compared categorical variables.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 30.7 ± 15.96 years. Most of the patients 32.1% (n = 17) were aged ≤ 19 years, and majority of the neoplasia 77.3% (n = 41) were extramedullary. Also, majority of the neoplasia 60.4% (n = 32) were benign and the malignant ones were 35.8% (n = 19). The mean duration of onset of symptoms for benign and malignant neoplasia in this study was 13.1 ± 16.4 and 3.4 ± 2.8 years, respectively, with statistical difference (95% CI 2.09–17.35, p = 0.014).

Conclusion

The patients with spinal cord neoplasia in the present study were of young age, and majority of them had benign neoplasia that were extramedullary located. The mean duration of onset of symptoms for patients with malignant neoplasia was significantly shorter than that of benign neoplasia.

Variation in management of spinal gliobastoma multiforme: results from a national cancer registry

PURPOSE

Primary glioblastoma of the spinal cord (spinal GBM) is a rare central nervous system tumor, relative to its cranial counterpart (cranial GBM). Our current knowledge of spinal GBM epidemiology, tumor characteristics and treatment are insufficient and mostly based on single-institution case series.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with grade-4 GBM from 2004 to 2014 were queried from the National Cancer Database. Chi square analysis was used to compare presenting characteristics while Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were employed for survival analyses.

RESULTS

Total 103,496 patients with cranial GBM and 190 patients with spinal GBM were analyzed. Median survival for spinal GBM was found to be higher compared to cranial GBM (p = 0.07). Spinal GBM patients had significant better survival in 18 to 65 years age group than < 18 years and > 65 years age group (p = 0.003). Overall survival time for 95 spinal GBM patients with available treatment data was not statistically different among the four treatment modalities (radiation with or without chemotherapy, surgery alone, surgery with adjuvant therapy, and palliative therapy; p = 0.28).On multivariable analysis, < 18 years age group was associated with improved survival (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-1.00, p = 0.046), while tumor extension was associated with poor survival (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.04-6.22, p = 0.041). Interestingly surgery with adjuvant therapy was unable to show increase survival compared to other treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study adds to the growing literature on spinal GBM with a focus on comparative trends with cranial GBM and outcomes with different treatment modalities.

Primary spinal glioblastoma multiforme: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

Primary spinal glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a rare clinical entity with an aggressive course and an invariably dismal prognosis. Its clinical characteristics, radiologic and pathologic findings, and treatment protocols have been discussed in a few cases.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 15-year-old female was admitted to the neurology department with a chief complaint of progressive numbness and weakness in her left upper extremity for 3 months and neck pain for 1 month.

DIAGNOSES

Spinal magnetic resonance imaging showed an intramedullary expansile mass localized between C4 and C7. The diagnosis of GBM was determined on the basis of the histopathological findings after operation.

INTERVENTIONS

Laminotomy and laminoplasty between C4 and C7 were performed, and the tumor was partially resected. The patient was administered focal adjuvant radiotherapy concomitantly with oral chemotherapy following the surgery.

OUTCOMES

With severe neurologic deficits at 13 months after the diagnosis, the patient expired.

LESSONS

Although therapeutic options have been improving, the prognosis of the primary spinal GBM remains poor. The treatment of primary spinal GBM entered into a central registry and multiple-center cooperation is important in establishing future therapeutic strategies.

Spinal perimedullary vein enlargement sign: an added value for the differentiation between intradural-extramedullary and intramedullary tumors on magnetic resonance imaging

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine the added value of the perimedullary spinal vein enlargement sign on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing intradural-extramedullary tumors (IDEMTs) from intramedullary spinal tumors (IMTs).

METHODS

Two hundred and eight consecutive spinal intradural tumors with histopathologic confirmation (21 IMTs, 187 IDEMTs) were enrolled. Two readers blinded to the final pathological diagnosis and clinical data independently assessed the venous enlargement sign to determine the agreement between them and jointly distinguished IDEMTs from IMTs according to the common MRI findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of IDEMTs were calculated for the common MRI findings, vein enlargement sign, and a combination of both.

RESULTS

Intraobserver agreement and interobserver agreement for both readers was excellent. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of common MRI findings for differentiating IDEMTs from IMTs were 83.4, 95.2, and 89.3 %, respectively. Thirty-one IDEMTs were mistakenly diagnosed as IMTs, in which seven were cases with vein enlargement signs. By applying the vein enlargement sign to the common MRI findings, the specificity remained at 95.2 %, while the sensitivity improved to 89.3 % and the accuracy increased to 92.3 %.

CONCLUSION

The spinal perimedullary vein enlargement sign is useful in assessing intradural tumors and to differentiate IDEMTs from IMTs.