The Blood–Brain Barrier in Neuroinflammation

Blood-Brain Barrier Overview: Structural and Functional Correlation

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a semipermeable and extremely selective system in the central nervous system of most vertebrates, that separates blood from the brain's extracellular fluid. It plays a vital role in regulating the transport of necessary materials for brain function, furthermore, protecting it from foreign substances in the blood that could damage it. In this review, we searched in Google Scholar, Pubmed, Web of Science, and Saudi Digital Library for the various cells and components that support the development and function of this barrier, as well as the different pathways to transport the various molecules between blood and the brain. We also discussed the aspects that lead to BBB dysfunction and its neuropathological consequences, with the identification of some of the most important biomarkers that might be used as a biomarker to predict the BBB disturbances. This comprehensive overview of BBB will pave the way for future studies to focus on developing more specific targeting systems in material delivery as a future approach that assists in combinatorial therapy or nanotherapy to destroy or modify this barrier in pathological conditions such as brain tumors and brain stem cell carcinomas.

Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in immuno-mediated neurological diseases

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is the brain-specific endothelial cell barrier that is important for maintaining brain homeostasis and preventing the entry of toxic substances. Pathological BBB dysfunction is a critical step of the disease process in several immuno-mediated neurological diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica (NMO), neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) and neuro-Behçet diseases. The pathological findings from patients with secondary progressive (SP) MS, NMO and NPSLE showed leaky BBB in the active lesions. NMO is a disease with strong evidence of disease-specific and pathogenic autoantibodies (aquaporin 4 [AQP4] autoantibodies). In the development of NMO, circulating AQP4 autoantibodies need to pass through the BBB in order to reach AQP4 on the astrocyte endfeet. Strong evidence suggests that NPSLE is associated with the disruption of the BBB and NPSLE patients frequently have antibodies bound to endothelial cells in their sera. We recently identified two BBB-reactive autoantibodies in immuno-mediated neurological diseases: galectin-3 autoantibodies in SPMS and GRP78 autoantibodies in NMO. In the present review article, we describe the basic structure and cellular biology of the BBB, discuss recent insights regarding the pathophysiology of the BBB breakdown in the setting of immuno-mediated neurological diseases, and describe our recent findings of autoantibody-mediated BBB breakdown.

Sera from remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients disrupt the blood-brain barrier

BACKGROUND

Pathological destruction of blood-brain barrier (BBB) has been thought to be the initial key event in the process of developing multiple sclerosis (MS). The purpose of the present study was to clarify the possible molecular mechanisms responsible for the malfunction of BBB by sera from relapse-remitting MS (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) patients.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of sera from the patients in the relapse phase of RRMS (RRMS-R), stable phase of RRMS (RRMS-S) and SPMS on the expression of tight junction proteins and vascular cell adhesion protein-1 (VCAM-1), and on the transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) in human brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs).

RESULTS

Sera from the RRMS-R or SPMS patients decreased the claudin-5 protein expression and the TEER in BMECs. In RRMS-R, this effect was restored after adding an MMP inhibitor, and the MMP-2/9 secretion by BMECs was significantly increased after the application of patients' sera. In SPMS, the immunoglobulin G (IgG) purified from patients' sera also decreased the claudin-5 protein expression and the TEER in BMECs. The sera and purified IgG from all MS patients increased the VCAM-1 protein expression in BMECs.

CONCLUSIONS

The up-regulation of autocrine MMP-2/9 by BMECs after exposure to sera from RRMS-R patients or the autoantibodies against BMECs from SPMS patients can compromise the BBB. Both RRMS-S and SPMS sera increased the VCAM-1 expression in the BBB, thus indicating that targeting the VCAM-1 in the BBB could represent a possible therapeutic strategy for even the stable phase of MS and SPMS.