Role of nephrectomy in metastatic kidney cancer

Surgical treatment of stage pT3b renal cell carcinoma in solitary kidneys: a case series

OBJECTIVE

To describe the surgical management of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a solitary kidney (managed preferentially by nephron-sparing surgery, NSS, to avoid dialysis) and extending into the renal vein or inferior vena cava (T3b).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 13 patients treated surgically between 1977 and 2002 for stage T3b RCC in a solitary kidney; their charts were reviewed to ascertain details of management, pathology and outcomes.

RESULTS

NSS was successful in seven patients (four in situ and three extracorporeally). Five patients had radical nephrectomy (RN), four after failed NSS. The mean (sem) operative duration was longer for NSS, at 5.8 (0.7) h, than RN, at 3.3 (0.6) h. There was one death during surgery before nephrectomy, and eight other complications in six patients. At a median (range) follow-up of 24 (0-204) months, eight patients had died, four from RCC (all having had NSS) at a median interval of 9.5 (7-16) months. Of the five patients alive at a median follow-up of 25 months, four had no identifiable disease, whilst one had systemic recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

NSS combined with venous tumour thrombectomy for treating T3b RCC involving a solitary kidney is feasible, albeit complicated. There was oncological success in a third of the patients. The treatment of these patients needs to be individualized, as alternatives to NSS (RN or observation) have obvious disadvantages.

Surgery for metastatic renal cell cancer

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) often presents in its metastatic form, or progresses after curative treatment. While the management of metastatic RCC has historically been mainly surgical, contemporary approaches often incorporate systemic immunotherapy. This review examines the current indications and scope of surgical treatment of patients with metastatic RCC. Surgery is sometimes indicated for symptom palliation at either the primary or secondary sites. However, other less invasive therapies may be equally effective, and should be considered carefully. Cytoreductive surgery prior to immunotherapy appears to confer a survival advantage, but only selected patients are suitable for this treatment regimen. Primary immunotherapy followed by surgical removal of the tumour in partial responders is an alternative treatment strategy, which has not yet been evaluated as in randomized trials. As immunotherapy develops further, the precise timing and role of surgery in multimodality treatment will need to be carefully evaluated. Occasionally, the complete surgical excision of metastases, and the primary tumour, if present, is feasible and this may prolong survival. Empirically, it would seem that such patients should also be treated with adjuvant immunotherapy, as eventual relapse is frequent. Surgery with the aim of inducing spontaneous tumour regression is not justifiable, given the rarity of this phenomenon.