The repeatability of diagnostic tests and surveys in dry eye

Evaluation of ocular neuropathic pain

AIM

To identify and assess the quality of current validated questionnaires that could be used to evaluate ocular neuropathic pain and its associated aetiologies.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library. Articles evaluating questionnaires for ocular neuropathic pain and its associated aetiologies were included. Data on psychometric properties, validity, and reliability of the questionnaires was extracted and analysed using a set of quality criteria. Clinical and demographical associations with ocular neuropathic pain were also reviewed.

RESULTS

The search generated 1738 results with 61 publications meeting the inclusion criteria. The 61 publications covered 28 questionnaires including 3 ocular pain, 12 dry eye disease, 2 blepharitis, 2 refractive surgery, 3 contact lens wear, 3 Sjogren's Syndrome, and 3 that were non-disease-specific. Only 57 publications provided enough data on psychometric properties and validity of the questionnaire to be included for quality assessment. The Contact Lens Discomfort Index (CLDI) had the highest rated psychometric properties, whereas the English version of the Ocular Comfort Index (OCI) provided the most data on psychometric properties (9 out of 10 criteria). Most ocular pain and disease-specific questionnaires contained appropriate items to assess ocular pain in specific populations. However, non-disease-specific ophthalmic questionnaires demonstrated poor reliability and validity when evaluating ocular pain.

CONCLUSION

Ocular pain questionnaires can potentially diagnose ocular neuropathic pain. Disease-specific questionnaires were limited to their target populations, and non-disease-specific ophthalmic questionnaires were unreliable. Further studies are required to determine the most appropriate questionnaire to evaluate ocular neuropathic pain.

Dust exposure: a novel environmental risk factor for conjunctivochalasis?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the relationship between clinical symptoms and findings of patients diagnosed with conjunctivochalasis in our clinic and the risk factors reported in the literature, to determine new possible etiological factors, and to compare routine tear assessment methods with novel strip meniscometry in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included patients who presented to our clinic between March 2019 and June 2019 and were diagnosed with conjunctivochalasis. The Ocular Surface Disease Index was used to assess ocular surface symptoms. Anterior segment examination included tear break-up time, corneal staining, localization of conjunctivochalasis, and the presence of pinguecula or pterygium. For each patient, tears were measured using both Schirmer and strip meniscometry. Patients with conjunctivochalasis were evaluated as lid-parallel conjunctival folds grade 1, 2, or 3.

RESULTS

There was a total of 57 participants, including 31 women (54.4%) and 26 men (45.6%). Lid-parallel conjunctival folds grade was found to be statistically significantly associated with dust exposure (p = 0.034). Multiple regression analysis revealed that dust exposure was an independent predictor of being diagnosed with lid-parallel conjunctival folds grade 2 versus lid-parallel conjunctival folds grade 1 (odds ratio = 3.515, p = 0.029). Moreover, Schirmer's test and strip meniscometry results were positively correlated in patients with conjunctivochalasis (r = 0.302 and p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that external factors are prominent in patients with conjunctivochalasis, especially dust exposure. In addition, strip meniscometry may be preferred as a more practical and noninvasive alternative to investigate dry eye symptoms in patients with conjunctivochalasis.

Itch in Organs Beyond the Skin

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to explore mechanisms, causes, and therapies of itchy conditions involving organs beyond the skin including the eyes, ears, nose, and genital region.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conditions which cause itch in these locations vary from skin diseases that extend to these areas (i.e., atopic dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, and psoriasis) to allergic conditions (i.e., allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis) and to neuropathic conditions that relate to afferent nerve fiber damage (i.e., lumbosacral radiculopathies in genital disease) as well as some psychological components. Similar to the skin, itch in these locations involves a complex interaction between epithelial cells, unmyelinated C nerve fibers, and cytokines. There is also a significant component of neural sensitization phenomena. Mechanisms of itch beyond the skin are currently an understudied topic that affects millions of patients. Future research should be done in order to further understand the pathophysiology of itch in these body sites.

The Reliability and Validity of McMonnies Dry Eye Index

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this report was to investigate the psychometric properties of the McMonnies questionnaire for dry eye disease.

METHODS

The instrument was administered to 75 patients with dry eye disease on two occasions. Additional dry eye clinical tests, patient-reported dry eye interviews, and the NEI-VFQ-25 were completed during these examinations. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest), validity (concurrent and discriminant), and accuracy were assessed for McMonnies Index scores.

RESULTS

McMonnies Index showed poor internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.43) and moderate test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.90). The mean difference between visits was 0.49 (1-sample t test, t = 0.92, P = 0.36), and the 95% limits of agreement for test-retest reliability were -8.6 to +9.6. The instrument also showed fair concurrent validity, correlating only with the NEI-VFQ-25 pain subscale, but better discriminant validity when comparing mild and severe patients. Finally, the McMonnies Index demonstrated fair accuracy in identifying severe dry eye patients as defined by signs and symptoms (area under the ROC curve = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

The McMonnies Index demonstrates fair reliably and validity as a patient-reported instrument for use in patient care and clinical studies of patients with dry eye disease.