Pharmacological considerations of primary alkylators

Total Body Irradiation Forever? Optimising Chemotherapeutic Options for Irradiation-Free Conditioning for Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Total-body irradiation (TBI) based conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is generally regarded as the gold-standard for children >4 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Retrospective studies in the 1990's suggested better survival with irradiation, confirmed in a small randomised, prospective study in the early 2000's. Most recently, this was reconfirmed by the early results of the large, randomised, international, phase III FORUM study published in 2020. But we know survivors will suffer a multitude of long-term sequelae after TBI, including second malignancies, neurocognitive, endocrine and cardiometabolic effects. The drive to avoid TBI directs us to continue optimising irradiation-free, myeloablative conditioning. In chemotherapy-based conditioning, the dominant myeloablative effect is provided by the alkylating agents, most commonly busulfan or treosulfan. Busulfan with cyclophosphamide is a long-established alternative to TBI-based conditioning in ALL patients. Substituting fludarabine for cyclophosphamide reduces toxicity, but may not be as effective, prompting the addition of a third agent, such as thiotepa, melphalan, and now clofarabine. For busulfan, it's wide pharmacokinetic (PK) variability and narrow therapeutic window is well-known, with widespread use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to individualise dosing and control the cumulative busulfan exposure. The development of first-dose selection algorithms has helped achieve early, accurate busulfan levels within the targeted therapeutic window. In the future, predictive genetic variants, associated with differing busulfan exposures and toxicities, could be employed to further tailor individualised busulfan-based conditioning for ALL patients. Treosulfan-based conditioning leads to comparable outcomes to busulfan-based conditioning in paediatric ALL, without the need for TDM to date. Future PK evaluation and modelling may optimise therapy and improve outcome. More recently, the addition of clofarabine to busulfan/fludarabine has shown encouraging results when compared to TBI-based regimens. The combination shows activity in ALL as well as AML and deserves further evaluation. Like busulfan, optimization of chemotherapy conditioning may be enhanced by understanding not just the PK of clofarabine, fludarabine, treosulfan and other agents, but also the pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics, ideally in the context of a single disease such as ALL.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part I

Although immunosuppressive treatments and target concentration intervention (TCI) have significantly contributed to the success of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), there is currently no consensus on the best immunosuppressive strategies. Compared with solid organ transplantation, alloHCT is unique because of the potential for bidirectional reactions (i.e. host-versus-graft and graft-versus-host). Postgraft immunosuppression typically includes a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and a short course of methotrexate after high-dose myeloablative conditioning, or a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil after reduced-intensity conditioning. There are evolving roles for the antithymyocyte globulins (ATGs) and sirolimus as postgraft immunosuppression. A review of the pharmacokinetics and TCI of the main postgraft immunosuppressants is presented in this two-part review. All immunosuppressants are characterized by large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and by narrow therapeutic indices. It is essential to understand immunosuppressants' pharmacokinetic properties and how to use them for individualized treatment incorporating TCI to improve outcomes. TCI, which is mandatory for the calcineurin inhibitors and sirolimus, has become an integral part of postgraft immunosuppression. TCI is usually based on trough concentration monitoring, but other approaches include measurement of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the dosing interval or limited sampling schedules with maximum a posteriori Bayesian personalization approaches. Interpretation of pharmacodynamic results is hindered by the prevalence of studies enrolling only a small number of patients, variability in the allogeneic graft source and variability in postgraft immunosuppression. Given the curative potential of alloHCT, the pharmacodynamics of these immunosuppressants deserves to be explored in depth. Development of sophisticated systems pharmacology models and improved TCI tools are needed to accurately evaluate patients' exposure to drugs in general and to immunosuppressants in particular. Sequential studies, first without and then with TCI, should be conducted to validate the clinical benefit of TCI in homogenous populations; randomized trials are not feasible, because there are higher-priority research questions in alloHCT. In Part I of this article, we review the alloHCT process to facilitate optimal design of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies. We also review the pharmacokinetics and TCI of calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate.

Real-time dose adjustment of cyclophosphamide in a preparative regimen for hematopoietic cell transplant: a Bayesian pharmacokinetic approach

PURPOSE

Dose-related toxicity of cyclophosphamide may be reduced and therapeutic efficacy may be improved by pharmacokinetic sampling and dose adjustment to achieve a target area under the curve (AUC) for two of its metabolites, hydroxycyclophosphamide (HCY) and carboxyethylphosphoramide mustard (CEPM). To facilitate real-time dose adjustment, we developed open-source code within the statistical software R that incorporates individual data into a population pharmacokinetic model.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Dosage prediction performance was compared to that obtained with nonlinear mixed-effects modeling using NONMEM in 20 cancer patients receiving cyclophosphamide. Bayesian estimation of individual pharmacokinetic parameters was accomplished from limited (i.e., five samples over 0-16 hours) sampling of plasma HCY and CEPM after the initial cyclophosphamide dose. Conditional on individual pharmacokinetics, simulations of the AUC of both HCY and CEPM were provided for a range of second doses (i.e., 0-100 mg/kg cyclophosphamide).

RESULTS

The results compared favorably with NONMEM and returned accurate predictions for AUCs of HCY and CEPM with comparable mean absolute prediction error and root mean square prediction error. With our method, the mean absolute prediction error and root mean square prediction error of AUC CEPM were 11.0% and 12.8% and AUC HCY were 31.7% and 44.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed dose adjustment software that potentially can be used to adjust cyclophosphamide dosing in a clinical setting, thus expanding the opportunity for pharmacokinetic individualization of cyclophosphamide. The software is simple to use (requiring no programming experience), reads individual patient data directly from an Excel spreadsheet, and runs in less than 5 minutes on a desktop PC.

Cyclophosphamide disposition in an anephric child

Although limited data are available about cyclophosphamide disposition in patients with renal insufficiency, nothing has been reported in anephric patients. We characterized cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics in an anephric child with bilateral Wilms tumor, both on (day 1) and off (day 2) hemodialysis. The median cyclophosphamide clearance on and off hemodialysis was 5.34 and 3.82 L/hr*m(2), respectively, demonstrating elimination of cyclophosphamide in this anephric child. The off hemodialysis clearance was similar to that in children with normal renal function. Hydroxycyclophosphamide (HCY) AUC was 20.6 and 8.77 microM*hr on and off hemodialysis. Carboxyethylphosphoramide mustard (CEPM) AUC obtained on hemodialysis (i.e., 194 microM*hr) was similar to that in children with normal renal function, although an elevated CEPM AUC was observed when hemodialysis was not received (i.e., 383 microM*hr). With the recent findings that clinical outcomes are related to CEPM AUC, further data are needed regarding the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and relevant metabolites in anephric children.