Mechanisms of resistance against cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide: can they be overcome without sacrificing selectivity?

Carboplatin and Etoposide With or Without Palifosfamide in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Adaptive, Randomized Phase III Study (MATISSE)

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of the addition of palifosfamide to carboplatin and etoposide in extensive stage (ES) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients and Methods MATISSE was a randomized, open-label, adaptive phase III study. Previously untreated patients with ES SCLC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to receive carboplatin at area under the serum concentration-time curve 5 on day 1 plus etoposide 100 mg/m² per day on days 1 to 3 every 21 days (CE) or carboplatin at area under the serum concentration-time curve 4 on day 1 plus etoposide 100 mg/m² per day plus palifosfamide 130 mg/m² per day on days 1 to 3 every 21 days (PaCE). The primary end point was overall survival. Results In all, 188 patients were enrolled; 94 patients received CE and 94 patients received PaCE. The median age on both arms was 61 years. Six cycles of chemotherapy were completed on both arms of the study by approximately 50% of the patients. Serious adverse events were documented and did not differ significantly between patients receiving PaCE and those receiving CE. Median overall survival was similar between both arms with 10.03 months on PaCE and 10.37 months on CE ( P = .096). Conclusion The addition of palifosfamide to CE failed to improve survival in ES SCLC.

Impact of severe hypothyroidism on cyclophosphamide disposition and routes of metabolism and transport in a patient with treatment-resistant lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

To report what we believe to be the first case of severe hypothyroidism with reduced drug metabolism and transport activity.

CASE SUMMARY

A 32-year-old African American woman with a history of treatment-resistant lupus nephritis and concurrent hypothyroidism was participating in a clinical study to evaluate cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics in patients with glomerulonephritis due to lupus nephritis and small-vessel vasculitis. Thyroid-stimulating hormone levels ranged from 60 to 300 μIU/mL, despite high doses of thyroid replacement hormone (levothyroxine 400 μg twice weekly). The pharmacokinetics of the probe drug cocktail (flurbiprofen/fexofenadine) were altered, with formation clearance of flurbiprofen (CYP2C9 function) lower in our patient versus the average value in our study cohort, suggesting a reduction in activity. The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours for fexofenadine (transporter function) was 2-fold higher in our patient compared to that of other study patients. Pharmacokinetic data showed markedly decreased cyclophosphamide clearance and exposure to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, as well as a reduced metabolic ratio of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide to cyclophosphamide.

DISCUSSION

Previous cases of altered pharmacokinetics and toxicity of medications in patients with mild to moderate thyroid dysfunction have been published. Our case evaluated the impact of a severe form of hypothyroidism on cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics and probe drug metabolism and transport. If changes were not demonstrated at the extreme spectrum of hypothyroidism, there would be little concern for changes in patients with less severe disease. Profound hypothyroidism likely contributed to the patient's poor response to cyclophosphamide treatment through its influence on CYP isoenzymes responsible for the activation to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide and possibly through reduced transport function.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should monitor for significant hypothyroidism in patients who are prescribed drugs (eg, cyclophosphamide) that require metabolic conversion to form active therapeutic moieties.

Efficient and divergent synthesis of cyclophosphamide analogues from 2-arylamino-3-acetyl-5,6-dihydro-4H-pyrans

A facile and efficient one-pot synthesis of substituted cyclophosphamidic chlorides and their analogues has been developed from readily available enaminones, 2-arylamino-3-acetyl-5,6-dihydro-4H-pyrans.

Metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines and the clinical implications

The oxazaphosphorines including cyclophosphamide (CPA), ifosfamide (IFO), and trofosfamide represent an important group of therapeutic agents due to their substantial antitumor and immuno-modulating activity. CPA is widely used as an anticancer drug, an immunosuppressant, and for the mobilization of hematopoetic progenitor cells from the bone marrow into peripheral blood prior to bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia, leukemia, and other malignancies. New oxazaphosphorines derivatives have been developed in an attempt to improve selectivity and response with reduced toxicity. These derivatives include mafosfamide (NSC 345842), glufosfamide (D19575, beta-D-glucosylisophosphoramide mustard), NSC 612567 (aldophosphamide perhydrothiazine), and NSC 613060 (aldophosphamide thiazolidine). This review highlights the metabolism and transport of these oxazaphosphorines (mainly CPA and IFO, as these two oxazaphosphorine drugs are the most widely used alkylating agents) and the clinical implications. Both CPA and IFO are prodrugs that require activation by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP)-catalyzed 4-hydroxylation, yielding cytotoxic nitrogen mustards capable of reacting with DNA molecules to form crosslinks and lead to cell apoptosis and/or necrosis. Such prodrug activation can be enhanced within tumor cells by the CYP-based gene directed-enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT) approach. However, those newly synthesized oxazaphosphorine derivatives such as glufosfamide, NSC 612567 and NSC 613060, do not need hepatic activation. They are activated through other enzymatic and/or non-enzymatic pathways. For example, both NSC 612567 and NSC 613060 can be activated by plain phosphodiesterase (PDEs) in plasma and other tissues or by the high-affinity nuclear 3'-5' exonucleases associated with DNA polymerases, such as DNA polymerases and epsilon. The alternative CYP-catalyzed inactivation pathway by N-dechloroethylation generates the neurotoxic and nephrotoxic byproduct chloroacetaldehyde (CAA). Various aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are involved in the detoxification of oxazaphosphorine metabolites. The metabolism of oxazaphosphorines is auto-inducible, with the activation of the orphan nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) being the major mechanism. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism is affected by a number of factors associated with the drugs (e.g., dosage, route of administration, chirality, and drug combination) and patients (e.g., age, gender, renal and hepatic function). Several drug transporters, such as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRP1, MRP2, and MRP4) are involved in the active uptake and efflux of parental oxazaphosphorines, their cytotoxic mustards and conjugates in hepatocytes and tumor cells. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism and transport have a major impact on pharmacokinetic variability, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship, toxicity, resistance, and drug interactions since the drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters involved are key determinants of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxazaphosphorines. A better understanding of the factors that affect the metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines is important for their optional use in cancer chemotherapy.