Lectin and anti-carbohydrate antibody assays using chemically modified ligands

Lectins as tools in glycoconjugate research

Lectins are ubiquitous proteins of nonimmune origin, present in plants, microorganisms, animals and humans which specifically bind defined monosugars or oligosaccharide structures. Great progress has been made in recent years in understanding crucial roles played by lectins in many biological processes. Elucidation of carbohydrate specificity of human and animal lectins is of great importance for better understanding of these processes. Long before the role of carbohydrate-protein interactions had been explored, many lectins, mostly of plant origin, were identified, characterized and applied as useful tools in studying glycoconjugates. This review focuses on the specificity-based lectin classification and the methods of measuring lectin-carbohydrate interactions, which are used for determination of lectin specificity or for identification and characterization of glycoconjugates with lectins of known specificity. The most frequently used quantitative methods are shortly reviewed and the methods elaborated and used in our laboratories, based on biotinylated lectins, are described. These include the microtiter plate enzyme-linked lectinosorbent assay, lectinoblotting and lectin-glycosphingolipid interaction on thin-layer plates. Some chemical modifications of lectin ligands on the microtiter plates and blots (desialylation, Smith degradation, beta-elimination), which extend the applicability of these methods, are also described.

Positively charged peptides can interact with each other, as revealed by solid phase binding assays

Solid phase assay systems such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and overlay gels are used to study processes of protein-protein interactions. The common principle of all these methods is that they monitor the binding between soluble and surface-immobilized molecules. Following the use of bovine serum albumin (BSA)-peptide conjugates or isolated synthetic peptides and the above-mentioned solid phase assay systems, the results of the current work demonstrate that positively charged peptides can interact with each other. Both the ELISA and SPR methods demonstrated that the binding process reached saturation with K(d) values ranging between 1 and 14 nM. No interaction was observed between BSA conjugates bearing positively charged peptides and conjugates bearing negatively charged peptides or with pure BSA molecules, strengthening the view that interaction occurs only between positively charged peptides. However, interactions between peptides in solution were not observed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or by native gel electrophoresis. It appears that for positively charged molecules to interact, one of the binding partners must be immobilized to a surface, a process that may lead to the exposure of otherwise masked groups or atoms. We discuss the relevance of our findings for the use of solid phase assay systems to study interactions between biomolecules.