Fluoropyrimidine catabolism

Phase I study of DFP-11207, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine with reasonable AUC and low Cmax and improved tolerability, in patients with solid tumors

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-FU derivatives, such as capecitabine, UFT, and S-1, are the mainstay of chemotherapy treatment for gastrointestinal cancers, and other solid tumors. Compared with other cytotoxic chemotherapies, these drugs generally have a favorable safety profile, but hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities remain common. DFP-11207 is a novel oral cytotoxic agent that combines a 5-FU pro-drug with a reversible DPD inhibitor and a potent inhibitor of OPRT, resulting in enhanced pharmacological activity of 5-FU with decreased gastrointestinal and myelosuppressive toxicities. In this Phase I study (NCT02171221), DFP-11207 was administered orally daily, in doses escalating from 40 mg/m²/day to 400 mg/m²/day in patients with esophageal, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic or gallbladder cancer (n = 23). It was determined that DFP-11207 at the dose of 330 mg/m²/day administered every 12 hours was well-tolerated with mild myelosuppressive and gastrointestinal toxicities. The pharmacokinetic analysis determined that the 5-FU levels were in the therapeutic range at this dose. In addition, fasted or fed states had no influence on the 5-FU levels (patients serving as their own controls). Among 21 efficacy evaluable patients, 7 patients had stable disease (33.3%), of which two had prolonged stable disease of >6 months duration. DFP-11207 can be explored as monotherapy or easily substitute 5-FU, capecitabine, or S-1 in combination regimens.

A simple and rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) assay in plasma and possible detection of patients with impaired dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity

BACKGROUND

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene polymorphism may lead to severe toxicity with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), a major anticancer drug extensively used in clinical oncology. Drug monitoring combined with early detection of patients at risk would enable timely dose adaptation so as to maintain drug concentrations within a therapeutic window. However, the best method to identify such patients remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a rapid and simple high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for estimating uracil/dihydrouracil (U/UH2) ratio in plasma, as an index of DPD status, and for assaying 5-FU as part of drug level monitoring.

METHOD

Assay of 5-FU, and U/UH2 detection were performed on a HPLC system equipped with UV detector. Analytes were separated at room temperature using a 5 microm particles, 25 cm RP-18 X-Terra column. The mobile-phase consisted of a KH(2)PO(4) salt solution (0.05 m) + 0.1% triethylamine (TEA) pumped at 0.4 mL/min. Detection of 5-FU and 5-bromouracil were performed at 254 nm; U and UH2 elution was monitored at 210 nm.

RESULTS

The method was sensitive and specific for assaying 5-FU within the 5-500 ng/mL concentration range, which covers exposure levels currently met in clinical practice. The method was simple, and relatively cheap, and rapid, with an analytical run time of about 30 min. Data from a patient with 5-FU toxicity suggest that the method was capable of identifying DPD metabolic phenotype in cancer patients, based on measurement of plasma U/UH2 ratio.

CONCLUSION

The method described should be suitable both for detecting patients at high risk of 5-FU toxicity, and for drug level monitoring during chemotherapy.

Biological and environmental monitoring of hospital personnel exposed to antineoplastic agents: a review of analytical methods

In order to assess occupational exposure of hospital personnel involved in the preparation and administration of antineoplastic drugs, biological and environmental monitoring are essential to identify the main exposure routes and to quantify potential health risks. If workplace contamination cannot be completely avoided, it is of utmost importance to reduce exposure to the lowest possible levels. To this aim, not only do education and training of the exposed subjects play an important role, but accurate standardized sampling techniques and analytical methods are also required. A critical overview of the most significant methods available in the literature is presented and their value is discussed, especially with respect to their sensitivity and specificity. In addition, attention is given to validation procedures and, consequently, to their reliability. The results from the most important surveys carried out at hospital departments are also discussed, with a view to improving both monitoring strategies and moreover working conditions.

Profound variation in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in human blood cells: major implications for the detection of partly deficient patients

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is responsible for the breakdown of the widely used antineoplastic agent 5-fluorouracil (5FU), thereby limiting the efficacy of the therapy. To identify patients suffering from a complete or partial DPD deficiency, the activity of DPD is usually determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBM cells). In this study, we demonstrated that the highest activity of DPD was found in monocytes followed by that of lymphocytes, granulocytes and platelets, whereas no significant activity of DPD could be detected in erythrocytes. The activity of DPD in PBM cells proved to be intermediate compared with the DPD activity observed in monocytes and lymphocytes. The mean percentage of monocytes in the PBM cells obtained from cancer patients proved to be significantly higher than that observed in PBM cells obtained from healthy volunteers. Moreover, a profound positive correlation was observed between the DPD activity of PBM cells and the percentage of monocytes, thus introducing a large inter- and intrapatient variability in the activity of DPD and hindering the detection of patients with a partial DPD deficiency.