Coupling between ATPase and force-generating attachment-detachment cycles of actomyosin in vitro

One must reconstitute the functions of interest from purified proteins

I am often asked by students and younger colleagues and now by the editors of this issue to tell the history of the development of the in vitro motility assay and the dual-beam single-molecule laser trap assay for myosin-driven actin filament movement, used widely as key assays for understanding how both muscle and nonmuscle myosin molecular motors work. As for all discoveries, the history of the development of the myosin assays involves many people who are not authors of the final publications, but without whom the assays would not have been developed as they are. Also, early experiences shape how one develops ideas and experiments, and influence future discoveries in major ways. I am pleased here to trace my own path and acknowledge the many individuals involved and my early science experiences that led to the work I and my students, postdoctoral fellows, and sabbatical visitors did to develop these assays. Mentors are too often overlooked in historical descriptions of discoveries, and my story starts with those who mentored me.

Blebbistatin Effects Expose Hidden Secrets in the Force-Generating Cycle of Actin and Myosin

Cyclic interactions between myosin II motors and actin filaments driven by ATP turnover underlie muscle contraction and have key roles in the motility of nonmuscle cells. A remaining enigma in the understanding of this interaction is the relationship between the force-generating structural change and the release of the ATP-hydrolysis product, inorganic phosphate (Pi), from the active site of myosin. Here, we use the small molecular compound blebbistatin to probe otherwise hidden states and transitions in this process. Different hypotheses for the Pi release mechanism are tested by interpreting experimental results from in vitro motility assays and isolated muscle fibers in terms of mechanokinetic actomyosin models. The data fit with ideas that actomyosin force generation is preceded by Pi release, which in turn is preceded by two serial transitions after/coincident with cross-bridge attachment. Blebbistatin changes the rate limitation of the cycle from the first to the second of these transitions, uncovering functional roles of an otherwise short-lived pre-power stroke state that has been implicated by structural data.

Do Actomyosin Single-Molecule Mechanics Data Predict Mechanics of Contracting Muscle?

In muscle, but not in single-molecule mechanics studies, actin, myosin and accessory proteins are incorporated into a highly ordered myofilament lattice. In view of this difference we compare results from single-molecule studies and muscle mechanics and analyze to what degree data from the two types of studies agree with each other. There is reasonable correspondence in estimates of the cross-bridge power-stroke distance (7–13 nm), cross-bridge stiffness (~2 pN/nm) and average isometric force per cross-bridge (6–9 pN). Furthermore, models defined on the basis of single-molecule mechanics and solution biochemistry give good fits to experimental data from muscle. This suggests that the ordered myofilament lattice, accessory proteins and emergent effects of the sarcomere organization have only minor modulatory roles. However, such factors may be of greater importance under e.g., disease conditions. We also identify areas where single-molecule and muscle data are conflicting: (1) whether force generation is an Eyring or Kramers process with just one major power-stroke or several sub-strokes; (2) whether the myofilaments and the cross-bridges have Hookean or non-linear elasticity; (3) if individual myosin heads slip between actin sites under certain conditions, e.g., in lengthening; or (4) if the two heads of myosin cooperate.

Force-generating capacity of human myosin isoforms extracted from single muscle fibre segments

Muscle, motor unit and muscle fibre type-specific differences in force-generating capacity have been investigated for many years, but there is still no consensus regarding specific differences between slow- and fast-twitch muscles, motor units or muscle fibres. This is probably related to a number of different confounding factors disguising the function of the molecular motor protein myosin. We have therefore studied the force-generating capacity of specific myosin isoforms or combination of isoforms extracted from short single human muscle fibre segments in a modified single fibre myosin in vitro motility assay, in which an internal load (actin-binding protein) was added in different concentrations to evaluate the force-generating capacity. The force indices were the x-axis intercept and the slope of the relationship between the fraction of moving filaments and the α-actinin concentration. The force-generating capacity of the β/slow myosin isoform (type I) was weaker (P < 0.05) than the fast myosin isoform (type II), but the force-generating capacity of the different human fast myosin isoforms types IIa and IIx or a combination of both (IIax) were indistinguishable. A single fibre in vitro motility assay for both speed and force of specific myosin isoforms is described and used to measure the difference in force-generating capacity between fast and slow human myosin isoforms. The assay is proposed as a useful tool for clinical studies on the effects on muscle function of specific mutations or post-translational modifications of myosin.

Cross-bridge duty cycle in isometric contraction of skeletal myofibrils

During interaction of actin with myosin, cross-bridges impart mechanical impulses to thin filaments resulting in rotations of actin monomers. Impulses are delivered on the average every tc seconds. A cross-bridge spends a fraction of this time (ts) strongly attached to actin, during which it generates force. The "duty cycle" (DC), defined as the fraction of the total cross-bridge cycle that myosin spends attached to actin in a force generating state (ts/ tc), is small for cross-bridges acting against zero load, like freely shortening muscle, and increases as the load rises. Here we report, for the first time, an attempt to measure DC of a single cross-bridge in muscle. A single actin molecule in a half-sarcomere was labeled with fluorescent phalloidin. Its orientation was measured by monitoring intensity of the polarized TIRF images. Actin changed orientation when a cross-bridge bound to it. During isometric contraction, but not during rigor, actin orientation oscillated between two values, corresponding to the actin-bound and actin-free state of the cross-bridge. The average ts and tc were 3.4 and 6 s, respectively. These results suggest that, in isometrically working muscle, cross-bridges spend about half of the cycle time attached to actin. The fact that 1/ tc was much smaller than the ATPase rate suggests that the bulk of the energy of ATP hydrolysis is used for purposes other than performance of mechanical work.