Iron binding capacity of didox (3,4 dihydroxybenzohydroxamic acid) and amidox (3,4 dihydroxybenzamidoxime) two inhibitors of the enzyme ribonucleotide reductase

Didox (3,4-dihydroxybenzohydroxamic acid) suppresses IL-33-induced cytokine production in primary mouse mast cells

While IgE is considered the primary mediator of mast cell activation, IL-33 contributes substantially in asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis. To develop effective treatments for allergic disease, it is important to understand the role of therapeutic agents on IL-33 activation. We examined the effect of Didox (3,4-dihydroxybenzohydroxamic acid), an antioxidant and ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) inhibitor, on IL-33-mediated mast cell activation. Didox suppressed IL-6, IL-13, TNF, and MIP-1α (CCL3) production in bone marrow derived mast cells following IL-33 activation. This suppression was observed in different genetic backgrounds and extended to peritoneal mast cells. The antioxidant N-acetylcysteine mimicked the suppression of Didox, albeit at a much higher dose, while the RNR inhibitor hydroxyurea had no effect. Didox substantially suppressed IL-33-mediated NFκB and AP-1 transcriptional activities. These results suggest that Didox attenuates IL-33-induced mast cell activation and should be further studied as a potential therapeutic agent for inflammatory diseases involving IL-33.

3,4-Dihydroxy-benzohydroxamic acid (Didox) suppresses pro-inflammatory profiles and oxidative stress in TLR4-activated RAW264.7 murine macrophages

Didox (3,4-dihydroxy-benzohydroxamic acid), is a synthetic ribonucleotide reductase (RR) inhibitor derived from polyhydroxy-substituted benzohydroxamic acid, and originally developed as an anti-cancer agent. Some studies indicate that didox may have anti-oxidative stress-like properties, while other studies hint that didox may have anti-inflammatory properties. Using nitric oxide production in response to LPS treatment as a sensitive screening assay for anti-inflammatory compounds, we show that didox is very potent at levels as low as 6.25 μM, with maximal inhibition at 100 μM. A qRT-PCR array was then employed to screen didox for other potential anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative stress-related properties. Didox was very potent in suppressing the expression of these arrayed mRNA in response to LPS, and in some cases didox alone suppressed expression. Using qRT-PCR as a follow up to the array, we demonstrated that didox suppresses LPS-induced mRNA levels of iNOS, IL-6, IL-1, TNF-α, NF-κβ (p65), and p38-α, after 24h of treatment. Treatment with didox also suppresses the secretion of nitric oxide, IL-6, and IL-10. Furthermore, oxidative stress, as quantified by intracellular ROS levels in response to macrophage activators LPS and phorbol ester (PMA), and the glutathione depleting agent BSO, is reduced by treatment with didox. Moreover, we demonstrate that nuclear translocation of NF-κβ (p65) in response to LPS is inhibited by didox. These findings were supported by qRT-PCR for oxidative stress genes SOD1 and catalase. Overall, this study supports the conclusion that didox may have a future role in managing acute and chronic inflammatory diseases and oxidative stress due to high production of ROS.

Short-term treatment with novel ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors Trimidox and Didox reverses late-stage murine retrovirus-induced lymphoproliferative disease with less bone marrow toxicity than hydroxyurea

We evaluated the ability of a short course of treatment with the ribonucleotide reductase (RR) inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU) and two novel RR inhibitors Trimidox (TX) and Didox (DX) to influence late-stage murine retrovirus-induced lymphoproliferative disease. LPBM5 murine leukaemia virus retrovirus-infected mice were treated daily with HU, TX or DX for 4 weeks, beginning 9 weeks post-infection, after development of immunodeficiency and lymphoproliferative disease. Drug effects on disease progression were determined by evaluating spleen weight and histology. Effects on haematopoiesis were determined by measuring peripheral blood indices (white blood cells and haematocrit) and assay of femur cellularity and femoral and splenic content of colony-forming units granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU-E). HU, TX and DX partially reversed late-stage retrovirus-induced disease, resulting in spleen weights significantly below pre-treatment values. Spleen histology was also improved by RR inhibitor treatment (DX>TX>HU). However, as expected, HU was significantly myelosuppressive, inducing a reduction in peripheral indices associated with depletion of femoral CFU-GM and BFU-E. In contrast, although TX and DX were moderately myelosuppressive, both drugs were significantly better tolerated than HU. In summary, short-term treatment in late-stage murine retroviral disease with HU, TX or DX induced dramatic reversal of disease pathophysiology. However, the novel RR inhibitors TX and DX had more effective activity and significantly less bone marrow toxicity than HU.