Concepts of organization. The leverage of ciliate protozoa

Role of Epigenetics in Biology and Human Diseases

For a long time, scientists have tried to describe disorders just by genetic or environmental factors. However, the role of epigenetics in human diseases has been considered from a half of century ago. In the last decade, this subject has attracted many interests, especially in complicated disorders such as behavior plasticity, memory, cancer, autoimmune disease, and addiction as well as neurodegenerative and psychological disorders. This review first explains the history and classification of epigenetic modifications, and then the role of epigenetic in biology and connection between the epigenetics and environment are explained. Furthermore, the role of epigenetics in human diseases is considered by focusing on some diseases with some complicated features, and at the end, we have given the future perspective of this field. The present review article provides concepts with some examples to reveal a broad view of different aspects of epigenetics in biology and human diseases.

Traction fibre: toward a "tensegral" model of the spindle

Most current hypotheses of mitotic mechanisms are based on the "PAC-MAN" paradigm in which chromosome movement is generated and powered by disassembly of kinetochore microtubules (k-MTs) by the kinetochore. Recent experiments demonstrate that this model cannot explain force generation for anaphase chromosome movement [Pickett-Heaps et al., 1996: Protoplasma 192:1-10]. Another such experiment is described here: a UV-microbeam cut several kinetochore fibres (k-fibres) in newt epithelial cells at metaphase and the half-spindle immediately shortened: in several cells, the remaining intact spindle fibres bowed outwards as they came under increased compression. Thus, severing of k-MTs can lead to increased tension between chromosomes and poles. This observation cannot be explained by models in which force is produced by motor molecules at the kinetochore actively disassembling k-MTs. Rather, we argue that tensile forces act along the whole k-fibre, which, therefore, can be considered as a classic "traction fibre." We suggest that anaphase polewards force is generated by MTs interacting with the spindle matrix and when k-MTs are severed, polewards force continues to act on the remaining kMT-stub; spindle MTs act as rigid struts concurrently resisting and being controlled by these forces. We suggest that the principles of "cellular tensegrity" [Ingber, 1993: J. Cell Sci. 104:613-627] derived from the behaviour and organization of the interphase cell apply to the spindle. In an evolutionary context, this argument further suggests that the spindle might originally have evolved as the mechanism by which a single tensegral unit (cytoplast) is divided into two cytoplasts; use of the spindle for segregating chromosomes might represent a secondary, more recent development of this primary function. If valid, this concept has implications for the way the spindle functions and for the spindle's relationship to cytokinesis.

Resurrecting the body: Has portmodernism had any effect on biology?

While postmodernism has had very little influence in biology (for reasons discussed in the paper), it can provide a framework for discussing the context in which biology is done. Here, four biological views of the body/self are contrasted: the neural, immunological, genetic, and phenotypic bodies. Each physical view of the body extrapolates into a different model of the body politic, and each posits a different relationship between bodies of knowledge. The neural view of the body models a body politic wherein society is defined by its culture and laws. The genetic view privileges views of polities based on ethnicity and race. The immune body extrapolates into polities that can defend themselves against other such polities. The phenotypic view of the body politic stands in opposition to these three major perspectives and integrates them without giving any predominance. The view of science as a "neural" body of knowledge contends that science is aperspectival and objective. The perspective of the "immune" body is that science exists to defend the interests of its creataors. The genetic view of science is that science is the basis of all culture. The extrapolation of the phenotypic body to science insists upon the utilitarian rationale for scientific interprises. In all instances, the genetic view of the body/body politic/body of science is presently in ascendance.