The role of lipids in progressive glomerular disease

Early treatment with everolimus exerts nephroprotective effect in rats with adriamycin-induced nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a clinical state characterized by massive proteinuria and excessive fluid retention. The effects of early versus late treatment with low or high doses of oral everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, on proteinuria in NS have not been previously described.

METHODS

The effects of early treatment (2 days prior to NS induction) versus late treatment (beginning 2 weeks following the establishment of NS) with a low (20 mg/L) or high (100 mg/L) dose of everolimus for 5-7 weeks on proteinuria and nephrin/podocin abundance were assessed in male adult SD rats with adriamycin-induced NS.

RESULTS

Adriamycin caused a significant increase in daily and cumulative proteinuria throughout the experimental period. Early, and to a lesser extent late treatment, with a low dose of everolimus, significantly decreased both daily and cumulative proteinuria and improved renal function. The anti-proteinuric effects of low-dose everolimus were associated with restoration of the disruptive glomerular nephrin/podocin abundance. In contrast, administration of a high dose of everolimus resulted in a decrease in proteinuria in NS rats, subsequently to deterioration of renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Early, and to a lesser extent late treatment, with a low but not a high dose of everolimus is effective in reducing proteinuria in nephrotic rats. The mechanism may be via nephrin/podocin protection.

Statin-Induced Increase in HDL-C and Renal Function in Coronary Heart Disease Patients

Background

Little is known about the potential of statin-induced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increase to improve renal function in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients.

Methods and Results

In thispost hocanalysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary heart disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study we investigated the effect of HDL-C increase after statin treatment on renal function. From a total of 1,600 patients, 880 were on various statins (mainly atorvastatin) and 720 were not. Other secondary prevention therapies were similar in the 2 groups. After a 3 year follow up, the lipid profile was unchanged in the statin untreated group and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was reduced by 5.1% compared with baseline (P<0.0001). In contrast, in the statin treated group non-HDL-C was reduced by 43%, HDL-C was increased by 7% and there was a significant increase in eGFR compared with baseline by 9.8% (P<0.0001). In multiple regression analysis, the mean 7% increase in HDL-C in the treated arm during the entire study was associated with a 5.6% increase in eGFR recorded after the 6^th week of treatment. The odds ratio of eGFR increase with every 5% statin-induced rise in HDL-C was 1.78 (95% confidence interval 1.19-3.34; P=0.001).

Conclusions

Statin treatment significantly improved renal function. Statin-induced HDL-C increase significantly and independently contributed to this improvement. This finding supports the concept that improving lipid variables other than low density lipoprotein cholesterol is also beneficial to preserving renal function.

Glomerular abundance of nephrin and podocin in experimental nephrotic syndrome: different effects of antiproteinuric therapies

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a clinical state characterized by massive proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, and eventual edema formation. Although the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not yet fully clarified, it is well accepted that nephrin and podocin are involved in the development of proteinuria. The effects of early treatment with various antiproteinuric therapies on proteinuria and glomerular staining of nephrin and podocin in rats with experimental NS have not been previously studied. Proteinuria and glomerular nephrin and podocin immunofluorescence were examined in rat kidneys with adriamycin-induced NS and the effects of antiproteinuric drug therapies during 5 wk with enalapril, losartan, alone or in combination, omapatrilat, and mycophenolate mofetil on these parameters were assessed. Injection of adriamycin caused a significant increase in daily (from 21.8 ± 1.4 to 983.1 ± 45.8 mg/day, P < 0.01) and cumulative protein excretion (from negligible values to 22,490 ± 931 mg, P < 0.001) during 5 wk. Early treatment with enalapril significantly decreased the daily (641.7 ± 82.4 mg/day, P < 0.0023) and cumulative proteinuria (15,727 ± 2,204 mg, P < 0.001). A similar effect, although to a lesser extent, was obtained after omapatrilat treatment: cumulative proteinuria was reduced to 18,706 ± 1,042 mg, P < 0.001. In contrast, losartan treatment did not significantly influence the cumulative proteinuria that remained comparable (20,351 ± 1,360 mg, P > 0.05) to that observed in untreated NS rats. Unexpectedly, when losartan was given in combination with enalapril, it abolished the beneficial effects of the latter. Pretreatment with mycophenolate mofetil exerted a moderate antiproteinuric effect, which appeared only during the last week of the experimental treatment. Nephrotic rats exhibited severe disruption of slit diaphragm structure as seen by rapid and profound loss of nephrin and podocin. Beneficial effects of enalapril, omapatrilat, and mycophenolate mofetil paralleled the preservation of nephrin, as determined immunohistochemically, and enabled prediction of significant antiproteinuric responses. Enalapril alone or in combination with losartan resulted in significant preservation of podocin. Pretreatment with enalapril, and to a lesser extent omapatrilat, is superior to losartan in reducing proteinuria in NS rats. A combination of ACE inhibitors with ANG II receptor blockers does not provide any advantageous antiproteinuric therapy in these animals. Nephrin loss is an indication of proteinuria in NS and the antiproteinuric effects of ACE inhibitors, vasopeptidase inhibitors, and mycophenolate mofetil attenuate this reduction. Not all the drugs which restore podocin reduce urinary protein in NS.

No aggravation of renal injury in apolipoprotein E knockout mice (ApoE(-/-)) after subtotal nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

There is substantial experimental evidence that various forms of dyslipidaemia aggravate the course of renal failure and that reversal of dyslipidaemia ameliorates progression of renal failure. The apolipoprotein E knockout mouse (ApoE(-/-)) is an established model of accelerated atherogenesis. We investigated whether the course of renal disease after uninephrectomy (UNX) and subtotal nephrectomy (SNX) is altered in ApoE(-/-) mice compared with their genetic controls.

METHODS

Ten-week-old, male ApoE(-/-) mice (body weight 25+/-2 g) were subjected either to sham operation (sham), UNX or SNX. C57BL/6 sham, UNX and SNX mice served as controls (body weight 26+/-3 g). The food intake of ApoE(-/-) and C57BL/6 mice was kept identical by a pair-feeding protocol. After 12 weeks, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were measured in awake resting mice, the kidneys were perfusion fixed and analysed using quantitative histological methods, immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR.

RESULTS

At baseline, the sham ApoE(-/-) mice had significantly higher (P<0.05) serum cholesterol and triglycerides than the controls. In parallel, mean arterial blood pressure was significantly elevated in sham ApoE(-/-) mice compared with controls (137+/-15 vs 116+/-4 mmHg; P<0.05). In the sham groups, the glomerulosclerosis index was significantly higher in the ApoE(-/-) mice (1.05+/-0.14 vs 0.57+/-0.07; P<0.05), whereas the tubulointerstitial damage score was comparable (0.06+/-0.04 vs 0.04+/-0.02; n.s.). After SNX there was a significant increase in glomerulosclerosis index, but no difference could be detected between ApoE(-/-) and controls (1.75+/-0.16 vs 1.61+/-0.01, n.s.). The same was true for the tubulointerstitial damage index.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some glomerulosclerosis and elevated mean arterial blood pressure at baseline, no acceleration of progression of renal disease was found in this genetic model of hyperlipoproteinaemia. This observation suggests that despite the known spontaneous histological changes in untouched kidneys, however, the presence of hyperlipidaemia in the ApoE(-/-) mouse does not cause more severe progression in the present models of moderate renal disease.

The effect of statins versus untreated dyslipidaemia on renal function in patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Greek atorvastatin and coronary heart disease evaluation (GREACE) study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about statins in the prevention of dyslipidaemia induced renal function decline. The secondary coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention GREACE study suggested that dose titration with atorvastatin (10-80 mg/day, mean dose 24 mg/day) achieves the national cholesterol educational programme treatment goals and significantly reduces morbidity and mortality, compared with usual care.

AIMS

To report the effect of statin on renal function compared with untreated dyslipidaemia in both treatment groups.

METHODS/RESULTS

All patients had plasma creatinine values within the reference range < 115 micro mol/litre (13 mg/litre). The on study creatinine clearance (CrCl), as estimated (for up to 48 months) by the Cockroft-Gault formula, was compared within and between treatment groups using analysis of variance to assess differences over time. Patients from both groups not treated with statins (704) showed a 5.2% decrease in CrCl (p < 0.0001). Usual care patients on various statins (97) had a 4.9% increase in CrCl (p = 0.003). Structured care patients on atorvastatin (783) had a 12% increase in CrCl (p < 0.0001). This effect was more prominent in the lower two quartiles of baseline CrCl and with higher atorvastatin doses. After adjustment for 25 predictors of all CHD related events, multivariate analysis revealed a hazards ratio of 0.84 (confidence interval 0.73 to 0.95; p = 0.003) with every 5% increase in CrCl.

CONCLUSIONS

In untreated dyslipidaemic patients with CHD and normal renal function at baseline, CrCl declines over a period of three years. Statin treatment prevents this decline and significantly improves renal function, potentially offsetting an additional factor associated with CHD risk.

Statins and renal function

Renal disease is often associated with an increased risk of vascular events. Moreover, an accelerated form of atherosclerosis commonly occurs in these patients. The reasons for these associations are not clearly defined but include the widespread presence of several established risk factors (eg, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes). Other predictors of atherosclerotic disease may also be abnormally elevated (eg, homocysteine, fibrinogen, and lipoprotein a). In addition, there is evidence that impaired renal function per se predicts vascular risk. Despite this high-risk background, the potential benefit of treatment with statins has not been widely investigated in these patients. The present review considers the evidence (experimental and clinical) that statins exert beneficial effects in patients with different types of renal disease. This includes improved renal function, decreased microalbuminuria, and a fall in blood pressure. Statins may also improve renal allograft survival. The potential mechanisms mediating these effects are considered. The interactions between statins and several risk factors that may be present in patients with impaired renal function are also considered. There is an urgent need to define the role of statins in these high-risk patients. Which is the statin of choice? This question is relevant because impaired renal function can interfere with statin pharmacokinetics. Furthermore, other drugs administered to these patients may cause serious interactions with statins.

Glycogenosis type I and diabetes mellitus: a common mechanism for renal dysfunction?

Diabetes mellitus and glycogen storage disease type I (GSDI) may initially appear disparate in metabolic profile: one characterized by uncontrolled hyperglycaemia due to disturbed insulin function and the other by fasting hypoglycaemia caused by impaired gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis. However, they share a remarkably similar pattern and progression of renal dysfunction. This may be, we suggest, due to a convergence of their metabolic sequelae in upregulation of flux through the pentose phosphate pathway. This pathway yields triose phosphate molecules, which are precursors of the lipid, diacylglycerol (DAG). DAG plays an important role in the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system via the protein kinase C pathway. GSDI may be an interesting model which helps to unravel further the contributions of the many, varied nephropathic influences in diabetes. Conversely patients with this rare disorders would have much to gain from the innovative and vastly greater body of research carried out in diabetes.

Systemic factors are involved in the pathogenesis of proteinuria-induced glomerulosclerosis in adriamycin nephrotic rats

This study aims to dissociate the respective roles of systemic nephrosis and of the intrarenal effects of proteinuria in the pathogenesis of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FGS) in adriamycin nephrosis. To this purpose, this study examined proteinuria and FGS in bilateral (BAP) and unilateral proteinuria (UAP) in two different rat strains. UAP was obtained by protecting one kidney from exposure to adriamycin by temporary clipping of one renal artery during adriamycin injection. At sacrifice (week 12), FGS was present in BAP and in exposed kidneys in UAP, but not in unexposed kidneys. FGS correlated significantly with proteinuria per kidney in BAP and UAP. Remarkably, for a given proteinuria per kidney, the sclerosis score was higher in BAP than in UAP, reflected by a higher ratio of FGS score per mg proteinuria per kidney (Wistar: 0.09 +/- 0.01 in BAP versus 0.05 +/- 0.01%/mg protein per d in UAP, P < 0.05; Lewis: 0.12 +/- 0.01 in BAP versus 0.07 +/- 0.01%/mg protein per d in UAP, P < 0.05), indicating that the local damaging effects of proteinuria are modified by other factors. Cholesterol correlated with total proteinuria in BAP and UAP. FGS score was positively correlated with cholesterol. The latter correlation was similar in BAP and UAP, indicating that cholesterol was a more uniform predictor for FGS than proteinuria per kidney. This was independent of strain-specific factors. On multilinear regression analysis, cholesterol turned out to be the most consistent predictor of FGS in proteinuric kidneys, with a stronger predictive value than proteinuria per kidney. It is concluded that although systemic sequelae of nephrosis do not induce renal damage in nonproteinuric kidneys, they modify the severity of proteinuria-induced FGS in proteinuric kidneys.

Renal hemodynamic effects of lovastatin in a renal ablation model

OBJECTIVES

Patients with renal mass reduction of more than 50% are at increased risk for progressive renal failure. Lipid-lowering agents have been shown to preserve renal function in various models of chronic renal failure. This study was performed to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of lovastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, in the remnant kidney model.

METHODS

Two groups of animals were studied. Group 1 (n = 9) served as controls and group 2 (n = 14) received lovastatin, 15 mg/kg/day orally, for 2 weeks after renal ablation. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR, inulin clearance), renal blood flow (RBF, ultrasonic flow probe), and 24-hour protein excretion were measured in anesthetized rats.

RESULTS

Two weeks after renal ablation, GFR was 0.28 +/- 0.09 mL/min/gkw (gram kidney weight) in group 1, whereas in group 2, lovastatin preserved GFR at 0.58 +/- 0.3 mL/min/gkw (P < 0.05). RBF in group 1 was 1.2 +/- 0.2 mL/min/gkw and increased to 2.1 +/- 0.4 mL/min/gkw in group 2 (P < 0.05), representing a 43% increase. Protein excretion decreased significantly to 13 +/- 1.7 mg/24 hr in group 2. The lovastatin-treated group had a lower serum cholesterol (59 +/- 3 mg/dL versus 71 +/- 2 mg/dL, P < 0.05), but serum triglyceride levels were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lovastatin preserves renal function in a renal ablation model after 2 weeks of treatment. It specifically increased total RBF. Therefore, in addition to its known cholesterol lowering effect, lovastatin also has the direct renal hemodynamic effect of increasing RBF and maintaining GFR.

Effects of hypertension and dyslipidemia on the decline in renal function

Experimental evidence suggests that in addition to hypertension, serum lipids might also accelerate the decline in renal function. We tested this hypothesis in 2702 dyslipidemic middle-aged men without renal disease participating in the Helsinki Heart Study, a coronary primary prevention trial. The decline in renal function was estimated from linear regression slopes based on reciprocals of 10 serum creatinine determinations over the study period. Renal function deteriorated 3% on average during the 5-year study, and hypertension accelerated this change. Subjects with an elevated ratio of low- to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( > 4.4) had a 20% faster decline than those with a ratio less than 3.2. Both the contribution of the lipoprotein ratio and the protective effect of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol alone remained significant in multiple regression analyses. In the study of joint effects the contribution of lipids was confined to subjects with simultaneous elevation of blood pressure and lipids. The results suggest that in addition to hypertension, blood lipids also modify the decline in renal function.

Effect of chronic cholesterol loading in the development of acute ischemic renal failure in rats

The effect of chronic cholesterol loading and lovastatin administration in renal artery clamping acute renal failure in rats is not known. Acute renal failure was induced by 60-min left renal artery clamping immediately after right nephrectomy. The changes in renal function after renal artery clamping in the hyperlipidemic rats were unexpected. The acute renal failure in the cholesterol-loaded groups was less severe than in the nonhyperlipidemic rats. The lovastatin administration had some favorable effect on renal function after ischemia; however, this effect was not additive to the high dietary cholesterol administration. Our results seems to favor the concept that in this special form of experimental renal ischemic acute renal failure, serum cholesterol levels, elevated through diet, may have protective effects with respect to renal tubular lesions during or following the acute ischemic insult.