Examples of in vitro-in vivo relationships with a diverse range of quality

In-vitro and in-vivo correlation for two gliclazide extended-release tablets

The aim of this study was to perform an in-vitro-in-vivo correlation (IVIVC) for two 60-mg gliclazide extended-release formulations (Fast and Slow release) given once a day and to compare their plasma concentrations over time. In-vitro release rate data were obtained for each formulation using the USP apparatus II, paddle stirrer at 50 and 100 rev min−1 in 0.1 M HCl and pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. The similarity factor (f2) was used to analyse the dissolution data. Eighteen healthy subjects participated in the study, conducted according to a completely randomized, two-way crossover design. The formulations were compared using area under the plasma concentration-time curve, AUC0-∞′, time to reach peak plasma concentration, Tmax', and peak plasma concentration Cmax', while correlation was determined between in-vitro release and in-vivo absorption. A linear correlation model was developed using percent absorbed data versus percent dissolved data from the two formulations. Predicted gliclazide concentrations were obtained by use of a curve fitting equation. Prediction errors were estimated for Cmax and area under the curve AUC0-∞ to determine the validity of the correlation. 0.1 M HCl at 50 rev min−1 was found to be the most discriminating dissolution method. Linear regression analysis of the mean percentage of dose absorbed versus the mean percentage of in-vitro release resulted in a significant correlation (r2 > 0.98) for the two formulations. An average percent prediction error for Cmax was 4.15% for Fast release and 3.99% for Slow release formulation whereas for AUC0-∞ it was 6.36% and 4.66% for Fast release and Slow release formulation, respectively.

Oral osmotically driven systems: 30 years of development and clinical use

The number of marketed oral osmotically driven systems (OODS) has doubled in the last 10 years. The main clinical benefits of OODS are their ability to improve treatment tolerability and patient compliance. These advantages are mainly driven by the capacity to deliver drugs in a sustained manner, independent of the drug chemical properties, of the patient's physiological factors or concomitant food intake. However, access to these technologies has been restricted by the crowded patent landscape and manufacturing challenges. In this review article, we intend to give an overview of the OODS development in the last 30 years, detailing the technologies, specific products and their clinical use. General guidance on technology selection is described in light of the recent advances in the field. The clinical performance of these technologies is also discussed, with a focus on food effects and the in vivo-in vitro correlation. Special attention is paid to safety given the controversial case study of Osmosin. Overall, oral osmotically driven systems appear to be a promising technology for product life-cycle strategies.

Profiling in vitro drug release from subcutaneous implants: a review of current status and potential implications on drug product development

This review presents current methods and strategies for studying the release characteristics of drugs from subcutaneous implant dosage forms. Implants are dosage forms that are subcutaneously placed with the aid of surgery or a hypodermic needle, and are designed to release drugs over a prolonged period of time. In most cases, the objective of a release test is to identify sufficiently discriminatory procedures that in turn would provide data to set meaningful specifications. Additional information obtained from successful in vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVC) and accelerated drug release tests are extremely useful during drug product development. Although several workers have employed different methods to monitor drug release from these dosage forms, the use of the compendial Apparatus 4 (flow-through) device has been recommended in a publication on FIP/AAPS Guidelines for drug release testing of modified release dosage forms. However, most of method development with this device has focused on oral immediate or controlled release dosage forms and little published information is available on implants. Two recent reports on workshops provide useful information on methods to evaluate drug release from controlled-release parenterals such as implants, including IVIVC and accelerated release testing. Details on such studies, however, are generally not found in the literature; possibly because of the high proprietary value of methodologies for establishing release specifications of implant dosage forms. This article reviews the current status of methodologies used in the investigation of drug release from subcutaneous implants with an emphasis on mechanistic, product development and regulatory perspectives.