The molecular basis for competence, determination and transdifferentiation: a hypothesis

Expression profiling of stemness markers in testicular germline stem cells from neonatal and adult Swiss albino mice during their transdifferentiation in vitro

BACKGROUND

Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) were considered to be stem cells with limited potencies due to their existence in adult organisms. However, the production of spermatogonial stem cell colonies with broader differentiation capabilities in primary germ cell cultures from mice of select genetic backgrounds (C57BL6/Tg14, ddY, FVB and 129/Ola) indicated that SSCs from these strains were pluripotent.

METHODS

We established primary cultures of SSCs from neonatal and adult Swiss 3T3 Albino mice. Stemness of SSC colonies were evaluated by performing real-time PCR and immunofluorescence analysis for a panel of chosen stemness markers. Differentiation potentials of SSCs were examined by attempting the generation of embryoid bodies and evaluating the expression of ectodermal, mesodermal and endodermal markers using immunofluorescence and real-time PCR analysis.

RESULTS

Spermatogonial stem cells from neonatal and mature mice testes colonised in vitro and formed compact spermatogonial stem cell colonies in culture. The presence of stem cell markers ALPL, ITGA6 and CD9 indicated stemness in these colonies. The differentiation potential of these SSC colonies was demonstrated by their transformation into embryoid bodies upon withdrawal of growth factors from the culture medium. SSC colonies and embryoid bodies formed were evaluated using immunofluorescence and real-time PCR analysis. Embryoid body like structures derived from both neonatal and adult mouse testis were quite similar in terms of the expression of germ layer markers.

CONCLUSION

These results strongly suggest that SSC-derived EB-like structures could be used for further differentiation into cells of interest in cell-based therapeutics.

Transdifferentiation of larval Xenopus laevis iris under the influence of the pituitary

Fragments of larval Xenopus laevis dorsal iris implanted together with the pituitary into the tail fin transdifferentiate into neural retina. On the contrary, in the control experiments the implanted tissues, dorsal iris alone, pituitary, or dorsal iris with liver fragments, do not undergo any retinal transformation.

The cytoskeletal mechanics of brain morphogenesis. Cell state splitters cause primary neural induction

There is a functional device in embryonic ectodermal cells that we propose causes them to differentiate into either neuroepithelial or epidermal tissue during the process called primary neural induction. We call this apparatus the "cell state splitter." Its main components are the apical microfilament ring and the coplanar apical mat of microtubules, which exert forces in opposite radial directions. We analyze the mechanical interaction between these cytoskeletal components and show that they are in an unstable mechanical equilibrium. The role of the cell state splitter is thus to create a mechanical instability corresponding to the embryonic state of "competence" in an otherwise mechanically stable cell. When the equilibrium of the cell state splitter is disturbed so as to produce a slight contraction of the apical end, apical contraction continues and the distinctive columnar neuroepithelial cells are produced. A slight expansion from the equilibrium state, on the other hand, results in flattened epidermal cells. The calculated forces are consistent with the known constitutive and force-generating properties and morphology of microfilaments and microtubules, and with free tubulin concentrations. There are no free parameters in the analysis. The first cells to assume the neuroepithelial state lie over the notochord. Propagation of the neuroepithelial state (homoiogenetic induction) then proceeds via stretch-induced constriction of the apical microfilament rings, until a hemisphere is covered, at which point the high rate of change of the meridional stress component necessary for further propagation vanishes. The remaining cells are stretched somewhat by this process and become epidermis. A sharp boundary between the tissues is thus formed (explaining "compartmentalization" and the binary nature of differentiation in general). Normal induction apparently involves setup of the cell state splitters in all of the ectoderm cells, perhaps synchronously timed by global embryo tension. The initial transition of cells from the ectodermal to the neuroepithelial state begins at the notoplate, where cell attachments to the notochord may both cause basal actin deposition and significantly reduce the stress induced in the ectoderm by the global tension, biasing the notoplate cell state splitters toward the neuroepithelial state. Introduction of an organizer or other solid substrate (artificial inducer) elsewhere, to which ectodermal cells can adhere, may likewise have both of these effects. Differentiation to either epidermis or neuroepithelium is thus a mechanical event followed by the synthesis of specific proteins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

From DNA transcription to visible structure: what the development of multicellular animals teaches us

This article is concerned with the problem of the relation between the genetic information contained in the DNA and the emergence of visible structure in multicellular animals. The answer is sought in a reappraisal of the data of experimental embryology, considering molecular, cellular and organismal aspects. The presence of specific molecules only confers a tissue identity on the cells when their concentration exceeds the 'threshold of differentiation'. When this condition is not fulfilled the activity of the genes that code for the specific molecules in question only confers on them a histogenetic potency, i.e. the capacity to form the corresponding tissue in further development (or to trans-differentiate to that tissue). The progressive restriction of histogenetic potencies during development reflects the irreversible repression of more and more genes. The establishment of a given tissue identity under the influence of an inducing tissue (or a morphogenetic hormone) is only possible when the cells have acquired the competence to respond. Tissue differentiation proceeds progressively during development thanks to the cytoplasmic 'memory' that cells retain collectively (or sometimes individually) of the items of information successively registered by their ancestors cells. The increasing complexity of visible structure emerging during development results only from the progression of tissue differentiation. This involves continual exchange of information among the cells and leads to (1) cell displacements and rearrangements, particularly during organogenesis and (2) extreme diversification of cell individualities within tissues, particularly during postembryonic growth. A mutation (just as a teratogenic factor) evokes an anomaly that is localized in both space and time because it alters a certain aspect of cell behaviour (particularly cell surface adhesiveness or mitotic activity) at the time when this is involved in the establishment of a particular structural trait. Neither the organization of the adult nor the modalities of development are encoded in the DNA. The automatic concatenation of cell interactions in the embryo and the structural amplification it entails is conditioned by the specific biochemical composition of the cytoplasm of the egg and by the heterogeneous distribution of its inclusions.

Cellular heterogeneity in the expression of the delta-crystallin gene in non-lens tissue

RNA transcripts of the delta-crystallin genes, which code for the major chicken lens protein, have been detected at low levels in many non-lens tissues. Here it is demonstrated by in situ hybridisation that these transcripts are concentrated at a high level in small, infrequent clusters of cells in many non-lens tissues. While the nuclei of these cells are very heavily labelled, there is only light labelling of the cytoplasm. The unlabelled cells surrounding the labelled clusters are of similar morphology and staining properties as the labelled cells, and all have the characteristic morphology of cells of the embryonic tissue used. With the exception of neural retina, it is not yet known whether the labelled clusters are found in specific locations in the tissues, or whether they arise at random.