Ligand biological activity predictions using fingerprint-based artificial neural networks (FANN-QSAR)

Opportunities and challenges in application of artificial intelligence in pharmacology

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a machine science that can mimic human behaviour like intelligent analysis of data. AI functions with specialized algorithms and integrates with deep and machine learning. Living in the digital world can generate a huge amount of medical data every day. Therefore, we need an automated and reliable evaluation tool that can make decisions more accurately and faster. Machine learning has the potential to learn, understand and analyse the data used in healthcare systems. In the last few years, AI is known to be employed in various fields in pharmaceutical science especially in pharmacological research. It helps in the analysis of preclinical (laboratory animals) and clinical (in human) trial data. AI also plays important role in various processes such as drug discovery/manufacturing, diagnosis of big data for disease identification, personalized treatment, clinical trial research, radiotherapy, surgical robotics, smart electronic health records, and epidemic outbreak prediction. Moreover, AI has been used in the evaluation of biomarkers and diseases. In this review, we explain various models and general processes of machine learning and their role in pharmacological science. Therefore, AI with deep learning and machine learning could be relevant in pharmacological research.

Concepts and applications of chemical fingerprint for hit and lead screening

Molecular fingerprints are used to represent chemical (structural, physicochemical, etc.) properties of large-scale chemical sets in a low computational cost way. They have a prominent role in transforming chemical data sets into consistent input formats (bit strings or numeric values) suitable for in silico approaches. In this review, we summarize and classify common and state-of-the-art fingerprints into eight different types (dictionary based, circular, topological, pharmacophore, protein-ligand interaction, shape based, reinforced, and multi). We also highlight applications of fingerprints in early drug research and development (R&D). Thus, this review provides a guide for the selection of appropriate fingerprints of compounds (or ligand-protein complexes) for use in drug R&D.

GGL-Tox: Geometric Graph Learning for Toxicity Prediction

Toxicity analysis is a major challenge in drug design and discovery. Recently significant progress has been made through machine learning due to its accuracy, efficiency, and lower cost. US Toxicology in the 21st Century (Tox21) screened a large library of compounds, including approximately 12 000 environmental chemicals and drugs, for different mechanisms responsible for eliciting toxic effects. The Tox21 Data Challenge offered a platform to evaluate different computational methods for toxicity predictions. Inspired by the success of multiscale weighted colored graph (MWCG) theory in protein-ligand binding affinity predictions, we consider MWCG theory for toxicity analysis. In the present work, we develop a geometric graph learning toxicity (GGL-Tox) model by integrating MWCG features and the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) algorithm. The benchmark tests of the Tox21 Data Challenge are employed to demonstrate the utility and usefulness of the proposed GGL-Tox model. An extensive comparison with other state-of-the-art models indicates that GGL-Tox is an accurate and efficient model for toxicity analysis and prediction.

Receptor Binding Affinities of Synthetic Cannabinoids Determined by Non-Isotopic Receptor Binding Assay

A major predictor of the efficacy of natural or synthetic cannabinoids is their binding affinity to the cannabinoid type I receptor (CB₁) in the central nervous system, as the main psychological effects of cannabinoids are achieved via binding to this receptor. Conventionally, receptor binding assays have been performed using isotopes, which are inconvenient owing to the effects of radioactivity. In the present study, the binding affinities of five cannabinoids for purified CB₁ were measured using a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technique as a putative non-isotopic receptor binding assay. Results were compared with those of a radio-isotope-labeled receptor binding assay. The representative natural cannabinoid Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol and four synthetic cannabinoids, JWH-015, JWH-210, RCS-4, and JWH-250, were assessed using both the SPR biosensor assay and the conventional isotopic receptor binding assay. The binding affinities of the test substances to CB₁ were determined to be (from highest to lowest) 9.52 × 10^-13 M (JWH-210), 6.54 × 10^-12 M (JWH-250), 1.56 × 10^-11 M (Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol), 2.75 × 10^-11 M (RCS-4), and 6.80 ×10^-11 M (JWH-015) using the non-isotopic method. Using the conventional isotopic receptor binding assay, the same order of affinities was observed. In conclusion, our results support the use of kinetic analysis via SPR in place of the isotopic receptor binding assay. To replace the receptor binding affinity assay with SPR techniques in routine assays, further studies for method validation will be needed in the future.

Development and Testing of Druglike Screening Libraries

Although significant advances in experimental high throughput screening (HTS) have been made for drug lead identification, in silico virtual screening (VS) is indispensable owing to its unique advantage over experimental HTS, target-focused, cheap, and efficient, albeit its disadvantage of producing false positive hits. For both experimental HTS and VS, the quality of screening libraries is crucial and determines the outcome of those studies. In this paper, we first reviewed the recent progress on screening library construction. We realized the urgent need for compiling high-quality screening libraries in drug discovery. Then we compiled a set of screening libraries from about 20 million druglike ZINC molecules by running fingerprint-based similarity searches against known drug molecules. Lastly, the screening libraries were objectively evaluated using 5847 external actives covering more than 2000 drug targets. The result of the assessment is very encouraging. For example, with the Tanimoto coefficient being set to 0.75, 36% of external actives were retrieved and the enrichment factor was 13. Additionally, drug target family specific screening libraries were also constructed and evaluated. The druglike screening libraries are available for download from https://mulan.pharmacy.pitt.edu .

Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis

Toxicity prediction is very important to public health. Among its many applications, toxicity prediction is essential to reduce the cost and labor of a drug's preclinical and clinical trials, because a lot of drug evaluations (cellular, animal, and clinical) can be spared due to the predicted toxicity. In the era of Big Data and artificial intelligence, toxicity prediction can benefit from machine learning, which has been widely used in many fields such as natural language processing, speech recognition, image recognition, computational chemistry, and bioinformatics, with excellent performance. In this article, we review machine learning methods that have been applied to toxicity prediction, including deep learning, random forests, k-nearest neighbors, and support vector machines. We also discuss the input parameter to the machine learning algorithm, especially its shift from chemical structural description only to that combined with human transcriptome data analysis, which can greatly enhance prediction accuracy.

Deep Learning for Drug Design: an Artificial Intelligence Paradigm for Drug Discovery in the Big Data Era

Over the last decade, deep learning (DL) methods have been extremely successful and widely used to develop artificial intelligence (AI) in almost every domain, especially after it achieved its proud record on computational Go. Compared to traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms, DL methods still have a long way to go to achieve recognition in small molecular drug discovery and development. And there is still lots of work to do for the popularization and application of DL for research purpose, e.g., for small molecule drug research and development. In this review, we mainly discussed several most powerful and mainstream architectures, including the convolutional neural network (CNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), and deep auto-encoder networks (DAENs), for supervised learning and nonsupervised learning; summarized most of the representative applications in small molecule drug design; and briefly introduced how DL methods were used in those applications. The discussion for the pros and cons of DL methods as well as the main challenges we need to tackle were also emphasized.