1
|
Sinnaeve D, Ben Bouzayene A, Ottoy E, Hofman GJ, Erdmann E, Linclau B, Kuprov I, Martins J, Torbeev V, Kieffer B. Fluorine NMR study of proline-rich sequences using fluoroprolines. MAGNETIC RESONANCE (GOTTINGEN, GERMANY) 2021; 2:795-813. [PMID: 37905223 PMCID: PMC10539733 DOI: 10.5194/mr-2-795-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
Proline homopolymer motifs are found in many proteins; their peculiar conformational and dynamic properties are often directly involved in those proteins' functions. However, the dynamics of proline homopolymers is hard to study by NMR due to a lack of amide protons and small chemical shift dispersion. Exploiting the spectroscopic properties of fluorinated prolines opens interesting perspectives to address these issues. Fluorinated prolines are already widely used in protein structure engineering - they introduce conformational and dynamical biases - but their use as 19 F NMR reporters of proline conformation has not yet been explored. In this work, we look at model peptides where Cγ -fluorinated prolines with opposite configurations of the chiral Cγ centre have been introduced at two positions in distinct polyproline segments. By looking at the effects of swapping these (4R )-fluoroproline and (4S )-fluoroproline within the polyproline segments, we were able to separate the intrinsic conformational properties of the polyproline sequence from the conformational alterations instilled by fluorination. We assess the fluoroproline 19 F relaxation properties, and we exploit the latter in elucidating binding kinetics to the SH3 (Src homology 3) domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davy Sinnaeve
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, Institut Pasteur de Lille, CHU Lille, U1167 – Risk Factors and Molecular Determinants of
Aging-Related Diseases (RID-AGE), 59000 Lille, France
- CNRS, ERL9002 – Integrative Structural Biology, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Abir Ben Bouzayene
- Department of Integrative Structural Biology, IGBMC, University of Strasbourg, Inserm U1258, CNRS UMR 7104, 1 rue Laurent Fries, 67404
Illkirch, France
| | - Emile Ottoy
- Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Ghent University,
Campus Sterre, S4, Krijgslaan 281, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gert-Jan Hofman
- Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Ghent University,
Campus Sterre, S4, Krijgslaan 281, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ,
United Kingdom
| | - Eva Erdmann
- Department of Integrative Structural Biology, IGBMC, University of Strasbourg, Inserm U1258, CNRS UMR 7104, 1 rue Laurent Fries, 67404
Illkirch, France
| | - Bruno Linclau
- School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ,
United Kingdom
| | - Ilya Kuprov
- School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ,
United Kingdom
| | - José C. Martins
- Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Ghent University,
Campus Sterre, S4, Krijgslaan 281, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Vladimir Torbeev
- Institut de Science et d'Ingénierie Supramoléculaires (ISIS),
International Center for Frontier Research in Chemistry (icFRC), University of Strasbourg,
CNRS UMR 7006, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Bruno Kieffer
- Department of Integrative Structural Biology, IGBMC, University of Strasbourg, Inserm U1258, CNRS UMR 7104, 1 rue Laurent Fries, 67404
Illkirch, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li Z, Miao Q, Yan F, Meng Y, Zhou P. Machine Learning in Quantitative Protein–peptide Affinity Prediction: Implications for Therapeutic Peptide Design. Curr Drug Metab 2019; 20:170-176. [DOI: 10.2174/1389200219666181012151944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background:Protein–peptide recognition plays an essential role in the orchestration and regulation of cell signaling networks, which is estimated to be responsible for up to 40% of biological interaction events in the human interactome and has recently been recognized as a new and attractive druggable target for drug development and disease intervention.Methods:We present a systematic review on the application of machine learning techniques in the quantitative modeling and prediction of protein–peptide binding affinity, particularly focusing on its implications for therapeutic peptide design. We also briefly introduce the physical quantities used to characterize protein–peptide affinity and attempt to extend the content of generalized machine learning methods.Results:Existing issues and future perspective on the statistical modeling and regression prediction of protein– peptide binding affinity are discussed.Conclusion:There is still a long way to go before establishment of general, reliable and efficient machine leaningbased protein–peptide affinity predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongyan Li
- Center for Informational Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu 610054, China
| | - Qingqing Miao
- Center for Informational Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu 610054, China
| | - Fugang Yan
- Center for Informational Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu 610054, China
| | - Yang Meng
- Center for Informational Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu 610054, China
| | - Peng Zhou
- Center for Informational Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu 610054, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Asencio-Hernández J, Kieffer B, Delsuc MA. NMR WaterLOGSY Reveals Weak Binding of Bisphenol A with Amyloid Fibers of a Conserved 11 Residue Peptide from Androgen Receptor. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0161948. [PMID: 27583469 PMCID: PMC5008648 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
There is growing evidence that bisphenol A (BPA), a molecule largely released in the environment, has detrimental effects on ecosystems and on human health. It acts as an endocrine disruptor targeting steroid hormone receptors, such as the estrogen receptor (ER), estrogen-related receptor (ERR) and androgen receptor (AR). BPA-derived molecules have recently been shown to interact with the AR N-terminal domain (AR-NTD), which is known to be largely intrinsically disordered. This N-terminal domain contains an 11 residue conserved domain that forms amyloid fibers upon oxidative dimerisation through its strictly conserved Cys240 residue. We investigate here the interaction of BPA, and other potential endocrine disruptors, with AR-NTD amyloid fibers using the WaterLOGSY NMR experiment. We observed a selective binding of these compounds to the amyloid fibers formed by the AR-NTD conserved region and glutamine homopolymers. This observation suggests that the high potency of endocrine disruptors may result, in part, from their ability to bind amyloid forms of nuclear receptors in addition to their cognate binding sites. This property may be exploited to design future therapeutic strategies targeting AR related diseases such as the spinal bulbar muscular atrophy or prostate cancer. The ability of NMR WaterLOGSY experiments to detect weak interactions between small ligands and amyloid fibers may prove to be of particular interest for identifying promising hit molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Asencio-Hernández
- Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), INSERM U596, CNRS UMR 7104, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
| | - Bruno Kieffer
- Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), INSERM U596, CNRS UMR 7104, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
| | - Marc-André Delsuc
- Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), INSERM U596, CNRS UMR 7104, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|