Assaying Radiosensitivity of Ataxia-Telangiectasia

How to Improve SBRT Outcomes in NSCLC: From Pre-Clinical Modeling to Successful Clinical Translation

Simple Summary

Despite major research and clinical efforts, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a major treatment modality for lung cancer in the last decade. Additional research is needed to elucidate underlying mechanisms of resistance and to develop improved therapeutic strategies. Clinical progress relies on accurate preclinical modelling of human disease in order to yield clinically meaningful results; however, successful translation of pre-clinical research is still lagging behind. In this review, we summarize the major clinical developments of radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and we discuss the pre-clinical research models at our disposal, highlighting ongoing translational challenges and future perspectives.

Abstract

Despite major research and clinical efforts, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death. While the delivery of conformal radiotherapy and image guidance of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have revolutionized the treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), additional research is needed to elucidate underlying mechanisms of resistance and identify novel therapeutic combinations. Clinical progress relies on the successful translation of pre-clinical work, which so far has not always yielded expected results. Improved clinical modelling involves characterizing the preclinical models and selecting appropriate experimental designs that faithfully mimic precise clinical scenarios. Here, we review the current role of SBRT and the scope of pre-clinical armamentarium at our disposal to improve successful clinical translation of pre-clinical research in the radiation oncology of NSCLC.

Genes affecting ionizing radiation survival identified through combined exome sequencing and functional screening

The study of genetic syndromes characterized by sensitivity to DNA damaging agents has provided important insights into the mechanisms that maintain genome stability and identified novel targets for cancer therapies. Here, we used exome sequencing to study 51 unrelated individuals with previously reported hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation as well as a range of neurologic, immunologic, and developmental features, but who did not clearly fit any previously defined genetic syndrome. Based on the combination of variant identification, computational evidence of deleteriousness, and functional screening, we identified three groups of subjects. Two subjects carried the bi-allelic loss of function variants in causative genes for known DNA damage response syndromes. Eight subjects carried the single loss of function variants in causative genes for DNA damage response syndromes, six of whom also carried predicted deleterious variants in other genes with DNA damage-related functions. Three subjects carried deleterious mutations in genes without obvious roles in DNA damage responses. However, treatment of U2OS cells with small interfering RNA targeting these genes resulted in significantly increased radiation sensitivity. Our results suggest that gene-gene interaction may contribute to ionizing radiation sensitivity as well as highlighting possible roles for several genes not obviously involved in the response to DNA damage.

G2-lymphocyte chromosomal radiosensitivity in patients with LPS responsive beige-like anchor protein (LRBA) deficiency

Lipopolysaccharide-responsive, beige-like anchor protein (LRBA) deficiency is an autosomal recessive primary immunodeficiency disease characterized by a CVID-like phenotype, particularly severe autoimmunity and inflammatory bowel disease. This study was undertaken to evaluate radiation sensitivity in 11 LRBA-deficient patients. Therefore, stimulated lymphocytes of the studied subjects were exposed to a low dose γ-radiation (100 cGy) in the G₂ phase of the cell cycle and chromosomal aberrations were scored. Lymphocytes of age-sex matched healthy individuals used in the same way as controls. Based on the G₂-assay, six (54.5%) of the patients had higher radiosensitivity score comparing to the healthy control group, forming the radiosensitive LRBA-deficient patients. This chromosomal radiosensitivity showed that these patients are predisposed to autoimmunity and/or malignancy, and should be protected from unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures using ionizing radiation and exposure to other DNA damaging agents.

Radiation-induced skin reactions: mechanism and treatment

Radiotherapy (RT) is a major treatment for malignant tumors. The latest data show that >70% of patients with malignant tumors need RT at different periods. Skin changes can be experienced by up to 95% of patients who underwent RT. Inflammation and oxidative stress (OS) have been shown to be generally associated with radiation-induced skin reactions (RISRs). Inflammatory response and OS interact and promote each other during RISRs. Severe skin reactions often have a great impact on the progress of RT. The treatment of RISRs is particularly critical because advanced RT technology can also lead to skin reactions. RISRs are classified into acute and chronic reactions. The treatment methods for acute RISRs include steroid treatment, creams, ointments, and hydrocolloid dressings, depending on the reaction grading. Chronic RISRs includes chronic ulcerations, telangiectasias, and fibrosis of the skin, and advanced treatments such as mesenchymal stem cells, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, superoxide dismutase, and low-intensity laser therapy can be considered. Here, we review and summarize the important mechanisms that cause RISRs as well as the standard and advanced treatments for RISRs.

Emerging biomarkers for the combination of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockers

Over the past few years, multiple immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) have achieved unprecedented clinical success and have been approved by regulatory agencies for the treatment of an increasing number of malignancies. However, only a limited fraction of patients responds to ICBs employed as a standalone intervention, calling for the development of combinatorial regimens. Radiation therapy (RT) stands out as a very promising candidate for this purpose. Indeed, RT mediates antineoplastic effects not only by cytotoxic and cytostatic mechanisms, but also by modulating immunological functions, both locally (within the irradiated field) and systemically. As combinatorial regimens involving RT and ICBs are being developed and clinically tested at an accelerating pace, it is paramount to identify biomarkers that reliably predict the likelihood of individual patients to respond. Here, we discuss emerging biomarkers that may potentially predict the response of cancer patients to RT plus ICBs.