Innovations in Clinical Trial Design in the Era of Molecular Profiling

Benefits of functional assays in personalized cancer medicine: more than just a proof-of-concept

As complex and heterogeneous diseases, cancers require a more tailored therapeutic management than most pathologies. Recent advances in anticancer drug development, including the immuno-oncology revolution, have been too often plagued by unsatisfying patient response rates and survivals. In reaction to this, cancer care has fully transitioned to the “personalized medicine” concept. Numerous tools are now available tools to better adapt treatments to the profile of each patient. They encompass a large array of diagnostic assays, based on biomarkers relevant to targetable molecular pathways. As a subfamily of such so-called companion diagnostics, chemosensitivity and resistance assays represent an attractive, yet insufficiently understood, approach to individualize treatments. They rely on the assessment of a composite biomarker, the ex vivo functional response of cancer cells to drugs, to predict a patient's outcome. Systemic treatments, such as chemotherapies, as well as targeted treatments, whose efficacy cannot be fully predicted yet by other diagnostic tests, may be assessed through these means. The results can provide helpful information to assist clinicians in their decision-making process. We explore here the most advanced functional assays across oncology indications, with an emphasis on tests already displaying a convincing clinical demonstration. We then recapitulate the main technical obstacles faced by researchers and clinicians to produce more accurate, and thus more predictive, models and the recent advances that have been developed to circumvent them. Finally, we summarize the regulatory and quality frameworks surrounding functional assays to ensure their safe and performant clinical implementation. Functional assays are valuable in vitro diagnostic tools that already stand beyond the “proof-of-concept” stage. Clinical studies show they have a major role to play by themselves but also in conjunction with molecular diagnostics. They now need a final lift to fully integrate the common armament used against cancers, and thus make their way into the clinical routine.

Reproducibility and Crossplatform Validation of Reverse-Phase Protein Array Data

Reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) technology is a high-throughput antibody- and microarray-based approach for the rapid profiling of levels of proteins and protein posttranslational modifications in biological specimens. The technology consumes small amounts of samples, can sensitively detect low-abundance proteins and posttranslational modifications, enables measurements of multiple signaling pathways in parallel, has the capacity to analyze large sample numbers, and offers robust interexperimental reproducibility. These features of RPPA experiments have motivated and enabled the use of RPPA technology in various biomedical, translational, and clinical applications, including the delineation of molecular mechanisms of disease, profiling of druggable signaling pathway activation, and search for new prognostic markers. Owing to the complexity of many of these applications, such as developing multiplex protein assays for diagnostic laboratories or integrating posttranslational modification-level data using large-scale proteogenomic approaches, robust and well-validated data are essential. There are many distinct components of an RPPA workflow, and numerous possible technical setups and analysis parameter options exist. The differences between RPPA platform setups around the world offer opportunities to assess and minimize interplatform variation. Crossplatform validation may also aid in the evaluation of robust, platform-independent protein markers of disease and response to therapy.