1
|
Van den Broeck L, Spurney RJ, Fisher AP, Schwartz M, Clark NM, Nguyen TT, Madison I, Gobble M, Long T, Sozzani R. A hybrid model connecting regulatory interactions with stem cell divisions in the root. QUANTITATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY 2021; 2:e2. [PMID: 37077208 PMCID: PMC10095808 DOI: 10.1017/qpb.2021.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Stem cells give rise to the entirety of cells within an organ. Maintaining stem cell identity and coordinately regulating stem cell divisions is crucial for proper development. In plants, mobile proteins, such as WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX 5 (WOX5) and SHORTROOT (SHR), regulate divisions in the root stem cell niche. However, how these proteins coordinately function to establish systemic behaviour is not well understood. We propose a non-cell autonomous role for WOX5 in the cortex endodermis initial (CEI) and identify a regulator, ANGUSTIFOLIA (AN3)/GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR 1, that coordinates CEI divisions. Here, we show with a multi-scale hybrid model integrating ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and agent-based modeling that quiescent center (QC) and CEI divisions have different dynamics. Specifically, by combining continuous models to describe regulatory networks and agent-based rules, we model systemic behaviour, which led us to predict cell-type-specific expression dynamics of SHR, SCARECROW, WOX5, AN3 and CYCLIND6;1, and experimentally validate CEI cell divisions. Conclusively, our results show an interdependency between CEI and QC divisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Van den Broeck
- Plant and Microbial Biology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ryan J. Spurney
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Adam P. Fisher
- Plant and Microbial Biology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Schwartz
- Plant and Microbial Biology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Natalie M. Clark
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, Iowa 50010, USA
| | - Thomas T. Nguyen
- Plant and Microbial Biology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Imani Madison
- Plant and Microbial Biology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mariah Gobble
- Plant and Microbial Biology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Terri Long
- Plant and Microbial Biology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rosangela Sozzani
- Plant and Microbial Biology Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Protein complex stoichiometry and expression dynamics of transcription factors modulate stem cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:15332-15342. [PMID: 32541020 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002166117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Stem cells divide and differentiate to form all of the specialized cell types in a multicellular organism. In the Arabidopsis root, stem cells are maintained in an undifferentiated state by a less mitotically active population of cells called the quiescent center (QC). Determining how the QC regulates the surrounding stem cell initials, or what makes the QC fundamentally different from the actively dividing initials, is important for understanding how stem cell divisions are maintained. Here we gained insight into the differences between the QC and the cortex endodermis initials (CEI) by studying the mobile transcription factor SHORTROOT (SHR) and its binding partner SCARECROW (SCR). We constructed an ordinary differential equation model of SHR and SCR in the QC and CEI which incorporated the stoichiometry of the SHR-SCR complex as well as upstream transcriptional regulation of SHR and SCR. Our model prediction, coupled with experimental validation, showed that high levels of the SHR-SCR complex are associated with more CEI division but less QC division. Furthermore, our model prediction allowed us to propose the putative upstream SHR regulators SEUSS and WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX 5 and to experimentally validate their roles in QC and CEI division. In addition, our model established the timing of QC and CEI division and suggests that SHR repression of QC division depends on formation of the SHR homodimer. Thus, our results support that SHR-SCR protein complex stoichiometry and regulation of SHR transcription modulate the division timing of two different specialized cell types in the root stem cell niche.
Collapse
|
3
|
Clark NM, Van den Broeck L, Guichard M, Stager A, Tanner HG, Blilou I, Grossmann G, Iyer-Pascuzzi AS, Maizel A, Sparks EE, Sozzani R. Novel Imaging Modalities Shedding Light on Plant Biology: Start Small and Grow Big. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY 2020; 71:789-816. [PMID: 32119794 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
The acquisition of quantitative information on plant development across a range of temporal and spatial scales is essential to understand the mechanisms of plant growth. Recent years have shown the emergence of imaging methodologies that enable the capture and analysis of plant growth, from the dynamics of molecules within cells to the measurement of morphometricand physiological traits in field-grown plants. In some instances, these imaging methods can be parallelized across multiple samples to increase throughput. When high throughput is combined with high temporal and spatial resolution, the resulting image-derived data sets could be combined with molecular large-scale data sets to enable unprecedented systems-level computational modeling. Such image-driven functional genomics studies may be expected to appear at an accelerating rate in the near future given the early success of the foundational efforts reviewed here. We present new imaging modalities and review how they have enabled a better understanding of plant growth from the microscopic to the macroscopic scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie M Clark
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA; ,
- Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA;
| | - Lisa Van den Broeck
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA; ,
| | - Marjorie Guichard
- Center for Organismal Studies (COS), University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; , ,
- CellNetworks Cluster of Excellence, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adam Stager
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19711, USA; ,
| | - Herbert G Tanner
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19711, USA; ,
| | - Ikram Blilou
- Department of Plant Cell and Developmental Biology, Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Guido Grossmann
- Center for Organismal Studies (COS), University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; , ,
- CellNetworks Cluster of Excellence, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anjali S Iyer-Pascuzzi
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology and Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA;
| | - Alexis Maizel
- Center for Organismal Studies (COS), University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; , ,
| | - Erin E Sparks
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences and the Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19711, USA;
| | - Rosangela Sozzani
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA; ,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clark NM, Buckner E, Fisher AP, Nelson EC, Nguyen TT, Simmons AR, de Luis Balaguer MA, Butler-Smith T, Sheldon PJ, Bergmann DC, Williams CM, Sozzani R. Stem-cell-ubiquitous genes spatiotemporally coordinate division through regulation of stem-cell-specific gene networks. Nat Commun 2019; 10:5574. [PMID: 31811116 PMCID: PMC6897965 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13132-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Stem cells are responsible for generating all of the differentiated cells, tissues, and organs in a multicellular organism and, thus, play a crucial role in cell renewal, regeneration, and organization. A number of stem cell type-specific genes have a known role in stem cell maintenance, identity, and/or division. Yet, how genes expressed across different stem cell types, referred to here as stem-cell-ubiquitous genes, contribute to stem cell regulation is less understood. Here, we find that, in the Arabidopsis root, a stem-cell-ubiquitous gene, TESMIN-LIKE CXC2 (TCX2), controls stem cell division by regulating stem cell-type specific networks. Development of a mathematical model of TCX2 expression allows us to show that TCX2 orchestrates the coordinated division of different stem cell types. Our results highlight that genes expressed across different stem cell types ensure cross-communication among cells, allowing them to divide and develop harmonically together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie M. Clark
- 0000 0001 2173 6074grid.40803.3fDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 United States ,0000 0001 2173 6074grid.40803.3fBiomathematics Graduate Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 United States ,0000 0004 1936 7312grid.34421.30Present Address: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 United States
| | - Eli Buckner
- 0000 0001 2173 6074grid.40803.3fDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 United States
| | - Adam P. Fisher
- 0000 0001 2173 6074grid.40803.3fDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 United States
| | - Emily C. Nelson
- 0000 0001 2173 6074grid.40803.3fDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 United States
| | - Thomas T. Nguyen
- 0000 0001 2173 6074grid.40803.3fDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 United States
| | - Abigail R. Simmons
- 0000000419368956grid.168010.eDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 United States
| | - Maria A. de Luis Balaguer
- 0000 0001 2173 6074grid.40803.3fDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 United States
| | - Tiara Butler-Smith
- 0000 0001 2173 6074grid.40803.3fDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 United States
| | - Parnell J. Sheldon
- 0000 0001 2173 6074grid.40803.3fDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 United States ,0000 0001 2185 2366grid.255014.7Department of Biology, Denison University, Granville, OH 43023 United States
| | - Dominique C. Bergmann
- 0000000419368956grid.168010.eDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 United States ,0000000419368956grid.168010.eHoward Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 United States
| | - Cranos M. Williams
- 0000 0001 2173 6074grid.40803.3fDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 United States
| | - Rossangela Sozzani
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States. .,Biomathematics Graduate Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Powers SK, Holehouse AS, Korasick DA, Schreiber KH, Clark NM, Jing H, Emenecker R, Han S, Tycksen E, Hwang I, Sozzani R, Jez JM, Pappu RV, Strader LC. Nucleo-cytoplasmic Partitioning of ARF Proteins Controls Auxin Responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Cell 2019; 76:177-190.e5. [PMID: 31421981 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The phytohormone auxin plays crucial roles in nearly every aspect of plant growth and development. The auxin response factor (ARF) transcription factor family regulates auxin-responsive gene expression and exhibits nuclear localization in regions of high auxin responsiveness. Here we show that the ARF7 and ARF19 proteins accumulate in micron-sized assemblies within the cytoplasm of tissues with attenuated auxin responsiveness. We found that the intrinsically disordered middle region and the folded PB1 interaction domain of ARFs drive protein assembly formation. Mutation of a single lysine within the PB1 domain abrogates cytoplasmic assemblies, promotes ARF nuclear localization, and results in an altered transcriptome and morphological defects. Our data suggest a model in which ARF nucleo-cytoplasmic partitioning regulates auxin responsiveness, providing a mechanism for cellular competence for auxin signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha K Powers
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Alex S Holehouse
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - David A Korasick
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Katherine H Schreiber
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA; Center for Engineering MechanoBiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Natalie M Clark
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Hongwei Jing
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA; Center for Engineering MechanoBiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Ryan Emenecker
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Soeun Han
- Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea
| | - Eric Tycksen
- Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Ildoo Hwang
- Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Korea
| | - Rosangela Sozzani
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Joseph M Jez
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Rohit V Pappu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA; Center for Science and Engineering of Living Systems (CSELS), Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Lucia C Strader
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA; Center for Engineering MechanoBiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA; Center for Science and Engineering of Living Systems (CSELS), Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Struk S, Jacobs A, Sánchez Martín-Fontecha E, Gevaert K, Cubas P, Goormachtig S. Exploring the protein-protein interaction landscape in plants. PLANT, CELL & ENVIRONMENT 2019; 42:387-409. [PMID: 30156707 DOI: 10.1111/pce.13433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) represent an essential aspect of plant systems biology. Identification of key protein players and their interaction networks provide crucial insights into the regulation of plant developmental processes and into interactions of plants with their environment. Despite the great advance in the methods for the discovery and validation of PPIs, still several challenges remain. First, the PPI networks are usually highly dynamic, and the in vivo interactions are often transient and difficult to detect. Therefore, the properties of the PPIs under study need to be considered to select the most suitable technique, because each has its own advantages and limitations. Second, besides knowledge on the interacting partners of a protein of interest, characteristics of the interaction, such as the spatial or temporal dynamics, are highly important. Hence, multiple approaches have to be combined to obtain a comprehensive view on the PPI network present in a cell. Here, we present the progress in commonly used methods to detect and validate PPIs in plants with a special emphasis on the PPI features assessed in each approach and how they were or can be used for the study of plant interactions with their environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylwia Struk
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anse Jacobs
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Biochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elena Sánchez Martín-Fontecha
- Plant Molecular Genetics Department, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CSIC), Campus Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Kris Gevaert
- Department of Biochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pilar Cubas
- Plant Molecular Genetics Department, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CSIC), Campus Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sofie Goormachtig
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miyashima S, Roszak P, Sevilem I, Toyokura K, Blob B, Heo JO, Mellor N, Help-Rinta-Rahko H, Otero S, Smet W, Boekschoten M, Hooiveld G, Hashimoto K, Smetana O, Siligato R, Wallner ES, Mähönen AP, Kondo Y, Melnyk CW, Greb T, Nakajima K, Sozzani R, Bishopp A, De Rybel B, Helariutta Y. Mobile PEAR transcription factors integrate positional cues to prime cambial growth. Nature 2019; 565:490-494. [PMID: 30626969 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0839-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Apical growth in plants initiates upon seed germination, whereas radial growth is primed only during early ontogenesis in procambium cells and activated later by the vascular cambium1. Although it is not known how radial growth is organized and regulated in plants, this system resembles the developmental competence observed in some animal systems, in which pre-existing patterns of developmental potential are established early on2,3. Here we show that in Arabidopsis the initiation of radial growth occurs around early protophloem-sieve-element cell files of the root procambial tissue. In this domain, cytokinin signalling promotes the expression of a pair of mobile transcription factors-PHLOEM EARLY DOF 1 (PEAR1) and PHLOEM EARLY DOF 2 (PEAR2)-and their four homologues (DOF6, TMO6, OBP2 and HCA2), which we collectively name PEAR proteins. The PEAR proteins form a short-range concentration gradient that peaks at protophloem sieve elements, and activates gene expression that promotes radial growth. The expression and function of PEAR proteins are antagonized by the HD-ZIP III proteins, well-known polarity transcription factors4-the expression of which is concentrated in the more-internal domain of radially non-dividing procambial cells by the function of auxin, and mobile miR165 and miR166 microRNAs. The PEAR proteins locally promote transcription of their inhibitory HD-ZIP III genes, and thereby establish a negative-feedback loop that forms a robust boundary that demarks the zone of cell division. Taken together, our data establish that during root procambial development there exists a network in which a module that links PEAR and HD-ZIP III transcription factors integrates spatial information of the hormonal domains and miRNA gradients to provide adjacent zones of dividing and more-quiescent cells, which forms a foundation for further radial growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Miyashima
- Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE/Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan
| | - Pawel Roszak
- Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE/Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Iris Sevilem
- Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE/Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Koichi Toyokura
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan
| | - Bernhard Blob
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jung-Ok Heo
- Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE/Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nathan Mellor
- Centre for Plant Integrative Biology (CPIB) and School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hanna Help-Rinta-Rahko
- Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE/Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sofia Otero
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Wouter Smet
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Ghent, Belgium.,Laboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Boekschoten
- Nutrition, Metabolism and Genomics Group, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Guido Hooiveld
- Nutrition, Metabolism and Genomics Group, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kayo Hashimoto
- Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan.,Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Nara Women's University, Nara, Japan
| | - Ondřej Smetana
- Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE/Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Riccardo Siligato
- Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE/Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eva-Sophie Wallner
- Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ari Pekka Mähönen
- Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE/Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Yuki Kondo
- Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Charles W Melnyk
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Thomas Greb
- Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Keiji Nakajima
- Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan
| | - Rosangela Sozzani
- Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Anthony Bishopp
- Centre for Plant Integrative Biology (CPIB) and School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Bert De Rybel
- Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. .,VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Ghent, Belgium. .,Laboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Ykä Helariutta
- Institute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE/Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. .,The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|