G-LoSA for Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites and Structures

CHARMM-GUI-Based Induced Fit Docking Workflow to Generate Reliable Protein-Ligand Binding Modes

Molecular docking is a preferred method to predict ligand binding modes and their binding energy to target protein receptors, which is critical in early phase structure-based drug discovery. However, there is a persistent challenge in docking that can be attributed to the induced fit effect, as receptor binding sites undergo induced fit conformational changes upon ligand binding to achieve better binding modes. In this work, based on CHARMM-GUI LBS Finder& Refiner and High-Throughput Simulator, we present a straightforward CHARMM-GUI induced fit docking (CGUI-IFD) workflow to generate reliable protein-ligand binding modes. The CGUI-IFD workflow generates an ensemble of receptor binding site conformations through ligand-binding site (LBS) refinement, runs rigid receptor docking, and performs high-throughput molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of protein-ligand complex structures in explicit solvents. The results are evaluated based on the ligand root-mean-square deviation (RMSD)-based binding stability and the molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area binding energy. For a benchmark test, we used 258 cross-docking protein-ligand pairs across 41 target proteins from the Schrodinger IFD-MD data set. The application of CGUI-IFD on this data set shows 80% success rate (within 2.5 Å RMSD from the experimental structures). We expect that the CGUI-IFD workflow can be useful to generate reliable ligand binding modes for cross-docking cases.

Estimating the Similarity between Protein Pockets

With the exponential increase in publicly available protein structures, the comparison of protein binding sites naturally emerged as a scientific topic to explain observations or generate hypotheses for ligand design, notably to predict ligand selectivity for on- and off-targets, explain polypharmacology, and design target-focused libraries. The current review summarizes the state-of-the-art computational methods applied to pocket detection and comparison as well as structural druggability estimates. The major strengths and weaknesses of current pocket descriptors, alignment methods, and similarity search algorithms are presented. Lastly, an exhaustive survey of both retrospective and prospective applications in diverse medicinal chemistry scenarios illustrates the capability of the existing methods and the hurdle that still needs to be overcome for more accurate predictions.

Exploring Ligand Binding Domain Dynamics in the NRs Superfamily

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are transcription factors that play an important role in multiple diseases, such as cancer, inflammation, and metabolic disorders. They share a common structural organization composed of five domains, of which the ligand-binding domain (LBD) can adopt different conformations in response to substrate, agonist, and antagonist binding, leading to distinct transcription effects. A key feature of NRs is, indeed, their intrinsic dynamics that make them a challenging target in drug discovery. This work aims to provide a meaningful investigation of NR structural variability to outline a dynamic profile for each of them. To do that, we propose a methodology based on the computation and comparison of protein cavities among the crystallographic structures of NR LBDs. First, pockets were detected with the FLAPsite algorithm and then an "all against all" approach was applied by comparing each pair of pockets within the same sub-family on the basis of their similarity score. The analysis concerned all the detectable cavities in NRs, with particular attention paid to the active site pockets. This approach can guide the investigation of NR intrinsic dynamics, the selection of reference structures to be used in drug design and the easy identification of alternative binding sites.

What Makes GPCRs from Different Families Bind to the Same Ligand?

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of cell-surface receptor proteins with important functions in signal transduction and often serve as therapeutic drug targets. With the rapidly growing public data on three dimensional (3D) structures of GPCRs and GPCR-ligand interactions, computational prediction of GPCR ligand binding becomes a convincing option to high throughput screening and other experimental approaches during the beginning phases of ligand discovery. In this work, we set out to computationally uncover and understand the binding of a single ligand to GPCRs from several different families. Three-dimensional structural comparisons of the GPCRs that bind to the same ligand revealed local 3D structural similarities and often these regions overlap with locations of binding pockets. These pockets were found to be similar (based on backbone geometry and side-chain orientation using APoc), and they correlate positively with electrostatic properties of the pockets. Moreover, the more similar the pockets, the more likely a ligand binding to the pockets will interact with similar residues, have similar conformations, and produce similar binding affinities across the pockets. These findings can be exploited to improve protein function inference, drug repurposing and drug toxicity prediction, and accelerate the development of new drugs.

CHARMM-GUI Ligand Designer for Template-Based Virtual Ligand Design in a Binding Site

Rational drug design involves a task of finding ligands that would bind to a specific target protein. This work presents CHARMM-GUI Ligand Designer that is an intuitive and interactive web-based tool to design virtual ligands that match the shape and chemical features of a given protein binding site. Ligand Designer provides ligand modification capabilities with 3D visualization that allow researchers to modify and redesign virtual ligands while viewing how the protein-ligand interactions are affected. Virtual ligands can also be parameterized for further molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and free energy calculations. Using 8 targets from 8 different protein classes in the directory of useful decoys, enhanced (DUD-E) data set, we show that Ligand Designer can produce similar ligands to the known active ligands in the crystal structures. Ligand Designer also produces stable protein-ligand complex structures when tested using short MD simulations. We expect that Ligand Designer can be a useful and user-friendly tool to design small molecules in any given potential ligand binding site on a protein of interest.

CHARMM-GUI LBS Finder & Refiner for Ligand Binding Site Prediction and Refinement

A protein performs its task by binding a variety of ligands in its local region that is also known as the ligand-binding-site (LBS). Therefore, accurate prediction, characterization, and refinement of LBS can facilitate protein functional annotations and structure-based drug design. In this work, we present CHARMM-GUI LBS Finder & Refiner (https://www.charmm-gui.org/input/lbsfinder) that predicts potential LBS, offers interactive features for local LBS structure analysis, and prepares various molecular dynamics (MD) systems and inputs by setting up distance restraint potentials for LBS structure refinement. LBS Finder & Refiner supports 5 different commonly used simulation programs, such as NAMD, AMBER, GROMACS, GENESIS, and OpenMM, for LBS structure refinement together with hydrogen mass repartitioning. The capability of LBS Finder & Refiner is illustrated through LBS structure predictions and refinements of 48 modeled and 20 apo benchmark target proteins. Overall, successful LBS structure predictions and refinements are seen in our benchmark tests. We hope that LBS Finder & Refiner is useful to predict, characterize, and refine potential LBS on any given protein of interest.

Ligand-Binding-Site Refinement to Generate Reliable Holo Protein Structure Conformations from Apo Structures

The first important step in a structure-based virtual screening is the judicious selection of a receptor protein. In cases where the holo protein receptor structure is unavailable, significant reduction in virtual screening performance has been reported. In this work, we present a robust method to generate reliable holo protein structure conformations from apo structures using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation with restraints derived from holo structure binding-site templates. We perform benchmark tests on two different datasets: 40 structures from a directory of useful decoy-enhanced (DUD-E) and 84 structures from the Gunasekaran dataset. Our results show successful refinement of apo binding-site structures toward holo conformations in 82% of the test cases. In addition, virtual screening performance of 40 DUD-E structures is significantly improved using our MD-refined structures as receptors with an average enrichment factor (EF), an EF_1% value of 6.2 compared to apo structures with 3.5. Docking of native ligands to the refined structures shows an average ligand root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 1.97 Å (DUD-E dataset and Gunasekaran dataset) relative to ligands in the holo crystal structures, which is comparable to the self-docking (i.e., docking of the native ligand back to its crystal structure receptor) average, 1.34 Å (DUD-E dataset) and 1.36 Å (Gunasekaran dataset). On the other hand, docking to the apo structures yields an average ligand RMSD of 3.65 Å (DUD-E) and 2.90 Å (Gunasekaran). These results indicate that our method is robust and can be useful to improve virtual screening performance of apo structures.

Binding site matching in rational drug design: algorithms and applications

Interactions between proteins and small molecules are critical for biological functions. These interactions often occur in small cavities within protein structures, known as ligand-binding pockets. Understanding the physicochemical qualities of binding pockets is essential to improve not only our basic knowledge of biological systems, but also drug development procedures. In order to quantify similarities among pockets in terms of their geometries and chemical properties, either bound ligands can be compared to one another or binding sites can be matched directly. Both perspectives routinely take advantage of computational methods including various techniques to represent and compare small molecules as well as local protein structures. In this review, we survey 12 tools widely used to match pockets. These methods are divided into five categories based on the algorithm implemented to construct binding-site alignments. In addition to the comprehensive analysis of their algorithms, test sets and the performance of each method are described. We also discuss general pharmacological applications of computational pocket matching in drug repurposing, polypharmacology and side effects. Reflecting on the importance of these techniques in drug discovery, in the end, we elaborate on the development of more accurate meta-predictors, the incorporation of protein flexibility and the integration of powerful artificial intelligence technologies such as deep learning.

Ligand-Binding-Site Structure Refinement Using Molecular Dynamics with Restraints Derived from Predicted Binding Site Templates

Accurate modeling of ligand-binding-site structures plays a critical role in structure-based virtual screening. However, the structures of the ligand-binding site in most predicted protein models are generally of low quality and need refinements. In this work, we present a ligand-binding-site structure refinement protocol using molecular dynamics simulation with restraints derived from predicted binding site templates. Our benchmark validation shows great performance for 40 diverse sets of proteins from the Astex list. The ligand-binding sites on modeled protein structures are consistently refined using our method with an average Cα RMSD improvement of 0.90 Å. Comparison of ligand binding modes from ligand docking to initial unrefined and refined structures shows an average of 1.97 Å RMSD improvement in the refined structures. These results demonstrate a promising new method of structure refinement for protein ligand-binding-site structures.

Binding site comparisons for target-centered drug discovery

INTRODUCTION

The success of binding site comparisons in drug discovery is based on the recognized fact that many different proteins have similar binding sites. Indeed, binding site comparisons have found many uses in drug development and have the potential to dramatically cut the cost and shorten the time necessary for the development of new drugs. Areas covered: The authors review recent methods for comparing protein binding sites and their use in drug repurposing and polypharmacology. They examine emerging fields including the use of binding site comparisons in precision medicine, the prediction of structured water molecules, the search for targets of natural compounds, and their application in the development of protein-based drugs by loop modeling and for comparison of RNA binding sites. Expert opinion: Binding site comparisons have produced many interesting results in drug development, but relatively little work has been done on protein-protein interaction sites, which are particularly relevant in view of the success of biological drugs. Growth of protein loop modeling for modulating biological drugs is anticipated. The fusion of currently distinct methods for the comparison of RNA and protein binding sites into a single comprehensive approach could allow the search for new selective ribosomal antibiotics and initiate pharmaceutical research into other nucleoproteins.

A Novel Geometry-Based Approach to Infer Protein Interface Similarity

The protein interface is key to understand protein function, providing a vital insight on how proteins interact with each other and with other molecules. Over the years, many computational methods to compare protein structures were developed, yet evaluating interface similarity remains a very difficult task. Here, we present PatchBag – a geometry based method for efficient comparison of protein surfaces and interfaces. PatchBag is a Bag-Of-Words approach, which represents complex objects as vectors, enabling to search interface similarity in a highly efficient manner. Using a novel framework for evaluating interface similarity, we show that PatchBag performance is comparable to state-of-the-art alignment-based structural comparison methods. The great advantage of PatchBag is that it does not rely on sequence or fold information, thus enabling to detect similarities between interfaces in unrelated proteins. We propose that PatchBag can contribute to reveal novel evolutionary and functional relationships between protein interfaces.

Comparative assessment of strategies to identify similar ligand-binding pockets in proteins

Background

Detecting similar ligand-binding sites in globally unrelated proteins has a wide range of applications in modern drug discovery, including drug repurposing, the prediction of side effects, and drug-target interactions. Although a number of techniques to compare binding pockets have been developed, this problem still poses significant challenges.

Results

We evaluate the performance of three algorithms to calculate similarities between ligand-binding sites, APoc, SiteEngine, and G-LoSA. Our assessment considers not only the capabilities to identify similar pockets and to construct accurate local alignments, but also the dependence of these alignments on the sequence order. We point out certain drawbacks of previously compiled datasets, such as the inclusion of structurally similar proteins, leading to an overestimated performance. To address these issues, a rigorous procedure to prepare unbiased, high-quality benchmarking sets is proposed. Further, we conduct a comparative assessment of techniques directly aligning binding pockets to indirect strategies employing structure-based virtual screening with AutoDock Vina and rDock.

Conclusions

Thorough benchmarks reveal that G-LoSA offers a fairly robust overall performance, whereas the accuracy of APoc and SiteEngine is satisfactory only against easy datasets. Moreover, combining various algorithms into a meta-predictor improves the performance of existing methods to detect similar binding sites in unrelated proteins by 5–10%. All data reported in this paper are freely available at https://osf.io/6ngbs/.