Nonradioactive Isotopic Labeling and Tracing of Selenoproteins in Cultured Cell Lines

Characterization and Quantification of Selenoprotein P: Challenges to Mass Spectrometry

Selenoprotein P (SELENOP) is an emerging marker of the nutritional status of selenium and of various diseases, however, its chemical characteristics still need to be investigated and methods for its accurate quantitation improved. SELENOP is unique among selenoproteins, as it contains multiple genetically encoded SeCys residues, whereas all the other characterized selenoproteins contain just one. SELENOP occurs in the form of multiple isoforms, truncated species and post-translationally modified variants which are relatively poorly characterized. The accurate quantification of SELENOP is contingent on the availability of specific primary standards and reference methods. Before recombinant SELENOP becomes available to be used as a primary standard, careful investigation of the characteristics of the SELENOP measured by electrospray MS and strict control of the recoveries at the various steps of the analytical procedures are strongly recommended. This review critically discusses the state-of-the-art of analytical approaches to the characterization and quantification of SELENOP. While immunoassays remain the standard for the determination of human and animal health status, because of their speed and simplicity, mass spectrometry techniques offer many attractive and complementary features that are highlighted and critically evaluated.

Selenium-regulated hierarchy of human selenoproteome in cancerous and immortalized cells lines

BACKGROUND

Selenoproteins (25 genes in human) co-translationally incorporate selenocysteine using a UGA codon, normally used as a stop signal. The human selenoproteome is primarily regulated by selenium bioavailability with a tissue-specific hierarchy.

METHODS

We investigated the hierarchy of selenoprotein expression in response to selenium concentration variation in four cell lines originating from kidney (HEK293, immortalized), prostate (LNCaP, cancer), skin (HaCaT, immortalized) and liver (HepG2, cancer), using complementary analytical methods. We performed (i) enzymatic activity, (ii) RT-qPCR, (iii) immuno-detection, (iv) selenium-specific mass spectrometric detection after non-radioactive ⁷⁶Se labeling of selenoproteins, and (v) luciferase-based reporter constructs in various cell extracts.

RESULTS

We characterized cell-line specific alterations of the selenoproteome in response to selenium variation that, in most of the cases, resulted from a translational control of gene expression. We established that UGA-selenocysteine recoding efficiency, which depends on the nature of the SECIS element, dictates the response to selenium variation.

CONCLUSIONS

We characterized that selenoprotein hierarchy is cell-line specific with conserved features. This analysis should be done prior to any experiments in a novel cell line.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

We reported a strategy based on complementary methods to evaluate selenoproteome regulation in human cells in culture.

Comparison of analytical methods using enzymatic activity, immunoaffinity and selenium-specific mass spectrometric detection for the quantitation of glutathione peroxidase 1

Glutathione peroxidase 1 (Gpx1), one of the most responsive selenoproteins to the variation of selenium concentration, is often used to evaluate "selenium status" at a cellular or organismal level. The four major types of analytical methodologies to quantify Gpx1 were revisited. They include (i) an enzymatic assay, (ii, iii) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) with (ii) western blot detection of protein or (iii) inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP MS) detection of selenium, and (iv) size-exclusion chromatography with ICP MS detection. Each of the four methods was optimized for the quantification of Gpx1 with maximum sensitivity. The methods based on the enzymatic and immunodetection offer a much higher sensitivity but their accuracy is compromised by the limited selectivity and limited dynamic range. The advantages, drawbacks and sources of error of each technique are critically discussed and the need for the cross-validation of the results using the different techniques to assure the quality assurance of quantitative analysis is emphasized.

Interplay between Selenium Levels and Replicative Senescence in WI-38 Human Fibroblasts: A Proteomic Approach

Selenoproteins are essential components of antioxidant defense, redox homeostasis, and cell signaling in mammals, where selenium is found in the form of a rare amino acid, selenocysteine. Selenium, which is often limited both in food intake and cell culture media, is a strong regulator of selenoprotein expression and selenoenzyme activity. Aging is a slow, complex, and multifactorial process, resulting in a gradual and irreversible decline of various functions of the body. Several cellular aspects of organismal aging are recapitulated in the replicative senescence of cultured human diploid fibroblasts, such as embryonic lung fibroblast WI-38 cells. We previously reported that the long-term growth of young WI-38 cells with high (supplemented), moderate (control), or low (depleted) concentrations of selenium in the culture medium impacts their replicative lifespan, due to rapid changes in replicative senescence-associated markers and signaling pathways. In order to gain insight into the molecular link between selenium levels and replicative senescence, in the present work, we have applied a quantitative proteomic approach based on 2-Dimensional Differential in-Gel Electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) to the study of young and presenescent cells grown in selenium-supplemented, control, or depleted media. Applying a restrictive cut-off (spot intensity ±50% and a p value < 0.05) to the 2D-DIGE analyses revealed 81 differentially expressed protein spots, from which 123 proteins of interest were identified by mass spectrometry. We compared the changes in protein abundance for three different conditions: (i) spots varying between young and presenescent cells, (ii) spots varying in response to selenium concentration in young cells, and (iii) spots varying in response to selenium concentration in presenescent cells. Interestingly, a 72% overlap between the impact of senescence and selenium was observed in our proteomic results, demonstrating a strong interplay between selenium, selenoproteins, and replicative senescence.